Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Evidence practice problem

Discuss your selected evidence-based practice problem/topic

Introduction to Evidence Practice Problem Paper

1.


Unit 2: Introduction (Required Content) (1 of 5)

2.


Unit 2: Required Resources (2 of 5)

3.


Current Assignment: Unit 2: Assignment – Introduction to Evidence Practice Problem Paper (3 of 5)

4.


Unit 2: Discussion – Research Design (4 of 5)

5.


Unit 2: Discussion – Sampling (5 of 5)

 

Instructions

In this assignment, you will select an evidence-based practice problem from an identified list of topics provided by your course faculty (this is the topic you selected and identified in your unit 1 discussion).  After selecting a topic from the provided list, you will develop a PICOT question around your topic. Then, you will discuss the selected topic problem and the significance of the problem, as well as your search strategy in locating three research articles that align with your selected topic. To meet the criteria for appropriate research articles, review the research designs in the week 2 module: quantitative, qualitative, or mixed designs. You must pick from these designs. The full-text link for each of these research articles must be included.

For this assignment, be sure to include the following assignment criteria in your paper:

TOPIC: In Long-term care facilities, what impact does bully, and cliques have on new hires compared to long time employees, and how can the administrative staff curtail this issue to retain new hires for at least 1 year?

1. Discuss your selected evidence-based practice problem/topic.

2. Discuss the significance of the selected evidence-based practice problem.

1. Support your discussion in terms of statistics and evidence-based outcomes.

3. Describe your PICOT question created around the selected evidence-based practice problem.

1. Included the individual PICOT components, as well as a combine PICOT question, in sentence format.

4. Identify the 

three
 articles you selected that address the problem which is the focus of your PICOT question.

5. Describe the search strategy you used to locate these 

three
 articles, including terms used when search, the research databases, and how you refined your search to select the three articles.

6. Provide a conclusion to summarize your findings.

Remember to support your ideas with the articles you found. These articles should be less than five (5) years old. They should not be from the Web, but from the library databases, and be sure to use a narrative format.

In addition, you must follow APA guidelines, providing a title page, reference page, and in-text citations, as well as use level headings to match the assignment criteria listed above.

Please use, at minimum three scholarly references, and your paper should be 300-400 words, excluding title and reference pages.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

Estimated time to complete: 4 hours

Assignment Resources

1. Gray, J. R., Grove, S. K. & Sutherland, S.  (2017). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed.) . St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders. ISBN 978-0-323-37758-4

· Chapters: 5 & 6

2.

PICOT Concepts for Developing a Purpose Statement

Download PICOT Concepts for Developing a Purpose Statement

3.

Elements for a Purpose Statement and Evidence Search

Download Elements for a Purpose Statement and Evidence Search

Rubric

NU560 Unit 2 Assignment Rubric

NU560 Unit 2 Assignment Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

NU560-CO3

75 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

67.5 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed

60 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

53.65 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

44.42 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

75 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

NU560-CO3

30 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

26.4 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

24 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

21.6 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

18 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

PRICE-I; PRICE-P

10 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

9 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

8 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

7 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting

PRICE-I; PRICE-P

10 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

9 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

8 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

7 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

6 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

10 pts

Total Points: 125

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

learners assesment

Learner’s Need Assignment [Student Name] [Course Number]: [Course Name] [Professor’s Name] West Coast University Los Angeles Campus [Due Date] Learners Needs Assignment Learning Style Assessment [What does the client (patient/family) say about their learning style?] Teaching Approach [How will you teach a client with this learning style?] Readiness Evaluation [How

NUR 514 discussion #7

Module 7 Discussion   Female Patient Cases 5 For this Discussion, your instructor will assign you three case  numbers. Case 4  Cases The Diagnosis criteria for Pre-eclampsia based on the ACOG guidelines and the maternal and fetal complications related. Questions for the case · Discuss the Diagnosis criteria for Pre-eclampsia based

IV

Instructions Read the scenario below and respond using clear, concise clinical reasoning. Your response must be a paragraph long. This assignment assesses your foundational knowledge of IV insertion, complication recognition, and appropriate nursing interventions. Scenario You begin your shift and take over care for a patient receiving IV fluids at

Unit V DB Health

see attached DB V •  Your initial post should be at least 200 words in length. Post 3: Response post to a second classmate or the instructor’s follow-up question is due by the end of day on Tuesday. You recently helped your patient review a denied insurance claim for a routine

Biostadistic

Data Set Code – InDist 1 7532 1 7532 1 7532 1 5380 1 7532 1 5300 1 4193 1 9534 1 5152 1 4354 1 5652 1 6335 1 5792 1 5792 1 5792 1 5674 1 5792 1 5718 1 5652 1 5268 1 5306 1 4193 1

Biostadistic

 Module 7: Assignment 1 Using the below dataset calculate in Excel; R and p-value to determine the power of association and if your calculations are statistically significant. V1 (Input Y Range) (Dependent Variable) V2 (Input X Range) (Independent Variable) 12 45 15 54 17 61 13 51 18 70 20 73

Biostadistic

Module 7: Assignment 2 The Mann-Whitney U Test is a nonparametric version of the independent samples t-test. The test primarily deals with two independent samples that contain ordinal data. The following example explained the comparison between the nonparametric versus parametric tests. 1. Select the best choice for the analysis and explain

Biostadistic

Module 6: Assignment 2 In a prior example we evaluated data from a survey of university graduates which assessed, among other things, how frequently they exercised. The survey was completed by 470 graduates. In the prior example we used the χ goodness-of-fit test to assess whether there was a shift in

Help with reseach

See attachment before bid.  Assignment 7 Final This week you will complete and submit your final paper. Include the table of content (outline) and abstract you wrote last week and the complete reference list in your final submission.  As a reminder, in your final paper, be sure to also include:

nurse interview

Am a nursing student and i attended my leadership clinicals at mercy hospital. on day one, i followed my preceptor for 12hours from 6am to 6pm on all of the 7 clinical day rotation she is an RN BSN nurse and the i was doing a leadership in nursing clinicals

home work

Competency This deliverable will allow you to apply deductive and inductive reasoning to analyze and create valid arguments. Instructions Part I: Consider the following definition: 1. A  fruit is the product of a tree or other plant that contains seeds and can be eaten as food. 2. A  fruit is the reproductive

NUR514W7

DISCUSSION: Once you received your case number; answer the specific question on the table above. Then, continue to discuss the 3 topics listed below for your case: 1. An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach

home work

Write a professional nursing article on a leadership topics Nurse Staffing. In the Interactive Discussion, you will be posting a link to the article or a PDF from a professional journal or other reputable health care source along with three insights that you gained from the article regarding the topic

CS65

Case Study Week 2 Patient Profile • Name: Sarah L., 32-year-old female • Occupation: Teacher • Chief Complaint: “My skin rash keeps getting worse and is really itchy.” • Onset: 2 weeks • Past Medical History: Mild seasonal allergies, no chronic illnesses • Medications: None • Social History: Lives with

NR 449 W6D

  This area provides you with an opportunity to reflect on what you have learned and what concepts you still need further exploration on.  Answer 1 question. Include a short summary of what has been learned, and include question(s) that are still unclear.   Post your answer to 1 of

Question

Using all you have learned about black aesthetic, and African Art. You will journey into the multifaceted life of Jean-Michel Basquiat through a comprehensive exploration that requires an in-depth investigation into his biography. Utilize APA format guidelines to structure your paper as you embark on a discovery to discern the

research appraisal

I need help with a critical appraisal of one qualitative and one quantitative research design.