Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Assessment

Follow rubric and all instructions carefully.

Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations –

Rubric

Introduction Paragraph 10 points

Criteria Description

Describe the need for additional research and include the problem

statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement.

5. Target 10 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

clear, appropriate and has strong details.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, the

problem statement or hypothesis, and the thesis statement are

vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the need for additional research of the topic, a

problem statement or hypothesis, and a thesis statement are

missing.

Collapse All

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 1 of 11

Participants Section 15 points

Criteria Description

Describe the demographics of those who can participate in the study,

any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and the number

of participants needed to conduct the study.

5. Target 15 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is expertly

written. Explanation is comprehensive and insightful with

exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is clear and

coherent. Explanation is strong with sound details.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is

appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is vague or

incomplete. Explanation is weak and missing many important

details.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 2 of 11

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the demographic of those who can participate in the

study, any factors and excluding factors that are not implied, and

the number of participants needed to conduct the study is missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 3 of 11

Materials/Instruments/Apparatuses Section 10 points

Criteria Description

List what is needed to conduct the study.

5. Target 10 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is comprehensive and

insightful with exceptional details.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is strong with sound

details.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is appropriate but is

somewhat limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is weak and missing

many important details.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

List of what is needed to conduct the study is missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 4 of 11

Procedures Section 15 points

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 5 of 11

Criteria Description

Include the informed consent and explain directions of the procedures

to conduct the study. It should be so clearly written that another

researcher could replicate your study.

5. Target 15 points

Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

conduct the study are expertly written. Explanation is

comprehensive with exceptional details and clarity. Another

researcher would be able to replicate the study from these

directions.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

conduct the study are appropriate, clear, and coherent. Explanation

is strong with sound details. Another researcher may be able to

replicate the study from these directions.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Informed consent is present. Directions of the procedures to

conduct the study are appropriate but are somewhat limited and

lack some essential details or clarity. Another researcher could not

fully replicate the study from these directions.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Informed consent may or may not be present. Directions of the

procedures to conduct the study are vague or incomplete.

Explanation is weak and missing many important details. Another

researcher could not replicate the study from these directions.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Directions of the procedures to conduct the study are missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 6 of 11

Design Section 15 points

Criteria Description

Describe the design of the study and how participants are assigned to

groups.

5. Target 15 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is expertly written. Explanation is

comprehensive and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is clear and coherent. Explanation

is strong with sound details.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is appropriate but is somewhat

limited and lacks some essential details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is vague or incomplete.

Explanation is weak and missing many important details.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the design of the study and how participants are

assigned to groups, if applicable, is missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 7 of 11

Ethical Considerations (B) 15 points

Criteria Description

Address ethical considerations associated with your research. At a

minimum, discuss informed consent, privacy, and any potential risks to

participants. Your study may require additional ethical considerations

depending upon the nature of your proposed research. (C3.1)

5. Target 15 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

expertly written. Discussion is comprehensive and insightful with

exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

clear and coherent. Discussion is strong with sound details.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

appropriate but is somewhat limited and lacks some essential

details or clarity.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the research is

vague or incomplete. Discussion is weak and missing many

important details.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Ethical considerations associated with the research are missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 8 of 11

Conclusion Paragraph 10 points

Criteria Description

Describe the main points from the whole research proposal.

5. Target 10 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

fully appropriate and insightful with exceptional details and clarity.

4. Acceptable 8.5 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

clear, appropriate and has strong details.

3. Approaching 7.5 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

present and appropriate. Section lacks some clarity.

2. Insufficient 6.5 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

vague or incomplete. Many important details are missing.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Description of the main points from the whole research proposal is

missing.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 9 of 11

Mechanics of Writing 6 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use,

sentence structure, etc.

5. Target 6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and

sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 5.1 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and

sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.5 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is

generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 3.9 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present.

Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are

recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning.

Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found

throughout.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 10 of 11

Format/Documentation 4 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and

level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references,

bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 3.4 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

errors.

3. Approaching 3 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there

are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient 2.6 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing.

Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is

provided.

