Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

english

see attachment 

CRAAP Test: Is Your Source Worthy of Inclusion in Your Essay Research?

If you want to succeed at your assignments or research, you should only use quality information. Use the following criteria, also known as the 
CRAAP Test, to evaluate any information source critically.


Video: Evaluating SourcesLinks to an external site.

Western University. (2012, January 13). 
Evaluating sources. [Video]. YouTube.

Academic Integrity and Plagiarism

Academic Integrity-University Code of Conduct

Academic honesty is fundamental in an educational environment. Instructors expect students to fulfill their academic obligations through honest and independent effort. Students need to demonstrate academic integrity: the respectful and truthful attribution of credit to those who have provided words and ideas that are used in research assignments.

Plagiarism

Plagiarism uses other people’s ideas, words, theories, illustrations or graphics, opinions, or facts without giving credit. Plagiarism is treated seriously and is part of the university code of conduct because it is seen as academic misconduct or simply cheating.

Follow these rules to avoid plagiarism:

1.
Cite Sources: cite sources using APA Style citations in TWO places:

·

· An “in-text citation” includes brief information a reader will need to find the complete reference in your list of sources within the paragraphs.

· In a “References” or “Bibliography” page at the end of the paper. Check this link for further details: 

General FormatLinks to an external site.

2.
Include Quotations: use a word-for-word duplication of an author’s original writing. See the Purdue University’s 

Handout: Quoting OthersLinks to an external site.

3.
Paraphrase: Restate sources’ ideas using your voice and credit the source. See Purdue University’s 

Paraphrase: Write It in Your Own WordsLinks to an external site.

4.
Present Own Ideas: Express the meaning of something written or spoken using different words. Students’ ideas, informed by research, are what professors look for. It’s the student’s voice that matters to the professor. See: 

Synthesis of Your Own IdeasLinks to an external site.

5.
Use a Plagiarism Checker: For example, the Blackboard SafeAssign tool compares submitted assignments against a set of academic papers to identify areas of overlap between the submitted assignment and existing works. See: 

Submit an assignment using SafeAssignLinks to an external site.

Practice

Click on the alternative that did NOT plagiarize information from the original text. Alternatively, 

click here to download the practice exercise on Word


 Download click here to download the practice exercise on Word
.

Creating a Safe Environment

In this course, you will need to have open and respectful discourse with your classmates regarding various topics, including giving and receiving feedback. Keep a growth mindset when giving and receiving feedback so that you can apply any suggested revisions to your assignments. Remember that keeping an open mind and seeing things from different perspectives is key to growth. Therefore, it will be essential to create a safe environment where everyone can share their thoughts and opinions.

These general etiquette rules serve as guidelines for online class discussions.

1.
Think and edit before you post. Make sure that your comment is accurate, appropriate, and precise.

2.
DON’T SHOUT: TYPING IN ALL CAPS IS AGGRESSIVE. If you are constantly using exclamation marks, you can sound disingenuous!

3.
Participate, but don’t dominate. Dare to initiate a discussion. Everyone has an equal chance to share. It generally helps to read the entire thread before replying. This way, you won’t restate points already made and contribute new information to the discussion. 

4.
Cite your sources. Refer to the class readings & previous lectures in your discussion posts and credit the source.

References

Blackboard. (n.d.). 
Submit with SafeAssign

to an external site.

Ohio State University. (n.d.). 
Synthesis of your own ideas. Lumen Learning. 

to an external site.

Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). 
General format. Purdue Writing Lab. 

to an external site.

Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). 
Handout: Quoting others. Purdue Writing Lab. 

to an external site.

Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). 
Paraphrasing: Write it in your own words. Purdue Writing Lab. 

to an external site.

Stone, E. A., & Charlson, M. (2021). 
The better college essay: From start to finish. City Limits Publishing.

Turabian, K. L. (2019). 
Student`s guide to writing college papers (5th ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Discussion board post

For this discussion, you will articulate your process for approaching a literature review that will help refine your annotated bibliography. 

