Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Evidence-Based Practice II

  

Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

Evidence Based Practice II

DUE January 26, 2025

Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

In the first week of this course, you reviewed and reflected on the project management plan you developed for a practice change. Now, in the final weeks of the course, you have implemented this practice change. How is it going? What are the lasting impacts of this change? What have you learned from this experience?

Reflection of an experience, lessons learned, and/or sustainability of a project, demonstrates a clear understanding of process. To reflect requires an ability to consider lessons learned, necessary corrections, and next steps. As we move into the final weeks of the course and the practice change implementation, it will be important for you to consider what you learned and how to sustain the project moving forward.

For this Blog, consider what you have learned thus far from the project implementation and evaluation of implementation data. Consider your role, as a leader, in implementing the change for the problem. How has your role impacted the problem or change? How might you approach a future implementation differently?

Reference:

Clark J. (2011). Let’s reflect: What is the point? 
British Journal of General Practice, 
61(593), 747.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

· Gilmour, J. A., Mukerji, G., Segal, P., Sutton, L., Wong, R., Caplan, L., Whitham, D., & Halperin, I. (2019). 
Implementing change ideas, interpreting data and sustaining change in a quality improvement projectLinks to an external site.. 
Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 43(4), 249–255.

· Nelson-Brantley, H. V., & Chipps, E. (2021). 
Implementation science and nursing leadership: Improving the adoption and sustainability of evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.. 
The Journal of Nursing Administration, 51(5), 237–239. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001006

To Prepare

· Review the Learning Resources concerning how to analyze and reflect on project implementation.

· Consider what you have learned thus far from your project implementation and evaluation.

Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content

60 to >49.0 pts

Excellent

• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

49 to >38.0 pts

Good

• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

38 to >27.0 pts

Fair

• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Does not post main blog by due date.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague’s main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

19 Hispanic Male Acute Appendicitis

19HispanicMaleAcute Appendicitis complete a soap 1 SOAP Note Assignment Instructions Consider constructing a Word document ‘SOAP note template’ and use it to assemble your note. By doing this you can use the template for efficiently constructing your SOAP notes such that you will be able to copy-and-paste for your weekly

Selecting Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

MY PICO QUESTION: In adults diagnosed with schizotypal personality disorder, how does cognitive behavioral therapy compared to pharmacological treatment with Risperidone affect overall social functioning?

Creative Study Guide

See instructions attached  Create a study guide for your assigned disorder (Autism Spectrum Disorder). Your study guide should be in the form of an outline with references, and you should incorporate visual elements such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards. Be creative! It should not

discussion 4

see attached, not needed until 7/19 Module 4 Discussion      Pretty Serious Partying After studying  Module 4: Lecture Materials & Resources , discuss the following: Jackie is a 31-year-old pregnant patient (2nd child, two different fathers) single mother of a 6-year-old who is coming for prenatal care since she

week 3 disc

Case 2 Chief Complaint (CC)  A 25-year-old Hispanic female, computer programmer presents to your clinic complaining of a 12-day history of a runny nose Subjective States that her symptoms began about 12 days ago. She suffers from allergies; she gets a runny nose during the spring-time, pollen season. However, in

WK 8 BLOG RESP

The Intersection of Social Determinants of Health on HIT and Patient Outcomes Health literacy is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as, “the cognitive and social skills which determine the motivation and ability of individuals to gain access to, understand, and use information in ways that promote and maintain

Clinical Experience 3

Describe your clinical experience for this week with a patient presenting with a urinary tract infection · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3

Female Patient Case 1

Woman comes in complaining of a breast mass she found on breast self-examination. You have performed a comprehensive assessment and conclude that it is benign.  .  · Discuss the different types of benign mass. · Discuss how do you differentiate them. · Discuss the different types breast tissue sampling procedures

week 2

  Week 2 Discussion: Organizational Systems and Structure The World Health Organization defines social determinants of health as the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. Social determinants of health influence the health of a community, and in turn they also influence what is needed from

NUR 504 506

NUR 506 Discussion 1 Nursing & Health-Care-Policy Analyze the history, structure, and process of health-care-policy and politics in nursing and the health care delivery systems in the United States. Submission Instructions: • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support

db2

  Innovate Tech is developing a new product aimed at enhancing remote team collaboration. Unlike quantitative methods that focus on statistical data, qualitative research focuses on experiences and insights from individuals or small groups. In a qualitative study, Innovate Tech is using purposive sampling, allowing it to select participants who

Nursing HA ASSIGNMENT 3

PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY.  image7.png image8.png image1.png image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png

Statistics

Discussion 1 Post answers to the following: · What is the relationship between a correlation matrix and multiple regression? How might they be used together? · What is the difference between logistic and multiple regression?  Salkind, N., & Frey, B. (2019). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics (7th ed.).

Policy

GLOBAL ISSUES IMPACTING NURSING United Nations Sustainable Development Goals ( Global health inequities and the social determinants of health The health of refugees and displaced persons Women’s reproductive health Maternal mortality and disability Infant mortality Childhood malnutrition Female circumcision Global infectious disease Global noncommunicable disease Overweight and obesity globally Disabilities

324Topic 3 DQ 2

What factors influencing nutritional practices in the United States could be changed to improve health?

324Topic 3 DQ 1

Select and identify a culture other than your own. In what ways will you have to modify your communication approach, your nursing tasks, and your patient education in formulating a culturally competent plan of care for this patient?