Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Dissertation Help

I really need help with my dissertation. Can you help me with chapter 1 revisions and chapter 2 foundation revisions.

Research Consulting Form – Quantitative (v.10.0) for Latissha Graves

1.
General Information

Student Name:

Latissha Graves 20373099

Chair:

Ruzanna Topchyan

Review Date:

10/5/2025

Methodologist:

Kerry Burner

Research Consultant:

Phillip Davidson

Content Expert:

None yet

SDA Supervisor:

SDA 6 Adell Newman-Lee

Review Level:

Level-1

Dissertation Title:

Possible Predictors of Leadership Emergence in Divorce Women Ages 35 – 50

2.
General Observations

Provide an overall summary of the document’s strengths and areas for improvement

Strengths

1. The instrumentation the student plans on using is well established and reliable.

2. The research method and design are a good fit for the specific study.

3. The topic is pertinent and relevant. The measurement of leadership emergence among midlife divorced women addresses an important societal and scholarly gap,

Areas for Improvement

1. Problem, purpose, are not in alignment and RQs could be reduced to one RQ for ease of use. There were no hypotheses listed in the Core Elements.

2. Sample size calculation incorrectly adds the require 15% to account for bad or incomplete data and another 15% for the possibility of needed to do a non-parametric analysis should an assume fail. The final sample size needed is 325. In addition, the ultimate sample calculation using the Events Per Variable is incorrectly described.

3. The inclusion criteria need to be clarified. One of your variables is leadership status, but there does not appear to be any criteria related to “inclusion” that reflects this variable. That could be a significant issue should all the participants have the same status.

3.
Level 1 – Critical Feasibility/Risk Items

Met/Not Met

1. The problem space is defined and justified with relevant data and/or scholarly sources.

Met

2.

The variables and how they are measured are supported by the instrument/data source. The null hypotheses that are being tested align with the proposed analytical approach.

Not Met

3.

Researcher is likely to obtain the needed site permission(s) to access the target population(s). Sufficiently large target population and recruitment plan to meet the minimum sample size as dictated by the planned analysis and variable structure. There are no ethical issues with accessing the target population.

Met

Comments:

     

4.
Level 2 – Critical Feasibility/Risk Items

Met/Not Met

1. If applicable, a complete and aligned revised core elements table and/or variable table are provided.

Met/Not Met

2. All variables align with the instruments being used. All instruments, including descriptive only, are provided in the appendix including scoring of variables.

Met/Not Met

3. The participant recruitment strategy, informed consent process, data collection process, and data management process are clearly identified, enabling potential study replication.

Met/Not Met

4. Data cleaning and preparation is in accordance with instruments. Assumptions testing aligns with intended analysis. Correct interpretation of final statistical results in rejecting/retaining null hypotheses are indicted.

Met/Not Met

Comments:

     

5.
Level 5 – Critical Feasibility/Risk Items

Met/Not Met

1.
If applicable, complete revised core elements table and/or variable table and/or data analysis is included.

Met/Not Met

2. Data cleaning and preparation is in accordance with instruments. Assumptions testing aligns with intended analysis.

Met/Not Met

3. Correct descriptions of the demographic qualities of the sample are presented. Appropriate descriptive statistics are presented.

Met/Not Met

4. Correct interpretation of final statistical results in rejecting/failing to reject null hypotheses are indicated.

Met/Not Met

Comments:

6.
Constructive Feedback

Actionable suggestions for improving the chapter.

1. Please refer to the comments in the core elements section to bring your problem and purpose statements into alignment and address issues with refining your research question(s). Be sure to also add in the hypotheses for the research question. There should be four sets of hypotheses. One for the predictor variables combined, and one additional set for the three predictor variables independently.

2. Please clarify your inclusion criteria to ensure that an aspect of leadership is included.

3. Revisit your sample size calculation and correct the sample size as well as the statements related to how the sample size was calculated.

5.
Writing and Presentation

Evaluate the clarity, coherence, and academic rigor of the writing.

Clarity and Readability

Adherence to Academic Standards / APA Formatting

|_| Excellent

|_| Excellent

|_| Adequate

|X| Adequate

|X| Needs Improvement

|_| Needs Improvement

Comments:

6.
Consultant’s Recommendations

Recommended next steps for the student.

This is a well written chapter 1. None of the issues are difficult or complex to resolve. It is recommended that the student work closely with the chair and methodologist to quickly address the issues noted before moving on with the rest of the proposal.

7.
Recommended Resources

Stoltzfus, J. C. (2011). Logistic regression: a brief primer. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18(10), 1099-1104.

Complete after returning the document to the Chair.

8. SDA Supervisor Action Requested

Immediate actions requested by the research consultant from the SDA supervisor. State “None” if the notice is advisory only.

