Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Healthcare Policy and Analysis

  

Advocacy Area

Advocacy Priorities

ASSIGNMENT

Advocacy Area

In the first two Discussions, you identified a vulnerable or marginalized population for whom you can determine an issue that could be addressed through engaging in policy advocacy. Now it is time to present this advocacy area with evidence to support and defend your selection. 

For this Assignment, you will explain and defend your selected advocacy issue. Using evidence and experience, you will determine the advocacy issue most important to your practice and organization. Why are you selecting this issue? Why is this an area of high need? How might this area be improved with policy? What can you do to advocate for this area of need? 

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Resources

Readings

· Dawes, Daniel E. (2020). 
The political determinants of health. Johns Hopkins University Press.

· Chapter 3, “The Political Determinants of Health Model” (pp. 41-77)

Media

· Get it Right! A Global Health Channel. (2020).
 

How to Understand What Are Vulnerable Groups in Less than 3 MinutesLinks to an external site.


Note: 

The approximate length of this media piece is 3 minutes.

Links to an external site.

· HMS DICP. (2020). 

Voting, Links to an external site.


Health Policy, and Social JusticeLinks to an external site.

: Political Determinants of Health. 


Note: 

The approximate length of this media piece is 58 minutes.

Links to an external site.

· Malloy, Donald. (2020). 

Vulnerable Populations in HealthcareLinks to an external site.

: Do you Know Who They Are? 


Note: 

The approximate length of this media piece is 3 minutes.

Links to an external site.

· Satcher Health Leadership Institute. (2021). 

The Political Determinants of Health — Jessica’s StoryLinks to an external site.


Note: 

The approximate length of this media piece is 5 minutes.

To Prepare

· Review resources associated with vulnerable or marginalized populations to determine an advocacy issue.

· Consider which advocacy issue you find most important, and why.

· Consider how policy might help to mitigate this need.

The Assignment: (1 page)

Select an issue you find most important, and then defend your position in a persuasive paper. 

Submit a 1-page persuasive argument defending why you selected the advocacy issue to move forward with as your priority in this course. 

Support—with evidence—why this advocacy issue is most important, and how it might be mitigated or eliminated through policy. Consider how this issue might set your policy agenda. 

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at 
to an external site.). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

 

Rubric

NURS_8100_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8100_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect an advocacy area you find most important.

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent

The advocacy area selected is clearly appropriate to move forward throughout the course, as well as clearly appropriate for the identified marginalized or vulnerable population.

35 to >31.0 pts

Good

The advocacy area selected is appropriate to move forward throughout the course, as well as appropriate for the identified marginalized or vulnerable population.

31 to >27.0 pts

Fair

The advocacy area selected is vaguely appropriate to move forward throughout the course, as well as vaguely appropriate for the identified marginalized or vulnerable population.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

The advocacy area selected is not appropriate to move forward throughout the course, or it is missing. The advocacy area selected is not appropriate for the identified marginalized or vulnerable population, or it is missing.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefend your position about the advocacy area selected.

45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly defends the advocacy selection. The response is persuasive and includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The response clearly defends the advocacy selection. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely defends the advocacy selection. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not defend the advocacy selection, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is selection.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation are used.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation, with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Week 4 discussion

Advanced practice nurses apply continuous quality improvement (CQI) processes to improve client-centered outcomes. Select one of the following client-centered care initiatives that you would like to improve in your practice area: client clinical outcomes, client satisfaction, care coordination during care transitions, or specialty consultations for clients.    Include the following

EBP

Module 2:  Overview of EBP Process and Translation Instructions: As a DNP scholar, you are expected to perform an academic search of scholarly peer-review journal articles on a given topic. For this assignment, you will choose an article from a peer-review journal database, including but not limited to CINAHL, MEDLINE,

Nursing homework

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

Rwh soap

Rwh soap It  This file is too large to display.View in new window

Week 5_JOURNAL_DNP855

 There are many theories associated with organizational behaviors. Organizational behavior theories study how employees interact with each other and the healthcare  

Week 5_DNP855

 There are many theories associated with organizational behaviors. Organizational behavior theories study how employees interact with each other and the healthcare organization  

Nursing homework

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

MM week 4

INSERT YOUR NAME HERE In-text citation for the resource – in the References list below this table include a full citation. You are required to upload the full-text file for each article represented in the matrix table into the assignment drop box. What is the purpose of the resource to

MR soap week 4

MR soap week 4 years Biological Sex: Male Race: White, Non Hispanic Clinical Information Time with Patient: 30 minutes Consult with Preceptor: 15 minutes Type of Decision-Making: Moderate complexity Student Participation: Shared (50-50) Reason for Visit: Follow-up (Routine) Chief Complaint: major depressive disorder Social Problems Addressed: Safety Role Change Procedures/Skills

powerpoint for topic

the topic is: Mother’s with infants who have hyperbilirubinemia instruction attached  Teaching Experience-316L 1. Purpose: To provide teaching to an individual client with a demonstrated need. With the completion of this assignment the student will be able to achieve the following objectives. a. Demonstrate ability to thoroughly assess the learning

Nursing

To prepare: Read and view the Learning Resources. By Day 3 of Week 10 Post a response to the following prompts: Evaluate a DNP QI project that used a mixed methods approach (choose from the list).  What was the relationship to the practice-focused question to the use of the quantitative

Nursing

To prepare: Read and view the Learning Resources. By Day 3 of Week 10 Post a response to the following prompts: Evaluate a DNP QI project that used a mixed methods approach (choose from the list).  What was the relationship to the practice-focused question to the use of the quantitative

Nursing

To Prepare Review the resources provided in the Nursing Informatics Competencies.  By Day 3 of Week 10 Post a cohesive response to the following: Consider all that you already knew and what you have learned in this class. What are the key informatics competencies that you feel every nurse should

home work

Competency Integrate social determinants, ethical concerns, and human rights for high-risk and vulnerable global populations. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “Grading rubric” in the right menu.  Scenario As a nurse on the ethics committee of a free clinic, you are educating staff

Data analysis and visualization activity

Table 1 Patient ID Age Gender Falls (Yes/No) CAUTIs (Yes/No) Medication Errors (Yes/No) MRSA (Yes/No) Age Falls CAUTIs Medication Errors MRSA 1 65 Female Yes No Yes No 67.5 2 70 Male No Yes No Yes 3 55 Female Yes No No No Male Female 4 80 Male No Yes