Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Psychology homework help

assessment

Literature Review Revision – Rubric

Summary of existing literature 72 points

Criteria Description

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study. Minimum

of 1250 words. Peer-reviewed sources were cited.

5. Target 72 points

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

thoughtful and makes relevant connections to current research in the field. 10-15

peer-reviewed sources were cited.

4. Acceptable 61.2 points

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

concise and makes some connections to current research in the field. 10-15 peer-

reviewed sources were cited.

3. Approaching 54 points

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is clear.

10 peer-reviewed sources were cited.

2. Insufficient 46.8 points

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

vague or inadequate. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet

the minimum word count.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

missing. Less than 10 peer-reviewed sources were cited. Did not meet the minimum

word count.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Proposed research 24 points

Criteria Description

Explanation how proposed research will add to existing literature.

5. Target 24 points

Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

research is insightful and makes relevant connections to current research.

4. Acceptable 20.4 points

Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

research is thoughtful and makes some connections to current research.

3. Approaching 18 points

Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

research is clear.

2. Insufficient 15.6 points

Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

research is vague or inadequate.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Explanation of how proposed research will add to the existing literature and

research is missing.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 12 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 12 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 10.2 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Approaching 9 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Insufficient 7.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

audience is evident.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing 6 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.1 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.5 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 3.9 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Format/Documentation 6 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 5.1 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 4.5 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 3.9 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 120 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

>Psychology homework help

Share This Post

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

PowerPoint Help

Need tutoring on how to form a PowerPoint. Title Name, Course, Capella University Video You can insert your video here. Go to Insert. Select Video. Select Movie from File (if you have it saved to your computer) or Movie from Browser (if you have a URL). Follow the prompts from

Discussion

Please follow the instructions. Read very well. No AI   Post a 200- to 250-word response, in which you. Ask an AI chatbot such as ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot for the clinical criteria for diagnosing one of the following disorders: Obsessive compulsive disorder Generalized anxiety disorder Post-traumatic stress disorder

quix

61. According to Leming, cause of death, is a fear of death. FALSE 62. The first stage of Kubler-Ross’s stages of the dying process is bargaining. FALSE 63. A dead human body used in medical schools for the purpose of dissection to learn the body parts and systems is

Ethical Recommendations

Develop a table offering a competence-based recommendations. Ethical Recommendation You will examine researchers’ views on the role and impact of professional codes, which are expected norms that can provide an organization with means to control organizational risk management and to protect an organization. For example, Adelstein and Clegg (2016) do

Psychology Can someone help me with my psychology personality homework?

Upon successful completion of this lesson, you will be able to: Identify common self doubts and fears of helpers Identify beliefs associated with effective and ineffective helping Challenge assumptions about clients Describe the stages involved in the helping relationship Review lecture material Step 2: Complete Discussion Board thread – Striving

Information Speech

see below Here you will submit your topic proposal for your Informative Presentation. The proposal has two parts: a description and a rationale. Your proposal should be about two to three full paragraphs in length as follows: Part 1: Description · With the first part of your description, offer basic presentation information:

Psychology Assignment

Please check very well. No AI Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 88 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2 Start Assignment  Back to Week at a Glance ( ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN MENTAL HEALTH In this week’s Assignment, you

FP Week 3 Discussion 1

Case Study A victim was stabbed in the left side of the neck in a fight and sustained a small superficial stab wound of the skin and jugular vein. There was a small pool of blood at the scene; the victim, however, expired in the ambulance on the way to

FP Week 3 Assignment

InstructionsInstructions Week Three Assignment – Questions Q1. What is the forensic significance of abrasions? (5 points) Q2. What are the methods used for estimation of time of death (PM interval)? (5 points)

MSW 531

Readings McInnis-Dittrich, K. (2020). Social work with older adults: A biopsychosocial approach to assessment and intervention (5th ed.). Pearson. · Chapter 14: Income Programs, Health Insurance, and Support Services for Older Adults: Challenges and Opportunities Ferraro, K., & Wilmoth, J. (Eds.) (2013). Gerontology: Perspectives and Issues (4th ed.). Springer. · Chapter 11:

Psychology

Compose a personal statement describing how this course, the study of psychology of stress, supports both your short-term and long-term goals. Goals can include curricular, extracurricular, professional, and personal experiences. When composing this journal discuss from your perspective (I, my, me). Your goals and aspirations are unique to you.

WEEK 7

Cultural Sensitivity in the Workplace and Community Advanced human services professional practitioners are bound by laws (e.g., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964), by the NOHS code of ethics, and by organizational policies and procedures that promote ethical behavior and cultural sensitivity. Practitioners may encounter challenges when

Essentials of Psychology

SSC130: Essay Your project must be submitted as a Word document (.docx, .doc). Your project will be individually graded by your instructor and therefore may take up to five to seven days to grade. Be sure that each of your files contains the following information: Your name Your student ID

Week seven

Need help with assignment Discipline Tracker Although your focus is on a social work research topic, the knowledge you employ will come from different knowledge bases from several different disciplines. By searching different knowledge bases, you can incorporate a broader range of diverse perspectives and insights into your research. For

Psychology ABA 503- Assignment 2

ABA503 Assignment 2 Rubric Grading item Completely accurate in content and clearly articulated Partially inaccurate in content OR somewhat unclear in articulation Partially inaccurate in content AND unclear in articulation Item is missing or completely inaccurate in content Total Completed FAOF using data provided 25 17 8 0 Description of

Psychology ABA 503- Assignment 1

ABA 503 Assignments – Case Study Justin is a 13-year-old boy diagnosed with autism. He has an effective, but below average, use of spoken language but is able to communicate his emotions using picture cards that have a sad face, a neutral face and a smiley face. He is able

psychology

1. Read Chapter 8: Biomedical Issues and Donations and research 2 other sources (include these in your reference section). 2. Discussion Questions: Provide arguments for and against each of the following basing your arguments on relevant research: a. National legislation legitimizing mercy killing. b. National legislation legitimizing the selling of human organs. c. The establishment of national

Mandated Reporting

Defend the application of the mandated reporting laws in a scenario. Required Resources · Applying Ethical Theories to Ethics Codes and Ethical Decision Making Knapp, S. J., & Fingerhut, R. (2024). Applying ethical theories to ethics codes and ethical decision making. In Practical ethics for psychologists: A positive approach., 4th