Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Evidence-Based Practice II

  

Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

Evidence Based Practice II

DUE January 26, 2025

Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

In the first week of this course, you reviewed and reflected on the project management plan you developed for a practice change. Now, in the final weeks of the course, you have implemented this practice change. How is it going? What are the lasting impacts of this change? What have you learned from this experience?

Reflection of an experience, lessons learned, and/or sustainability of a project, demonstrates a clear understanding of process. To reflect requires an ability to consider lessons learned, necessary corrections, and next steps. As we move into the final weeks of the course and the practice change implementation, it will be important for you to consider what you learned and how to sustain the project moving forward.

For this Blog, consider what you have learned thus far from the project implementation and evaluation of implementation data. Consider your role, as a leader, in implementing the change for the problem. How has your role impacted the problem or change? How might you approach a future implementation differently?

Reference:

Clark J. (2011). Let’s reflect: What is the point? 
British Journal of General Practice
61(593), 747.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

· Gilmour, J. A., Mukerji, G., Segal, P., Sutton, L., Wong, R., Caplan, L., Whitham, D., & Halperin, I. (2019). 
Implementing change ideas, interpreting data and sustaining change in a quality improvement projectLinks to an external site.
Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 43(4), 249–255.

· Nelson-Brantley, H. V., & Chipps, E. (2021). 
Implementation science and nursing leadership: Improving the adoption and sustainability of evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.
The Journal of Nursing Administration, 51(5), 237–239. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001006

To Prepare

· Review the Learning Resources concerning how to analyze and reflect on project implementation.

· Consider what you have learned thus far from your project implementation and evaluation.

Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content

60 to >49.0 pts

Excellent

• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

49 to >38.0 pts

Good

• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

38 to >27.0 pts

Fair

• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Does not post main blog by due date.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague’s main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Nursing HW –

Choose a topic for your teaching project which is suitable for your clinical site. See an example attached. APA Format. Subject: Stroke To develop the Goals and Objectives for the Community Teaching project, follow the following steps: 1. The goal or aim of your project is a broad statement of what

Women’s Health Clinical Experience 2

Weekly Clinical Experience 2 Describe your clinical experience for this week with a patient experiencing Bacterial Vaginosis · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least

Women’s Health Discussion 2

Women’s Health  · Focusing on women’s health: · Name and describe the components and rationale of the gynecological health history. · Define and describe each component of the GTPAL system used to document pregnancy history. · Following the guidelines of the United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF) what screening recommendations

Nursing assignment

Negotiating the Nurse Practitioner Employment Contract If you could work at the practice of your dreams, what would that look like? How would you negotiate that dream job contract? Graduating from nurse practitioner school is an exciting time of accomplishment. However, it’s also time to turn dreams into reality and

NUR504W2A

For this assignment, answer the following questions: · What are the Pros and Cons to telehealth? · How will you approach and perform a telehealth assessment? · What are the limits to telehealth? · What is the difference between the provider’s need for a successful telehealth visit versus the Patient’s

NUR601 W2A

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health. PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) Your presentation should: 1. Identify and select a screening tool   2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to

NUR601W2

· An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach maximal health potential on individuals. · Name the different family developmental stages and give examples of each one. · Describe family structure and function and

NUR504W2

ANSWER QUESTIONS: 1. What other subjective data would you obtain? 2. What other objective findings would you look for? 3. What diagnostic exams do you want to order? 4. Name 3 differential diagnoses based on this patient presenting symptoms? 5. Give rationales for each of your differential diagnoses. INSTRUCTIONS: ·

Optimizing Population Health Through Community Practice assessment 3

Develop a disaster recovery plan to reduce health disparities and improve access to community services after a disaster. Then develop a brochure, storyboard, or poster communicating the plan for the local system, city officials, and the disaster relief team. Nurses perform a variety of roles and their responsibilities as healthcare

Week 4

Please attached. Week 4 Discussion Post Abuse Using the ICHS online library, find an evidence-based article on elder abuse or child abuse. Write a summary of the article and whether you agree with the article related to the diagnosis of abuse. Why do you agree or disagree? Article:     What

Nursing

Ll A. Write a paper (suggested length of 4–7 pages) reflecting on your experiences during the Interprofessional Leadership and Communication course, including the following formatting requirements: • double-spaced text with one-inch margins • a heading at the top of page one of the paper with your name, the course name,

leadership

Assignment including   Influential Nursing Professional and  Personal Strengths and Leadership Traits 

Nursing ASSIGNMENT

CONTROVERSY ASSOCITED WITH DISSOCIATIVE DISORDERS · PREPARE: Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders. · Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.  · · · ASSIGNMENT :2-3pages · · Explain the