Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

assigment

Module 5: 
Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: What are They?

As a DNP, it is important to know the type of statistics utilized in the study under investigation. Prepare a question-guided essay with the following questions: 

1. What is the difference between descriptive and inferential statistics?  

2. What is the purpose of a descriptive analysis of the study population?  

3. How do you compare descriptive and inferential statistics? Include a Venn Diagram in your essay where an explanation of the differences and similarities between descriptive and inferential statistics is shown.  

Use an Essay Format 

You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.
Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).
Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.
When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.
Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment’s due date.

 

Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Be sure to review the 

academic expectations
 for your submission.

fficial Essay Rubric

– Official Essay Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

Mastery of the Information

30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentThe essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.

27 to >24.0 ptsGoodThe essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples.

24 to >21.0 ptsFairThe essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples.

21 to >18.0 ptsPoorThe essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.

18 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

Structure of the Essay

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentThe essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodThe essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairThe essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorThe essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking

Development of Ideas

15 to >14.0 ptsExcellentDetails are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained.

14 to >12.0 ptsGood (12 -11 pts)Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained.

12 to >11.0 ptsFairDetails are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information.

11 to >9.0 ptsPoorDetails are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made.

9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy

Quality of Resources

15 to >14.0 ptsExcellentSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.

14 to >12.0 ptsGoodSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

12 to >11.0 ptsFairSupporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

11 to >9.0 ptsPoorThe following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.

9 to >0 ptsUnacceptableResources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics and Grammar

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentExcellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.

9 to >8.0 ptsGoodMinimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 ptsFairMultiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >5.0 ptsPoorSevere (8 – 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

5 to >0 ptsUnacceptableUnacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Guidelines

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentThe essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting.

9 to >8.0 ptsGoodThe essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.

8 to >6.0 ptsFairThe essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.

6 to >5.0 ptsPoorThe essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.

5 to >0 ptsUnacceptableAPA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Risk Management Interview

see attachment The purpose of this assignment is to gain real-world insight into how risk management programs operate within health care organizations. Select a local health care organization where you can conduct an interview with an employee who is involved in risk management processes. This organization can be your current

Telemedicine and Risk

see attachment The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your understanding of the responsibility of a health care organization in establishing a risk management program that addresses liability and malpractice. Assume your organization will begin offering synchronous telemedicine services and you have been asked to present information about incorporating

ANA Code of Ethics

Written Assignment – ANA Code of Ethics For this assignment, you will include the following: · Describe the importance of the code of ethics in nursing. · Identify the ANA Standards of Practice for the licensure you are obtaining (LPN or RN) · Discuss the main principles of the ANA

Nutrition is the cornerstone of health and healing.

Introduction Nutrition is the cornerstone of health and healing. Nurses play a vital role in assessing patients’ nutritional status, identifying risk factors for dietary disorders, planning interventions, and evaluating outcomes. Nurses must integrate nutritional knowledge with clinical judgment to support optimal outcomes when caring for patients with chronic illness, hospitalized

Nursing WEEK 8 ASSIGNMENT

ATTACHED  To Prepare: · Review the Resources and reflect on your thinking regarding the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs. · Select a healthcare program within your practice and consider the design and implementation of this program. · Reflect on advocacy efforts and

Week 8

Assignment 1 Complete and analyze the Johns Hopkins Appendix C: Stakeholder Analysis and Communication Tool for the healthcare organization or clinical setting you selected. Attach the completed tool as an Appendix to Installment 3 of three. Analyze evidence from the literature and course materials, synthesize the information, and develop a

Mm part 3 week 7

Mm part 3 week 7 NU 700 Assignment: Unit 7 – KTA Part 3 Evaluation Measures Instructions: Utilize the template to provide responses to each prompt. Please do not include a cover/title page for the assignment. NAME OF STUDENT: Part 1: Questions Questions: Type Answers in the Spaces below 1.

Week 7 rw soap

week 7 rw soap Vaginal Discharge “I’ve had itching and discharge for a few days.” 32-year-old female reports thick white discharge and itching for 4 days. No new partners. No pelvic pain. Erythematous vaginal mucosa, white curd-like discharge. Plan: Treat for yeast infection with fluconazole 150 mg PO x1; educate

week8 case study

Common Health Conditions with Implications for Women Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems or symptoms. Such case studies enable nurse learners to apply concepts, lessons, and critical thinking to interviewing, screening, and diagnostic approaches, as well as to the development

Journal Response MODULE 4_DNP850

 describe the various roles of the DNP as a nurse educator.   Considering your readings from Module 4, describe the various roles of the DNP as a nurse educator. What education preparation and experience do you feel is vital for the role of the nurse educator? How do you think

Nursing MODULE 4 ASSIGNMENT_DNP850

 Compare and contrast the principles behind each of these doctoral degrees and how they lend to scholarly work. Doctoral Prepared Nursing Educators Write a 2000 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your

Lorem, ipsum

Assignment Developing a Healthcare Improvement Process Instructions Objective: The objective of this assignment is to provide you with an opportunity to examine your current practice setting or your desired future practice setting through the lens of healthcare improvement processes. You will outline a healthcare improvement process aimed at addressing a specific

nursing

To prepare: Review the studies and articles provided in the Learning Resources. Consider the strengths and limitations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Make sure you are clear on the difference between the two approaches. By Day 3 of Week 8 Post a brief summary of your informed opinion regarding the validity

nursing

To Prepare: Review resources about nursing profession issues in the United States. Look specifically at the NLN and ANA website resources. Review the global issues explored by the International Council of Nurses. Consider a nursing issue that may impact you.  Consider what might be done about this issue.  By Day

powerpoint slides

THIS IS A POWERPOINT ASSIGNMENT Screenshot of directions and rubric attached in files Instructions: In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following. Your title and references slides do not count toward the 5- to 10-slide limit.  Provide an overview of the article you selected. What population (individual, group,

DISC 5

   Review      the Resources and reflect on the various strategies presented throughout      the course that may be helpful in disseminating effective and widely cited      EBP. This       may include: unit-level or organizational-level presentations, poster       presentations, and podium presentations at organizational, local,       regional, state, and national levels, as well as publication in