Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Evidence-Based Practice II

  

Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

Evidence Based Practice II

DUE January 26, 2025

Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

In the first week of this course, you reviewed and reflected on the project management plan you developed for a practice change. Now, in the final weeks of the course, you have implemented this practice change. How is it going? What are the lasting impacts of this change? What have you learned from this experience?

Reflection of an experience, lessons learned, and/or sustainability of a project, demonstrates a clear understanding of process. To reflect requires an ability to consider lessons learned, necessary corrections, and next steps. As we move into the final weeks of the course and the practice change implementation, it will be important for you to consider what you learned and how to sustain the project moving forward.

For this Blog, consider what you have learned thus far from the project implementation and evaluation of implementation data. Consider your role, as a leader, in implementing the change for the problem. How has your role impacted the problem or change? How might you approach a future implementation differently?

Reference:

Clark J. (2011). Let’s reflect: What is the point? 
British Journal of General Practice, 
61(593), 747.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

· Gilmour, J. A., Mukerji, G., Segal, P., Sutton, L., Wong, R., Caplan, L., Whitham, D., & Halperin, I. (2019). 
Implementing change ideas, interpreting data and sustaining change in a quality improvement projectLinks to an external site.. 
Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 43(4), 249–255.

· Nelson-Brantley, H. V., & Chipps, E. (2021). 
Implementation science and nursing leadership: Improving the adoption and sustainability of evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.. 
The Journal of Nursing Administration, 51(5), 237–239. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001006

To Prepare

· Review the Learning Resources concerning how to analyze and reflect on project implementation.

· Consider what you have learned thus far from your project implementation and evaluation.

Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content

60 to >49.0 pts

Excellent

• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

49 to >38.0 pts

Good

• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

38 to >27.0 pts

Fair

• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Does not post main blog by due date.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague’s main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Appendix I: Action Plan and Translation Tool

 Appendix I: Action Plan and Translation Tool  The next step in your DNP project development process is the completion of the Appendix I: Action Plan and Translation Tool document. This tool is your actual work plan that you will present to the organization. In your plan, you will outline the

Caring for Chinese, Filipino, & Vietnamese Populations

Describe health and illness practices that may augment problems associated with the treatment of hypertension for Chinese-American clients.  Describe the locus-of-control variable that some Filipino Americans have that may influence health-seeking behavior. Describe the importance of folk medicine and folk healers to Vietnamese Americans. 

Research and Evidence 4

 an abstract that summarizes the work you have done previously and create a policy for interprofessional evidence-based care within your organization. 

Cardiovascular Disorders

 In this exercise, you will complete a MindMap to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap. myocardial infarction congenital heart disease (may select ASD, VSD, or PDA) peripheral arterial disease peripheral vascular disease valvular heart disease cardiomyopathy (may select

unit 10 discussion

see attached Ethical Considerations Discuss ethical considerations and equality in the pediatric population. Instructions: 1. Research ethics and equality in the pediatric psychiatric population using scholarly articles. 2. Choose a pediatric psychiatric diagnosis and discuss the following topics in your discussion a. Discuss the specific diagnosis. b. Discuss symptoms/ screening

HIT 2100 MOD 2 ASSN

INFO ATTACHED Has your last name changed or have you mispelled your name? Click  here to request an update to the name on your account. Email: [email protected] Username: KHemphill01 Password- 1$Torm87

nur

I need your expertise  Telehealth Medicine For this assignment, answer the following questions: · What are the Pros and Cons to telehealth? · How will you approach and perform a telehealth assessment? · What are the limits to telehealth? · What is the difference between the provider’s need for a

Nursing HOMEWORK

FOCUSED SOAP NOTE FOR ANXIETY, PTSD, AND OCD PREPARE: · Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider the insights they provide about assessing and diagnosing anxiety, obsessive compulsive, and trauma-related disorders. · Review the Focused SOAP Note template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. There is also a Focused

Quin assessment 3

Quin assessment 3 Practicum Focus Sheet, Assessment 3 1 Practicum Focus Sheet Assessment 3 Note: Expect to spend at least 2 hours with the patient, family, or group you’ll be working with during this portion of your practicum, exploring issues of technology, care coordination, and community resources associated with the

Quin assessment 2

quin assessment 2 Practicum Focus Sheet, Assessment 2 1 Practicum Focus Sheet Assessment 2 Note: Expect to spend at least 2 hours with the patient, family, or group you’ll be working with during this portion of your practicum, exploring issues of patient safety, quality, and costs associated with the health

Quin assessment 1

Quin assessment 1 Practicum Focus Sheet, Assessment 1 1 Practicum Focus Sheet Assessment 1 Note: Expect to spend at least 2 hours with the patient, family, or group you’ll be working with during this portion of your practicum, assessing the health problem you’ve defined from a leadership, collaboration, communication, change

Roch week 2 ppt

Roch week 2 ppt  Instructions For this assignment you are going to identify a complex healthcare ethical dilemma facing the professional nurse in our multi-dimensional healthcare environment. This ethical dilemma can be one that you have observed in your current practice setting or one that you have observed in the

WK5 ASSIGNMENT HP-216

COMPLETE WITH INFO PROVIDED WK5 ASSIGNMENT HP-216  Instructions 1. Using Medical Terms, Abbreviations, and Acronyms on the Job As we have determined, there are many terms, abbreviations, and acronyms that health care professionals need to know and understand as part of their job responsibilities. It is important for you to

WK5 ASSIGNMENT HP-214

COMPLETE WITH ALL INFO PROVIDED Reimbursement Methodologies – Week 5 Lecture 2   Clean vs. Dirty CMS1500/UB04 Claims   A clean claim is a submitted claim without any errors or other issues, including incomplete documentation that delays timely payment. There are several required elements for a clean claim, and medical

Chapter 8 – Change in Organization

Change in an Organization This chapter involves change and the response to change in an organization. If you feel uncomfortable already you probably are in the majority. Let’s read the scenario below and try to understand why change is so difficult.  Scenario: Imagine the days before COVID when we were

nursing

Respond to any questions you may have been asked by your peers in your assigned group area . Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of reading the comments your peers made.

peds CJP

Initials – D.G DOB 10/17/2017 Age 7  brought to the hospital with inpetigo and fever, skin lesions/ warm and dry blisters on hands (bumps with pus) – pending labs,blood culture Contact precautions for staphylococcus no allergies  history – Coartraction of aorta, horsesechoe kidney, asthma, trach that was removed 4/2025  IV