Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Evidence-Based Practice II

 Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation 

Evidence Based Practice II

Due Jan 30, 2025

Blog: Lessons Learned From Project Implementation and Evaluation

Read a selection of your colleagues’ blog posts. 
Respond to 
at least two of your colleagues by expanding on their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.

PEER #1

Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye

Jan 28 7:41pm

Manage Discussion by Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye

Reply from Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye

Introduction

Restraints and seclusions are restrictive interventions commonly used in psychiatric inpatient units, including those for children and adolescents, to address situations involving imminent risk of harm to the patient or others. However, these methods remain controversial due to their association with significant adverse effects, including injuries and fatalities among both patients and staff (Kersting et al., 2019). Effectively addressing challenges in behavioral health requires a proactive approach grounded in innovative strategies that prioritize education, collaboration, and evidence-based practices. My project, which focused on training mental health staff in de-escalation techniques to reduce the use of restraints, highlighted the complexities of behavioral health management. By identifying key barriers such as knowledge gaps, communication breakdowns, and systemic inefficiencies, the project underscored the critical need for customized interventions. These targeted strategies are essential to overcoming challenges and fostering safer, more therapeutic environments for both patients and staff.

Lesson Learned from Project Implementation and Evaluation

Reflecting on project implementation and evaluation is essential for identifying successes and areas for improvement. A key lesson learned is the importance of stakeholder engagement to ensure alignment and buy-in throughout the project. Self-analysis and evaluation are equally critical for assessing the effectiveness of changes, staff acceptance, and project sustainability. This includes examining how barriers were addressed and considering alternative approaches. Notably, the impact of program changes may not be immediately apparent; for instance, improved reporting practices might initially increase recorded restraint incidents (Clark, 2011). Effective evaluation requires evidence-based methods. This project incorporates several strategies, including pre- and post-tests to measure staff knowledge and perceptions, comparisons of restraint incident rates before and after implementation, and staff surveys to gather feedback on the program. These evaluations aim to identify effective strategies and ensure the program remains aligned with its goals.

Factors for Sustaining Change

Transforming an organization’s culture as a strategic priority requires comprehensive strategic and operational adjustments across the organization (Doherty et al., 2022). To achieve sustainable change, it is crucial to embed new practices within the organizational culture, emphasizing ongoing learning and seamless integration of restraint prevention initiatives. Regular training sessions play a key role in reinforcing these efforts, ensuring adherence to high standards while enabling the organization to remain responsive to process updates or technological advancements. Strong leadership support is vital in driving commitment, allocating necessary resources, and providing a solid foundation for sustaining long-term change. Establishing a dedicated group, such as a restraint prevention committee, to oversee the program will enhance sustainability by managing restraint episode reporting, tracking monthly restraint rates, and maintaining up-to-date policies and materials. Furthermore, utilizing a Quality Improvement Model, such as the PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) approach, ensures that restraint prevention interventions remain on track. This model facilitates continuous improvement by identifying areas for refinement and optimizing the implementation of changes over time (Bell & Gallacher, 2016).

Sustaining the Translation

To promote consistency and reliability, it is essential to develop comprehensive, clear, and easily accessible documentation for all processes and updates. Such documentation serves as a central reference point, ensuring that all stakeholders have a shared understanding of procedures and can execute tasks with accuracy and uniformity. Equally important is the establishment of continuous feedback mechanisms, which provide opportunities for regular assessment and improvement. By actively seeking input from team members, stakeholders, or end users, you can identify potential challenges, uncover inefficiencies, and make timely adjustments. These mechanisms not only help maintain the relevance of the implementation but also foster a culture of collaboration and adaptability. By prioritizing these strategies robust documentation and continuous feedback you create a strong foundation for the ongoing evaluation and optimization of your project. This approach ensures its long-term effectiveness, maximizes its impact, and enhances sustainability, enabling the project to adapt to evolving needs and deliver lasting value.

