Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Applied Sciences Assignment

In this assignment, you will identify 3 effective practices or interventions that have been proven in the professional literature to be effective with children with special needs and 3 ineffective practices used with this population. You can use the effective practices in Assignment 1, but your analysis of the professional literature needs to be thorough. You will also find 3 interventions or practices that have proven to be ineffective with this same population. Your analysis of both effective and ineffective practices needs to reflect the professional literature, not your opinion.

 These interventions may be academic or social and do not have to use only classroom examples, but can be from community and home settings as well.  The ineffective strategies may be ineffective because of poor implementation, or the theoretical foundation may be flawed. You can use practices that you have seen used with children with special needs in any setting – not just the classroom- but you should provide some professional references and clear statements about why these interventions or practices are ineffective or inappropriate, not your opinion. So, you should have a final paper of no more than 5 pages containing 3 effective and 3 ineffective interventions or practices. These interventions do not need to be listed in any order, such as best to worst or good to best. You will be able to use the content articles you selected for use in effective practices and practices in Assignment 1, but you will have to add to that the ineffective practices or interventions in order to write a group paper that examines the 3 most effective interventions and 3 ineffective classroom practices that are used with children with special needs. You should also explain why you selected the three most ineffective strategies. This need not be a lengthy discussion, but you must provide a coherent explanation as to why you consider them ineffective.  You must receive a score of at least 80%  in order to pass the class. If you receive a score of less than 80%, you will have to work with the instructor in order to complete a remedial program for this assignment. 

You should also use interventions that have been used within the last 20 years. No need to discuss trepanning (You’ll have to look that up).  Have some fun with this assignment.

General Rubric For All Assignments

This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

 

    Criteria                                                                     Ratings

 

 

 

 

 

Grasp of readings

 

Excellent

Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments.

Good

Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail.

Developing

Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Critical analysis

Excellent

Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue.

Good

Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining.

Developing

Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Evidence

Excellent

Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated.

Good

Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated.

Developing

Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.

Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Organization & Clarity

Excellent

Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research.

Good

Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly.

Developing

Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections.

 

Needs Improvement

Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Mechanics

Excellent

When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues.

Good

Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues.

Developing

There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues.

Needs Improvement

Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Evaluating a Public Healthcare Leaders Style

Pick a public leader that responded to the Covid-19 crisis and discuss what leadership style or characteristics they demonstrated. Was their behavior consistent with your expectations for a leader in that position? Why or why not? Be sure to respond to at least TWO of your classmates’ posts.

PEP

PRACTICUM EXPERIENCE PLAN (PEP) As you establish your goals and objectives for this course, you are committing to an organized plan that will frame your practicum experience in a clinical setting, including planned activities, assessment, and achievement of defined outcomes. In particular, they must address the categories of clinical reasoning,

ORGLABOR CASE

This assignment is about unions and labor contract agreements. The written agreement is a key element to the understanding of how actions and activities take place in the workplace. Often, however, there are differences in opinion between management and labor. View the following humorous video that shows the importance of

ORGLABOR SLP

In the SLP assignment, you have the opportunity to evaluate strategies taken by union organizers to organize nonunion workplaces. Review the sources pertaining to union organizing listed on the Module 3 Background page, review the indystar.com article (below), and conduct your own research. Hussein, F. (2017).  Labor Movement Turns to

Enhancing Patient Safety #3

 For this assessment, you will develop an 8–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with thorough speaker’s notes designed for a hypothetical in-service session related to the improvement plan you developed in Assessment 2. 

Enhancing Patient Safety #2

 For this assessment, you must use the supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be the template, focusing on the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment. 

discussion

 Discuss the importance of  understanding the history and background of autism and how it has impacted ABA treatments for autism and the general guiding philosophy of ABA programs?  What has the history of autism taught us about pseudoscience like refrigerator mothers? 

self assessment

Before embarking on any professional or academic activity, it is important to understand the background, knowledge, and experience you bring to it. You might ask yourself, “What do I already know? What do I need to know? And what do I want to know?” This critical self-reflection is especially important

wk2 study plan

STUDY PLAN Can you imagine an athlete deciding to run a marathon without training for the event? Most ambitious people who have set this goal will follow a specific training plan that will allow them to feel confident and prepared on the big day. Similarly, if you want to feel

wk2

EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT (E/M) Insurance coding and billing is complex, but it boils down to how to accurately apply a code, or CPT (current procedural terminology), to the service that you provided. The payer then reimburses the service at a certain rate. As a provider, you will have to understand

assg

# 1 assg Clinical Case Presentation SOAP Formulate a professional nurse practitioner case presentation in a SOAP format. Create a PowerPoint (PPTx) case presentation from one of your clinical experiences. Content should only be the relevant information. Use the SOAP format. Ensure that your presentation is HIPAA compliant. Subjectice Opener

BIT 415 Resource Allocation and Optimization

Lowest Level Task Resource Assignments Finalize project team Project Manager Develop project charter Project Manager Develop scope statement Project Manager Develop and refine other plans Project Manager Conduct research for income mechanism into Global Treps Support Team Manager Evaluate current systems Support Team Manager, System Test Engineer Define requirements Website

assg

While ethical principles guide moral decision-making, legal standards set enforceable rules. Sometimes, ethical obligations may conflict with legal requirements, requiring careful navigation by healthcare professionals. Reflect on an ethical or medicolegal experience or issue you have encountered as a nurse or during your nurse practitioner training. Describe the situation in

Vocational Applications for Anatomy and Physiology

1. How do his reflections on calling relate to yours as you pursue vocation within the spheres of healthcare?  2. How do you anticipate your study of anatomy and physiology enhancing your understanding of the body as a whole? In your response, connect how this knowledge might benefit not only

Personal and professional codes of ethics

In this week’s study, you reviewed the APHA Code of Ethics. Consider it and how you approach ethical questions as you discuss the following: What are the key aspects of your ethical code (e.g., faith, integrity, principles)? Where does your ethical code originate from (e.g., parents, teachers, faith)? Oftentimes, our

Research and Evidence-Base #4

 Create a 5–10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you propose an evidence-based plan to improve the outcomes for your diagnosis. 

wk1

CERTIFICATION AND LICENSURE PLAN  Now that you are in the final course in your program, it is time to turn in earnest to preparing for certification and licensure. You will need to take and pass the national PMHNP certification exam. Once certified, you will then be eligible to apply for

Research and Evidence-Base

 Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.