Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

EVIDENCE BASED

Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course. 

· Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.

· Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

· Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

· The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

· A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

· A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

By Day 7 of Week 3

Submit your Evidence-Based Project.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
 MD2Assgn+last name+first initial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: *The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach.

90 to >80.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

80 to >71.0 pts

Good

The response accurately provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

71 to >62.0 pts

Fair

The response provides incomplete or inaccurate citations of each peer-reviewed article in APA format. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

62 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing. …The responses inaccurately & vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing.

90 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or synthesis is missing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Nur 502/512 Dus 6

Please help me with your expert in discussion post for week 6 NUR 502 Week DUS 6 1. Musculoskeletal Function: G.J. is a 71-year-old overweight woman who presents to the Family Practice Clinic for the first time complaining of a long history of bilateral knee discomfort that becomes worse when

week 4

explore the intricacies of hormonal regulation and its potential disruptions. 

computer

its below in file. ASSIGNMENT: CMSPC-1513 – MODULE 5 – SPREADSHEETS ASSIGNMENT: This assignment will cover practicing the basics of spreadsheets with two types of sheets you might use in your studies or personal life. Use this opportunity to get familiar with using the spreadsheet tools to enter and format

Nursing Nursing Assignment – medication research

Attached PN107 IN-PERSON SIMULATION (GERIATRIC) PATIENT CHART (WALLACE PETERSON) Updated 7/25/2023 Page 1 of 50 PATIENT: Peterson, Wallace DOB: 06/06/1954 AGE: 69 GENDER: MALE MRN: 7214732 HOSPITAL FLOOR: Med-Surg ROOM: 327 HCP: Lois Myer, MD CODE STATUS: FULL CODE ISOLATION: Standard ALERTS: None DRUG ALLERGIES: NKDA ENVIRONMENTAL ALLERGIES: NKA FOOD

Nursing WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT

Select a particular area of nursing that is of interest to you (COPD) and write IN A 200 words about the specifics of nursing research in relation to this area, what can be accomplished by it, and why you believe it to be valuable. Include an explanation of the following questions

Burn Victim Assessment

You are working the night shift on a medical-surgical unit. You assignment includes a 19 year old woman admitted early this morning. She has sustained burns over 30% of her body surface area, with partial-thickness burns on her legs and back. Instructions The staff are following the Parkland Formula for

topic strategy search

burnout in nurses working during the covid -19 pandemic, how does implementing stress management and support programs compared to no intervention affect burnout levels and patient care quality within 6 months?

Leadership Redo 1

 Health care systems around the world provide useful models for analysis. 

To evaluate one disease condition (COPD) in the adult population

  Signature Assignment: Understanding disease conditions specific to advanced primary care is vital to ensuring proper and timely diagnosis and treatment to improve healthcare outcomes for the patient. The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate one disease condition (COPD) in the adult population and explore current evidence-based guidelines and treatments

assigment

Library Assignment: AACN Essential Paper This assignment provides a concise description and appraisal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials of master’s Education in Nursing. Following APA guideline, briefly explain each essential reflecting on each essential affects the clinical practice and the author’s interpretation of each essential. Include

assigment

Screening – with Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Presentation Develop a PowerPoint presentation regarding your patient that includes the following criteria: · Slide 1:  Title Page. · Slide 2:  SBIRT overview – Describe the history of SBIRT, the SBIRT process, and how it is used in clinical practice settings

WEEK 3 replies

Claudia Avila 11/13/24, 11:03 AM Top of Form   Nursing EBP November 13, 2024 Literature Review In my literature review on multimodal pain management for elderly hospice patients with cancer, Hinther et al. (2021) highlighted significant reductions in opioid consumption. They improved early postoperative outcomes for head and neck cancer

D9

Watch the following Youtube videos and answer the following questions. EACH QUESTIONS NEEDS APA 7TH EDITION REFERENCE Name five different types of disabilities. What is expected of health care providers who treat individuals with disabilities? What is the most important thing medical providers should do to treat individuals who have

professor response

  During wk4 discussion, select ONE or MORE Of the following questions to answer as the Instructor Question: 1) List and briefly describe the 7 domains of nursing practice as outlined by Benner’s Novice to Expert nursing theory. 2) Differentiate the definition of health concept in King’s Goal Attainment theory

assessment 63

Develop a 20-minute video presentation for nursing colleagues highlighting the fundamental principles of care coordination. Create a detailed narrative script for your presentation, approximately 4-5 pages in length. This is a video presentation. Collapse All Introduction This assessment provides an opportunity for you to educate your peers on the care

assessment 62

Select a community organization or group that you feel would be interested in learning about ethical and policy issues that affect the coordination of care. Then, develop and record a 10-12-slide, 20-minute presentation, with audio, intended for that audience. Create a detailed narrative script or speakers notes for your presentation,

Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue

Please look at all attached documents, thank you Instructions: Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 and provide details about it. · As you describe the topic you explored in Assessment 2, use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid

assessment 61

3pg Develop a 3-4 page preliminary care coordination plan for a selected health care problem. Include physical, psychosocial, and cultural considerations for this health care problem. Identify and list available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care. Collapse All Introduction The first step in any effective project