Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

help



Week 4 Assignment: Critiquing Mixed-Methods or Action Research

Overview:

This week’s assignment asks the student to critique examples of published research. During a professional career, a person will often be presented with research on a specific topic. As a consumer of research, how will that person know if the research is legitimate and/or worthwhile? At other times, there will be a need to find research regarding problems, issues, or needs at an agency, campus or district. Additionally, if you found yourself needing to personally research a topic, this uniform method would assist with establishing a disciplined approach to conducting research that could be shared with others and added to the body of knowledge on the topic. The purpose of the Week 4 assignment is to critique a quantitative or qualitative research article.

Week 4 targets the following Course Learning Objectives

· CLO4: Review and analyze published, empirical studies using a variety of research methodologies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, and action research)

· CLO5: Develop a coherent research plan that support instructional planning through data-driven decision-making

Week 4 Learning Outcomes

Students will:

· Read a mixed-methods and action research article and formally critique one of them.

General Instructions

(1) Read the two research articles provided to you in the week 4 reading section. One article will be a mixed-methods research example and the other will be an action research example.

(2) Write a critique on one of the articles. Use the template below for your submission. Five sections have been identified. These include the introduction, review of the literature, methodology, findings, and conclusions.

(3) Review the grading rubric. Pay close attention to the Exceeds Criteria if you want all points.

(4) VERY IMPORTANT – Be sure to cover the required components. There is no need to submit a wordy document. Organize your thoughts and be concise and to the point.

Section I



Introduction – Review the Introduction section of the article. Briefly describe each of the following three parts of the Introduction and note the degree of clarity and completeness of each. Include any concerns found or suggestions for improvement (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) Setting of the study and problem being addressed

(2) Purpose and significance of the study

(3) Research questions

Section II



Literature Review – Read the Review of the Literature (or Background) section of the chosen article. Address the following four questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) How many different sources were cited?

(2) Were the majority of sources current? (Be sure to compare with the date of publication)

(3) Briefly describe the consensus (or main point) of this section

(4) Did this section adequately cover the body of knowledge related to the topic? Why or why not?

Section III

Methodology – Review the Methodology section of your chosen article. Address the following four questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)
Note: To answer questions 1 & 2, refer to the text – qualitative sampling, pages 167-169 and quantitative sampling, pages 191-199. To answer questions 3 & 4, refer to the text – qualitative data collection methods, pages 169-178 and quantitative data collection methods, pages 202-214.

(1) What type of sample was used?

(2) Did the sample adequately represent the population? Why or why not?

(3) What data were collected?

(4) How were the data collected?

Section IV

Findings – Review the Findings section of the chosen article. Address the following three questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) How were the data presented?

(2) Was the manner of presenting the data clear and understandable?

(3) Were the Findings directly related to the research question?

Section V

Conclusions – Review the Conclusions section of the chosen article. Address the following three questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) Were the conclusions solely based on the Findings of the study? Briefly describe.

(2) What populations can the conclusions be generalized to, and why?

(3) Why was the study design (quantitative or qualitative) the appropriate design?

Use the following Rubric to guide your work on the Week 4 Assignment.

PEDG 5307

Week 4

Tasks

Does Not Meet Minimum Criteria

Approaches Minimum Criteria

Meets Criteria

Exceeds Criteria

Part 1

Introduction Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions

(20 points)

Part 2

Literature Review Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not and/or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not but omits (15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not

(20 points)

Part 3

Methodology Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected and/or omits two or more prompt

(10 points)

Candidate describes the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected

(20 points)

Part 4

Findings Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not and/or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not

(20 points)

Part 5

Conclusions Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate and/or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate

(20 points)

1

PEDG 5307_Fall 2021 Page

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Discussion Board

 There are both supporters of and critics of managed care, and the research has been mixed. Discuss at least two pros and cons of managed care. 

discussion board

 Contact a child welfare social worker and interview them about their experiences in their field of practice.  Include these areas in your interview: cultural factors in assessment; legal and policy implications and challenges in practice; and ethical considerations in practice.  Your initial posting should summarize the key points from your

6070-4d

  Post a potential solution to the ethical scenario that draws on ethical leadership and the NASW Code of Ethics. Provide justification for your choices using a specific NASW ethical standard. Additionally, explain the type of power you would utilize in achieving the solution.  (scenario) You have been told that the

