Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Asssigment

Module 6: 
Clinical Work

Instructions

Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

Clinical Question:

In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis 
(P) is a CT scan 
(I) compared to MRI 
(C) more accurate diagnosing 
(O)TB caverns during patient assessment T?

P = Patient Population – TB Patients

I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

T: Time – Patient assessment

Based on the question above please complete the following:

1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

Use an Essay Format 

· You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

· Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

· Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

· When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

· Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment’s due date.

 

Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Be sure to review the 

academic expectations
 for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. 

·
 Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

– Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning

Development of Ideas

40 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

36 to >32.0 pts

Good

The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

32 to >28.0 pts

Fair

The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

28 to >24.0 pts

Poor

The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

24 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

Mastery

25 to >23.0 pts

Excellent

The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.

23 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.

20 to >18.0 pts

Fair

The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.

18 to >15.0 pts

Poor

The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.

15 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy

Quality of Resources

15 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.

14 to >12.0 pts

Good

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

12 to >11.0 pts

Fair

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

11 to >9.0 pts

Poor

The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.

9 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics, Grammar, and APA

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat

Organization and Presentation of Information

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

·
Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Sam, Nurse

Objective: The objective of this assignment is to provide you with an opportunity to examine your current practice setting or your desired future practice setting through the lens of healthcare improvement processes. You will outline a healthcare improvement process aimed at addressing a specific issue or area for enhancement within a

HM4004

APL STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES Leadership Strategies in Healthcare

HM400work

HM4004: Leadership Strategies : Apply leadership strategies to management scenarios. Written Response Submission Form Your Name: First and last Your E-Mail Address: Your e-mail here Instructions Write your responses where it reads “Enter your response here.” Write as much as needed to satisfy the requirements indicated. Each item contains the

Nursing iPA

complete doc attavhed Student: Date: Clinical Instructor: Name (initials only): Unit: Current Legal Status (Vol., 5150, 5250, 30 day, T-Con, LPS-Conservatorship): Multiaxial Diagnostic System: Axis I (Clinical Disorder): Axis II (Personality Disorder / Mental Retardation): Axis III (General Medical Conditions): Axis IV (Psychosocial and Environmental Problems): Axis V (Global Assessment

Question 8

Please complete this assignment: elaborate on each part, especially the differential diagnoses. Use a current clinical guideline for the treatment plan. 

4k35 safety n quality

Assessment 2 Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan For this assessment, you can use a supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be a scholarly paper focusing on a quality or safety issue in a healthcare setting of your choice as well as a safety improvement

NUR 514 Clinical Soap note 3

Submission Instructions: Your SOAP note should be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspellings. You must use the template provided. Turnitin will recognize the template and not score against it.

Ion Channels and G Proteins

Discussion on  Ion Channels and G Proteins Discussion: Ion Channels and G Proteins Post a response answering the following: · Explain the difference between ion channels and G proteins as they relate to signal transduction and targets of medications. · How would you answer the following patient question: · My grandmother

Care plan

Introduction: The first step in any effective project is planning. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to strengthen your understanding of how to plan and negotiate the coordination of care for a particular health care problem. Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural considerations for this health care problem. Identify and

PHI

Scenario: In this assessment, imagine you are a nurse in one of the health care settings described in the following resource: · Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information (Attached Below) Before your shift begins, you scroll through Facebook and notice that a coworker has posted a photo of herself and

health and wellness

NR222 Health and Wellness Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Project Guidelines TOPIC: The impact of universal health coverage on public health outcomes’ 1. Discuss the professional nurse’s role in health promotion activities. 3. Discuss health promotion, illness prevention, health maintenance, health restoration, and rehabilitation in relation to the nurse’s role

patient care

NURS 112 Clinical Week 3 Assignment 10 Points Include APA formatted in-text citations and reference page. References must be published in the last 5 yrs. Medical dictionaries and textbooks are excellent references. Websites must be .gov, .org, and .edu. NO .com websites. NO patient education websites (Mayo, Cleavland clinic). Students

Asssigment

Module 6:  Descriptive and Inferential Statistics  Instructions Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals. Once all the articles considered important to answer the clinical question

Asssigment

Follow the feedback  Final Capstone Project Part I, II, III Exercise Instructions CAPSTONE: PART I, II, III    Part 1 Attempt feedback You are on the right track. For the final proposal, discuss nursing leadership skills and stakeholders. What specifically will the nurses teach? Part 2 Attempt feedback Focus on

SOAP Note

Patient is coming in for pap smear    SOAP Note 3 A SOAP note is a method of documentation employed by healthcare providers to record and communicate patient information in a clear, structured, and in an organized manner. This assignment will provide students with the necessary tools to document patient

case study 2

Kylie, a 24-year-old female patient, comes to your office for a refill of her allergy medication. Before going into the room, you note that her Patient Health Questionnaire – Depression (PHQ-9) score is 20, and that she is not currently on any medication for depression. When you enter the room,