Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Evidence-Based Practice II

  

Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

Evidence Based Practice II

DUE January 26, 2025

Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

In the first week of this course, you reviewed and reflected on the project management plan you developed for a practice change. Now, in the final weeks of the course, you have implemented this practice change. How is it going? What are the lasting impacts of this change? What have you learned from this experience?

Reflection of an experience, lessons learned, and/or sustainability of a project, demonstrates a clear understanding of process. To reflect requires an ability to consider lessons learned, necessary corrections, and next steps. As we move into the final weeks of the course and the practice change implementation, it will be important for you to consider what you learned and how to sustain the project moving forward.

For this Blog, consider what you have learned thus far from the project implementation and evaluation of implementation data. Consider your role, as a leader, in implementing the change for the problem. How has your role impacted the problem or change? How might you approach a future implementation differently?

Reference:

Clark J. (2011). Let’s reflect: What is the point? 
British Journal of General Practice
61(593), 747.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

· Gilmour, J. A., Mukerji, G., Segal, P., Sutton, L., Wong, R., Caplan, L., Whitham, D., & Halperin, I. (2019). 
Implementing change ideas, interpreting data and sustaining change in a quality improvement projectLinks to an external site.
Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 43(4), 249–255.

· Nelson-Brantley, H. V., & Chipps, E. (2021). 
Implementation science and nursing leadership: Improving the adoption and sustainability of evidence-based practiceLinks to an external site.
The Journal of Nursing Administration, 51(5), 237–239. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001006

To Prepare

· Review the Learning Resources concerning how to analyze and reflect on project implementation.

· Consider what you have learned thus far from your project implementation and evaluation.

Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content

60 to >49.0 pts

Excellent

• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

49 to >38.0 pts

Good

• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

38 to >27.0 pts

Fair

• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Does not post main blog by due date.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague’s main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.

20 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

11 to >6.0 pts

Good

• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.

6 to >2.0 pts

Fair

• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.

20 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Qualitative & Quantitative Research Design

Critically appraise a qualitative and quantitative research design – Please select two research articles (qualitative and quantitative) and critically appraise both of them.    Once you chose your research articles, answer the following questions for both studies:  1. Is the evidence from a known, reputable source? 2. Has the evidence

Describing, Diagnosing, & Treatment of Skin, Eye, & Ear Disorders

Describe dermatitis, diagnostic criteria, and treatment modalities Describe the drug therapy for Conjunctivitis and Otitis Media  Discuss Herpes Virus infections, patient presentation, and treatment Describe the most common primary bacterial skin infections and the treatment of choice. 

Nursing

Post a cohesive response to the following: What are the key challenges that healthcare practitioners encounter when balancing patient care with the requirement for stringent data protection? How can healthcare organizations ensure patient confidentiality while effectively leveraging digital tools to enhance care delivery?

help with home work

Nurs 506 unit 2 assignment Canada is the first country to permit nurse practitioners to provide euthanasia. Assisted dying legislation has been introduced in Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand health systems. From the perspectives of your nursing practice specialization (nurse executive leader, nurse practitioner, and nurse educator), propose

help with home work

NU507-1: Examine U.S. health care policy structures and the role of the nursing leader as a change agent at the public policy table. Directions You will choose one federal-level healthcare policy issue that interests you. As a change agent, using “X” a microblogging platform, you will write to one of your

Can help by tomorrow night ?

In this creative writing assignment, you will take on the role of an advocate and analyze how federal and state powers interact in addressing public, health, and environmental issues. Utilize the First Amendment, your state constitution, and any other documents needed. Select a topic from the list below and create a

Baby Fae Discussion

  Identify and list two ethical or moral issues you observed in this case. Review the ethical codes/tenants of the stakeholders (see attached documents below). You will be assigned to take the perspective of one stakeholder group (RESEARCHERS) using the belmont report and decide how they would respond to one

Literature Evaluation

In collaboration with the approved clinical preceptor, students will identify a specific evidence-based topic for the capstone project change proposal. Students should consider the clinical environment in which they are currently employed or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational issue, a

Can you complete this by tomorrow night ?

Week 2 Guided Learning Activity: Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Directions: Type the letter answer into Canvas. You may also include the whole line. The letter comes before the line or sentence Example: [A] Paris is the biggest city in France. [B] It is a major cultural center with many famous

Mental health soap mitz

Mental health soap mitz Initial Psychiatric Interview/SOAP Note Template There are different ways in which to complete a Psychiatric SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) Note. This is a template that is meant to guide you as you continue to develop your style of SOAP in the psychiatric practice setting.

RH soap note

RH soap note Initial Psychiatric Interview/SOAP Note Template There are different ways in which to complete a Psychiatric SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) Note. This is a template that is meant to guide you as you continue to develop your style of SOAP in the psychiatric practice setting. Criteria

Nursing Homework

Week 3 PICOT Worksheet Question Assignment Preparing the Assignment Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. While many different models for evidence-based practice (EBP) exist, a core methodology is shared within each. Central to EBP models is the review

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with

Nursing Nursing Homework

Nursing Homework help  MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK ONLY PRIMARY POST: 1. Create a PICO question using proper PICO formatting. i. Formulate an EBP question using the PICO format on your selected practice issue (you can assess any intervention other than CHG bathing). 2. Locate one journal article relevant to your

Home work

Competency Analyze the incidence, distribution, and control of emerging healthcare concerns in global populations. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “Grading rubric” in the right menu.  Scenario You are preparing to speak at a global health conference about a disease affecting a global

Nursing Wk8 assignment conc

Proposed mechanism of action Baseline assessment, laboratory considerations, and frequency of ongoing labs and assessments Note: Discuss the importance of assessment and labs. Special population considerations (birth assigned gender, age, other medical comorbidity considerations) FDA approval indications Typical dosing with discussion on therapeutic endpoints for psychiatric use Major drug–drug interaction

Ip-1 cap

Part 1: Topic Research and Selection Begin this process by researching what health care organizations are doing or attempting to do to increase profitability. Remember, profitability can be improved from many different angles. A nonexclusive list of potential ways would be adding additional services, decreasing costs, increasing the amount of