Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Applied Sciences Assignment

assignment

Your Office Manager has asked you to participate in writing a letter for patients who would like information on the Medicare options.

· The letter should explain the parts of Medicare, their differences, and features.
For this assignment, write a 2-3-page letter discussing Medicare Parts A, B, C, and D.

· Review Unit 2, Topic 2 Content and website links provided to assist you in writing the letter.

· Requirements:

· 2-3-page letter format, using proper APA format

· Use a professional tone when addressing patients.

· Clearly define and describe the four parts of Medicare so the patient will understand them.

· Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Please be cautioned that any material used in the assignment directly from the internet (copy and paste) will be given a zero-based on Herzing University Ethics Policy (Plagiarism). All information not your own must be given appropriate APA citation reference.

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Rubric

MO205 Unit 2 Assignment – Medicare: Patient Letter

MO205 Unit 2 Assignment – Medicare: Patient Letter

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

MO205-CO1

20 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

18 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

16 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

14 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

12 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

20 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

18 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

16 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

14 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

12 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

5 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5 pts

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

QUZ and QDD

Using ChatGPT (Artificial Intelligence AI) respond to the following questions: 1. What is organizational change according to AI? How does the definition compare to the textbook’s definition? 2. What are the organizational change models listed by ChatGPT? Describe each of them. TEXTBOOK(S) AND REQUIRED MATERIALS: Title: Organization Change: Theory and

8

The purpose of this discussion is to reflect on your own readiness to practice as a DNP- prepared nurse, to consider what you learned in this course and how this knowledge will impact your practice. Reflective inquiry allows for the expansion of self-awareness, identification of knowledge gaps, and assessment of

2 discussions adv

2 separate discussions It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum requirement, but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the

GrowthCase

The purpose of the Case Assignment is to create a “Live Case” by experiencing the process of coaching. Because this case is designed around  experiential learning , we can go beyond the conceptual knowledge covered in the reading materials to actual skills building. This requires putting what you are learning

GrowthSlp

Developing a vision statement In Module 1, you began the process of the Leadership Growth Plan with a thorough self-assessment. Then you identified and prioritized your most important values and motivators and explored your basic leadership style. In this module, you will establish your vision and determine what you need

77

The purpose of this discussion is for the DNP student to demonstrate an understanding of how stakeholders influence practice change. You will continually gain experience considering the organization, community, and national stakeholders and how they influence sustained practice change. 1. Identify and examine organization and/or community stakeholders you anticipate will

COM Week 3

  View the TED Talk “Weird, or just different?”Links to an external site. by Derek Sivers (TEDIndia, 2009). Respond to the following questions: What are your impressions of his talk? Did his talk give you any new perspective on the process or skill of communication, especially with regard to intercultural

98

  Specific Instructions: Team Structure: As part of the course, starting Week 2, you will all be automatically placed into groups, and all your Discussions until the end of the class will be carried out in groups. So, in each week’s discussion, you will only see your teammates.  Please respond

Applied Sciences WK3 ASSIGNMENT2

Week Three: Module 3 Session 6 Assignment Paper Assignment: Please refer to your org. structure that you were guided to retrieve in Module Two. Next, see pg. 226: Given the current structure of your chosen org., decide whether a redesign would help your organization compete more effectively, or reach its

wk8

LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES RELATED TO PSYCHIATRIC EMERGENCIES The diagnosis of psychiatric emergencies can include a wide range of problems—from serious drug reactions to abuse and suicidal ideation/behaviors. Regardless of care setting, the PMHNP must know how to address emergencies, coordinate care with other members of the health care team

DQQ33

There are three questions, Q1 discissions, and the other 2  Q are replies for friends Q.2 and Q.3  Q.1 THINKING PASSAGES: GLOBAL WARMING (350 or More) The three passages on global warming offer very different views on the validity of the concept. You should answer the questions at the end

Gospel Message Friendships and Barriers

What practical steps would you take to build a friendship with a follower of this worldview who might be a co-worker, neighbor, etc.? What do’s and don’ts would you apply when preparing to share the gospel with them? What are some beliefs/reasons a person from this worldview might have that

SE

READ- Problem There are knowledge gaps between heart disease and depression risk factors. Cardiovascular patients may have depressive symptoms that develop, due to chronicity of their illness, lack of physical activity, increased stress levels, or pre-existing mental health conditions. Cardiovascular individuals are screened for depressive symptoms utilizing validated screeners: and

pi

2 Discussion: Biomedical Issues and Donations Name Institution Course Professor Date Your major paper is focused on persuasion theories and is due Oct. 17 Read Chapters Five and six and select only three theories.  Only choose three from the following theories: 1.      Authoritarianism and acquiescence (these are concepts and not a

Discussion response unit 6 adv health

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts.  To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts: · Do you agree with your peers’ assessment? · Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion. ·

Unit 6 response adv psych

Instructions: Please read and respond to at least two of your peers’ initial postings. You may want to consider the following questions in your responses to your peers: · Compare and contrast your initial posting with those of your peers.   · How are they similar or how are they