Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

EN 111 MOD 4 Comparative

INSTRUCTIONS ATTACHED

“Rise of the Machines” Is Not a Likely Future

MICHAEL LITTMAN

MICHAEL LITTMAN is Royce Family Professor of Teaching Excellence in Computer Science at Brown University. With Dave Ackley, he is the host of the podcast Computing Up. This piece was originally published in Live Science on January

AND

The Electoral College Embodies American Ideals

GAVIN REID

GAVIN REID, a chemical engineering major, wrote this essay as a freshman at the University of Alabama. It was published in Analog, a collection of essays by the university’s first-year students,

Assignment Summary

Write your half draft of Writing Project 2, using the learning materials (textbook chapters, project instructions, supplemental learning materials, etc.) available in Module 4.

Submit your half draft of Writing Project 2 on this page for instructor grading. Submit your draft as a Word document. (If using Google Docs, do the following to convert your file: go to File / Download and select Microsoft Word (.docx); then name and save your file.)   You may also write a message to your instructor in the text box (optional).

Half Draft

· Clearly developed thesis statement that takes a position about the similarities and differences between the two closed research theme readings

· An introductory paragraph that attempts to gain the interest of the reader, introduces the closed research theme readings, and presents the thesis statement

· Body paragraphs that compare and analyze key similarities and differences between the closed research theme readings (For this half draft, include as much of your analysis as you can develop within the word count restrictions.)

· Well-reasoned analysis based on relevant and complex comparisons illustrated and supported with evidence from the closed research theme readings

· In-text citations of “They Say” summaries and quotations of the closed research theme readings and other sources you might use

· APA or MLA style formatting, as specified by your instructor, with a References (APA) or Works Cited (MLA) page

· Observation of the conventions of Standard Written English

· 450-600 words (no more, no less) for the half draft (Works Cited or References list does not count in the minimum word-count requirement)

· See the assessment rubric at the bottom of this page for an understanding of how the half-draft will be graded

To prepare the final draft of Writing Project 2: Comparative Analysis, do the following: 

1. Start with your half-draft. Continue to add and develop your body paragraphs comparing the two readings.  Also, add a concluding paragraph. 

2. Review feedback from your instructor (in Grades) on your final draft of Writing Project 1 and/or the half draft of this project, from your peers (in M05 Peer Response–Writing Project 2: Comparative Analysis Half Draft), and from your Tutor.com tutoring session, and revise your draft based on this feedback.

3. Review the instructions for Writing Project 2 (in Module 5). Compare your draft to the instructions, looking for areas requiring further development. Revise your draft to address any issues that you found.

4. Finally, submit your final draft of Writing Project 2 here for instructor grading. Submit your draft as a Word document. (If using Google Docs, do the following to convert your file: go to File / Download and select Microsoft Word (.docx); then name and save your file.) You may also write a message to your instructor in the text box (optional).

Assignment Summary

Final Draft

· Clearly developed thesis statement that takes a position about the similarities and differences between the two closed research theme readings

· An introductory paragraph that attempts to gain the interest of reader, introduces the closed research theme readings, and presents the thesis statement

· Body paragraphs that compare and analyze key similarities and differences between the closed research theme readings, with topic sentences and transitions

· Well-reasoned analysis based on relevant and complex comparisons, illustrated and supported with evidence from the closed research theme readings

· A concluding paragraph

· In-text citations of “They Say” summaries and quotations of the closed research theme readings and other sources you might use

· APA or MLA style formatting, as specified by your instructor, with a References (APA) or Works Cited (MLA) page

· Observation of the conventions of Standard Written American English

· Minimum 1000 words for the final draft (Works Cited or References list does not count in the minimum word-count requirement)

· See the assessment rubric on the assignment page “M05 Writing Project 2 Comparative Analysis: Final Draft” for an understanding of how the final draft will be graded