Total 100 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

7/17/25, 2:54 AM
Page 11 of 11

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

L&CP Week 3 Assignment

Instructions Respond to the following questions. What is the importance, if any, of officer intent and motive in the “objective standard of reasonable force” under the current state of the law? Contrast the definition of probable cause with that of reasonable suspicion. Complete the following questions: Compare and contrast Fourth

Controversial Treatments Chelation Therapy

  1 Controversial Treatments: Reflection Paper and Video Presentation Liadanay Velazquez Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Capella University PSY7710: Ethics in Applied Behavior Analysis Instructor Name Assignment Due Date Controversial Treatments: Reflection Paper and Video Presentation (Please note, all italicized writing in this template is for instructional purposes. You

psychology

PSYC 320 Behavior Modification Project: Baseline Phase Report Assignment Instructions Overview To assess your baseline as you begin the experiment, you need to observe your target behavior before you ever treat it or try to modify it – in other words do not change anything you do. Thus, you will

psych brain functioning (Les)

Module 3: Critical Thinking/Application Prompts     Instructions Each week, you will be presented with a series of critical thinking prompts and application prompts. Please copy/paste the prompts into an offline document (Word, for example) and compose your responses offline (be sure to save your work).  Then click on the “Submit

Psychology week two assignment

  Hi Barbara, Nice start with clear outcomes. As you draft Section 1 of your assignment, just remember to include some credible statistics describing the scope of the problem the program addresses.

Feedback keiland

       If the CHANCE program were highly successful, success would mean that adolescents who are survivors of human trafficking experience lasting emotional healing, safety, and self-sufficiency. Youth would show stronger self-worth, consistent school or job engagement, and the ability to form trusting relationships with supportive adults. Families and foster caregivers

psych wk 2 less

Main post (due Friday, November 7, by 11:59 PM):  leslie Please read the following information related to concussions and then answer the questions below: The brain sits in the cranium, surrounded by cerebral fluid. When a severe blow to the head occurs, the brain may collide with the cranium, then

Social Media

I need help understanding the paragraph format Overview In this assignment, you will write a 3–5 page paper on the effects of social media on the developing mind. Preparation Topic Selection Choose one of the following topics: · Internet use among elementary age children (ages 5–11). · Social media use

psychology

Behavior Modification Project: Research Paper Assignment Instructions Overview You will write a 4-6-page, current APA formatted, research paper that will aid you in the Behavior Modification Project. You should reference your textbook and at least 6 additional peer-reviewed empirical research journal articles. The research paper will include a title page,

assitant needed E Kenniqua

Shared Writing: Psychological Disorders One of your authors once attended a training session where the instructor shared that they did not believe in the DSM or in using diagnoses. This person believed that diagnoses were much like rumors in that they had the potential to lead toward specific beliefs and

Week 11

Post a brief description of the culture in which you immersed yourself. Next, explain how the Immersion Project assisted you in understanding and respecting other cultures in general and helped you further develop cultural humility.

Summary

Use the attachment to complete work.  Instructions: Answer the question in two paragraphs. In a social work perspective, also using community-based approaches or programs in the response. Use opinions, and facts and provide information regarding the diagnosis. Initial Post Prompt Question: How can social workers help Asian clients living with

assitant needed E Kenniqua

please see attachment 1 We have covered several areas of research that have prompted various levels of controversy, and for various reasons. You have read about the possible comorbidity of ADHD and bipolar disorders in children. You have also read about genetics research in psychological disorders. How might this knowledge impact your personal behavior

follow the instructions attached

Week 6 Assignment Start Assignment Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 100 Submitting a file upload File Types docx, doc, and pdf Identify an event related to your chosen Hot Topic Module in which compassion was surprisingly shown or not shown. That is, choose an instance from current events or history

Prof Double R

 I NEED TWO PARAGRAPH For your initial post, review the videos A Class Divided and Social Development: Crash Course Sociology #13. Then respond to the following: Based on the content in “A Class Divided,” are children immune to the attitudes and behaviors of other group members? Explain. In what ways

L&CP Week 2 Assignment

Instructions Respond to the following questions. Does the use of a drug sniffing dog during a routine traffic stop violate the Fourth Amendment? Would the result be different if an individual had to be transported to a location where a drug sniffing dog was available? When does the Fourth Amendment

L&CP Week 2 Discusssion

Instructions Chapters 3 and 4 introduced you to the Fourth Amendment and various aspects of searches and limited seizures, otherwise known as stops or detentions.  With these course readings in mind, consider and respond to the following questions. In light of your reading in Chapter 4, do you think that profiling is

FEG Plus With Free Derma Roller Price in Karachi

Why Choose FEG Plus with Free Derma Roller? When you purchase FEG Plus, you not only get the powerful lash and brow serum but also a complimentary Derma Roller. The Derma Roller helps to enhance the absorption of the serum, allowing it to penetrate more deeply into the skin for