Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

CS w4

Case Study Analysis

A 38-year-old female presents to the emergency room with complaints of dyspnea and left leg pain.  Patient reports that her left leg started feeling heavy a few days ago and has also been red since she returned from a recent trip.  She denies any injury to her leg.  She reports that she started having some dyspnea in the last 24 hours.  Patient history is remarkable for systemic lupus erythematosus and a history of recent airplane travel.  She is also taking oral birth control.  Her bp is 130/84, heart rate 100, R 24, and temp is 100.4F.  Physical exam reveals unilateral +2 pitting leg edema to left leg with erythema.

 

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

·
The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.

·
Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.

·
How these processes interact to affect the patient

·

Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain pulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >22.0 pts

Fair

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes reasons for the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

22 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include reasons for pulmonary pathophysiologic processes, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

24 to >22.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how thepulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

22 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how thepulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, and/or explanations based on inappropriate evidence/research.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

week 10

 Concepts of Women and Men’s Health Emily B. is a 19-year-old Caucasian college sophomore who presents to the student health clinic for evaluation of increased vaginal discharge, occasional pelvic discomfort, and mild dysuria over the past week. She denies fever, chills, or abnormal bleeding. She became sexually active at 17

Student Learning Outcome

Patients’ information: Pt 1: Primary Diagnosis (PD): Non–Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) Comorbidities: AKI, Asthma, COPD, seizure, Depression, Anxiety, CAD, Caffeine abuse, and hypercholesterolemia Pt 2: Primary Diagnosis (PD): Suspected conversion disorder Comorbidities: Bilateral lower extremity weakness, PTSD, and ADH Please, for the Gordon assessment, use patient 1, who is a

WK 5 PROJECT DOCUMENTS CONT

Develop SMART objectives you want your participants to accomplish from this DNP project  (DONE BY GERRY) Complete the ADDIE tool (DONE BY GERRY) WILL UPLOAD BOTH DOCUMENTS. START FROM HERE PLEASE 1) Make Power Point slides that you are going to present to them during this ~ 1-hour education session

research

i need to humanize my assignment, using the outline given below. Research Paper #2: Quantitative Literature Review Outline I. Introduction · Purpose of the review · Focus of the topic · Current state of knowledge (brief overview) · Organization of sources (highest → lowest level of evidence) · Use of

Nursing health care homework

THESE ARE MY THREE ARTICLE NOW I WILL GIVE YOU THE  OUTLINE AND TEMPLATE PLEASE FIULL IT OUT ACCORDINGLY.    Research  #2:  Quantitative Literature Review Outline I. Introduction • Purpose of the review • Focus of the topic • Current state of knowledge (brief overview) • Organization of sources (highest

Oxygen

🫁 Oxygenation Assignment #10 – Patient Education Handout Objective: Create a patient education handout on oxygen safety that teaches patients how to use and care for their oxygen safely at home or in a healthcare setting. 📝 Instructions Design a pamphlet, flyer, or handout that includes the key teaching points

Care plan

Care Planning Assignment #11 · Create a care plan for the patient: Mr. J. is a 68-year-old male being discharged home after a 7-day hospital stay for pneumonia. He will be using 2 L/min oxygen via nasal cannula at home. He reports feeling weak, becomes short of breath with activity,

NR 449 week 2

  This area provides you with an opportunity to reflect on what you have learned and what concepts you still need further exploration on.  Answer 1 question. Include a short summary of what has been learned, and include question(s) that are still unclear.   Post your answer to 1 of

goal

 PICOT question In adults’ patients undergoing general anesthesia, does forced-air warming before or during induction compared to passive blanket warming decrease incidence of hypothermia and improve intraoperative blood pressure stability during intraoperative period through PACU discharge? look at the attachement

Telehealth

What are the Pros and Cons to telehealth? How will you approach and perform a telehealth assessment? What are the limits to telehealth? What is the difference between the provider’s need for a successful telehealth visit versus the Patient’s perspective?

Nursing Assignment Instructions attached

Module 3:  Chart From the following chart, prepare 2 scatter plots, identifying the relationship between age and height, and age and weight. Using a bar graph for age frequency. AGE  HIGH WEIGHT 53 1.75 140 56 1.60 70 62 1.84 86 36 1.65 80 39 1.69 65 26 1.64 64

Nursing Assignment Instructions attached

Module 3:  Probability With the data presented here and in your readings in this module :  · Express in probability terms the probability of each variable (age, height, weight, & BMI)  · In the following graphs, with the additional data, mark the possible value of the mean in the graph

Nursing HOMEWORK3

Journal Entry Prepare · Refer to the “Population-Focused Nurse Practitioner Competencies” in the Learning Resources, and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced practice nurses must possess in your specialty. · Refer to your “Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form” you submitted in Week 1 and consider your strengths and opportunities for

HCAD D7W7

 Healthcare organizations have traditionally encountered great difficulty in accurately capturing the costs of the services and goods that they provide. Traditional costing methods (i.e., direct, step-down, etc.) have proven marginally useful despite decades of use. In general, this has caused problems within healthcare organizations as it obscures the true cost

Middle Range Theory

I need help with making sure my concepts of theory is correct. I need to make sure it makes sense

Nursing

Barriers to and Drivers of Effective Collaboration in Interprofessional Healthcare Teams Instructions: At the AGMU virtual library, look for an article showing barriers to and drivers of effective collaboration in interprofessional healthcare teams; elaborate a summary of the article explaining the findings and propose possible solutions (or strategies) to avoid

POWER POINT 2

To Prepare: · Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace. · This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you submitted in Module 4. It may also

POWER POINT

To Prepare: · Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT. · Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for