Annotated Bibliography

Write it as a student in
college

Week 4 Assignment:
Annotated Bibliography

Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 50
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Available Nov 17 at 12am – Nov 26 at 11:59pm

For your Signature Assignment for this course, you will submit a written or video
response to a case study, incorporating at least three scholarly sources including your
textbook.

This week, you will prepare for the Signature Assignment by creating an annotated
bibliography.

1. Review the Signature Assignment instructions. The Signature Assignment is
due in Week 8.

2. Watch the Case Study

3. Links to an external site.
4.
5. Read details about the case study below.
6. Locate four (4) scholarly resources to be used as you complete the Signature

Assignment.

For each source:

● List the source in APA Style. The references should be organized
alphabetically by the author on the References list.

● Follow the source with a brief annotation that summarizes the source
information (approximately 3–5 sentences). You may quote briefly from the
source, but do not copy and paste from the abstract. Include internal citations
as needed

● In 1 or 2 sentences, explain and evaluate the source’s relevance and
significance to your thesis. Does the information from this source support or
discredit your thesis?

● Use an academic tone and style.

Case Study Details (read after viewing the case study video):

Neuroscience: Sarah’s difficulties in language acquisition, social communication, and
attention, alongside abnormalities in brain development, particularly in areas associated
with language processing, attention, and emotional regulation, suggest underlying
neurobiological factors. The decreased activity in the prefrontal cortex points to deficits
in executive functioning and cognitive control. These findings highlight the intricate
interplay between brain regions and their effect on cognitive and behavioral functioning.

Consciousness and Cognitive Functioning: Sarah’s level of consciousness appears
intact, but her cognitive abilities are significantly affected. Her awareness may be
compromised in social contexts due to difficulties in social communication. Attentional
deficits and executive dysfunction likely contribute to her challenges in maintaining
focus and expressing thoughts verbally. These factors collectively influence her level of
consciousness and cognitive processing.

Thinking and Learning: Sarah’s cognitive processes are impaired, particularly in
abstract thinking, problem-solving, and academic performance. These challenges align
with the characteristics of neurodevelopmental disorders like autism spectrum disorder
(ASD), affecting her ability to navigate academic tasks and everyday problem-solving
situations effectively.

Development and Memory: Sarah’s developmental milestones are delayed, and it’s
evident in her struggles with language acquisition and social communication skills since
early childhood. Her memory processes may also be affected with weaknesses in
encoding, storage, and retrieval of information. However, she may possess strengths in
certain mnemonic abilities, which could be explored further to support her learning and
development.

Psychological Disorders: Based on Sarah’s presentation and assessments, she
meets the criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This diagnosis encompasses her

difficulties in social communication, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors. The
effects of ASD on Sarah’s psychological well-being underscores the importance of early
intervention and comprehensive support to address her complex needs effectively.

Motivation and Emotion: Sarah’s motivation levels appear low, possibly influenced by
her difficulties in social interaction and academic performance. Additionally, her
challenges with emotional regulation contribute to her withdrawn behavior and overall
adjustment. Understanding these factors is crucial in developing tailored interventions to
enhance her motivation and emotional well-being.

Visit these sources to learn more about the annotated bibliography:

●
● Annotated Bibliography Template

●

Visit the Writing Resources link under the Student Resources Tab to learn more about
annotated bibliographies.

Rubric
PSYC_160_OL – Annotated Bibliography

Criteria Ratings Pts

This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome

Annotate
d
Bibliogra
phy

20 to >17.33 ptsExceeds ExpectationsSources are highly relevant to the topic
and add greatly to research potential. Few, if any, additional sources are needed.
All sources are from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. All main/critical
points of the research study are included for each annotation. Annotations
succinctly and comprehensively describe the source material.

17.33 to >15.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsSome sources are relevant to the topic.
May require additional sources. Most sources are from credible, scholarly,
peer-reviewed materials. Main/critical points of the research study are included
but may be lacking in detail for each annotation. Most annotations are succinct
and generally describe the source material.

