Attempt feedback: F
Marie,
I appreciate your efforts in resubmitting this assignment. Unfortunately, I must submit this to the Academic Integrity Committee for Review. Again, there are use of references that do not align with the information presented. It also appears that you have revised statements that were cited/not cited before but have now been cited or citations removed. The committee will decide on whether or not you will continue in this course
I got in big Problem because the person who helped me with the assignment falsified the citation and 98% plagiarism please be careful with the reference page .
Criterion 1
0% of total grade
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Demonstrates a limited or unclear understanding of principles of change and fails to apply them appropriately to the context of hiring a new CEO and changing strategic direction at Juniper Inc.
Criterion Feedback
Your discussion on the principles of change provides a clear and concise overview of key concepts relevant to organizational change. However, to enhance its academic rigor and clarity, see my comments within your paper to improve this section.
Criterion 2
0% of total grade
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Demonstrates a limited or unclear understanding on the importance of organizational culture in driving performance and behavior.
Criterion Feedback
There is not enough information and could be further developed. You have 3 bullet points listed and you need to expand and explain in detail to demonstrate an understanding of this concept.
Additionally, you might cite specific research on how certain types of culture lead to different performance outcomes. This would provide empirical support and show a deeper engagement with the literature.
Criterion 3
0% of total grade
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Provided a limited or unclear examination of organizational cultural variables, differentiating between those that hinder and those that support change, specifically in the context described in the instructions.
Criterion Feedback
Marie,
Its important that you provide an examination of the variables that inhibit and support the changes that are happening at Juniper. You have to give more information other than list them.
Criterion 4
0% of total grade
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Provided limited or unclear discussion on how organizational culture develops through the stages of change at Juniper Inc.
Criterion Feedback
Again, there is no discussion on each stage you have listed. Please review the live session again to help you achieve this deliverable successfully.
Criterion 6
0% of total grade
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Demonstrates a limited or unclear understanding of the importance of aligning tangible and intangible employee rewards with change efforts in the specified scenario with no supported example(s) provided.
Criterion Feedback
The information listed here is an outline and lacks the demonstration of understanding the importance of aligning tangible and intangible rewards.
Criterion 7
0% of total grade
0
F – 1 – No Pass
The training exercise is of poor quality, demonstrating insufficient planning, unclear communication, and ineffective design. It is unlikely to engage participants or meet its objectives effectively.
Criterion Feedback
Your exercise needs to contain more details. You have restated the instruction in the assignment outline.
Criterion 8
0% of total grade
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Did not utilize professional language, did not support with evidence in APA style, and did not establish a scholarly position or contains numerous errors that diminish readability. Failed to use or identify credible sources.
Criterion Feedback
The reference page and sources used for research need your attention. After reviewing your sources, I noticed that the information cited within the text does not align with the source.
In addition, you have to incorporate supporting evidence within each criterion to support your key points.
Although you have provided in-text citations within your work,
many of the citations are not valid citations related to the paraphrasing. I have attached the work you uploaded with Dr. Steed’s feedback sharing the academic integrity concerns. You should be aware of how to properly paraphrase and provide an in-text citation after the paraphrased information. If you do not, you must set up some time with the Writing Lab for help. There is also a great deal of information in the writing lab to help students.
While looking over the notes in your file related to the integrity violation for deliverable one, it was noted you were warned in the 1st submission for the inaccurate use of sources. In the 2nd submission, you falsified the use of sources again. All three sources were revised and compared with the information cited in the text. The information you presented is not aligned with the author’s work you share you researched the information. It appears that you took keywords and used the source as a citation. For example;
· The direct quote from Zabaleta on page 4 is not in the Zabaleta source.
· The source from Backhaus does not talk about the culture of flexibility, as noted on page 3.
· Also, on page 3, for the discussion on organizational culture, you revised the information with different words and a different source.
· These types of violations are red flags for the possible use of AI and rewording the information differently.
· NOTE: you may use an AI tool to help with your writing, however, you MUST document the use of AI in your in-text citations and references. You can get more help on this in the writing lab.