Conclusion

Every episode of restraint or seclusion is harmful to the individual and humiliating to staff members who understand their job responsibilities. The importance of ongoing evaluation has become evident, emphasizing the necessity of continuous monitoring, feedback, and adaptation to address evolving needs. This dynamic process strengthens best practices while facilitating the early detection of challenges, allowing for timely and effective interventions. Together, these insights highlight the transformative potential within behavioral health when education, collaboration, and evidence-based strategies are prioritized—ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and elevating the quality of care.

References

Bell, A., Gallacher, N. (2016). Succeeding in Sustained Reduction in the use of Restraint using the Improvement Model. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 5(1): u211050.w4430. doi: 10.1136/bmjqualityu211050. w4430. PMID: 27335641; PMCID: PMC4915305.

Clark J. (2011). Let’s reflect: What is the point? British Journal of General Practice, 61(593), 747. Links to an external site.

Doherty, J.A., Johnson, M., McPheron, H. (2022). Advancing health equity through organizational change: Perspectives from health care leaders. Health Care Manage Rev.  01;47(3):263-270. doi: 10.1097/HMR. 0000000000000326. Epub 2021 Aug 27. PMID: 34456273; PMCID: PMC9162074.

Kersting, XAK., Hirsch, S., Steinert, T. (2019). Physical harm and death in the context of coercive measures in psychiatric patients: a systematic review. Front Psychol.10:400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00400. 

  • Reply to post from Olufunmilayo Elizabeth Adeloye
    Reply

  • Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread



PEER #2

Oluwakemi Aregbesola

Jan 28 6:04pm

Manage Discussion by Oluwakemi Aregbesola

Reply from Oluwakemi Aregbesola

Week 10 Blog: Main Post

The project is a staff educational project on improving discharge planning to reduce patient no-shows among individuals with alcohol use disorder who receive treatment at an outpatient mental health clinic.

Lessons on Project Implementation and Evaluation

            The project implementation process has brought to light several lessons for me. I appreciated the role of having a change agent from the facility. I was able to request the assistance of a nurse practitioner at the project site, and she was impactful as a change agent in influencing the participation of the providers at the site in the staff educational sessions and implementing the project intervention (Ericson Lidman & Strandberg, 2023). Adopting a transformative leadership approach during project implementation assisted me in motivating the providers to implement the intervention. Further, building trust and promoting teaming strategies with the providers was essential in obtaining support for the practice change intervention (Bohnenkamp et al., 2023). I also appreciated the impact of planning for potential barriers to implementation. For example, I foresaw participation challenges due to differences in working shifts. I planned to address the challenge by developing educational sessions to accommodate shift differences. The above intervention worked well, and I educated all the staff working at the project site. The project outcomes were evaluated through quantitative analysis. The knowledge levels of the participants were analyzed through a paired t-test to determine the significance of the difference between pre-and post-interventional outcomes.

Sustainability

            The factors influencing sustainability include stakeholder buy-in for the project, incorporation into routine interventions within the project site, and monitoring the implementation of the intervention to promote long-term implementation (Urquhart et al., 2021). Stakeholders buy-in and leadership support for the intervention will promote facility-wide support for the intervention, leading to the adoption of the intervention and long-term implementation. Incorporation of the practice change into routine practice intervention will advance the facility culture for evidence-based interventions, thereby promoting the long-term sustainability of the intervention. Monitoring the intervention implementation will assist in identifying backsliding, gaps, or inconsistencies in the practice change intervention, thereby informing interventions to promote sustained implementation of the intervention, such as through additional staff education interventions or educating new staff during the induction process to promote awareness of the practice change.

References

Bohnenkamp, J. H., Patel, C., Connors, E., Orenstein, S., Ereshefsky, S., Lever, N., & Hoover, S. (2023). Evaluating strategies to promote effective, multidisciplinary team collaboration in school mental health. 
Journal of Applied School Psychology
39(2), 130.

Ericson Lidman, E., & Strandberg, G. (2023). Meanings of being a change agent in implementing a new organizational culture in home care services: A phenomenological hermeneutic study. 
Nordic Journal of Nursing Research.