15.8 to >11.8 ptsApproaches ExpectationsFew sources are relevant to the
topic. Requires additional sources. Some sources are from credible, scholarly,
peer-reviewed materials. Main/critical points of the research study are lacking in
detail for each annotation. Some annotations are succinct and generally describe
the source material.

11.8 to >0 ptsNot Meeting ExpectationsSources are not relevant to the topic.
Extensive additional research is needed. Sources lack credibility. Main/critical
points of the research study are absent or significantly lacking in detail for each
annotation and/or some annotations may be missing.

20
pts

This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome

Review/
Critique
of
Scholarly
Researc
h

20 to >17.33 ptsExceeds ExpectationsFully answers all questions posed and
demonstrates a sophisticated ability to critically think about and evaluate scholarly
research. Provides substantial, relevant, and clear explanations that are insightful
and well-supported.

17.33 to >15.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsAnswers all questions posed and
demonstrates ability to critically think about and evaluate scholarly research.
Provides explanations that are well-supported.

15.8 to >11.8 ptsApproaches ExpectationsAnswers most questions posed and
demonstrates some ability to critically think about and evaluate scholarly
research.

11.8 to >0 ptsNot Meeting ExpectationsMost questions posed are not
answered. Work does not demonstrate the student’s ability to critically think about
and evaluate scholarly research.

20
pts

This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome

APA
Style

5 to >4.5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe assignment accurately and consistently
follows APA Style. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

4.5 to >3.95 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe assignment consistently follows current
APA Style with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes. Mostly meets length and
formatting requirements of the assignment.

3.95 to >2.95 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe assignment has numerous
errors in APA Style. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style. May not meet
length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

2.95 to >0 ptsNot Meeting ExpectationsThe assignment has significant errors
in APA Style. Does not meet length and formatting requirements of the
assignment.

5
pts

This
criterion
is linked
to a
Learning
Outcome

Writing
Mechani
cs

5 to >4.5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writing demonstrates sophisticated
clarity and conciseness and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling,
and capitalization are all correct with minimal to no errors.

4.5 to >3.95 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe writing is clear, concise, and well
organized. May contain a few punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.

3.95 to >2.95 ptsApproaches ExpectationsWriting lacks clarity, conciseness, or
organization. Several errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract
from the readability of the paper.

2.95 to >0 ptsNot Meeting ExpectationsThe writing is unfocused and poorly
organized. Many errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from
the readability of the paper.

5
pts

Total Points: 50

Template for the bibliography

Annotated Bibliography

Your Name Here

University Name

Course Number: Course Name

Instructor’s Name

Due Date

2

Below are sample entries for an Annotated Bibliography. A bibliography is a list of sources

are relevant to your research, and an annotation is a short summary (150-200 words) desc

the source. Sometimes, you may be asked to evaluate the source as well as summarize it.

all your items are listed, rearrange the items so the final version is in

alphabetical order

. Make

sure to save this and remove all directions for formatting.

The

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association

(7th ed.) states the

following formatting rules:

•

The text and the reference list should be double-spaced.

•

Numbering starts on the title page, at the top right of the page.

•

There should be 1 inch (2.54 cm) margins all around (top, bottom, left, and right) on each

page.

•

Use Times Roman font, or a similar serif font.

•

Reference list entries must have a hanging indent

•

Each annotation should be a new paragraph below its reference entry. Indent the entire

annotation 0.5 in. from the left margin.

3

Annotated Bibliography

American Psychological Association. (2020).

Publication manual of the American Psychological

Association

(7

th

ed.).

Highlight this passage and replace it with your annotation. In a descriptive annotation,

you merely describe what the book, web page, or article is about. In a critical

bibliography, you provide a descriptive annotation, and you evaluate the success or

reliability of the book, web page, or article. You might also compare or contrast the

source with another source on the topic.

Barthelemy, J., & Geyer, D. (2005). An empirical investigation of IT outsourcing versus

outsourcing in France and Germany.

Information & Management, 42,

533-542.

Highlight this passage and replace it with your annotation. In a descriptive annotation,

you merely describe what the book, web page, or article is about. In a critical

bibliography, you provide a descriptive annotation, and you evaluate the success or

reliability of the book, web page, or article. You might also compare or contrast the

source with another source on the topic