Spring 2025

I am hoping to reconnect with Sheryl Hogan Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title Putting It All Together Directions: Read the directions carefully for each section and completely fill in the table for all 4 parts. Part 1: Source Review For Part I, review Adira, et al.’s (2022)

Excel

Communications Template Stakeholder Name Role Information Timeframe Media Responsible for Updates Responsible for Delivery

home work

Please follow instructions and No Ai . Please no copyright LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 9, “Basics of Psychoanalysis” Chapter 10, “Psychoanalysis After Freud: Neo-Freudians, Object Relations, and Current Research” Walden University Writing Center. (2021). Using quotations, part

Presentation

Powerpoint presentation instructions are listed below  Presentation Grading Rubric PSYC2430 Name: Course: Title: Quality of Visual Aids ___/4 Script/knowledge of Material ___/3 Title and Hypothesis ___/3 Variables and Reasoning ___/3 Previous Research Review ___/3 Participants and Material ___/3 Procedure ___/3 Creativity ___/3 TOTAL ________ / 25 · Make sure to

week 6 discussion

  Collapse Describe the variety of ways that one can assess the validity of an instrument in terms of our self-esteem measure. If we were creating a new measure of self-esteem, what is the process that we would use to validate this measure?

psychology 1

Skip to main content My Account Page path Home StraighterLine Moodle Username Password Remember username Log in Forgotten your username or password? Cookies must be enabled in your browser Some courses may allow guest access Log in as a guest © 2023 StraighterLine. All rights reserved

Psychology ADVERTISEMENT ASSIGNMENT

   Build upon the topic selected in the Psychoeducational Group Plan Assignment to focus on developing a psychotherapy group. The first step in this process is to create a recruitment flyer that effectively communicates the purpose and structure of the group while attracting suitable members.    Watch from 1:05:35 to 1:23:15.

Impact of Life Experiences on Development

How does life experiences impact development? The Impact of Life Experiences on Development Complete a 7- to 9-page (not including title page and references) paper with the following criteria: Choose four events from your life which you believe had a significant impact on your development. There must be at least

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Analysis of the Terms: Polarization and Groupthink After reading the module and the assigned references, students will complete a written assignment where they explain and analyze, in their own words, the terms  Polarization and  Groupthink. The task includes: · Providing a concrete example of how a group demonstrates each

Group Dynamics

see attachment    Effects of Groupthink After reading the module and the article by Smith (or the article selected by the course instructor), each student will critically analyze the material and critically address the following question and points for analysis: Article:  Smith, T. E. (2016). The road to high-quality decision-making:

Car & pow

ECED 6260: Career Development and Appraisal Spring 2025 Career Project Rubric Total Points: 100 You will create an individual presentation that includes a written portion, visual component, and class presentation/powerpoint submission. Each student will be required to write a paper and to create a powerpoint presentation. A very general guide

home work

Please follow instructions . No Ai LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 5, “Traits and Types: The Big Five and Beyond” Chapter 6, “Personality Stability, Development, and Change” Truity. ( (2021). Truity.com Locate the Personality Tests drop down menu

Identify Different Theories of Gender Development

Social learning theory and cognitive development theory have valid criticisms when applied to gender development. However, when viewed together, they do a fairly good job of describing how gender develops in children.  Studying and reviewing these two theories for your assignment this week will help you prepare for your signature

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Content Analysis After studying, analyzing, and reflecting on the module’s content and references, students will: · Write an analysis on how important they consider observation and analysis of group functioning to be for the effectiveness and achievement of the group’s goals. · Provide a supported response to the

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Use of Observation Keys After studying this module, students will: · Identify and select a type of group to describe and analyze its forms of communication. · To structure their writing, students will use the key questions for group observation presented in the module. · Once their contribution

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Reading Analysis Students must read the articles by Gervits et al. (2016) and Felps et al. (2006). Gervits, F., Eberhard, K., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Team communication as a collaborative process.  Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3(62), 1-14. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00062  to an external site. Felps, W., Mitchell, T.R.,