Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

advance patho

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

An understanding of the factors surrounding women’s and men’s health can be critically important to disease diagnosis and treatment in these areas. This importance is magnified by the fact that some diseases and disorders manifest differently based on the sex of the patient. 

Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond the human systems involved. The impact of patient characteristics, as well as racial and ethnic variables, can also have an important impact.

An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in systems based on these characteristics is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health. 

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

· The factors that affect fertility (STDs).

· Why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID.

· Why prostatitis and infection happens. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 10

Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by 
Day 7 of Week 10.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at 

to an external site.
). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
WK10Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following as it relates to the case you were assigned (omit section that does not pertain to your case, faculty will give full points for that section): Explain the factors that affect fertility (STDs)

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

21 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the life span and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.

21 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why prostatitis and infection happen. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.

25 to >22.5 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

22.5 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

20 to >17.5 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.

17.5 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time….The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

This week we will be discussing women’s and men’s infections and hematologic disorders. There is a knowledge check and a case study this week. The knowledge check will consist of five questions that require an essay type response. Keep in mind that if you use the work of another you must cite the reference. There is also a case study that will need to be reviewed and followed up with a one to two page paper.

 

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following as it applies to the scenario you were provided 
(Below is a list of questions that will need to be addressed within your paper. Not all will apply to scenario. You will need address all of the questions even if they are not directly related to the scenario):

· The factors that affect fertility (STDs).

· Why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID.

· Why prostatitis and infection happens. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.

· Why a patient would need a splenectomy after a diagnosis of ITP.

· Anemia and the different kinds of anemia (i.e., micro and macrocytic).

Case Scenario:

 

A 30-year-old female presents to the emergency room with a chief complaint of yellow, creamy vaginal discharge and difficulty with urination.  She states these symptoms started about 3 days ago, and she thought she had a urinary tract infection. She denies pelvic pain.  The patient had unprotected sexual intercourse in the last two weeks with her new partner. She denies any lower back pain or foul-smelling urine or frequency. PMH is negative.

Vital signs T 98.8 F Pulse 80 Resp 22 O2 sat 99% on room air. Cardio-respiratory exam unremarkable for murmurs, rubs, clicks, or gallops. Abdominal exam negative for any pain or tenderness to deep palpation.  Pelvic exam demonstrates mucopurulent vaginal discharge and erythema to cervix with some bleeding noted to the cervix when touched with the swab.  No masses on bimanual exam.

 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Psychiatric Note 6 LS

 Write the clinical write up for a  psychiatric fictitious  patient .-32 Year-Old female With Panic attack Disorder. Follow up visit. . Stable patient .  Form attached 

help with response 2

Great post. I want to extend your discussion on the importance of fostering a safety culture by emphasizing the role of psychological safety within healthcare teams. As discussed in recent literature, psychological safety is a critical component of a learning culture. It allows healthcare workers to openly discuss mistakes, near-misses,

help with response 1

I think we are all in agreement not to criminalize errors But how do we take care of errors that cause harm or even death? If your family member’s outcome was death what would you do?

Sevidence

PICOT Question: In nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic, how do coping strategies, compared to no intervention or standard support, affect burnout and psychological well-being during the pandemic time period? Paper should be 3-4 content pages in length. Title and reference pages are required but are excluded from 3-4 page length.

Science of Learning D3

The Science of Learning Deliverable 3 – Learning Theories Top of Form Bottom of Form Assessments Content 1. Top of Form Question <bdi></bdi> Competency Distinguish between the major learning theories. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link,

Science of Learning D2

The Science of Learning Deliverable 2 – Cognitive Function Top of Form Bottom of Form Assessments Content 1. Top of Form Question <bdi></bdi> Competency Interpret cognitive function in learning. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which

Science of Learning D1

The Science of Learning Deliverable 1 – Evaluation Top of Form Bottom of Form Assessments Content 1. Top of Form Question <bdi></bdi> Competency Evaluate methods for effective instruction. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is

D9 JM

Name five different types of disabilities. Five disabilities that come to mind are: Mental Health like someone with depression, anxiety, Intellectual disability with down syndrome, dementia, Learning disabilities like ADHD, dyslexia. Physical Disability like someone in a wheelchair due to spinal cord injury or lower extremity amputations. Sensory disabilities, like

Nur 502/512 Dus 6

Please help me with your expert in discussion post for week 6 NUR 502 Week DUS 6 1. Musculoskeletal Function: G.J. is a 71-year-old overweight woman who presents to the Family Practice Clinic for the first time complaining of a long history of bilateral knee discomfort that becomes worse when

week 4

explore the intricacies of hormonal regulation and its potential disruptions. 

computer

its below in file. ASSIGNMENT: CMSPC-1513 – MODULE 5 – SPREADSHEETS ASSIGNMENT: This assignment will cover practicing the basics of spreadsheets with two types of sheets you might use in your studies or personal life. Use this opportunity to get familiar with using the spreadsheet tools to enter and format

Nursing Nursing Assignment – medication research

Attached PN107 IN-PERSON SIMULATION (GERIATRIC) PATIENT CHART (WALLACE PETERSON) Updated 7/25/2023 Page 1 of 50 PATIENT: Peterson, Wallace DOB: 06/06/1954 AGE: 69 GENDER: MALE MRN: 7214732 HOSPITAL FLOOR: Med-Surg ROOM: 327 HCP: Lois Myer, MD CODE STATUS: FULL CODE ISOLATION: Standard ALERTS: None DRUG ALLERGIES: NKDA ENVIRONMENTAL ALLERGIES: NKA FOOD

Nursing WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT

Select a particular area of nursing that is of interest to you (COPD) and write IN A 200 words about the specifics of nursing research in relation to this area, what can be accomplished by it, and why you believe it to be valuable. Include an explanation of the following questions

Burn Victim Assessment

You are working the night shift on a medical-surgical unit. You assignment includes a 19 year old woman admitted early this morning. She has sustained burns over 30% of her body surface area, with partial-thickness burns on her legs and back. Instructions The staff are following the Parkland Formula for

topic strategy search

burnout in nurses working during the covid -19 pandemic, how does implementing stress management and support programs compared to no intervention affect burnout levels and patient care quality within 6 months?

Leadership Redo 1

 Health care systems around the world provide useful models for analysis. 

To evaluate one disease condition (COPD) in the adult population

  Signature Assignment: Understanding disease conditions specific to advanced primary care is vital to ensuring proper and timely diagnosis and treatment to improve healthcare outcomes for the patient. The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate one disease condition (COPD) in the adult population and explore current evidence-based guidelines and treatments

assigment

Library Assignment: AACN Essential Paper This assignment provides a concise description and appraisal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials of master’s Education in Nursing. Following APA guideline, briefly explain each essential reflecting on each essential affects the clinical practice and the author’s interpretation of each essential. Include