Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Asssigment

Module 6: 
Clinical Work

Instructions

Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

Clinical Question:

In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis 
(P) is a CT scan 
(I) compared to MRI 
(C) more accurate diagnosing 
(O)TB caverns during patient assessment T?

P = Patient Population – TB Patients

I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

T: Time – Patient assessment

Based on the question above please complete the following:

1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

Use an Essay Format 

· You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

· Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

· Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

· When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

· Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment’s due date.

 

Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Be sure to review the 

academic expectations
 for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. 

·
 Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

– Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning

Development of Ideas

40 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

36 to >32.0 pts

Good

The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

32 to >28.0 pts

Fair

The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

28 to >24.0 pts

Poor

The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

24 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

Mastery

25 to >23.0 pts

Excellent

The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.

23 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.

20 to >18.0 pts

Fair

The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.

18 to >15.0 pts

Poor

The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.

15 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy

Quality of Resources

15 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.

14 to >12.0 pts

Good

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

12 to >11.0 pts

Fair

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

11 to >9.0 pts

Poor

The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.

9 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics, Grammar, and APA

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat

Organization and Presentation of Information

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

·
Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Advance Epidemiology of Nursing

Module 2:  Government Databases Prepare a 500 words essay explaining how government clinical databases can help researchers study different diseases. · · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, with a font size of 12. · Pay attention to grammar rules

Advance Epidemiology of Nursing

Module 1:  Epidemiology Triangle Each student will prepare a paper focused on answering the following guidelines: · Choose a current emerging disease or reemerging disease prevalent in your community or the larger community of the nation or world. · Complete an epidemiology triangle diagram for the chosen disease and thoroughly

Peer response

  What are your initial thoughts after reviewing the AHRQ website? What are your roles and responsibilities related to healthcare literacy? What are some practices as you can use when providing patient care as you transition to the role of APRN? How can you use the website and resources for

Nursing debate assignment

  Debate Assignment: Is the Health Insurance System in the USA the Best? Debate Topic: “The U.S. health insurance system provides better access, cost efficiency, and quality of care compared to other countries.” Instructions for Your Initial Post: Choose a Position: Take a stance for the statement, arguing that the

The Disputed Election or Revolution of 1800

  Describe the historical setting surrounding the Election of 1800.  Assess what constitutional issue the election of 1800 results helped to reveal. What did Congress do to mitigate the issue?  Do you think it was necessary to pass the Twelfth Amendment? Why or why not?  Analyze why the Presidential Election

Population Health and Emerging Disease

  Create an infographic that effectively summarizes the key components of value-based care, particularly in the context of population health and emerging diseases.   The infographic should visually represent the following aspects: Use visuals such as charts, graphs, icons, and text to convey the information.  Definition and Principles of Value-Based Care: 

Anxiety and Panic disorder PPT

please see instructions Using the DSM 5 TR along with other sources please complete 3 separate PPTs for the following: 1. Generalized anxiety disorder 2. Panic disorder 3. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Instructions Must be done for each Diagnosis/ PPT You might also want to check the DSM-5-TR Clinical Cases text

EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY DESIGNS

find attached the instructions As introduced in the first few weeks of this course, investigators use various epidemiological study designs to study health problems and the effects of health interventions. You have examined several study designs, including descriptive designs (in Week 2) and analytic study designs that are observational (in

RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN EPIDEMIOLOGY

use the attached info for this work RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN EPIDEMIOLOGY Imagine that researchers are conducting a randomized controlled trial of a high-fiber supplement as a preventive measure in persons at increased risk of type 2 diabetes. People enrolled in the study are disease free at the time they agree

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

please read the attached information carefully to understand  week 4 Week 4 Case Study Prompt (Student version) A 67-year-old man presents with progressive shortness of breath over 8 months. He  reports: • Increasing dyspnea with exertion • Dry, persistent cough • Fatigue • Decreased exercise tolerance • Unintentional 10-pound weight

Agency Synopsis

Agency Synopsis The purpose of this assignment is so that you will be able to differentiate between the healthcare policy agencies’ impact on various patient populations. 1. Identify regulatory agencies that regulate health and the health care system in the US. 2. Create a table listing at least 5 regulatory

NUR 650

NUR650 Discussions Submission Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style Provide support for your work from at least 2 academic sources less than 5 years old. Wk1 Tom’s Parents are Fighting After studying Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources,

Preventative Care

Following the guidelines of the United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF), discuss and describe the screening recommendations for the following: Cervical cancer Breast cancer Osteoporosis Colorectal cancer Lung cancer Ovarian cancer Intimate partner violence (IPV).

patient care coordination 1

Develop infographic of a preliminary care coordination plan for a selected healthcare problem identified from the Sentinel-U Family Assessment v5. You determine which healthcare problem you will use FROM the simulation. Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural considerations for this healthcare problem. Listen to the patient simulation and select one of

Peer response

  What are your initial thoughts after reviewing the AHRQ website? What are your roles and responsibilities related to healthcare literacy? What are some practices as you can use when providing patient care as you transition to the role of APRN? How can you use the website and resources for

nursing

( Social Media for Nurses ) ( Objectives Locate, evaluate, and share nursing informatics websites, blogs, forums, or social media platforms Create social media workplace guidelines for nurses ) ( Overview Social networking (e.g., Facebook, LinkedIn); 2. Blogging ( and wikis ( 3. Microblogging (e.g., Twitter); 4. Social bookmarking or

casestudy 3

Emergency Nursing Management Activity 2050 Advanced Skills You are Nursing House Supervisor and work with the Nursing Management team at your local hospital. Your hospital is a level 2 Trauma Center and you have access to all resources that are generally acceptable for current health care practices in this environment.

NUR 650

NUR 650 SMART Goals For this assignment, you will work on setting goals for yourself using the SMART method. You will find an explanation of this method in the module that will guide you in your goal-setting process. You will list a minimum of five professional goals that you would like to accomplish during the clinical experience