Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

The 
DSM-5-TR is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the 
DSM-5-TR, and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder.

In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare

· Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.

· Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment. 

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

· Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

· Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

· Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

· Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

By Day 7 of Week 9

Submit your Assignment

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

15 to >13.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

13 to >11.0 ptsGoodThe response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

11 to >10.0 ptsFairThe response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

10 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references.

22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references.

19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current.

17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

30 to >26.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

26 to >23.0 ptsGoodThe response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

23 to >20.0 ptsFairThe response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

20 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

15 to >13.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

13 to >11.0 ptsGoodThe response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

11 to >10.0 ptsFairThe response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

10 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains three or four APA format errors

3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (five or more) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

· Boland, R. Verdiun, M. L. & Ruiz, P. (2022). 
Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry  (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. 

· Chapter 11, “Dissociative Disorders”

· Hilt, R. J., & Nussbaum, A. M. (2025). 
DSM-5-TR pocket guide for child and adolescent mental health. American Psychiatric Association Publishing.

· Chapter 7, “Reaching a DSM-5-TR Pediatric Diagnosis When You Have 45 Minutes or More” (pp. 130 – 132)

· Osmosis. (2017, November 20). 

Dissociative disorders – causes, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, pathology 
Links to an external site.
 [Video]. YouTube. to an external site.

· Mad Medicine. (2019, August 18). 

Dissociative disorders (Psychiatry) – USMLE Step 1 
Links to an external site.
 [Video]. YouTube. to an external site.

· Grande, T. (2018, October 22). 

The dissociative identity disorder controversy (Trauma vs. Iatrogenic)
Links to an external site.


.  [Video]. YouTube.

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Pressure ulcers

Homework  1 1 Outcomes, Approach, and Budget [Remove brackets & insert Your Full Name Here] Nightingale College [Remove brackets & insert Your Course Number: Course Title] [Remove brackets & insert Your instructor’s name using Professor __________] [Remove brackets & insert Month Day, Year] Outcomes, Approach, and Budget [The introduction to

Mm week 4 ppt

Mm week 4 ppt In this assignment, you will analyze the team structure and process in your own practice setting and identify the essential members who will contribute to the success of your proposed graduate project. You will present this analysis in a professional, visually engaging slide presentation.Title (1 slide) Include your

presentation

Rapid Response vs Code Blue: Knowing When to Act Staff Education In-Service Presenter Name / Date / Clinical Area Learning Objectives By the end of this session, participants will be able to: Identify the difference between Rapid Response and Code Blue events. Explain when each activation should occur based on

Pt case study

pt case study help  Week 2 Case Study Assignment Building a Health History: Communicating Effectively to Gather Appropriate Health-Related Information 👩‍⚕️ Patient Scenario You have been assigned the case of  S.J., a 28-year-old Lebanese Muslim female who is in her first year of graduate school and living in university housing.

PPT

Assigment The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book,  The Landmarks of Tomorrow  (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar? Nurses are

Mental Health PTSD

Mental Illness Creative Paper Assignment “A Day Living With My Mental Illness” Each student will write a one-page paper in first person as if you are living with your assigned mental illness. Be creative but realistic. The goal is to demonstrate understanding of what daily life might feel like for

discussion question

discussion question  Topic: healthcare providers shortages 1. Access the Policy Map Blog and view the blog listings (There are many pages of entries). 2. Briefly summarize (2-3 sentences) policy map blog and address the socio-political, ethical, and or nursing workforce implications of the topic. 3. APA format for references

Peer response

  The development of advanced practice nursing roles globally shows how important quality and safety competencies are in guiding practice. When looking at the variability in education, regulation, and scope of practice across countries, it becomes clear that standardized competencies are essential to ensure safe and consistent care (Wheeler et

nursing

see file In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect the need for the new policy. Second, create a detailed, annotated training agenda for the pilot

nursing

see file Propose an organizational policy and practice guidelines that you believe will lead to an improvement in quality and performance associated with the benchmark underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1. Be precise, professional, and persuasive in demonstrating the merit of your proposed actions. The policy proposal requirements

case study

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

casestudy

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

PLEASE READ ALL ATTACHED Week 2 Case Study Prompt  A 28-year-old African American woman presents with 4 months of worsening fatigue, joint  pain, and intermittent low-grade fevers. She reports: • Symmetrical pain and stiffness in hands and wrists (morning stiffness ~1 hour) • Photosensitivity • Facial rash that worsens with

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF SECONDARY DATA SOURCES

find attached n use the rubrics In this information age, where data are readily accessible and there is both a great demand for accelerated research projects and strict limitations on research funding, using existing data makes sense. Data used in this way are called secondary data; they come in many

Evaluation and Management

Evaluation and Management (E/M) Insurance coding and billing is complex, but it boils down to how to accurately apply a code, or CPT (current procedural terminology), to the service that you provided. The payer then reimburses the service at a certain rate. As a provider, you will have to understand

EBP

Module 7:  Research Project As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients’ need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of

Home work

Determine the linear correlation and regression equation between two variables to make predictions for the dependent variable. Project Deliverable tie to Competency  In this assignment, you will demonstrate your understanding of how relationships between two variables can be analyzed and used to make informed predictions. By interpreting scatter plots, conducting