Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Evidence-Based Practice II

  

Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

Evidence Based Practice II

DUE January 26, 2025

Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

In the first week of this course, you reviewed and reflected on the project management plan you developed for a practice change. Now, in the final weeks of the course, you have implemented this practice change. How is it going? What are the lasting impacts of this change? What have you learned from this experience?

Reflection of an experience, lessons learned, and/or sustainability of a project, demonstrates a clear understanding of process. To reflect requires an ability to consider lessons learned, necessary corrections, and next steps. As we move into the final weeks of the course and the practice change implementation, it will be important for you to consider what you learned and how to sustain the project moving forward.

For this Blog, consider what you have learned thus far from the project implementation and evaluation of implementation data. Consider your role, as a leader, in implementing the change for the problem. How has your role impacted the problem or change? How might you approach a future implementation differently?

Reference:

Clark J. (2011). Let’s reflect: What is the point? 
British Journal of General Practice, 
61(593), 747.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

· Gilmour, J. A., Mukerji, G., Segal, P., Sutton, L., Wong, R., Caplan, L., Whitham, D., & Halperin, I. (2019). 
Implementing change ideas, interpreting data and sustaining change in a quality improvement projectLinks to an external site.. 
Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 43(4), 249–255.

· Nelson-Brantley, H. V., & Chipps, E. (2021). 
Implementation science and nursing leadership: Improving the adoption and sustainability of evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.. 
The Journal of Nursing Administration, 51(5), 237–239. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001006

To Prepare

· Review the Learning Resources concerning how to analyze and reflect on project implementation.

· Consider what you have learned thus far from your project implementation and evaluation.

Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content

60 to >49.0 pts

Excellent

• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

49 to >38.0 pts

Good

• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

38 to >27.0 pts

Fair

• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Does not post main blog by due date.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague’s main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

nursing

Respond to any questions you may have been asked by your peers in your assigned group area . Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of reading the comments your peers made.

peds CJP

Initials – D.G DOB 10/17/2017 Age 7  brought to the hospital with inpetigo and fever, skin lesions/ warm and dry blisters on hands (bumps with pus) – pending labs,blood culture Contact precautions for staphylococcus no allergies  history – Coartraction of aorta, horsesechoe kidney, asthma, trach that was removed 4/2025  IV

Nursing Mod 4 Assignment WH

Gynecological Health Care for Lesbian, Bisexual & Transgender Individuals The purpose of this assingment is to better understand gynecological health care for lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals. Define and describe for lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals. Gender and sexuality concepts. Social and political context. Social determinants of health affecting lesbian,

NUR 509CL Module 3 discussion

Module 3 Discussion   Weekly Clinical Experience 3 Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? (Learning how to prescribing) · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and

NUR 509 Discussion 3

Module 3 Discussion   The House Painter Patient Evaluation & Management Plan A 52-year-old male patient who is a house painter presents to the office reporting chronic fatigue and “mild” chest pain. When he is painting, chest pain is relieved after taking a break. He reports that the pain usually

NUR 620

Daniela Anxiety Case Summarize the clinical case Ms. JN is a 24y old student of law with the complaints of the generalized anxiety disorder. She presents herself with continuous concern in various areas of her life such as academics, money and the health of her husband. According to her, she

last wk2 db

  Is your clinical change project highly significant to nursing? Does the project encompass the core graduate nursing competencies of patient-centered care, social equity, cultural appropriateness, evidence-based practice, health promotion, and disease prevention  

continue

_________________________________________________________________________ Community: Bronzeville, chicago Overview In week 1 you identified the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in your community. These certainly indicate health needs. This week expand your thinking to other types of health needs your community as a whole and members of your community is or might be

IP1

Provide an overview of how healthcare in the United States has evolved since the post-industrial period.  How has the evolution of medical technology, graduate medical education, and the professionalization of medical and nursing staff affected the delivery of care?  Why has the United States been unsuccessful in evolving the current

DB 1

Discuss 3 current trends and directions for healthcare delivery in the United States and the role that managed care has in shaping those 3 trends.  Besides managed care, what other forces have influenced these trends and directions?  Are these trends and directions moving healthcare delivery in a positive direction? Explain

Master’s Prepared Nurse Leading Change

Students will develop a scholarly paper addressing a problem, issue, or situation needing change within the practice setting. The paper will address how the advanced practice nurse can facilitate and develop a road map for change. Assignment Criteria: 1. Identify a problem, issue, or situation needing change within the practice

NUR509CLW3

DISCUSSION: Describe your clinical experience for this week. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales. (CASE: PATIENT HAS

NUR509W3

DISCUSSION: A 52-year-old male patient who is a house painter presents to the office reporting chronic fatigue and “mild” chest pain. When he is painting, chest pain is relieved after taking a break. He reports that the pain usually lasts 5 minutes or less and occasionally spreads to his left

research

in this discussion, you will: TOPIC: BURNOUT IN Nursing  Introduce and define the general topic you have identified. Explain its significance to nursing and nursing research. Search for two (2) relevant articles on the topic to “make a case” for why your topic is relevant to nursing and nursing research,

SEARCHING DATABASES

MOD 3 DISCUSSION identify      a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

identifying research methodology

mod assign 2 Help identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

Nursing homework

In no more than 2 paragraph, write about how the DNP program support your my Carrers plan at UTHealth tower in 3-5 years

Nursing Interview assignment

Wilkes University Passan School of Nursing NSG 504 Assignment 1 Interview Assignment (20 points) Interview Guide • The purpose of this assignment is to explore the role of the advanced practice nurse (APN) in depth as she/he functions in the context of the institution in which he/she is employed. Compare