Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Asssigment

Module 6: 
Clinical Work

Instructions

Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

Clinical Question:

In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis 
(P) is a CT scan 
(I) compared to MRI 
(C) more accurate diagnosing 
(O)TB caverns during patient assessment T?

P = Patient Population – TB Patients

I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

T: Time – Patient assessment

Based on the question above please complete the following:

1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

Use an Essay Format 

· You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

· Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

· Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

· When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

· Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment’s due date.

 

Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Be sure to review the 

academic expectations
 for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. 

·
 Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

– Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning

Development of Ideas

40 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

36 to >32.0 pts

Good

The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

32 to >28.0 pts

Fair

The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

28 to >24.0 pts

Poor

The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

24 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

Mastery

25 to >23.0 pts

Excellent

The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.

23 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.

20 to >18.0 pts

Fair

The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.

18 to >15.0 pts

Poor

The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.

15 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy

Quality of Resources

15 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.

14 to >12.0 pts

Good

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

12 to >11.0 pts

Fair

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

11 to >9.0 pts

Poor

The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.

9 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics, Grammar, and APA

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat

Organization and Presentation of Information

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

·
Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Help with Research

View the  Sample Chart and videos located in  Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources.  Create and complete a comparison chart for each of these research methods. Includes Qualitative Research: · design elements · purpose · focus · methods of data collection · methods of data analysis Submission Instructions: · The chart is

smart goal

complete the template  SMART Goals Directions: Complete the following activity, setting a goal for school for the semester. S.M.A.R.T. Questions… Specific Does your goal clearly and specifically state what you are trying to achieve? If your goal is particularly large or lofty, try breaking it down into smaller, specific SMART

Journal Response MODULE 2

IMPACT CHANGE Journal Question: Drawing upon your readings, research, and life experiences, consider the change processes you have been involved in. Provide an example of the change required and what the response from the team you were working with was, positive or negative. What barriers were encountered, and what would

Nursing Week 2_Assignment_DNP855

 Change requires altering or replacing existing knowledge, skills, attitudes, systems, policies, or   Organizational Change Essay Write a 1250-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows

Nursing

To Prepare Review the Learning Resources associated with the topics: AI, Machine Learning, Genomics, Precision Health, and Robotics. Consider the role of these technologies in your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Analyze the differences of these technologies as they may impact healthcare delivery and nursing practice. Reflect on the potential

Nurse Competency

DQ7 After reviewing “Professionalism” in the AONL Nurse Leader Core Competencies, answer the following prompts: • Select one sub-competency each from two categories (profession accountability, advocacy, etc.). • Describe a situation where you “met” or “did not meet” the sub-competency recommendations. • Align your selection with recommendations from Learning Resources

Transforming Nursing

Two pages each for the DQ with intro, conclusion and at least 3 recent references. DQ7 Post a response to your blog for the following:   · Choose one of the five topics: AI, Machine Learning, Genomics, Precision Health, or Robotics, how has this technology been applied in your practice or

Poster Presentation with Peers

Poster Presentation with Peers It is not enough to simply implement your project, but you must also share. This is an integral part of the implementation process, you must disseminate the information (or share the information with the relevant stakeholders).   For this Discussion, you will construct a Poster Presentation

Quality, Safety, and Fiscal Responsibility

Quality, Safety, and Fiscal Responsibility Implementation requires consideration of many different impacts and issues. Some of these considerations include the impact of quality and safety and fiscal management issues. How have you considered these impacts in your implementation? What have you done to address them? In this Discussion you will

Healthcare Check-up

Charlie is an 8-year-old boy who is having difficulty making friends and sitting still in class. When he goes to school, his teacher complains that he can’t sit still. He will sit for 3 minutes, but soon afterwards, he starts bouncing his legs, and then he begins tapping his pencil.

module 1:2

 Evidence-Innovation-Leadership Framework   Module 1 Assignment 1.2 Write a 1250-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions as described below. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas

Week 1dis

General Instructions This week, you will identify a quality or safety issue pertinent to your future advanced nursing practice role.    Include the following sections: Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. Identify ONE client-focused quality or safety issue that may be pertinent to your future advanced nursing practice

EBP, IS, AND QI

USE THE ATTACHED AS GUIDELINE image2.jpg image11.jpg image18.jpg image19.jpg image21.jpg image22.jpg image23.jpg image24.jpg

Journal Response MODULE 1

 Evidence-Innovation-Leadership Framework   Drawing on what you have learned from your readings, research, and life experiences, how would you use the Evidence-Innovation-Leadership Framework to identify significant challenges facing healthcare organizations, and how can healthcare managers, leaders, or directors use new knowledge to build upon and navigate within, to drive evidence-based practice,

Nursing Module 1 Assignment 1.2

 the future to support innovative ways of care, practice, and leadership  12/31/25, 9:47 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP855 Sect1 Organizational Leadership and Systems-Based Practice – Aspen University Classroom 12/31/25, 9:47 AM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 – DNP855 Sect1 Organizational Leadership and Systems-Based

wk6

Negotiating the Nurse Practitioner Employment Contract If you could work at the practice of your dreams, what would that look like? How would you negotiate that dream job contract? Graduating from nurse practitioner school is an exciting time of accomplishment. However, it’s also time to turn dreams into reality and

Nursing

DeSigning a Nursing Informatics Project for Your Organization