Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Evidence-Based Practice II

  

Data Collection and Plan for Analysis

DUE January 24, 2025

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

Evidence Based Practice II

Data Collection and Plan for AnalysisHow you collect, manage, and assess data can affect the evaluation of the implementation. If the data collection resources are not functional and/or are not measuring what was meant to be measured, the evaluation and dissemination of results will be flawed. Therefore, it is important to consider how you will assess the data collected and determine if what you are using is working.

For this Assignment, you will assess the data you have collected thus far in the implementation. Using your data, determine whether your scorecard is functional and appropriate. You will explore the best approach for analysis to ultimately evaluate the implementation.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

· White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2019). 
Translation of evidence into nursing and healthcare (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.

· Chapter 11, “Data Management and Evaluation of Translation” (pp. 245–254)

· Benetato, B. B., Tillman, J., Corbett, R. W., & Hodges, A. (2021). 
The doctor of nursing practice project data collection tool: A teaching strategy for data collectionLinks to an external site.
Nursing Education Perspectives, 42(6), E72–E73.

· Bohm, V., Lacaille, D., Spencer, N., & Barber, C. E. H. (2021). 
Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: Development and implementationLinks to an external site.
BMJ Open Quality, 10(3), e001293.

· Mailat, D., Stoica, D.-A., Surgun, M. B., Traistaru, N. I., & Vranceanu, A. (2019). 
Balanced scorecard vs. dashboard: Implications and managerial prioritiesLinks to an external site.
Academic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(1), 170.

· Victor, S., & Farooq, A. (2021). 
Dashboard visualisation for healthcare performance management: Balanced scorecard methodLinks to an external site.
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management, 16(2).

· Wyatt, J. (2004). 
Scorecards, dashboards, and KPIs keys to integrated performance measurementLinks to an external site.
Healthcare Financial Management, 58(2), 76–80.

To Prepare

· Review the Learning Resources concerning data collection and plan for analysis.

· Assess the data collection thus far from your implementation. 

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

Construct a paper describing your organized data collection and plan for analysis. Assess whether your scorecard is functional and whether it measures what it was developed to measure. Explain how you are managing your dashboard.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references.

Rubric

NURS_8503_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8503_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe your organized data collection.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly describes the organized data collection for the project change implementation.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response clearly describes the organized data collection for the project change implementation.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the organized data collection for the project change implementation.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the organized data collection for the project change implementation, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe your plan for analysis.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly explains the plan for analysis of the data. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the analysis plan.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response clearly explains the plan for analysis of the data. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the analysis plan.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the plan for analysis of the data. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the analysis plan.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the plan for analysis of the data, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the analysis plan, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssess and describe the scorecard functionality.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and fully assesses the scorecard functionality. … The response comprehensively and clearly describes whether the scorecard measures what it is intended to measure. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the assessment of the scorecard functionality.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response clearly assesses the scorecard functionality. … The response clearly describes whether the scorecard measures what it is intended to measure. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the assessment of the scorecard functionality.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely assesses the scorecard functionality. … The response inaccurately or vaguely describes whether the scorecard measures what it is intended to measure. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the assessment of the scorecard functionality.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely assesses the scorecard functionality, or it is missing. … The response inaccurately and vaguely describes whether the scorecard measures what it is intended to measure, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support assessment of the scorecard functionality, or it is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how you are managing your dashboard.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly explains how you are managing your dashboard. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains how you are managing your dashboard. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanation.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how you are managing your dashboard. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanation.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how you are managing your dashboard, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (more than five) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (more than five) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Theoretical and Scientific Foundation

Please see attached. Theoretical and Scientific Foundation DQ Explain your initial thinking about your personal philosophy of nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples. Include descriptions of the following: Your professional experiences Your area(s) of interest and expertise Your personal beliefs about nursing practice Your goals and plans for expanding

HIT 1550 MOD 5 ASSN

 INSTRUCTIONS ATTACHED 1. See the AHIMA Vlab Encoder announcement for 3M for access code information, as needed.  Review the 3M FAQS and Vlab Login Credentials in 3M. 2. Go to AHIMA Vlab 3M Encoder and complete Activity #1 Login, and Activities #2 and #3 Clinical Coding and Reimbursement.  If you have

