1. Review the characteristics of quantitative research within the Explore section of this week’s module and readings.
2. Systematic reviews are not permitted for this assignment.
3. Use the most current version of Microsoft Word,
You can tell the document is saved as the current version because it will end in “docx.”
1. Create a Title page.
2. Write a narrative critique of the quantitative, descriptive or correlational research article using the
Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool
Download Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool
Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReaderand
Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
Download Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader. Your critique should be in paragraph format.
a. Present an overview of the article’s findings.
b. Discuss how the article findings relate to the practice problem.
c. Explain how the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool assists in the critique of the article about your practice problem.
3. The reference page must be in the correct APA format.
4. Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool
a. The Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool is included with the assignment.
b. Accurately completes all sections in the Article Summary Information on pages 1-3.
c. Enter the Evidence level and quality rating.
d. Enter the robust study findings.
e. Complete the quantitative and quality sections, and all boxes are completed on page 2.
f. The Quantitative appraisal is completed as A, B, or C on page 3.
5. Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
a. The Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Tool is included with the assignment.
b. All columns are completed and are accurate.
c. Use the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool to summarize the descriptive or correlational articles and complete all columns accurately.
d. Enter a complete current APA formatted reference and permalink.
e. Enter the research paradigm and research study design.
f. Enter detailed information about the sampling plan, size, and setting.
g. Include the specific intervention, and/or explicit information on what the researcher was studying.
h. Enter in detail the findings by the researcher.
i. Describe the tools used or how outcomes were measured. Include Cronbach alpha if a tool was used.
j. Enter limitations described by the researcher. Also, add your appraisal if limitations were not described.
k. Enter the level of the research study and the quality. Transfer this from the Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool.
6. Scholarly writing is in the third person.
7. Title page required
8. Length: 1-2 pages (not including title page or references page)
9. 1-inch margins
10. Double-spaced
11. 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
12. Use of level 1 headers to separate each section
13. References and citations in proper APA format (current version)
14. In-text citations
15. Reference page required
16. Standard English usage and mechanics
17. No spelling or typographical errors.
You can use the same reference as before below plus 2 more
Popoviciu, M. S., Marin, V. N., Vesa, C. M., Stefan, S. D., Stoica, R. A., Serafinceanu, C., Merlo, E. M., Rizvi, A. A., Rizzo, M., Busnatu, S., & Pantea Stoian, A. (2022). Correlations between diabetes mellitus self-care activities and glycaemic control in the adult population: A cross-sectional study.
Healthcare, 10(1), 174.
to an external site.