None at this time

9. SDA Supervisor Notes

©Grand Canyon University 2024-2025 Updated: 5/16/25

CONFIDENTIAL: For internal use only. Do not distribute

All information is subject to change.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

questions

  Please answer each question in complete paragraph. Do not repeat the questions. All answers should be followed by a reference   Any use of AI will result in automatic 0    

ANALYSIS

PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS  Vision and Mission Analysis Assignment Overarching Question:   Why are vision and a mission important to the overall health of your school’s culture and ultimately, to the success of your students?  Overview: Candidates will examine their school’s vision and mission and write a 3–5-page analysis of the influence of their vision and mission

Lorem, lpsum

Ask for Help Print BXN1 — BXN1 Task 1: Information Technology Information Technology in Nursing Practice — D220 PRFA — BXN1 PreparationTask OverviewSubmissionsEvaluation Report Competencies 738.3.1 : Explain Health Data The learner explains how data factors into decision-making to promote high-quality patient healthcare. 738.3.2 : Identify Barriers to Informatics Use

13Course Synthesis

  Course Synthesis Based on all of the course components including the readings, discussions, and assignments, identify three of the most important concepts that you have learned during this course. Indicate how these will likely affect your professional practice.

Module 3 Discussion Questions: Chapter 5

How might the parent-teacher partnerships in the primary grades be like the ones in preschool or childcare? How might they be different?  Textbook: Child, family, and community: Family-Centered Early Care and Education

Chapter 4: Student Activity: Diversity

Student Activity on Diversity Prepare a presentation on one of the research group listed below: Research Group 1: gifted students. Research Group 2 students with learning disabilities. Research Group 3 at-risk students. Research Group 4 students with physical impairments. Presentation slides should include the following: A description of the area

edu 535 week 11 discussion

  Feedback is one of the most important aspects to employee training and development. For this discussion, please address the following: Why is it important to provide feedback? What factors make feedback more effective?

education

In this assignment, you will apply what you’ve learned about the role of research in social work practice. You will identify a social problem or practice issue that you care about and demonstrate how research supports ethical, evidence-informed approaches to addressing it. Instructions Write a 3–page paper that uses the

WEEK 1

Directions: Below are two discussion questions. Each initial post should be answered separately, be 300–500 words, and must end with a provocative question that will either deepen the conversation or invite suggestions for personal growth. Be sure to cite resources using APA format. DQ 1: In the article from the

Module 2 Discussion Question: Chapter 3

Saying good-bye can be hard for some children. What experience do you have with helping children cope with separation issues? What advice would you have for a parent who is leaving his or her child in childcare for the first time? What advice would you have for the teacher/caregiver or

Knowledge

Formative Assessment: Becoming an Expert and Sharing your Knowledge In this formative assessment, you will create a blog post describing your communication plan for your capstone project. You will explain the communication methods you plan to utilize to notify your stakeholders of your progress, completion, and results of your capstone

IEP Development

Help with homework on EDSP 622 EDSP 622 Case Study for Data Analysis Report Ethan Smith is a 13-year-old diverse learner in 7th grade. He has two parents who work with him diligently to improve his reading. At the beginning of the year, his mother expressed concerns over Ethan’s ability

quiitajo

 Topic:  The evolution and legal framework of the Stafford Act and how it shapes modern emergency and disaster management in the United States.   1. legal considerations that the emergency manager must consider when conducting searches, 2. legal considerations that the emergency manager must consider when conducting seizures, and 3.

brumsey

please see attachment COM 200: Interpersonal Communication Spring 2026 Dr. Tarsha Rogers Assignment Descriptions MIDTERM PAPER First, take the Myers-Briggs Personality Test (free) here: Assignment Title: Understanding Myself Through the Myers-Briggs Personality Assessment Overview For this midterm assignment, you will analyze the results of your Myers-Briggs personality assessment. Through a

sharcice

please see attachment COM 200: Interpersonal Communication Spring 2026 Dr. Tarsha Rogers Assignment Descriptions MIDTERM PAPER First, take the Myers-Briggs Personality Test (free) here: Assignment Title: Understanding Myself Through the Myers-Briggs Personality Assessment Overview For this midterm assignment, you will analyze the results of your Myers-Briggs personality assessment. Through a

question

Journal Entry 1 · What is the difference between facilitating learning and teaching information​? Journal Entry 2 · Imagine that the parents in your class are not pleased with the authentic measures for assessment being used. They want to know if their children are doing as well as others. Based

Hello I Am …. Family, Friends, and Community Presentation

Directions: I am excited to get to know you and for you to really introduce yourself to your peers. This is an introductory assignment. The goal of this assignment is to build rapport, strengthen friendships, and establish ourselves as a “community of learners” within this course. So, you will do the

harmony

COM 200: Interpersonal Communication Spring 2026 Dr. Tarsha Rogers Assignment Descriptions MIDTERM PAPER First, take the Myers-Briggs Personality Test (free) here: Assignment Title: Understanding Myself Through the Myers-Briggs Personality Assessment Overview For this midterm assignment, you will analyze the results of your Myers-Briggs personality assessment. Through a 4-page, MLA-style paper,