Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

c4-asss4

Assessment 4

Presenting Your PICO(T) Process Findings to Your Professional Peers



Instructions



Resources


Activity


Attempt 1
available


Attempt 2
Attempt 3

InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3

Create a 5–10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you propose an evidence-based plan to improve the outcomes for your diagnosis.

Collapse All

Introduction

As part of the critical role that EBP plays in nursing, professional nurses share their findings with their peers and others. A big part of research is sharing knowledge so that others can also learn. Professional nurses attend seminars and read journals specific to their practice, and they also publish and present what they have learned. This assessment prepares you to share your knowledge with others.

Instructions

For this assessment, you are a presenter! You will create a 5–10 minute video using Kaltura or similar software. In the video and written narrative:

· Review your findings from Assessment 3.

· Create a poster presentation based on your findings from Assessment 3 (see the samples in the 

Assessment 4: Poster Template Examples
 
reading list). Include:

· An explanation of the diagnosis.

· The research question you developed using PICO(T).

· A summary of your sources.

· The answer to your PICO(T) question based on your analysis of evidence.

· Describe the key steps of care you are recommending based on your evidence.

· Give a professional presentation to your peers, showing your poster with your voice narration using Kaltura or similar software.

· Include your written narrative/script of the presentation in a Word document. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative.

Refer to 

Using Kaltura
 Campus resource as needed to record and upload your video.

Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact 

[email protected]
 to request accommodations. If, for some reason, you are unable to record a video, please contact your faculty as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment.

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

·
Length of video: 5–10 minutes.

·
References: Cite at least three professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.

·
APA reference page: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. Be sure to format the reference page according to current APA style.

·
Video and narrative: You must submit a written narrative of all of your video content. Add the link to your video at the end of your written narrative.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

· Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

· Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications.

· Summarize the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

· Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.

· Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

· Explain the answer to a PICO(T) question based on an analysis of the evidence.

· Describe key steps of care based on the evidence.

· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

· Organize content in a poster presentation and written narrative so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

· Communicate effectively in a professional audiovisual presentation with clear light and sound.

· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

Scoring Guide

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

Collapse All

Criterion 1

Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications.

Distinguished

Explains a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications, providing examples.

Proficient

Explains a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications.

Basic

Explains a diagnosis, but may not fully cover outcomes, risks, and complications in the explanation.

Non Performance

Does not explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications.

Criterion 2

Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

Distinguished

Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis, and identifies how the question meets each of the criteria of the PICO(T) process.

Proficient

Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

Basic

Describes a research question developed using the PICO(T) process, though the question may not be specific enough to address all the criteria of the PICO(T) process.

Non Performance

Does not describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.

Criterion 3

Summarize the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

Distinguished

Summarizes the content of more than three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

Proficient

Summarizes the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

Basic

Summarizes the content of at least three sources of evidence, though not the credibility and relevance.

Non Performance

Does not summarize the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.

Criterion 4

Explain the answer to a PICO(T) question based on an analysis of the evidence.

Distinguished

Explains the answer to a PICO(T) question based on an analysis of the evidence, identifying assumptions on which the analysis is based.

Proficient

Explains the answer to a PICO(T) question based on an analysis of the evidence.

Basic

Explains the answer to a PICO(T) question, though not based on the evidence.

Non Performance

Does not explain the answer to a PICO(T) question based on an analysis of the evidence.

Criterion 5

Describe key steps of care based on the evidence.

Distinguished

Describes key steps of care based on the evidence, and explains why these are the most appropriate steps.

Proficient

Describes key steps of care based on the evidence.

Basic

Describes key steps of care, though it’s unclear how they relate to the evidence.

Non Performance

Does not describe key steps of care based on the evidence.

Criterion 6

Organize content in a poster presentation and written narrative so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Distinguished

Organizes content in a poster presentation and written narrative with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.

Proficient

Organizes content in a poster presentation and written narrative so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Basic

Organizes content in a poster presentation and written narrative with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Non Performance

Does not organize content in a poster presentation and written narrative so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains many errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Criterion 7

Communicate effectively in a professional audiovisual presentation with clear light and sound.