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

QUZ and QDD

Using ChatGPT (Artificial Intelligence AI) respond to the following questions: 1. What is organizational change according to AI? How does the definition compare to the textbook’s definition? 2. What are the organizational change models listed by ChatGPT? Describe each of them. TEXTBOOK(S) AND REQUIRED MATERIALS: Title: Organization Change: Theory and

8

The purpose of this discussion is to reflect on your own readiness to practice as a DNP- prepared nurse, to consider what you learned in this course and how this knowledge will impact your practice. Reflective inquiry allows for the expansion of self-awareness, identification of knowledge gaps, and assessment of

2 discussions adv

2 separate discussions It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum requirement, but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the

GrowthCase

The purpose of the Case Assignment is to create a “Live Case” by experiencing the process of coaching. Because this case is designed around  experiential learning , we can go beyond the conceptual knowledge covered in the reading materials to actual skills building. This requires putting what you are learning

GrowthSlp

Developing a vision statement In Module 1, you began the process of the Leadership Growth Plan with a thorough self-assessment. Then you identified and prioritized your most important values and motivators and explored your basic leadership style. In this module, you will establish your vision and determine what you need

77

The purpose of this discussion is for the DNP student to demonstrate an understanding of how stakeholders influence practice change. You will continually gain experience considering the organization, community, and national stakeholders and how they influence sustained practice change. 1. Identify and examine organization and/or community stakeholders you anticipate will

COM Week 3

  View the TED Talk “Weird, or just different?”Links to an external site. by Derek Sivers (TEDIndia, 2009). Respond to the following questions: What are your impressions of his talk? Did his talk give you any new perspective on the process or skill of communication, especially with regard to intercultural

98

  Specific Instructions: Team Structure: As part of the course, starting Week 2, you will all be automatically placed into groups, and all your Discussions until the end of the class will be carried out in groups. So, in each week’s discussion, you will only see your teammates.  Please respond

Applied Sciences WK3 ASSIGNMENT2

Week Three: Module 3 Session 6 Assignment Paper Assignment: Please refer to your org. structure that you were guided to retrieve in Module Two. Next, see pg. 226: Given the current structure of your chosen org., decide whether a redesign would help your organization compete more effectively, or reach its

wk8

LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES RELATED TO PSYCHIATRIC EMERGENCIES The diagnosis of psychiatric emergencies can include a wide range of problems—from serious drug reactions to abuse and suicidal ideation/behaviors. Regardless of care setting, the PMHNP must know how to address emergencies, coordinate care with other members of the health care team

DQQ33

There are three questions, Q1 discissions, and the other 2  Q are replies for friends Q.2 and Q.3  Q.1 THINKING PASSAGES: GLOBAL WARMING (350 or More) The three passages on global warming offer very different views on the validity of the concept. You should answer the questions at the end

Gospel Message Friendships and Barriers

What practical steps would you take to build a friendship with a follower of this worldview who might be a co-worker, neighbor, etc.? What do’s and don’ts would you apply when preparing to share the gospel with them? What are some beliefs/reasons a person from this worldview might have that

SE

READ- Problem There are knowledge gaps between heart disease and depression risk factors. Cardiovascular patients may have depressive symptoms that develop, due to chronicity of their illness, lack of physical activity, increased stress levels, or pre-existing mental health conditions. Cardiovascular individuals are screened for depressive symptoms utilizing validated screeners: and

pi

2 Discussion: Biomedical Issues and Donations Name Institution Course Professor Date Your major paper is focused on persuasion theories and is due Oct. 17 Read Chapters Five and six and select only three theories.  Only choose three from the following theories: 1.      Authoritarianism and acquiescence (these are concepts and not a

Discussion response unit 6 adv health

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts.  To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts: · Do you agree with your peers’ assessment? · Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion. ·

Unit 6 response adv psych

Instructions: Please read and respond to at least two of your peers’ initial postings. You may want to consider the following questions in your responses to your peers: · Compare and contrast your initial posting with those of your peers.   · How are they similar or how are they