IM
Isaiah McCain-Mercado
Apr 6 3pm
Reply from Isaiah McCain-Mercado
The four types of conflict are task, interpersonal, analytical, and role conflict. Analytical conflict, as discussed in Barrett’s text, arises when team members disagree over project details, problem-solving methods, or answers to core issues. This form of conflict is often constructive, leading to greater creativity and better decision-making. However, it must be carefully managed so that the disagreement remains focused on ideas—not personal attacks. When handled properly, analytical conflict fosters a healthy, intellectually stimulating environment that encourages innovation.
To manage analytical conflict effectively, one proven approach is setting clear ground rules that encourage open debate while maintaining respect. According to Brett et al. (2006) in the Harvard Business Review, productive disagreement in multicultural or cross-functional teams requires psychological safety, where individuals feel comfortable expressing differing opinions. Leaders should create an environment where questioning is welcomed and not viewed as confrontational. Teams should agree early on that disagreements are about improving the work—not criticizing the person.
Moreover, facilitation is helpful in guiding discussions and keeping the team focused. A neutral facilitator or team leader can redirect conversations when they become too personal or unproductive. In sum, analytical conflict should not only be tolerated but welcomed—as long as it’s guided by respect and structure. When teams embrace this mindset, they are more likely to reach deeper insights and develop stronger solutions.
Reference
Brett, J., Behfar, K., & Kern, M. C. (2006). Managing Multicultural Teams. Harvard Business Review, 84(11), 84–91.
William Stallworth
Apr 6 1:20am
| Last reply Apr 6 3:37pm
Reply from William Stallworth
A team conflict that stuck out to me was Task, sourly because it can affect the whole project. task you could be waiting on one person to complete a certain portion of the project to move on into the next part. An approach I would use to solve it during the team meeting as really analyze my team in a leader’s position to see who is best for each task before given out. Make sure each member assign to a task has a clear understanding of what their part in the project is. Also give them a place to go to if they have questions just in case, they hit a roadblock to keep the progress moving. Give each task a deadline to meet so we can stay on task for the project too not get behind and we’ll be thrown off the whole assignment.
In an article By: David BurkusLinks to an external site. he discusses in handling the task conflict by having a more open discussion with team to find better way to handle team task. It can improve team performance which I agree with because everyone working together is the goal. So, if a task can bring everyone together to complete a task and work progress is made, I agree this can be a good solution.
Reference:
Burkus, D. (2023, October 23). 4 types of team conflict. Retrieved from
