Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Composition 2

Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a Source

ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources that you intend to support your argument (outlined in Touchstone 1.2 — if you want to change topics, you will need to submit a new Touchstone 1.2 for grading). Which source you choose is up to you; however, it must be verifiable and should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested.

NOTE: If your source or direct quotations are not verifiable for authenticity (working link, author/title/publication information match, locatable quotation) by a grader, your Touchstone will be returned for a single chance to resubmit.

The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: After you recap your research paper’s central argument argument, provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)

You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:

1. Credibility (at least one full paragraph): Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.

2. Usefulness (at least one full paragraph): Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?

Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.

Sample Touchstone

In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review 
Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review 
Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI.


A. Assignment Guidelines

DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. Refer to the Sample Touchstone for additional guidance on structure, formatting, and citation.



1. Source Identification

The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:

❒ Have you recapped your research paper’s central argument?

❒ Have you provided the author’s name?

❒ Have you provided the source title?

❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?

❒ Have you ended the introduction with a thesis statement that sums up your evaluation of the source’s credibility and usefulness?



2. Source Evaluation

❒ Have you provided an evaluation on the source’s credibility in at least one full paragraph?

❒ Have you used specific, verifiable examples from the source to illustrate your evaluation of its credibility?

❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source’s usefulness in at least one full paragraph?

❒ Have you used at least two specific, verifiable quotations (cited with accurate page/paragraph-numbers) from the source to illustrate your evaluation of its usefulness?

❒ Did you include a reference list with complete source data such as author(s)’ name(s), date of publication, title, publication outlet or journal, an URL address (if available)?



3. Reflection

❒ Have you answered all reflection questions including specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight in all responses?

❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?



B. Reflection Questions

DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

1. What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)

2. How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)



C. Rubric

 

Advanced (100%)

Proficient (85%)

Acceptable (75%)

Needs Improvement (50%)

Non-Performance (0%)

Thesis Statement

Provide a clear thesis statement with sufficient support. (20%)

The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is clear, focused, and well-supported.

The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is adequately supported.

The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea that is generally supported.

The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea, but it is not well supported or does not match most of essay’s content.

The thesis statement is missing or completely unsupported.

Evidence and Analysis

Evaluate a single source based on the characteristics of credibility and usefulness with at least two verifiable direct quotations. (40%)

The analysis includes specific and accurate examples from a correctly identified source as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are fully developed with at least two verifiable direct quotations in the explanation of usefulness.

The analysis includes accurate examples from a correctly identified source as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are adequately developed with at least two verifiable direct quotations in the explanation of usefulness.

The analysis includes some accurate examples from a correctly identified source, though they are potentially vague or abstract; claims for credibility and usefulness are established but need further development and/or one direct quotation might be missing or unverifiable.

The analysis includes one or two accurate examples from a correctly identified source, but they are of a vague, abstract nature; claims for either credibility or usefulness are missing, and/or both direct quotations might be missing or unverifiable.

The analysis includes no examples or inaccurate/unverifiable examples for support, the source is not correctly identified, and/or there are no established claims for either credibility or usefulness.

Organization

Exhibit competent organizational writing techniques. (10%)

Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an engaging introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement.

Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement.

Presents nearly all of the required components of a source evaluation essay; however, one component is missing.

Presents most of the required components of a source evaluation essay, but is lacking two components; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the essay.

Lacks several or all of the components of a source evaluation essay; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the essay.

Style

Establish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices. (10%)

Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures.

Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures.

Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures.

Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.

Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.

Conventions

Follow conventions for standard written English. (10%)

There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.

There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.

There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.

There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.

There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.

Reflection

Answer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully. (10%)

Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight, following or exceeding response length guidelines.

Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight, following response length guidelines.

Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines.

Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines.

No reflection responses are present.



D. Requirements

The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:

· Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words).

· Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.

· Use a readable 12-point font.

· All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.

· Composition must be original and written for this assignment.

· Use of generative chatbot artificial intelligence tools (ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard) in place of original writing is strictly prohibited for this assignment.

· Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.

· Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.

· Include all of the assignment components in a single file.

· Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.



E. Additional Resources

The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:

1.
Purdue Online Writing Lab’s APA Formatting and Style Guide

a.
This site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types.

2.
Frequently Asked Questions About APA Style

b.
This page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The “References,” “Punctuation,” and “Grammar and Writing Style” sections will be the most useful to your work in this course.