HIT 1550 MOD 5 DB

  Instructions: This discussion will be completed in two parts and will give you an opportunity to reflect upon this week’s content and to interact with your classmates. Part 1 – Post your initial response to the discussion questions by Thursday at 11:59 pm Part 2 – Post substantive feedback

SOAP NOTE: Abdominal Pain (PEDIATRIC PATIENT)

SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE Review the Rubric for more Guidance Demographics Chief Complaint (Reason for seeking health care) History of Present Illness (HPI) Allergies Review of Systems (ROS) General: HEENT: Neck: Lungs: Cardio Breast: GI: M/F genital: GU: Neuro Musculo: Activity: Psychosocial: Derm: Nutrition: Sleep/Rest: LMP: STI Hx: Vital Signs Labs

4k35 safety n quality assess 3

Assessment 3 Improvement plan In-Service Presentation For this assessment, you will develop an 8–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with thorough speaker’s notes designed for a hypothetical in-service session related to the improvement plan you developed in Assessment 2. Expand All Introduction As a practicing professional, you are likely to present educational

Nursing Homework question222

In Nursing 500, you completed a reflection assignment on your professional identity in nursing (PIN). In  Professional Identity in Nursing Download Professional Identity in Nursing  Download Professional Identity in Nursing Download Professional Identity in Nursing , Dr. Mazyck describes how PIN is applied at a leadership level. The first step for advance practice registered

Asssigment

Decision-Making Process Paper  My topic The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Clinical Decision-Making and Its Impact on Nursing Practice Instructions In this assignment, you will be writing a 6–8-page paper identifying, comparing and contrasting at least 3 different decision-making approaches of care from a multidisciplinary perspective using a pertinent and significant

NR507 Collaboration Cafe Week 8

 Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. Reflect on your learning experience in this course. Which concepts stood out to you and made an impact? How do you envision using these concepts in your future nursing practice as a master’s prepared nurse?    Describe how course learning activities and assignments will help

NR 226 week 8

Relearning: Clinical Judgment Plan of Care Template Student Name: Client Initials: Age/DOB: Allergies: BSA/BMI: Code Status: Date of Admission: Date of Care: Admitting Diagnosis: Comorbidities: Planned Treatments/Procedures: Nursing and HCP Collaborative Plan for Care: Include a description of priority client specific information, nursing actions, and provider orders Cultural/Spiritual: Neurological/Cognition/Coping/Adaptation/Function: Nutrition/Elimination:

Asssigment

Florida National University NUR4636 Course Reflection Guidelines Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to reflect on selected RN-BSN competencies acquired through the NUR4636 course. Course Outcomes This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes: · The students will

Asssigment

Florida National University Course Reflection Guidelines Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to reflect on selected RN-BSN competencies acquired through the course. Course Outcomes This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes: · Identify the different legal and

Sam, Nurse

Objective: The objective of this assignment is to provide you with an opportunity to examine your current practice setting or your desired future practice setting through the lens of healthcare improvement processes. You will outline a healthcare improvement process aimed at addressing a specific issue or area for enhancement within a

HM4004

APL STYLE , AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES Leadership Strategies in Healthcare

HM400work

HM4004: Leadership Strategies : Apply leadership strategies to management scenarios. Written Response Submission Form Your Name: First and last Your E-Mail Address: Your e-mail here Instructions Write your responses where it reads “Enter your response here.” Write as much as needed to satisfy the requirements indicated. Each item contains the

Nursing iPA

complete doc attavhed Student: Date: Clinical Instructor: Name (initials only): Unit: Current Legal Status (Vol., 5150, 5250, 30 day, T-Con, LPS-Conservatorship): Multiaxial Diagnostic System: Axis I (Clinical Disorder): Axis II (Personality Disorder / Mental Retardation): Axis III (General Medical Conditions): Axis IV (Psychosocial and Environmental Problems): Axis V (Global Assessment

Question 8

Please complete this assignment: elaborate on each part, especially the differential diagnoses. Use a current clinical guideline for the treatment plan.