Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1: IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course. 

· Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.

· Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

· Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

· The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

· A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

· A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 3

Submit your Evidence-Based Project.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
 MD2Assgn+last name+first initial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: *The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach.

90 to >80.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

80 to >71.0 pts

Good

The response accurately provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

71 to >62.0 pts

Fair

The response provides incomplete or inaccurate citations of each peer-reviewed article in APA format. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples. …The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

62 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing. …The responses inaccurately & vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing.

90 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or synthesis is missing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

ST04

ST3004 Assessment Template Prepared by: Replace this text with your name. Date: Replace this text with the submission date. Page 2 of 2 Hypothesis testing Part 1- Hypothesis testing in Research For this portion you will be making use of the following article from the Walden Library References Whitley, D.,

module 10 reflections

follow all directions HCM 700 Module Ten Journal Guidelines and Rubric Overview The journal ac�vi�es in this course are private between you and your instructor. Journal ac�vi�es are designed to help you make meaningful connec�ons between the course content and the course larger goals. Prompt This journal will encourage you

rua

Your paper must follow APA guidelines Title slide: please include title of RUA, your name, name of school, number and name of course, instructor name, due date or session. All information should be on its own line and centered.-FOLLOW APA GUIDELINES! Please delete the highlighted areas when submitting, this is

topic

Please read thoroughly as price is non-negotiable. 2 2 Your Title Here Your Name (without credentials) Chamberlain University College of Nursing Course Number: Course Name Name of Instructor Assignment Due Date Title of Your Paper in Upper and Lower Case Clinical Question Levels of Evidence Search Strategy Relevant Articles Conclusion

Nursing nus 601 M5 assignment

  Guide for a Selected Chronic Condition The purpose of this assignment is to design a study guide that will assist you and your peers to translate relevant clinical guidelines and evidence-based research into evidence-based practice to promote health and prevent chronic health problems. The conditions below: · Congestive Heart

Nursing Planning for “Pamphlet Presentation & Peer Review” Assignment

 Assignment: Pamphlet Presentation and Peer Review Assignment.  In preparation for your module seven assignment, choose a cultural group that you believe is essential for your colleagues to understand in your healthcare setting. Consider the diversity of patients you may encounter. Begin conducting thorough research on the chosen cultural group.  Compile

Question03

Given that BMI is approximately normally distributed, present the following summary statistics for BMI of smokers and nonsmokers (Hint: Think about ST3001.).   Smokers Nonsmokers Mean     Standard deviation     Use this table to answer the following questions based on your individual data. For each response, write a

Nursing Nursing, Help with homework

 need help to see if this is done correctly.  The Role of the School Nurse and the Coronavirus Pandemic Purpose: To provide the student with an overview of the essential role the nurse plays in the community as a school nurse with a focus on the present pandemic. Learning Objectives

ST02

Professor notes: Show the calculation for r^2.  How do you manually calculate it? What is each of the six measures correlated with? You have to read the article.  Please check page 583 in the text for the wording on r-squared, the Coefficient of Determination. It is in bold print there.

Week 4 Reflection NR505NP

  Reflection: write 1-2 paragraphs reflecting on your learning for the week. Guiding questions are provided or you may write about what you felt was most significant to you for the week. How hard was it to find a qualitative article related to your area of interest? Did you have

Week 3 collaboration Cafe NR505NP HB Response 1

 reply to below CBT and medication in depression (Review) – PMC (nih.gov)Links to an external site. Article Summary To show that depression is a serious problem, primarily for the patient. The WHO has increased the number of cases in a 10 year case study for 18.4%. Purpose: This article investigates

case study Allen

 Allen is a 70-year-old with a medical history of hypertension and GERD  APA FORMAT, AND REFERENCES, peer review scholarly resource cited in APA format from 2019-2024 only. (Within the last 5 years) Please do not solely use a website as your scholarly reference. It is fine to use it as

Leadership Interview

Instructions are on file Nursing Management NURS 4412 Leader Interview PURPOSE Interview a current nursing leader in the healthcare organization where you complete your precepted clinical experience. You can ask any of your preceptors these interview questions and keep for reference or comparison when you do your formal leader interview.

Ch 12

Instructions: 1. Obtain a copy of your hospital’s organizational chart. Above is the University of Miami’s Organizational Chart. Most of them can be found online, or you can ask your administrative office for a copy. If you are not working right now, then look up the map of a local

Ch 14

Instructions: 1. Complete the  Staffing Table. 2. Type your answers in the  Staffing Table, save the file, and then upload the file.

FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE 4

   Nurse leaders must be able to make effective financial and policy decisions. Equally important is the ability to communicate their vision for change to policymakers and provide objective, evidence-based support for their position with respect to the regulatory, political, social, ethical, legal, and financial aspects of systemic change.

Management Plan/ Soap Note

Management Plan 2 yo African American female who presents with a rash. The rash started this morning on abdomen and has now spread to arms and legs. No itching or pain per mom. Mom reports she has not tried anything for the rash. She had fever of 103, nonproductive cough,

FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE 3

   To improve health care outcomes within a community, leaders must understand the needs of specific populations. In addition, it is important that leaders are able to gather and present persuasive evidence to decision makers to obtain the necessary funding and establish these needs as priorities for budget and resource