Detailed

See attachment Assignment Questions: “What do individuals need to do to be prepared economically for their older years?” · Identify the age that you are starting from and how long this individual will be able to plan for retirement, etc. · Be specific in your responses. Utilize information available on-line,

psych 421

Chapter 5 – Artificially Modeling the mind (200 words) Hello; for this week, please, read chapter 5 and answer the following questions: 1. How do artificial neural network models work alongside neuroscientific techniques to help us study the brain? What do they add to our understanding? 2. Why do you think

feed back prof

 his is a good start but there are some areas that need more detail. I’m going to focus on self-esteem. You mention how others define self-esteem but I’d like you to discuss difficulties in defining self-esteem. Also, how would you define self-esteem after looking at Rosenberg’s scale and others? Do

Discussion

· Discussion 1 · · · Should Russ Saffold intervene to help his team handle this crisis? If so, what type of leadership action should he take, and why? · What leadership actions, if any, should team members take? · What should Russ Saffold do, if anything, to mitigate the

Psychology Can someone help me with my critical thinking homework?

Open Quick Links Quick Links Page Landmarks Content Outline Keyboard Shortcuts Current Location SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Course Content Week 9 – Conflict Resolution Menu Management Options Course Menu: SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Getting Started Home Start Here Course Information My Course Annoucements Course Content My Grades Email Collaborate Technical

Psychology Can someone help me with my critical thinking homework?

Open Quick Links Quick Links Page Landmarks Content Outline Keyboard Shortcuts Current Location SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Course Content Week 9 – Conflict Resolution Menu Management Options Course Menu: SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Getting Started Home Start Here Course Information My Course Annoucements Course Content My Grades Email Collaborate Technical

world cultures

see attachment  Introduction After the death of Alexander in 323 B.C.E, his empire was divided among his generals. For the next few hundred years the Greek culture settled in the customs of the people it had invaded through Alexander. However, while this was happening the Roman people were starting to

world cultures

see attachment  I nstructions: 1. Look up the consequences of Julius Caesar’s assassination. 2. Come up with a scenario in which Caesar wouldn’t have been assassinated. 3. Think three possibilities of your own and explain why you think those. 4. Submit your assignment in Word and in the space provided

english

see attachment  CRAAP Test: Is Your Source Worthy of Inclusion in Your Essay Research? If you want to succeed at your assignments or research, you should only use quality information. Use the following criteria, also known as the  CRAAP Test, to evaluate any information source critically. Video: Evaluating SourcesLinks to

english

see attachment  CRAAP Test: Is Your Source Worthy of Inclusion in Your Essay Research? If you want to succeed at your assignments or research, you should only use quality information. Use the following criteria, also known as the  CRAAP Test, to evaluate any information source critically. Video: Evaluating SourcesLinks to

english

see attachment  Discussion Etiquette Guidelines: 1. Think and edit before you post. 2. DON’T SHOUT: TYPING IN ALL CAPS IS AGGRESSIVE.  3. Participate, but don’t dominate. 4. Cite your sources. · Imagine sending as a text message one of these guidelines to the main character in a movie who reacted

Psychology

EAB4764 Assessment and Intervention Lecture Engagement: Written Lecture Summary Student Name: Date Completed: Student ID: (41) zoom 0 – YouTube On minute 21:22. After watching the video students must complete. Please answer the questions below in a narrative form. Each answer should be a complete paragraph. 1. What was the main

Psychology

I need help with formatting a disorder fact sheet.  Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title Neurodiversity Fact Sheet (Include name of the diagnosis in title.) Description of neurodiverse condition: The impact on individuals with the condition: Technique 1 for enhancing learning for (Name the condition and remove this

Discussion Board

 There are both supporters of and critics of managed care, and the research has been mixed. Discuss at least two pros and cons of managed care. 

Behavioral Therapy final

Attached AS 3010 Research Paper Assignment Rubric RESEARCH PAPER ON BEHAVIORAL THERAPY Please Read the Rubric Carefully!! _____ 10 points – Posted theory research pre-approval request in the appropriate forum AND it was approved by the instructor _____ 10 points – The pre-approval request matches what was turned in _____