Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

EVIDENCE BASED

Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course. 

· Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.

· Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

· Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

· The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

· A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

· A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

By Day 7 of Week 3

Submit your Evidence-Based Project.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
 MD2Assgn+last name+first initial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: *The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach.

90 to >80.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

80 to >71.0 pts

Good

The response accurately provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

71 to >62.0 pts

Fair

The response provides incomplete or inaccurate citations of each peer-reviewed article in APA format. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

62 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing. …The responses inaccurately & vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing.

90 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or synthesis is missing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Health Assessment

Locate an evidence-based practice article on any topic related to culture and healthcare. You can search the JSU library database, which has thousands of free articles available to faculty and students or use a search engine. Some examples of specific search criteria might include Hispanic Evidence-Based Practice Pain or Korean

week 3 Informatics replies

Top of Form Ashley Evans Health Care Informatics-DAX-DL01 Prof. Deborah Crevecoeur Discussion Week 3 “The FDA’s mobile medical apps policy does not  regulate the sale or general consumer use of smartphones or tablets” (I.Sim, 2019). The FDA’s mobile medical apps policy does not  consider entities that exclusively distribute mobile apps, such as

week 3 replies leadership

Leydis Garcia Florida National University Nursing Leadership and Management-DAX-DL01 Dr. Carmen Lazo September 18, 2024 What is Emotional Intelligence [EI]?  Emotional Intelligence (EI) is a willingness to identify, understand, and control the emotions of both oneself and others. It entails qualities like empathy, awareness of oneself, self-management, and interpersonal skills, all

CASE_OBU

APA FORMAT, AND REFERENCES, peer review scholarly resource cited in APA format from 2019-2024 only. (Within the last 5 years) Please do not solely use a website as your scholarly reference. It is fine to use it as a supplement, but a journal article or text should be referenced. Please

CRRT

The health care technology is CRRT (Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy) Introduce the healthcare technology. Name the healthcare technology. A brief fictional case illustrates the healthcare technology. a. Explanation and Background– a. Include a clear description of the healthcare technology. b. Discuss how the healthcare technology works. c. Describe the patient

week7 psychotherapy

Create a video of yourself performing  two different therapies. 1. First, you will present a brief case scenario describing the client with whom you will perform the therapy. State the patient’s demographic information such as age, gender, race, marital status, occupation, and other pertinent information. Make sure you discuss the patient’s

week 3 discussion

  View the TED Talk “5 Ways to Listen Better”Links to an external site. by Julian Treasure (TEDGlobal, 2011). Next, complete the linked listening assessmentLinks to an external site.. In light of Treasure’s talk, respond to the following questions: What do you find most interesting about the skill of listening?

Nursing Homework3

PLEASE see the attached information for instruction. Professional writing assignment related to one of two topics.  Y ou may choose the topic “Impaired Nurse” or “Burnout” .   These topics are wide-ranging in scope, and there is no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ way to proceed.  In other words, you may choose to

neurowk6

Chief complaint -I have been having frequents headaches lately” History of present illness (HPI) -A 25-year-old Hispanic female presents to your clinic with a headache located on right temporal area, pulsatile. PMH-Frequent headaches since I was 15, with menses. Drug history-Ibuprofen for Headaches Subjective-Light makes headache worst Nausea associated with

Nursing 2- Concept on Fluid & Electrolytes- Assignment Portfolios

Nursing Concept-Based Approach Study Sheet CONCEPT: EXEMPLAR 1: EXEMPLAR 2: EXEMPLAR 3: EXEMPLAR 4: NORMAL BIOPHYSICAL PROCESSES ALTERATION IN THE NORMAL ALTERATION IN THE NORMAL ALTERATION IN THE NORMAL ALTERATION IN THE NORMAL Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Structure: Pathology/Etiology: Pathology/Etiology: Pathology/Etiology: Pathology/Etiology: . Function: Risk Factors Risk Factors .

help with discussion

The App is  MDCalc Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. Name of the app: Identify the name of the app. Author: Describe who created, developed, or maintains the app. Endorsement: Identify whether the app is licensed by the Food and Drug Administration, another government agency, or endorsed by

09/20

see attachment 46 year-old Kathy is complaining of “heavy periods that are painful.” She states for the past six months, her periods have become longer in duration. Kathy was alarmed this past month on days 2 and 3 of her period as she passed several clots and soaked three super

Nursing homework

HSN/476: Healthcare Policy And Financial Management In this assessment, you will explore how a healthcare model/framework impacts health policy. You will explain the current United States presidential administration’s proposed changes to healthcare. This will help you understand the factors that affect healthcare finance. Healthcare changes rapidly. This assessment is designed

Nursing Health Promotion Module 5 Assignment

The purpose of this assignment is to design a study guide that will assist you and your peers to translate relevant clinical guidelines and evidence-based research into evidence-based practice to promote health and prevent chronic health problems. You must choose one of the conditions below: · COPD Your study guide

Health Promotion Module 5 Discussion

Discussion 5 Case #2 M.T. is a nurse practitioner in a busy OBGYN clinic. Her clients include women from various socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. M.T. spends her time educating women about interventions for a healthy pregnancy. She promotes the physical, mental, and spiritual health of her clients throughout the childbearing

Advance health Module 5 Discussion

Case #2 Complain: I have pain in my belly” A 25-year-old female presents to the emergency room (ER) with complaints of severe abdominal pain for 2 weeks . The pain is sharp and crampy It hurts if I run, sit down hard, or if I have sex PMH: Patient denies