Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

evidence based instructions

Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Critical Appraisal of Research

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

 
To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

· Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

By Day 7 of Week 7

Submit Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
MD4Assgn+last name+first initial.

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchCritical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. …The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. …The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. …The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3B: Evidence-Based Best PracticesEvidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with the selected resources.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent

The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of the four peer reviewed articles.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good

The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair

The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. …The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained.

24 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field or are missing. …A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Gerontology Power Point Presentation

Case Presentation-PowerPoint Presentation Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case for a 75-year-old female patient with Restless Legs Syndrome. 1. Provide information about the incidence, prevalence, and pathophysiology of the disease/disorder to the cellular level. 2. Educate advanced practice nurses on assessment and care/treatment, including genetics/genomics—specific for this disorder.

final disc

Now that you are in your final course in your program, it is time to turn in earnest to preparing for certification and licensure. You will need to take and pass a national FNP certification exam.  Once certified, you will then be eligible to apply for licensure as an advanced

Nursing Assignment

Nursing Program Clinical II – SIM 4 – Case Studies *to be done early in the semester Case Study 1   Scenario P.M., 24-year-old house painter, too ill to work the past 3 days. Arrived at your outpatient clinic with his girlfriend, he seems alert but acutely ill, with an

home work

Competency This deliverable will allow you to demonstrate your ability to clearly discern between valid and invalid arguments. Instructions Consider the following arguments All chickens have feathers. This animal has feathers. Therefore, this animal is a chicken. All chickens are green. No green birds eat pickles. Therefore, no chickens eat

Help with Research

See outline.  For your Final Assignment (Due in Module 7), you will use everything that you have learned in this course. You will select, analyze and appraise a quantitative study of your choice that uses one of the following designs: · Survey Research · Correlational Research · Experimental Research ·

NR 449 W5D

  This area provides you with an opportunity to reflect on what you have learned and what concepts you still need further exploration on.  Answer 1 question. Include a short summary of what has been learned, and include question(s) that are still unclear.   Post your answer to 1 of

SAM

Now that you have engaged with the learning resources in this module, you are ready to apply the principles of improvement science to your own practice setting – whether in a direct or indirect care role.  This assignment focuses on connecting real-world healthcare improvement needs with benchmarking, the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)

nursing

Post a response including the following: Identify the gap in knowledge (in the research article) and the gap in practice (in the QI study) presented in the articles provided. Explain how the practice-focused question emerged in the DNP EBP project. Review Chapter 4 in Bissett et al., (2025). Evaluate the

Pharmacology

Write a research paper in regards to a drug or drug therapy and explain in detail about the study and why it is important. Include the following criteria: Subject: Beta blocker therapy post myocardial infarction MI Example these topic Beta-blockers are a standard part of post-MI therapy because they provide

Pharmacology

Write a research paper in regards to a drug or drug therapy and explain in detail about the study and why it is important. Include the following criteria: Subject: Beta blocker therapy post myocardial infarction MI Example these topic Beta-blockers are a standard part of post-MI therapy because they provide

AI tool

Describe the information you gathered from the AI tool and any errors found as well as corrections made

powerpoint nursing

Nursing Theorist Powerpoint Rough Draft  This assignment is mandatory and gives the student an opportunity to receive feedback on the nurse theorist Power Point presentation. I will review it and make comments in order to improve your work. You may choose a nurse theorist for your Power point presentation or

Nursing Technology

Transforming Nursing DQ1 Question: For this Discussion, reflect on the role of individual nursing informatics innovators and consider their contributions, the impact of their contributions, and what you might specifically learn from them in your nursing practice. Reflect on your background and experiences in nursing informatics. Explore on how you

Gerontology Clinicals Discussion 6

Module 6 Discussion     Weekly Clinical Experience 6 Describe your clinical experience for this week for 69-year-old complaining of wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and coughing with a history of asthma. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment

Gerontology Module 6 Discussion

Module 6 Discussion     Case 5 A 79-year-old male remarks on his first visit that he has noticed a gradual decrease in vision in both his eyes since last year. His old medical record has not yet arrived at your office. He states that since he moved from Florida

sam

After engaging with the learning resources in this module, your knowledge and understanding of the importance of “Teams” for achieving optimum outcomes has grown.  Now it is time to examine the Team structure and Team process in your practice setting and to identify the essential Team members for promoting the

Nursing Homework

NR584NP Week 5 Assignment Preparing the Assignment Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. General Instructions The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) ensures the quality of client care using defined standards.  Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS)Links