Distinguished

Communicates effectively in a professional audiovisual presentation with clear light and sound. Content delivery is focused, smooth, and well-rehearsed. Video presentation is between 5 and 10 minutes.

Proficient

Communicates effectively in a professional audiovisual presentation with clear light and sound.

Basic

Video is difficult to hear and see, or presentation isn’t professional.

Non Performance

Does not communicate effectively in a professional audiovisual presentation with clear light and sound.

Criterion 8

Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

Distinguished

Exhibits adherence to most aspects of APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Correctly uses quotes and paraphrasing.

Proficient

Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting adherence to most aspects of APA format.

Basic

Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings, and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeable from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes, and/or paraphrasing.

Non Performance

Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.


WalkMe


Chat

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Peer response

  The development of advanced practice nursing roles globally shows how important quality and safety competencies are in guiding practice. When looking at the variability in education, regulation, and scope of practice across countries, it becomes clear that standardized competencies are essential to ensure safe and consistent care (Wheeler et

nursing

see file In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect the need for the new policy. Second, create a detailed, annotated training agenda for the pilot

nursing

see file Propose an organizational policy and practice guidelines that you believe will lead to an improvement in quality and performance associated with the benchmark underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1. Be precise, professional, and persuasive in demonstrating the merit of your proposed actions. The policy proposal requirements

case study

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

casestudy

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

PLEASE READ ALL ATTACHED Week 2 Case Study Prompt  A 28-year-old African American woman presents with 4 months of worsening fatigue, joint  pain, and intermittent low-grade fevers. She reports: • Symmetrical pain and stiffness in hands and wrists (morning stiffness ~1 hour) • Photosensitivity • Facial rash that worsens with

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF SECONDARY DATA SOURCES

find attached n use the rubrics In this information age, where data are readily accessible and there is both a great demand for accelerated research projects and strict limitations on research funding, using existing data makes sense. Data used in this way are called secondary data; they come in many

Evaluation and Management

Evaluation and Management (E/M) Insurance coding and billing is complex, but it boils down to how to accurately apply a code, or CPT (current procedural terminology), to the service that you provided. The payer then reimburses the service at a certain rate. As a provider, you will have to understand

EBP

Module 7:  Research Project As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients’ need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of

Home work

Determine the linear correlation and regression equation between two variables to make predictions for the dependent variable. Project Deliverable tie to Competency  In this assignment, you will demonstrate your understanding of how relationships between two variables can be analyzed and used to make informed predictions. By interpreting scatter plots, conducting

DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY: DATA SOURCES AND DATA COLLECTION

Diabetes is a significant public health challenge in the United States, with Table 3.2 identifying Hemoglobin A1C levels, incidence of skin infections, obesity, peripheral neuropathy, and renal insufficiency as key measurable outcomes (Curley, 2024). The population selected for this discussion is Hispanic/Latino adults in the United States, a group disproportionately

Community Health

Please see attached. Create a slide presentation of the health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1. Complete the following: · Prepare a 12–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with detailed speaker notes that reflects your presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker

Scholarship For Nursing practice

It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. . All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format.

Week 1 clinic skills

Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the procedures identified on the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form.   Based on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.    Based on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop three to four (3–4) measurable goals and objectives for this practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form.   

The future of Nursing

It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. All posts should be supported by a minimum

Psychopharmacology Discussion Week 1 reply

 Need a response Epigenetics and Gene Expression Epigenetics serves as the regulatory switch for gene expression by modifying chromatin structure without altering the underlying DNA sequence. This system determines how tightly DNA is wound around proteins called histones. When chemical tags like methyl groups are added (methylation), the chromatin condenses,

Psychopharmacology Discussion Week 1 reply TG

Need a response  Main Post As I have been working through my advanced healthcare degree and taking classes such as advanced pharmacology and now psychopharmacology, I have started to see how signal transduction really brings the “why” behind medications to life, especially when I think about mental health treatments. Ion