Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Case study advance health assessment

See attached doc

Case study

For your assignment you will work on this case: you will take on the role of an APRN who is building a health history for this patient. You will consider how social determinants of health and specific cultural considerations will influence your interview and communication techniques as you work in partnership with the patient to gather data for an accurate health history.  

Include the following: 

· Explain the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned. Be specific. 

· Consider how you would build a health history for the patient. What questions would you ask? How might you target your questions based on the patient’s social determinants of health? How would you frame the questions to be sensitive to the patient’s background, lifestyle, and culture? 

· Identify any potential health-related risks, based on the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting, which should be taken into consideration. 

· What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with this patient? 

· Explain the issues that you would need to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient, and why.  

· Describe the communication techniques you would use with this patient. Include strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient. Be specific and explain why you would use these techniques. 

· Summarize the health history interview you would conduct with this patient. Provide at least 
five (5) targeted questions you would ask the patient to build their health history and to assess their health risks. Explain your reasoning for each question and how you frame each for this specific patient. 

· Identify
one risk assessment instrument, and then justify why it would be applicable to your assigned patient. Be specific. 

46 y/o African American male who recently was seen in the Emergency Department for
alcoholic withdrawal seizures and released. Referred to clinic for follow up on his hypertension
history. He ran out of the Norvasc prescription given by the Emergency Department. He is living
in a homeless shelter now. He states not drinking anymore but needs to smoke cigarettes to calm down and function. 

Week 2_Assignment 1_Rubric

NURS_6512_Week 2_Assignment 1_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned. Be specific.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is inaccurate and/or missing explanations of the socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the issues that you would need to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient, and why.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are clear, accurate, and detailed.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are accurate.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are vague and/or inaccurate.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is inaccurate and/or missing explanations of the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are inaccurate or missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the communication techniques you would use with this patient. Include strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient. Be specific and explain why you would use these techniques.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail communication techniques to use with the patient, including specific strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and a detailed explanation of why to use these techniques.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies and describes communication techniques to use with the patient, including specific strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and an explanation of why to use these techniques.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy identifies and describes communication techniques to use with the patient, including strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and a vague explanation of why to use these techniques.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response identifies inaccurately and/or is missing descriptions of communication techniques to use with the patient, including inaccurate or missing strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and an inadequate or missing explanation of why to use these techniques.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize the health history interview you would conduct with this patient. Provide at least five (5) targeted questions you would ask the patient to build their health history and to assess their health risks. Explain your reasoning for each question and how you frame each for this specific patient.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly, accurately, and in detail summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including at least five targeted questions to ask to build the health history and assess health risks, with detailed explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response accurately summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including five targeted questions to ask to build the health history and assess health risks, with explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

19 to >16.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including five questions to ask that are vague or lacking specificity to build the health history and assess health risks, with vague explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

16 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inadequately summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including fewer than five questions that are inadequate for building the health history and assessing health risks, with inadequate or missing explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and then justify why it would be applicable to your assigned patient. Be specific.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly and accurately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides detailed and specific justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides specific justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides vague justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inadequately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides inadequate or missing justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: Paragraph Development and Organization — Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused and neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing Standards — Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: APA The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Pt case study

pt case study help  Week 2 Case Study Assignment Building a Health History: Communicating Effectively to Gather Appropriate Health-Related Information 👩‍⚕️ Patient Scenario You have been assigned the case of  S.J., a 28-year-old Lebanese Muslim female who is in her first year of graduate school and living in university housing.

PPT

Assigment The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book,  The Landmarks of Tomorrow  (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar? Nurses are

Mental Health PTSD

Mental Illness Creative Paper Assignment “A Day Living With My Mental Illness” Each student will write a one-page paper in first person as if you are living with your assigned mental illness. Be creative but realistic. The goal is to demonstrate understanding of what daily life might feel like for

discussion question

discussion question  Topic: healthcare providers shortages 1. Access the Policy Map Blog and view the blog listings (There are many pages of entries). 2. Briefly summarize (2-3 sentences) policy map blog and address the socio-political, ethical, and or nursing workforce implications of the topic. 3. APA format for references

Peer response

  The development of advanced practice nursing roles globally shows how important quality and safety competencies are in guiding practice. When looking at the variability in education, regulation, and scope of practice across countries, it becomes clear that standardized competencies are essential to ensure safe and consistent care (Wheeler et

nursing

see file In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect the need for the new policy. Second, create a detailed, annotated training agenda for the pilot

nursing

see file Propose an organizational policy and practice guidelines that you believe will lead to an improvement in quality and performance associated with the benchmark underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1. Be precise, professional, and persuasive in demonstrating the merit of your proposed actions. The policy proposal requirements

case study

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

casestudy

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

PLEASE READ ALL ATTACHED Week 2 Case Study Prompt  A 28-year-old African American woman presents with 4 months of worsening fatigue, joint  pain, and intermittent low-grade fevers. She reports: • Symmetrical pain and stiffness in hands and wrists (morning stiffness ~1 hour) • Photosensitivity • Facial rash that worsens with

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF SECONDARY DATA SOURCES

find attached n use the rubrics In this information age, where data are readily accessible and there is both a great demand for accelerated research projects and strict limitations on research funding, using existing data makes sense. Data used in this way are called secondary data; they come in many

Evaluation and Management

Evaluation and Management (E/M) Insurance coding and billing is complex, but it boils down to how to accurately apply a code, or CPT (current procedural terminology), to the service that you provided. The payer then reimburses the service at a certain rate. As a provider, you will have to understand

EBP

Module 7:  Research Project As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients’ need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of

Home work

Determine the linear correlation and regression equation between two variables to make predictions for the dependent variable. Project Deliverable tie to Competency  In this assignment, you will demonstrate your understanding of how relationships between two variables can be analyzed and used to make informed predictions. By interpreting scatter plots, conducting

DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY: DATA SOURCES AND DATA COLLECTION

Diabetes is a significant public health challenge in the United States, with Table 3.2 identifying Hemoglobin A1C levels, incidence of skin infections, obesity, peripheral neuropathy, and renal insufficiency as key measurable outcomes (Curley, 2024). The population selected for this discussion is Hispanic/Latino adults in the United States, a group disproportionately

Community Health

Please see attached. Create a slide presentation of the health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1. Complete the following: · Prepare a 12–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with detailed speaker notes that reflects your presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker

Scholarship For Nursing practice

It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. . All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format.