Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

CS w4

Case Study Analysis

A 38-year-old female presents to the emergency room with complaints of dyspnea and left leg pain.  Patient reports that her left leg started feeling heavy a few days ago and has also been red since she returned from a recent trip.  She denies any injury to her leg.  She reports that she started having some dyspnea in the last 24 hours.  Patient history is remarkable for systemic lupus erythematosus and a history of recent airplane travel.  She is also taking oral birth control.  Her bp is 130/84, heart rate 100, R 24, and temp is 100.4F.  Physical exam reveals unilateral +2 pitting leg edema to left leg with erythema.

 

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

·
The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.

·
Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.

·
How these processes interact to affect the patient

·

Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain pulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >22.0 pts

Fair

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes reasons for the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

22 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include reasons for pulmonary pathophysiologic processes, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

24 to >22.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how thepulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

22 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how thepulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, and/or explanations based on inappropriate evidence/research.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

CLINICAL 514 DISCUSSION #6

Anything in this color is answers Module 6 Discussion     Weekly Clinical Experience 6 Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? Treating pregnant patients and their needed follow up. · Describe the assessment of a patient,

NUR 514 DISCUSSION 6

Module 6 Discussion   Female Patient Cases 4 For this Discussion, your instructor will assign you a case number. Case 3  Cases You work in a women’s health clinic. Many come lower abdominal discomfort. with Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP). Questions for the case · Discuss and described the pathophysiology and

Advance Psychiatric

Please follow APA format, add citations and references within 5 years old. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!  Instructions: 1. Identify a clinical healthcare problem in mental health care. These problems can be either from your clinical site location, personal clinical experiences, or a review

Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment

  Comprehensive Integrated CComprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric AssessmenPsychiatric Assessment  Many assessment principles are the same for children and adults; however, unlike with adults/older adults, where consent for participation in the assessment comes from the actual client, with children it is the parents or guardians who must make

APN Business Planning

Discuss the process of Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) business planning from a system approach.

assistant

Nursing Program Clinical II – SIM 4 – Case Studies *to be done early in the semester Case Study 1   Scenario P.M., 24-year-old house painter, too ill to work the past 3 days. Arrived at your outpatient clinic with his girlfriend, he seems alert but acutely ill, with an

advanced pathophysiology

See attached  document for instructions APA format 7th edition. Please cite at least 3 credible sources. Patient is a 45-year-old male presenting with an acute onset of pain that began in his legs and has since spread to his lower back. The pain is rated 9/10 and described as deep,

Gerontology Power Point Presentation

Case Presentation-PowerPoint Presentation Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case for a 75-year-old female patient with Restless Legs Syndrome. 1. Provide information about the incidence, prevalence, and pathophysiology of the disease/disorder to the cellular level. 2. Educate advanced practice nurses on assessment and care/treatment, including genetics/genomics—specific for this disorder.

final disc

Now that you are in your final course in your program, it is time to turn in earnest to preparing for certification and licensure. You will need to take and pass a national FNP certification exam.  Once certified, you will then be eligible to apply for licensure as an advanced

Nursing Assignment

Nursing Program Clinical II – SIM 4 – Case Studies *to be done early in the semester Case Study 1   Scenario P.M., 24-year-old house painter, too ill to work the past 3 days. Arrived at your outpatient clinic with his girlfriend, he seems alert but acutely ill, with an

home work

Competency This deliverable will allow you to demonstrate your ability to clearly discern between valid and invalid arguments. Instructions Consider the following arguments All chickens have feathers. This animal has feathers. Therefore, this animal is a chicken. All chickens are green. No green birds eat pickles. Therefore, no chickens eat

Help with Research

See outline.  For your Final Assignment (Due in Module 7), you will use everything that you have learned in this course. You will select, analyze and appraise a quantitative study of your choice that uses one of the following designs: · Survey Research · Correlational Research · Experimental Research ·

NR 449 W5D

  This area provides you with an opportunity to reflect on what you have learned and what concepts you still need further exploration on.  Answer 1 question. Include a short summary of what has been learned, and include question(s) that are still unclear.   Post your answer to 1 of

SAM

Now that you have engaged with the learning resources in this module, you are ready to apply the principles of improvement science to your own practice setting – whether in a direct or indirect care role.  This assignment focuses on connecting real-world healthcare improvement needs with benchmarking, the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)

nursing

Post a response including the following: Identify the gap in knowledge (in the research article) and the gap in practice (in the QI study) presented in the articles provided. Explain how the practice-focused question emerged in the DNP EBP project. Review Chapter 4 in Bissett et al., (2025). Evaluate the

Pharmacology

Write a research paper in regards to a drug or drug therapy and explain in detail about the study and why it is important. Include the following criteria: Subject: Beta blocker therapy post myocardial infarction MI Example these topic Beta-blockers are a standard part of post-MI therapy because they provide