Description
Locate a peer-reviewed journal article through the Saudi Digital Library. This article will describe a healthcare quality improvement that occurred within an organization. In this discussion, you will
- Examine the quality improvement that occurred, including the background and the process changes.
- Explain the challenges in adopting these changes and outline the key issues that need to be considered when implementing the process of change for this decision.
- Describe how this quality improvement effort aligns with Saudi Vision 2030.
Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories (which require supporting citations) in your initial response along with at least one scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article. Keep in mind that these scholarly references can be found in the Saudi Digital Library by conducting an advanced search specific to scholarly references. Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.
You are required to reply to at least two peer discussion question post answers to this weekly discussion question and/or your instructor’s response to your posting. These post replies need to be substantial and constructive in nature. They should add to the content of the post and evaluate/analyze that post’s answer. Normal course dialogue doesn’t fulfill these two peer replies but is expected throughout the course. Answering all course questions is also required.
Discussion 10
Description
10 points
Rubric Detail
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Some Expectations
Unsatisfactory
Quantity
2.5 Points
2 Points
1.5 Points
0 Points
Initial post and two other posts
of substance.
Initial post and one other post
of substance.
Initial post only.
Did not
participate.
2.5 Points
2 Points
1.5 Points
0 Points
Demonstrates excellent
knowledge of concepts, skills,
and theories relevant to the
topic.
Demonstrates knowledge of
concepts, skills, and theories.
Demonstrates satisfactory
knowledge of concepts,
skills, and theories.
Did not
participate.
2.5 Points
2 Points
1.5 Points
0 Points
Discussion post(s) exceed
expectations in terms of
support provided and extend
the discussion.
Discussion post(s) meet
expectations in terms of
support provided.
Statements are satisfactory
in terms of support
provided.
Did not
participate.
2.5 Points
2 Points
1.5 Points
0 Points
Writing is well organized, clear,
concise, and focused; no errors.
Some significant but not major
errors or omissions in writing
organization, focus, and clarity.
Numerous significant errors
or omissions in writing
organization, focus, and
clarity.
Did not
participate.
Content
Support
Writing
View Associated Items
Print
Close Window
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
