Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Asssigment

Module 6: 
Clinical Work

Instructions

Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

Clinical Question:

In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis 
(P) is a CT scan 
(I) compared to MRI 
(C) more accurate diagnosing 
(O)TB caverns during patient assessment T?

P = Patient Population – TB Patients

I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

T: Time – Patient assessment

Based on the question above please complete the following:

1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

Use an Essay Format 

· You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

· Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

· Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

· When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

· Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment’s due date.

 

Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Be sure to review the 

academic expectations
 for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. 

·
 Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

– Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning

Development of Ideas

40 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

36 to >32.0 pts

Good

The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

32 to >28.0 pts

Fair

The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

28 to >24.0 pts

Poor

The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.

24 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

Mastery

25 to >23.0 pts

Excellent

The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.

23 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.

20 to >18.0 pts

Fair

The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.

18 to >15.0 pts

Poor

The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.

15 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy

Quality of Resources

15 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.

14 to >12.0 pts

Good

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

12 to >11.0 pts

Fair

Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.

11 to >9.0 pts

Poor

The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.

9 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics, Grammar, and APA

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat

Organization and Presentation of Information

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

·
Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

NU 675

HOMEWORK Research intellectual spectrum disorders or autism and briefly discuss resources in your community to assist children with autism or intellectual disabilities and their families. Your journal entry should be at least 250 words in length. You must use at least two outside sources for this journal. Be sure to

DNP

Lead and Manage in the Twenty-First Century Instructions: Write an essay about how to Lead and manage in the Twenty-first Century. Consider all the points explained when describing the topic in the module content. Contribute a minimum of three pages. It should include at least three academic sources, formatted and

DNP

  Leadership When you complete your DNP program, you will be the leader of your group of work. In your post, you may tell the type (or types) of leader you consider yourself with samples. Which type of leader best describes yourself? Why? Remember to review the  academic expectations for your

Nursing Cultural Assessment: 5 Assignments

Title Introduction Capture reader’s interest Build case through logic Topic sentence/thesis statement First main point (strongest) A. Support Example Example B. Support 1. Example Example C. Support 1. Example Example Second main point (second strongest) A. Support 1. Example Example B. Support 1. Example Example C. Support 1. Example Example

Biostadistic

Module 2:  Assignment 3 From the questionnaire  “Prevaccination Checklist for COVID-19 Vaccines”  Download “Prevaccination Checklist for COVID-19 Vaccines”(Module 2), Table 1, select the most appropriate method to display the frequency of patients presenting with the four questions shown in the table.  With the same information (COVID-19), prepare a bar graph

Biostadistic

Module 2:  Assignment 2 From the following chart, prepare 2 scatter plots, identifying the relationship between age and height, and age and weight. Using a bar graph for age frequency. AGE  HIGH WEIGHT 53 1.75 140 56 1.60 70 62 1.84 86 36 1.65 80 39 1.69 65 26 1.64

DNP

Module 2:  Assignment 1 Directions: Using the information from the two studies referenced in this week’s lecture: 1. Identify the variables being measured in each survey and explain which measure of central tendency would be used to evaluate them. 2. Write the results for study I and extrapolate to the

final project transition to nursing

Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to give you the opportunity to reflect on what inspiration you will carry you through the program, what lessons you will take away from the course, and the ability to write a letter to your future self about where you aspire to be

Nursing NUR 514 Assignment #1

United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF) Following the guidelines of the United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF), discuss and describe the screening recommendations for the following: · Cervical cancer · Breast cancer · Osteoporosis · Colorectal cancer · Lung cancer · Ovarian cancer · Intimate partner violence (IPV). Submission Instructions:

NUR514 Discussion #1

After studying  Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources , discuss the following: · Name and discuss four prevention essential health benefits for women that must be covered under the Affordable Care Act. · For women in the age range of early adulthood describe: · The psychosocial development. · As a

DNP Project Documents

Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare Professionals Individual Evidence Summary Tool Appendix G Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Individual Evidence Summary Tool (Appendix G) EBP Question: Reviewer name(s) Article number Author, date, and title Type of evidence Population, size, and setting Intervention Findings that help answer the

nur514CL discussion 1

please write discussion post based on a 24 year old who is 8 weeks pregnant image1.png image2.png

Nursing week 5_Assignment_DNP850

   Consider health promotion, disease prevention, and access to care. Health promotion and disease prevention programs focus on keeping people or the population healthy. With healthcare promotion and prevention programs, the DNP can engage and empower people to make changes to reduce the risk of developing chronic diseases or other

Journal Response MODULE 5_DNP850

 Considering the topics in public health nursing,   Journal Response MODULE 5_DNP850 Considering the topics in public health nursing, what healthcare issue related to your DNP project, can be addressed from a population health standpoint (i.e., tobacco use or substance abuse)? Discuss the continuum of care and continuity of care

Question

Journal Assignment: If you’re a member of the Prosecution, you will write 300 words or more for your journal, laying out the best evidence to convict William Bradfield. If you are Defense, write 300 more words laying out the best evidence to find him innocent. If you are on team

Nursing Assignment

Review the Learning Resources below focusing on the smallpox and polio epidemics and how health organizations applied principles of epidemiology to eradicate (or in the case of polio, nearly eradicate) these diseases. · Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021).  Epidemiology for public health practice  (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.