Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Assessment

Follow rubric and all instructions carefully.

Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

Rubric

Introduction Paragraph 10 points

Criteria Description

Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

5. Target 10 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

clear, appropriate and has strong details.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

missing.

Collapse All

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 1 of 11

Participants Section 15 points

Criteria Description

Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

of participants needed to conduct the study.

5. Target 15 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

details.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 2 of 11

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 3 of 11

Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

Criteria Description

List what is needed to conduct the study.

5. Target 10 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

insightful with exceptional details.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

details.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

many important details.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 4 of 11

Procedures Section 15 points

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 5 of 11

Criteria Description

Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

researcher could replicate your study.

5. Target 15 points

Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

directions.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

replicate the study from these directions.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

fully replicate the study from these directions.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 6 of 11

Design Section 15 points

Criteria Description

Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

groups.

5. Target 15 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

is strong with sound details.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 7 of 11

Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

Criteria Description

Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

5. Target 15 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

important details.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 8 of 11

Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

Criteria Description

Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

5. Target 10 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

clear, appropriate and has strong details.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 9 of 11

Mechanics of Writing 6 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

sentence structure, etc.

5. Target 6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.1 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.5 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 3.9 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

throughout.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 10 of 11

Format/Documentation 4 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

errors.

3. Approaching 3 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

provided.

Total 100 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 11 of 11

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

quix

      61. According to Leming, cause of death, is   a fear of death. FALSE 62. The first stage of Kubler-Ross’s stages of the dying   process is bargaining. FALSE 63. A dead human body used in medical   schools for the purpose of dissection to learn the body parts and systems is

Ethical Recommendations

Develop a table offering a competence-based recommendations.  Ethical Recommendation You will examine researchers’ views on the role and impact of professional codes, which are expected norms that can provide an organization with means to control organizational risk management and to protect an organization. For example, Adelstein and Clegg (2016) do

Psychology Can someone help me with my psychology personality homework?

  Upon successful completion of this lesson, you will be able to: Identify common self doubts and fears of helpers Identify beliefs associated with effective and ineffective helping Challenge assumptions about clients Describe the stages involved in the helping relationship   Review lecture material Step 2: Complete Discussion Board thread – Striving

Information Speech

see below  Here you will submit your topic proposal for your Informative Presentation. The proposal has two parts: a  description and a  rationale. Your proposal should be about  two to three full paragraphs in length as follows: Part 1: Description · With the first part of your description, offer basic presentation information:

Psychology Assignment

Please check very well. No AI Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 88 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2 Start Assignment  Back to Week at a Glance ( ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN MENTAL HEALTH In this week’s Assignment, you

FP Week 3 Discussion 1

Case Study  A victim was stabbed in the left side of the neck in a fight and sustained a small superficial stab wound of the skin and jugular vein. There was a small pool of blood at the scene; the victim, however, expired in the ambulance on the way to

FP Week 3 Assignment

InstructionsInstructions Week Three Assignment – Questions Q1. What is the forensic significance of abrasions? (5 points) Q2. What are the methods used for estimation of time of death (PM interval)? (5 points)

MSW 531

Readings McInnis-Dittrich, K. (2020).  Social work with older adults: A biopsychosocial approach to assessment and intervention (5th ed.). Pearson. · Chapter 14: Income Programs, Health Insurance, and Support Services for Older Adults: Challenges and Opportunities Ferraro, K., & Wilmoth, J. (Eds.) (2013).  Gerontology: Perspectives and Issues (4th ed.). Springer. · Chapter 11:

Psychology

  Compose a personal statement describing how this course, the study of psychology of stress, supports both your short-term and long-term goals.  Goals can include curricular, extracurricular, professional, and personal experiences.  When composing this journal discuss from your perspective (I, my, me).  Your goals and aspirations are unique to you. 

WEEK 7

Cultural Sensitivity in the Workplace and Community Advanced human services professional practitioners are bound by laws (e.g., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964), by the NOHS code of ethics, and by organizational policies and procedures that promote ethical behavior and cultural sensitivity. Practitioners may encounter challenges when

Essentials of Psychology

SSC130: Essay Your project must be submitted as a Word document (.docx, .doc). Your project will be individually graded by your instructor and therefore may take up to five to seven days to grade. Be sure that each of your files contains the following information: Your name Your student ID

Week seven

Need help with assignment Discipline Tracker Although your focus is on a social work research topic, the knowledge you employ will come from different knowledge bases from several different disciplines. By searching different knowledge bases, you can incorporate a broader range of diverse perspectives and insights into your research. For

Psychology ABA 503- Assignment 2

ABA503 Assignment 2 Rubric Grading item Completely accurate in content and clearly articulated Partially inaccurate in content OR somewhat unclear in articulation Partially inaccurate in content AND unclear in articulation Item is missing or completely inaccurate in content Total Completed FAOF using data provided 25 17 8 0 Description of

Psychology ABA 503- Assignment 1

ABA 503 Assignments – Case Study Justin is a 13-year-old boy diagnosed with autism. He has an effective, but below average, use of spoken language but is able to communicate his emotions using picture cards that have a sad face, a neutral face and a smiley face. He is able

psychology

  1. Read Chapter 8: Biomedical Issues and Donations and research 2 other sources (include these in your reference section). 2.  Discussion Questions:  Provide arguments for and against each of the following basing your arguments on relevant research: a. National legislation legitimizing mercy killing. b. National legislation legitimizing the selling of human organs. c.  The establishment of national

Mandated Reporting

Defend the application of the mandated reporting laws in a scenario. Required Resources · Applying Ethical Theories to Ethics Codes and Ethical Decision Making Knapp, S. J., & Fingerhut, R. (2024). Applying ethical theories to ethics codes and ethical decision making. In  Practical ethics for psychologists: A positive approach., 4th

Psychology Assignment

Please follow instructions and NO AI Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 88 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2 Start Assignment  Back to Week at a Glance ( THEORIES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS This week, you explore a variety of models that help

Physiological Psychology

see attachment Final Reflection We have concluded the course content! I invite you to write a final reflection describing your learning experience. This activity consists of preparing a piece of writing containing the following: · What were your expectations at the beginning of the course? · Your experience in the