Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

assigment

Module 3: 
Concept Analysis Paper 

Choose a terminology related to the health area (Nursing), and develop the concept analysis step by step, following the 

example guide in the attachment


 Download example guide in the attachment
.

 

Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Be sure to review the 

academic expectations
 for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

Official Assignment Rubric

– Official Assignment Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism

Concept Application

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar

Written Communication

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentExcellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodMinimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors

16 to >14.0 ptsFairMultiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorSevere (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableUnacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication

Specific Formatting

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking

Thought analysis process

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy

Quality of Sources and APA Citations

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

wk6

Negotiating the Nurse Practitioner Employment Contract If you could work at the practice of your dreams, what would that look like? How would you negotiate that dream job contract? Graduating from nurse practitioner school is an exciting time of accomplishment. However, it’s also time to turn dreams into reality and

Nursing

DeSigning a Nursing Informatics Project for Your Organization

565 week 1 discussion

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. Include the following sections: Choose a clinical condition from the list below that is applicable to your practice area or clinical interests. Assess the linked clinical practice guideline (CPG) related to

WHO

see attached Wk 11 assignment To Prepare: · Review the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global health agenda and select one global health issue to focus on for this Assignment. · Select at least one additional country to compare to the U.S. for this Assignment. · Reflect on how the global

Health Policy

see attached Week 7 discussion To Prepare: · Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy. · Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy. Post a description of the

Question

Lab 1 Fun with Dimensional Analysis You are to listen to the video, write down pertinent and useful information and provide a 2-3 page summary of the experiment discussed. Your write-up should include- a) introduction b) materials used c) procedure d) data presented e) discussion f) conclusion. Decomposition of Copper

Proposed project

PROPOSE NURSING INFORMATIC PROJECT You will use project management tools and strategies to propose how you would support and potentially implement a proposed nursing informatics project. To complete this project, you will define an informatics project that would be beneficial to your healthcare organization or nursing practice. You can discuss

Submitting Poster for Faculty Review

 Submitting Poster for Faculty Review It is not enough to simply implement your project, but you must also share. This is an integral part of the implementation process, you must disseminate the information (or share the information with the relevant stakeholders).   For this Assignment, you will construct a Poster

Nursing

Post a summary on how predictive analytics might be used to support healthcare. Note: These topics may overlap as you will find in the readings (e.g., some processes require both Data Mining and Analytics). In your post include the following: Describe a practical application for predictive analytics in your nursing

policy PPT

Assig Nursing is a very highly regulated profession. There are over 100 boards of nursing and national nursing associations throughout the United States and its territories. Their existence helps regulate, inform, and promote the nursing profession. With such numbers, it can be difficult to distinguish between BONs and nursing associations,

POLICY

POLICY What are legislators currently doing to address your selected advocacy priorities for a vulnerable population? Are there current policies in place? Are there current policies proposed at either the state or federal level? What are the most obvious strengths and weaknesses of these policies as they relate to your

Improving Medication Reconciliation Accuracy at Admission and Discharge

See attachment In collaboration with the approved clinical preceptor, students will identify a specific evidence-based topic for the capstone project change proposal. Students should consider the clinical environment in which they are currently employed or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational

Study Plan

Study Plan Based on your practice exam question results from Week 2, identify strengths and areas of opportunity and create a tailored study plan to use throughout this course to help you prepare for the national certification exam. This will serve as an action plan to help you track your

Executive Summary

Executive Summary During this course, you will be tasked with completing an Executive Summary. The goal of an Executive Summary is to summarize your DNP project, highlighting key points. Please carefully review all instructions, and use the proper checklists and templates, to effectively complete your Executive Summary.   This will

Question

Density Determination Lab – YouTube You are to listen to the video, write down pertinent and useful information and provide a 2-3 page summary of the experiment discussed. Your write-up should include- a) introduction b) materials used c) procedure d) data presented e) discussion f) conclusion. You are to listen

Reflection

Please reflect and write your reflections on the following:   1. What content in this course helped you strengthen your concept of yourself as a PMHNP? Case studies 2. What do you find yourself thinking about as you prepare to start clinical? Class: Transition to practice