Assessment 4
Improvement Plan Tool Kit
Instructions
Resources
Activity
Attempt 1
available
Attempt 2
Attempt 3
InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3
For this assessment, you will develop a Word document or an online resource repository of at least 12 annotated professional or scholarly resources that you consider critical for the audience of your safety improvement plan to understand or implement to ensure the success of the plan.
Collapse All
Introduction
Communication in the healthcare environment consists of an information-sharing experience whether through oral or written messages (Chard & Makary, 2015). As healthcare organizations and nurses strive to create a culture of safety and quality care, the importance of interprofessional collaboration, the development of tool kits, and the use of wikis become more relevant and vital. In addition to the dissemination of information and evidence-based findings and the development of tool kits, continuous support for and availability of such resources are critical. Among the most popular methods to promote ongoing dialogue and information sharing are blogs, wikis, websites, and social media. Nurses know how to support people in time of need or crisis and how to support one another in the workplace; wikis in particular enable nurses to continue that support beyond the work environment. Here they can be free to share their unique perspectives, educate others, and promote healthcare wellness at local and global levels (Kaminski, 2016).
You are encouraged to complete the Determining the Relevance and Usefulness of Resources activity prior to developing the repository. This activity will help you determine which resources or research will be most relevant to address a particular need. This may be useful as you consider how to explain the purpose and relevance of the resources you are assembling for your tool kit. The activity is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates course engagement.
References
Chard, R., & Makary, M. A. (2015). Transfer-of-care communication: Nursing best practices.
AORN Journal, 102(4), 329–342.
Kaminski, J. (2016). Why all nurses can/should be authors.
Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 11(4), 1–7.
Overview
Nurses are often asked to implement processes, concepts, or practices—sometimes with little preparatory communication or education. One way to encourage sustainability of quality and process improvements is to assemble an accessible, user-friendly tool kit for knowledge and process documentation. Creating a resource repository or tool kit is also an excellent way to follow up an education or in-service session, as it can help to reinforce attendees’ new knowledge as well as the understanding of its value. By practicing creating a simple online tool kit, you can develop valuable technology skills to improve your competence and efficacy. This technology is easy to use and resources are available to guide you.
For this assessment, build on the work done in your first three assessments and create an online tool kit or resource repository that will help the audience of your in-service understand the research behind your safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue and put the plan into action.
Preparation
Google Sites is recommended for this assessment; the tools are free to use and should offer you a blend of flexibility and simplicity as you create your online tool kit. Please note that this requires a Google account; use your Gmail or Google Docs login, or create an account following the directions under the “Create Account” menu. Visit
Wiki Resources
for help.
Instructions
Using Google Sites, assemble an online resource tool kit containing at least 12 annotated resources that you consider critical to the success of your safety improvement initiative. These resources should enable nurses and others to implement and maintain the safety improvement you have developed.
It is recommended that you focus on the three or four most critical categories or themes with respect to your safety improvement initiative. For example, if your initiative concerns improving workplace safety for practitioners, you might choose broad themes such as general organizational safety and quality best practices; environmental safety and quality risks; individual strategies to improve personal and team safety; and process best practices for reporting and improving environmental safety issues.
Following the recommended scheme, you would collect at least three resources on average for each of the four categories. ;Each resource listing should include the following:
· An APA-formatted citation of the resource with a working link.
· A description of the information, skills, or tools provided by the resource.
· A brief explanation of how the resource can help nurses better understand or implement the safety improvement initiative.
· A description of how nurses can use this resource and when its use may be appropriate.
Remember that you must make your site public so that your faculty can access it. Check out the Google Sites resources in the Wiki Resources above for more information.
Here is an example entry:
· Ko, S., Hsieh, M., & Huang, R. (2023). Human error analysis and modeling of medication-related adverse events in Taiwan using the human factors analysis and classification system regression.
Healthcare, 11(14), 2063.
· Nurses have a crucial responsibility in preventing medication errors. They should follow the “five rights of medication” to reduce the risk of such errors. These include the “right patient,” “right medication,” “right time,” “right dose,” and “right documentation.” By understanding these rights, nurses can manage medication administration effectively and ensure patient safety.
Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
· Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative.
· Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.
· Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk.
· Present reasons and relevant situations for use of resource tool kit by its target audience.
· Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.
Example Assessment: You may use the following example to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but
keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1. Note that you do not have to submit your bibliography in addition to the Google Site; the example bibliography is merely for your reference.
·
Assessment 4 Example [PDF]
.
To submit your online tool kit assessment, paste the link to your Google Site in the assessment submission box.
Example Google Site: You may use the example Google Site found in
Assessment 4: Improved Heparin Infusion Safety
to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the rubric would look like for this assessment but
keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1.
Note: If you experience technical or other challenges in completing this assessment, please contact your faculty member.
Additional Requirements
·
Number of resources: Your tool kit must include at least 12 professional or academically relevant resources that support the continued learning and implementation of knowledge and processes related to a safety improvement initiative. See the
BSN Nursing Program Library Guide
as needed.
·
APA format: Use proper APA formatting for in-text citations and each annotated resource. See the
APA Module
.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
· Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.
· Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.
· Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.
· Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.
· Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.
· Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.
· Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.
· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.
· Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.
Scoring Guide
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
Collapse All
Criterion 1
Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.
Distinguished
Identifies necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue. Organizes resources logically for ease of use.
Proficient
Identifies necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue.
Basic
Identifies resources, but the necessity or support for the safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue is unclear.
Non Performance
Does not identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue.
Criterion 2
Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.
Distinguished
Analyzes the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements, providing specific examples of utility within the context of a specific healthcare setting.
Proficient
Analyzes the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.
Basic
Summarizes but does not analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.
Non Performance
Does not analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements.
Criterion 3
Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.
Distinguished
Analyzes the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality, identifying the most valuable resources.
Proficient
Analyzes the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.
Basic
Describes resources that may not be relevant to patient safety risk or quality improvement.
Non Performance
Does not analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality.
Criterion 4
Present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.
Distinguished
Uses persuasive, engaging language to present compelling reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.
Proficient
Presents reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.
Basic
Presents reasons and situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience that are not compelling or relevant.
Non Performance
Does not present reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit use by its target audience.
Criterion 5
Communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.
Distinguished
Communicates online resource tool kit using Google Sites in a clear and organized structure and professional manner that applies nearly flawless, current APA style and formatting throughout.
Proficient
Communicates resource tool kit in a Word doc or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that partially follows APA style and formatting.
Basic
Communicates online resource kit using a Word Doc or Google Sites in an unclear and disorganized structure and unprofessional manner that minimally follows APA style and formatting.
Non Performance
Does not communicate resource tool kit in a Word document or Google Sites in a clear, logically structured, or professional manner or partially follow APA style and formatting.
