Description
– I want original text, no plagiarism.
– You can find the instructions in the file. Please read it carefully.
– APA Style
Thanks
–
Textbook:
Stevenson, W. (2021). Operations management (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin
the professor requested that.
Capacity and Reliability Simulation – Smartphone Assembly Plant
Assume a Riyadh-based smartphone manufacturer faces a 30% demand surge and
apply your strategic capacity planning skills to save the Smartphone Assembly Plant.
1. Capacity Planning Appraisal:
•
Calculate the design capacity vs. effective capacity using production data (e.g.,
20,000 units/month design capacity vs. 15,000 units/month effective capacity
after accounting for maintenance).
•
Recommend adjustments based on capacity analysis.
2. Reliability Impact:
•
Compute system reliability for a production line with three serial
components
where each
component has 95% reliability).
•
Propose redundancy strategies to achieve 99% overall reliability and evaluate
cost implications.
3. Operational Strategy:
•
Draft a memo linking design decisions to production efficiency and profit
margins.
Directions:
•
Your assignment is required to be four to five pages in length, which does not include
the title page and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum
requirements.
•
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from
the textbook and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles. Use the
Saudi Digital Library to find your resources.
•
Formatted according to APA 7th edition and Saudi Electronic University writing
standards.
•
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
Textbook:
Stevenson, W. (2021). Operations management (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Irwin.
Operation Management
MGT530-XXXX
Operation Management
Critical Thinking. product and service design. Module 05
100 pts
Student ID: XXXXX
Name
XX/09/2025
1
Name
CT_Rubric_100
Description
100 Points
Rubric Detail
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Exceeds Expectation
Meets Expectation
Some Expectations
Unsatisfactory
Content
33 to 35 points
29 to 32 points
26 to 28 points
0 to 25 points
Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive knowledge of
the materials, with no
errors or major
omissions.
Demonstrates adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may include
some minor errors or
omissions.
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the materials
and/or includes some
major errors or omissions.
Fails to demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many major
errors or omissions.
33 to 35 points
29 to 32 points
26 to 28 points
0 to 25 points
Provides strong thought,
insight, and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides adequate
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts and
applications.
Provides poor though,
insight, and analysis of
concepts and applications.
Provides little or no
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts and
applications.
15 to 15 points
13 to 14 points
11 to 12 points
0 to 10 points
Sources go above and
beyond required criteria
and are well chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Sources meet required
criteria and are
adequately chosen to
provide substance and
perspectives on the issue
under examination.
Sources meet required
criteria but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and perspectives
on the issue under
examination.
Source selection and
integration of knowledge
from the course is clearly
deficient.
15 to 15 points
13 to 14 points
11 to 12 points
0 to 10 points
Project is clearly
organized, well written,
and in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and paragraph
structure, contains no
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style, or
APA citations and
references.
Project is fairly well
organized and written
and is in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Reasonably
good sentence and
paragraph structure, may
include a few minor
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style, or APA
citations and references.
Project is poorly organized
and written and may not
follow proper format as
outlined in the assignment.
Inconsistent to inadequate
sentence and paragraph
development, and/or
includes numerous or
major errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style or APA
citations and references.
Project is not organized
or well written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor quality
work; unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style, and
APA citations and
references.
Analysis
Sources
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
View Associated Items
Print
Close Window
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
