Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Case study advance health assessment

See attached doc

Case study

For your assignment you will work on this case: you will take on the role of an APRN who is building a health history for this patient. You will consider how social determinants of health and specific cultural considerations will influence your interview and communication techniques as you work in partnership with the patient to gather data for an accurate health history.  

Include the following: 

· Explain the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned. Be specific. 

· Consider how you would build a health history for the patient. What questions would you ask? How might you target your questions based on the patient’s social determinants of health? How would you frame the questions to be sensitive to the patient’s background, lifestyle, and culture? 

· Identify any potential health-related risks, based on the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting, which should be taken into consideration. 

· What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with this patient? 

· Explain the issues that you would need to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient, and why.  

· Describe the communication techniques you would use with this patient. Include strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient. Be specific and explain why you would use these techniques. 

· Summarize the health history interview you would conduct with this patient. Provide at least 
five (5) targeted questions you would ask the patient to build their health history and to assess their health risks. Explain your reasoning for each question and how you frame each for this specific patient. 

· Identify
one risk assessment instrument, and then justify why it would be applicable to your assigned patient. Be specific. 

46 y/o African American male who recently was seen in the Emergency Department for
alcoholic withdrawal seizures and released. Referred to clinic for follow up on his hypertension
history. He ran out of the Norvasc prescription given by the Emergency Department. He is living
in a homeless shelter now. He states not drinking anymore but needs to smoke cigarettes to calm down and function. 

Week 2_Assignment 1_Rubric

NURS_6512_Week 2_Assignment 1_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned. Be specific.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is inaccurate and/or missing explanations of the socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the issues that you would need to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient, and why.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are clear, accurate, and detailed.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are accurate.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are vague and/or inaccurate.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is inaccurate and/or missing explanations of the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are inaccurate or missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the communication techniques you would use with this patient. Include strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient. Be specific and explain why you would use these techniques.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail communication techniques to use with the patient, including specific strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and a detailed explanation of why to use these techniques.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies and describes communication techniques to use with the patient, including specific strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and an explanation of why to use these techniques.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy identifies and describes communication techniques to use with the patient, including strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and a vague explanation of why to use these techniques.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response identifies inaccurately and/or is missing descriptions of communication techniques to use with the patient, including inaccurate or missing strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and an inadequate or missing explanation of why to use these techniques.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize the health history interview you would conduct with this patient. Provide at least five (5) targeted questions you would ask the patient to build their health history and to assess their health risks. Explain your reasoning for each question and how you frame each for this specific patient.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly, accurately, and in detail summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including at least five targeted questions to ask to build the health history and assess health risks, with detailed explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response accurately summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including five targeted questions to ask to build the health history and assess health risks, with explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

19 to >16.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including five questions to ask that are vague or lacking specificity to build the health history and assess health risks, with vague explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

16 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inadequately summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including fewer than five questions that are inadequate for building the health history and assessing health risks, with inadequate or missing explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and then justify why it would be applicable to your assigned patient. Be specific.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly and accurately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides detailed and specific justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides specific justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides vague justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inadequately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides inadequate or missing justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: Paragraph Development and Organization — Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused and neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing Standards — Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: APA The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

nur521

I need assistance with a question  Realistic Treatment Plan For this assignment, you will develop a realistic clinical case presentation. Use PowerPoint to create the slides for your presentation.  Do not use the notes section for rubric information, as it will not be graded; all information must be included in

Qualitative Journal

Qualitative Journal Club: Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the various components of a qualitative research study and methodology. Instructions: For this discussion, please complete the following: 1. Complete the Qualitative Journal Club Template in a Word document 1. At the top of the template provide an APA

HEALTH ASSESSMENT

   Reflection questions 1. The patient was newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. What social determinants of health (SDOH) should the nurse assess for that could impact the patient’s ability for diabetes self-management? 2. What are some environmental and/or individual factors that could impact the patient’s ability for diabetes self-management? 

Week 6

please see attached    Assignment: Research an article on Crisis or Disasters, summarize the article and create a care plan for a person in Crisis in the discussion post.  Article:Impact of  Crisis  Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness and/or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review  • 2024 Introduction: 

Compp

Using the  Windshield Survey,  while in your community, you will assess the community location. This will lead to a list of identified, prioritized health needs and your recommendations for intervention. You will complete a windshield survey of your community. The objective of a windshield survey is to assess a community

Case study

help with 1-2 case study In 1 -2 pages, answer the questions below in detail. You must use current evidence-based resources to support your answers. Follow APA guidelines. and the grading rubric. Chief Compliant: Mrs. Lin Zhang is a 52-year-old Chinese-American woman who presents with chronic lower back pain, bilateral knee

Nursing Literature Review & Evidence Matrix Assignment

will attached instructions in notepad Evidence Matrix Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________ Author Journal Name/ Year of Publication Research Design Sample Size Outcome Variables Measured Quality (A, B, C) Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to

Discussion

Case Presentation-PowerPoint Presentation Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case that was seen during your experience or a topic that is of interest to you. 1. Select a health problem that primarily affect the older adult population. Topic: Rheumatoid Arthritis. 2. Provide information about the incidence, prevalence, and pathophysiology

MOdule 4 Pharm

Describe causes of Upper respiratory infections and drug therapy  Discuss triggers of asthma and treatment options Discuss corticosteroids  Describe chronic bronchitis and treatment options Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment recommendations Discuss symptoms of GERD, complications, and drug management Compare and contrast Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative colitis

Assessment

See attached for instructions 1 Assessment 04 – Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care Create a 5-10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you will propose an evidence- based plan to improve the outcomes the patient in the provided case study below, and examine how remote collaboration provided

WK 9 DISC

3   Back to Week at a Glance Ethics, Cyber Ethics, and Security In recent years, hackers have targeted medical records, from hospitals and other healthcare institutions, across the country. These records contain personal information, contact information, and most importantly, for the hackers, information that may prove useful in stealing

Professional Portfolio

Daniela Padron 786-461-0734 [email protected] Opa-locka, FL 33055 CONTACT SKILLS Organized• Team Player• Critical Thinking skills• Time management• Punctual• Hard working• Decision Making• Creative Problem Solving• Blood Draw and Sample Collection • Clinical judgment• Vitals monitoring• Spanish/English Fluency• Dedicated and compassionate Registered Nurse (RN) with progressive career history in direct patient

Comproimp

briefly describe one community health problem from your community’s health improvement plan. What structure, process, and outcome standards would you use to evaluate a program addressing this problem?

SOAP

need to come up with a SOAP note following this specific algorithm. Instructions will be provided. 

Discussion post/case study

Topic: What is the Impact of using teach back to educate Latino men on the importance of lifestyle changes, exercise and medication adherence to blood pressure medication?