Urquhart, R., Kendell, C., Cornelissen, E., Powell, B. J., Madden, L. L., Kissmann, G., Richmond, S. A., & Bender, J. L. (2021). Identifying factors influencing sustainability of innovations in cancer survivorship care: A qualitative study. 
BMJ Open
11(2), Article e042503.

  • Reply to post from Oluwakemi Aregbesola
    Reply

  • Mark as Unread
    Mark as Unread

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Case Study

Please follow APA format, add citations and references within 5 years old. Document will be verified for plagiarism and AI use. Thank you!  Topic: ADHD Case Presentation Paper (CO: 1-9): Students are required to complete a case presentation paper guided by a Nursing Theorist or Psychodynamic Theory to inform clinical care. The

WK6 QUESTIONS3 HP-216

COMPLETE WITH CODES Instructions: Assign the appropriate CPT E & M level, procedures and ICD-10-CM code(s) for the physician office encounter. When there are multiple CPT codes, always sequence E & M level first. When there are multiple ICD-10-CM codes, sequence first-listed diagnosis first. This patient was referred by her

module 4

please include a literature flow diagram must have 5 sources will include previous assignment for reference and has the 5 sources that can be used

Nursing HOMEWORK

Complex case study presentation · · Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide. Also review the Kaltura Media Uploader resource in the left-hand navigation of the classroom for help creating your self-recorded Kaltura video. · Select a child/adolescent or adult patient from your clinical experience that

nursing

T-Mobile: As of 09/17/2025, your line ending in 8910 has reached $58.00 in international call charges and/or calls to premium-rated numbers in this bill cycle. Visit t-mo.co/HBN2 for info. To avoid possible service interruption or for questions call 611

nursing

Post a response detailing the following:  Which contextual factors will promote getting your advocacy priority on the agenda?  Which contextual factors might work against it?

nursing

see files To prepare for your assessment, you will research the literature on your selected health care problem. You will describe the priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members. You will identify changes to the plan based upon EBP and

nursing

Respond to at least two colleagues on two different days in one or more of the following ways: Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research. Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives. Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the

nursing

Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by supporting or expanding on the ideas identified by your colleague or sharing additional perspectives on the analysis of contextual factors described by your colleague.

c5-ass2

root cause analysis Assessment 2 Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan Instructions Resources Activity Attempt 1 available Attempt 2 Attempt 3 InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3 For this assessment, you must use the supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be the template, focusing on the

c5-ass3

POWER POINT Assessment 3 Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation Instructions Resources Activity Attempt 1 available Attempt 2 Attempt 3 InstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1 availableAttempt 2Attempt 3 For this assessment, you will develop an 8–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with thorough speaker’s notes designed for a hypothetical in-service session related to the improvement plan you

State & Federal Advocacy

What advocacy actions might you take to improve health care through legislation at the state or federal level?

Nurses Map

NIGHTINGALE COLLEGE DIRECT-FOCUSED CARE: CONCEPT MAPPING ASSIGNMENT WORKSHEET Name: Click or tap here to enter text. Course: Click or tap here to enter text. Client Information (SBAR) Concept of the Map Situation Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. Background Click or tap

Environmental and Occupational Health Sept 16

Assignment Submit your environmental health “Paper Topic” in this discussion board. Argue the significance of this issue in improving the health of the public. Each topic should be supported by two peer-reviewed articles (300 words; APA citations required). This maps to LO1, LO3, LO6, LO8

NUR 620

1. Reply from Daniela Barbeito Depression Case Summary of the Clinical Case Ms. Z is a 28-year-old assistant store manager who appears sad after she had a breakup one month ago. On the subjective, she complains that she has low mood, oversleeping, fatigue despite long sleep duration, lack of concentration

NUR 504 Module 4 Discussion

Module 4 Discussion   The Homeless Patient Evaluation & Management Plan The nurse practitioner (NP) is working at a health clinic in a homeless shelter during the early evening. A 48-year-old African American man approaches the practitioner and asks to have his blood pressure taken, saying that he has not