3.
APA Style: Quick Answers—References

c.
This page on the official APA Style website provides numerous examples of reference list formatting for various source types.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Assistance

Please see two attachments  Instructions: Read the article attached and answer the 6 questions below. There is no specific page limit, but the answers MUST be single-spaced WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. MUST be typed, with 1” margins throughout the document. 12-point, Times New Roman

Discussion II

See attachments Watch this link: and read the attached article Then, answer the following questions in APA Format: Must have in-text citations and reference list each question should be answered in its own paragragh:  1. What is your overall reaction to the interrogation?  2. Given the research discussed in the Brady

How Does it Enhance Teamwork and Cooperation?

By maintaining the same team across multiple matches, the ‘Persistent Matches’ system in Black Ops 7 fosters a sense of camaraderie and teamwork among players. When you play with the same group of teammates repeatedly, you develop a better understanding of each other’s playstyles, strengths, and weaknesses. This allows you

Navigating the UK Visa Appeal Process: Expert Guidance

  Facing a UK visa refusal can be a stressful experience, but understanding the appeal process is essential for improving your chances of success. A UK visa appeal allows applicants to challenge a decision if they believe it was unjust or if there are new circumstances that could influence the

ML1

READ THE ATTACHMENTS!!!! Rubric A1:EMAIL TO INTERNAL STAFF WITH ADVANTAGES Competent The email logically discusses 2 advantages that align with the product presented in the chosen scenario and applies the appropriate tone for internal staff. A2:EMAIL TO INTERNAL STAFF WITH DISADVANTAGES Competent The email logically discusses 2 disadvantages that align

W3 3

 Need help with a topic and will share with the right person 

W3 4

 Need help with a topic and will share with the right person 

Visual Thinking Strategies – Hathor and Seti

Take a LONG look at the image. Look from corner to corner and all around. 1.) What is going on in this picture? 2.) What do you see that makes you think that? 3.) What more can you find? The image is attached below.

Visual Thinking Strategies – Masaccio

Take a LONG look at the image. Look from corner to corner and all around. 1.) What is going on in this picture? 2.) what do you see that make you think that? 3.) What more can you find? The image is attached below.

Visual Thinking Strategies – Titian

Take a LONG look at this image. Look from corner to corner and all around. 1.) What is going on in this picture? 2.) What do you see that make you think that? 3.) What more can you find? The image is attached below.

Visual Thinking Strategies – Two Horsemen

Take a LONG look at this image. Look from corner to corner and all around. 1.) What is going on in this picture? 2.) What do you see that make you think that? 3.) What more can you find? The image is attached below.

Revese Rough draft with this intructios

Revision & Editing Checklist –– Revision –– Content & Organization ☐ My introduction includes an academic hook, sufficient background information, and a one-sentence thesis statement at the end. ☐ My thesis statement makes an argument, chooses a side, and is specific enough. ☐ My topic sentences all clearly introduce a

hw help

I need assistance Chapter 6 – Written Assignment (Professional Business Letter) Due Date: See Lesson Schedule for all assignment due dates Purpose:  The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the various costs of production and to practice writing a professional letter. Skills: This assignment will help improve your communication

Week 8 Participation Activity

YouTube Full Video: to an external site. News media clip:  to an external site.Links to an external site. to an external site.Links to an external site. There are quite a bit of news and think pieces on the matter. Please do your research and consider the outlet you are getting

Revise Rough Draft

2 The Case for Paying College Athletes The Case for Paying College Athletes College sports are not mere sideshows but a massive business that makes millions of dollars selling tickets, merchandise, and TV contracts. Each season, millions of fans who watch their favorite teams on TV fill stadiums. This leads

Create a mini slide show using Microsoft powerpoint

Select 4 resources from the attached list. Choose resources that will expand/challenge your thinking or help you move beyond your current level of understanding. : Develop a mini-slide show  that documents your engagement with your four resources (e.g., screenshots, links, images, notes, clips, etc.) that describes your thought processes regarding

Create a mini slide show using Microsoft powerpoint

Select 4 resources from the attached list. Choose resources that will expand/challenge your thinking or help you move beyond your current level of understanding. : Develop a mini-slide show  that documents your engagement with your four resources (e.g., screenshots, links, images, notes, clips, etc.) that describes your thought processes regarding

Visual Thinking Strategies – Giotto

Take a LONG look at the image. Look from corner to corner and all around. 1.) What is going on in this picture? 2.) What do you see that makes you think that? 3.) What more can we find that?