Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Case study advance health assessment

See attached doc

Case study

For your assignment you will work on this case: you will take on the role of an APRN who is building a health history for this patient. You will consider how social determinants of health and specific cultural considerations will influence your interview and communication techniques as you work in partnership with the patient to gather data for an accurate health history.  

Include the following: 

· Explain the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned. Be specific. 

· Consider how you would build a health history for the patient. What questions would you ask? How might you target your questions based on the patient’s social determinants of health? How would you frame the questions to be sensitive to the patient’s background, lifestyle, and culture? 

· Identify any potential health-related risks, based on the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting, which should be taken into consideration. 

· What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with this patient? 

· Explain the issues that you would need to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient, and why.  

· Describe the communication techniques you would use with this patient. Include strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient. Be specific and explain why you would use these techniques. 

· Summarize the health history interview you would conduct with this patient. Provide at least 
five (5) targeted questions you would ask the patient to build their health history and to assess their health risks. Explain your reasoning for each question and how you frame each for this specific patient. 

· Identify
one risk assessment instrument, and then justify why it would be applicable to your assigned patient. Be specific. 

46 y/o African American male who recently was seen in the Emergency Department for
alcoholic withdrawal seizures and released. Referred to clinic for follow up on his hypertension
history. He ran out of the Norvasc prescription given by the Emergency Department. He is living
in a homeless shelter now. He states not drinking anymore but needs to smoke cigarettes to calm down and function. 

Week 2_Assignment 1_Rubric

NURS_6512_Week 2_Assignment 1_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned. Be specific.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is inaccurate and/or missing explanations of the socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the assigned patient.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the issues that you would need to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient, and why.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are clear, accurate, and detailed.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are accurate.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are vague and/or inaccurate.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is inaccurate and/or missing explanations of the issues to be sensitive to when interacting with the patient; explanations why are inaccurate or missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the communication techniques you would use with this patient. Include strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient. Be specific and explain why you would use these techniques.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail communication techniques to use with the patient, including specific strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and a detailed explanation of why to use these techniques.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies and describes communication techniques to use with the patient, including specific strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and an explanation of why to use these techniques.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely and with some inaccuracy identifies and describes communication techniques to use with the patient, including strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and a vague explanation of why to use these techniques.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response identifies inaccurately and/or is missing descriptions of communication techniques to use with the patient, including inaccurate or missing strategies to demonstrate sensitivity with this patient, and an inadequate or missing explanation of why to use these techniques.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize the health history interview you would conduct with this patient. Provide at least five (5) targeted questions you would ask the patient to build their health history and to assess their health risks. Explain your reasoning for each question and how you frame each for this specific patient.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly, accurately, and in detail summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including at least five targeted questions to ask to build the health history and assess health risks, with detailed explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response accurately summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including five targeted questions to ask to build the health history and assess health risks, with explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

19 to >16.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including five questions to ask that are vague or lacking specificity to build the health history and assess health risks, with vague explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

16 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inadequately summarizes the health history interview to conduct with this patient, including fewer than five questions that are inadequate for building the health history and assessing health risks, with inadequate or missing explanations for the wording of each question and why it is asked.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and then justify why it would be applicable to your assigned patient. Be specific.

15 to >12.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly and accurately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides detailed and specific justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

12 to >9.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides specific justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

9 to >6.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides vague justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inadequately identifies the selected risk assessment instrument, and provides inadequate or missing justification for why it is applicable to the assigned patient.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: Paragraph Development and Organization — Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused and neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing Standards — Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: APA The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Question

Journal Assignment: If you’re a member of the Prosecution, you will write 300 words or more for your journal, laying out the best evidence to convict William Bradfield. If you are Defense, write 300 more words laying out the best evidence to find him innocent. If you are on team

Nursing Assignment

Review the Learning Resources below focusing on the smallpox and polio epidemics and how health organizations applied principles of epidemiology to eradicate (or in the case of polio, nearly eradicate) these diseases. · Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021).  Epidemiology for public health practice  (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

317Topic 1 DQ 1

Explain the different types of research methodologies used in the health sciences. Describe how you would apply one of these research methods in your workspace or your future health care profession.

NUR 630

NUR 630 SMART Goals This semester is going from pediatric standpoint For this assignment, you will work on setting goals for yourself using the SMART method. You will find an explanation of this method in the module that will guide you in your goal-setting process. You will list a minimum

week 1

  Following the guidelines of the United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF), discuss and describe the screening recommendations for the following: Cervical cancer Breast cancer Osteoporosis Colorectal cancer Lung cancer Ovarian cancer Intimate partner violence (IPV).

Caos and Complexity

Chaos and Complexity: Preparing for the Change What are the differences between chaos and complexity? As a DNP, you will be the leader of your group. How can you prepare for changes in your workplace as a leader managing a chaotic situation like the one faced during the Covid pandemic?

Change theory

Change Theory Instructions: In your DNP project, you may implement a change theory to generate the necessary changes on the proposed topic. Prepare a recorded PowerPoint presentation explaining, step by step, the change theory for you selected, and provide examples of how you would implement it. Develop a SWOT analysis

Gerontology Clinical Experience 1

Weekly Clinical Experience 1 Describe your clinical experience for this week with a 65 year old female with a history of uncontrolled diabetes · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment,

Disease Screenings

Disease Screenings A 65-year-old female patient is seen your office for an annual physical examination. The patient states that she has not seen a healthcare provider for the past 10 years because she has been feeling well. She has no past medical or surgical history. She reports no complaints. The

case study

 Patient: M.T., 44-year-old warehouse supervisor  Chief concern (Day 1): “Bad low-back pain after lifting a box.”  Home AI tool: Patient uses the health system’s portal symptom-checker chatbot. After entering “low back pain,”  “both legs tingling,” “can’t feel when wiping,” and “peeing less than usual,” the bot outputs “likely muscular  strain

Clinical reasoning.

Competency Evaluate factors integral to clinical reasoning. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane. Scenario You recently started a new position as a nurse manager in a

peer reviewed article

See doc for instruction Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed

Managed Care Organizations

See attachment Reflect on and evaluate the role that the managed care organization (MCO) plays in today’s health care environment by developing a 750-1,000-word response that addresses the following: · Explain what a health care organization’s administrative role is in executing risk management policies and ensuring compliance with managed care

Research Analysis

See instructions on document. Week 3 Assignment To Prepare: · Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this week’s Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research. · Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field

Question

Write 1 -2 paragraphs on each of the topics below. Include a cover page and a reference page. 1) Write about and describe the arts of Sandogo and Poro amongst the Senufo. Discuss how they use sculpture, jewelry, and even architecture as a means of emphasizing gender roles in their

Nursing

see attachment For this assessment, you will propose a hypothetical health promotion plan addressing a particular health concern or health need affecting a fictitious individual or group living in the community. The hypothetical individual or group of your choice must be living in the community, not in a hospital, assistant