Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Asssigment

Module 6: 
Clinical Work

Instructions

Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

Clinical Question:

In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis 
(P) is a CT scan 
(I) compared to MRI 
(C) more accurate diagnosing 
(O)TB caverns during patient assessment T?

P = Patient Population – TB Patients

I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

T: Time – Patient assessment

Based on the question above please complete the following:

1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

Use an Essay Format 

· You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

· Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

· Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

· When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

· Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment’s due date.

 

Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Be sure to review the 

academic expectations
 for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. 

·
 Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

– Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning

Development of Ideas

40 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

36 to >32.0 pts

Good

The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

32 to >28.0 pts

Fair

The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

28 to >24.0 pts

Poor

The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

24 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

Mastery

25 to >23.0 pts

Excellent

The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.

23 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.

20 to >18.0 pts

Fair

The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.

18 to >15.0 pts

Poor

The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.

15 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy

Quality of Resources

15 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.

14 to >12.0 pts

Good

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

12 to >11.0 pts

Fair

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

11 to >9.0 pts

Poor

The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.

9 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics, Grammar, and APA

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat

Organization and Presentation of Information

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

·
Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Can you help by tomorrow?

Instructions Policymaking Charting Assignment: Part I of the Course Project (135 points): In this first step of your Policymaking project, use the provided  MS Word Chart template  Download MS Word Chart template Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader (a minimum of one page in length): · Research and choose one

NUR 640

NUR 640 Weekly Discussion FYI Remember… I am a Black Haitian American Female live in USA, FL Submission Instructions: • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points. Week

Hello can this be helped with by tomorrow ?

Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: · Textbook: Chapter 3 · Lesson Instructions Click the tab below to review the description of the course project.  Course Project Overview Week 2 Assignment:  This week, you will choose one of the following topics for your project.  Step 1: Pick

Nursing Module 7 assignment

PowerPoint presentation with a realistic case study and include appropriate and pertinent clinical information that will be covering the following Subjective data Objective data:  Assessment: Plan:  Other: 

ethical issues related to wearable technologies

What are the ethical issues related to dexcom blood glucose monitoring Week 5 Assignment Part 2: Ethical Issues with Wearable Technologies Template Directions: Use the wearable technology selected in the Week 3 Part 1: Examining Wearable Technologies assignment. Use this template to complete the Part 2: Ethical Issues with Wearable

Bj week 5

Bj week 5 Enhancing Referral Follow-Through for Veterans in Outpatient Mental Health Care

Asssigment part 2 part one attached

Module 3:  Selecting a Topic and Designing a Clinical Question using PICOT Taxonomy Instructions:   Create an essay of a minimum of five pages explaining the PICOT format and what is the importance of following the PICOT format when formulating the clinical question? 1. What is the PICOT Format? 2. What

Mm week 4 gap analysis

Mm week 4 gap  1 Gap Analysis – Fall Risk Prevention and Assessment Nurse-Led. Michelle Murray Herzing University NU801 Dr. Stephanie Turner Jan 30, 2026 2 Gap Analysis – Fall Risk Prevention and Assessment Nurse-Led. Background: Older adults in adult day care settings experience falls, which is a severe patient

Healthcare laws

see file 1. Policy Application: Find a policy, set of guidelines, or government regulations and apply it to the organization’s work on the chosen topic: PREVENTING WORKPLACE VIOLANCE. 2. You may choose a policy you have access to from your organization. Other sources of policies include those published online from a

help with home work

Discussion 5: Topic: Influencing Healthcare Policy Nurs: 507 Why is it important that health professionals share a common understanding of safety standards and practice for all stakeholders? What are policy implications within an institution related to federal and state regulations? Format/Style/APA/ Citations (20%) 2-3 paragraph

Lorem, ipsum

U 700 Unit 5-KTA Part 1: Alternate Intervention Paper 1. You are going to construct an APA-formatted paper for the assignment. 2. Provide an APA-formatted title page. 3. Develop an introduction section that discusses the professional nurses’ role for the implementation of an improvement project. 4. Provide a review of

NUR 640

Reply from Eliset Campos Rivas Module 4 Discussion: Automatic Thoughts Completing automatic thought records is a common cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) homework assignment, but it can be particularly difficult for patients with depression. Depression is often described as being in the “darkest of dark” places, where even the simplest tasks

nursing

Purpose The student will review the current NCLEX-RN test plan and reflect on areas for improvement and strategies to support the student’s transition to practice. The student will assess clinical learning against the activity statements outlined in the test plan and determine next steps to explore new opportunities in future

Hello can this be helped with by tomorrow ?

The arguments against marijuana are just wrong and shouldn’t even be discussed.          I use it, and I’m just fine, so I don’t see how it could be harmful. I don’t see those people who are fighting to outlaw marijuana also out there fighting to outlaw alcohol.

Dh assessment 1 revise

Dh assessment 1 revise 2 Capella University Darren Holton January 30, 2026 Communication Styles and Professional Effectiveness Understanding Key Communication Styles Communication style influences how individuals convey ideas, handle disagreement, and interact with others in professional environments. In workplace communication, four commonly recognized styles are passive, aggressive, passive-aggressive, and assertive.

nonmaleficence

 In healthcare, the principle of nonmaleficence—”do no harm”—is foundational to ethical decision-making. However, many medical interventions carry inherent risks of harm, even when intended to benefit the patient. How should healthcare professionals balance the principle of nonmaleficence with the potential benefits of a treatment or procedure? Are there situations where