Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

help



Week 4 Assignment: Critiquing Mixed-Methods or Action Research

Overview:

This week’s assignment asks the student to critique examples of published research. During a professional career, a person will often be presented with research on a specific topic. As a consumer of research, how will that person know if the research is legitimate and/or worthwhile? At other times, there will be a need to find research regarding problems, issues, or needs at an agency, campus or district. Additionally, if you found yourself needing to personally research a topic, this uniform method would assist with establishing a disciplined approach to conducting research that could be shared with others and added to the body of knowledge on the topic. The purpose of the Week 4 assignment is to critique a quantitative or qualitative research article.

Week 4 targets the following Course Learning Objectives

· CLO4: Review and analyze published, empirical studies using a variety of research methodologies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, and action research)

· CLO5: Develop a coherent research plan that support instructional planning through data-driven decision-making

Week 4 Learning Outcomes

Students will:

· Read a mixed-methods and action research article and formally critique one of them.

General Instructions

(1) Read the two research articles provided to you in the week 4 reading section. One article will be a mixed-methods research example and the other will be an action research example.

(2) Write a critique on one of the articles. Use the template below for your submission. Five sections have been identified. These include the introduction, review of the literature, methodology, findings, and conclusions.

(3) Review the grading rubric. Pay close attention to the Exceeds Criteria if you want all points.

(4) VERY IMPORTANT – Be sure to cover the required components. There is no need to submit a wordy document. Organize your thoughts and be concise and to the point.

Section I



Introduction – Review the Introduction section of the article. Briefly describe each of the following three parts of the Introduction and note the degree of clarity and completeness of each. Include any concerns found or suggestions for improvement (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) Setting of the study and problem being addressed

(2) Purpose and significance of the study

(3) Research questions

Section II



Literature Review – Read the Review of the Literature (or Background) section of the chosen article. Address the following four questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) How many different sources were cited?

(2) Were the majority of sources current? (Be sure to compare with the date of publication)

(3) Briefly describe the consensus (or main point) of this section

(4) Did this section adequately cover the body of knowledge related to the topic? Why or why not?

Section III

Methodology – Review the Methodology section of your chosen article. Address the following four questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)
Note: To answer questions 1 & 2, refer to the text – qualitative sampling, pages 167-169 and quantitative sampling, pages 191-199. To answer questions 3 & 4, refer to the text – qualitative data collection methods, pages 169-178 and quantitative data collection methods, pages 202-214.

(1) What type of sample was used?

(2) Did the sample adequately represent the population? Why or why not?

(3) What data were collected?

(4) How were the data collected?

Section IV

Findings – Review the Findings section of the chosen article. Address the following three questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) How were the data presented?

(2) Was the manner of presenting the data clear and understandable?

(3) Were the Findings directly related to the research question?

Section V

Conclusions – Review the Conclusions section of the chosen article. Address the following three questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) Were the conclusions solely based on the Findings of the study? Briefly describe.

(2) What populations can the conclusions be generalized to, and why?

(3) Why was the study design (quantitative or qualitative) the appropriate design?

Use the following Rubric to guide your work on the Week 4 Assignment.

PEDG 5307

Week 4

Tasks

Does Not Meet Minimum Criteria

Approaches Minimum Criteria

Meets Criteria

Exceeds Criteria

Part 1

Introduction Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions

(20 points)

Part 2

Literature Review Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not and/or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not but omits (15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not

(20 points)

Part 3

Methodology Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected and/or omits two or more prompt

(10 points)

Candidate describes the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected

(20 points)

Part 4

Findings Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not and/or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not

(20 points)

Part 5

Conclusions Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate and/or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate

(20 points)

1

PEDG 5307_Fall 2021 Page

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Discussion Response

I need a response to two discussion questions.  1. I believe strategic therapists dig down to the root of the problem. In my words, these therapists get to the meat of the matter. I appreciate the fact that this particular therapist is in place to assist the individual/family in need

Human Sexuality

see attachment  How External Influences Affect Our Sexual Development REMINDER:  All coursework is due by 11:59 PM Eastern on Saturday of this last Module. Introduction: In this forum, we will explore the profound impact that external influences have on our sexual development. Our discussion will focus on how various cultural

Interpersonal assign

Journal Assignment (I do not have the textbook, so answer as best you can) Be sure to use MLA format and double space. Choose only one of the questions below, discuss in detail and be sure to provide examples to support your views. You are not limited to the suggestions

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need assistance with a discussion question Experiential therapy is not a specific type of psychotherapy but covers therapeutic techniques that require engaging in some type of activity or action such as role playing, sculpting, rock climbing, or using props.  Experiential therapy encourages clients to delve into underlying issues – such

Sociology Principles

see attachment  Module 7:  Essay After reading the course materials, follow the instructions for the assignment and its submission: Submission Instructions: Write  an essay on the role of education in social mobility in Puerto Rico. · Use a word processor, such as Word, to complete the  Assignment. · Include bibliographic

Sociology Principles

see attachment  Module 7:  Conceptual Domain After reading the course materials, follow the instructions for the assignment and its submission: Submission Instructions: Develop a conceptual map on  sociological perspectives and social stratification systems. · Use a word processor, such as Word, to complete the  Assignment. · You can use an

Family and Marriage Therapy

 I need assistance with a reflection  · Weekly “Reflection” Papers – The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the material in the readings by sharing your interpretation of a primary topic. You may relate it to a case that you have either worked with or a family experience

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need assistance with a discussion question Sometimes a family in crisis needs a more direct interaction from a helping professional. This is the role of the Strategic Therapist. The strategic therapist is somewhat of a “Drill Seargent” in the counseling environment. They do complete an initial assessment of the presenting

Week 8

Week 8 DisCUSsion 1: The Impact of Industrial Psychology in the Workplace In this Discussion, you will explore how specific principles, models, and/or theories related to selection, assessment, training, and performance evaluation have contributed to improvements in the practice of industrial psychology. Then, in your response to your peers, you

week 7 response

INSTRUCTION: Respond to the colleague below who discussed different theories than you did in one or more of the following ways: · Ask a probing question and provide insight into how you would answer your question and why. · Ask a probing question and provide the foundation, or rationale, for the

Dis

Respond to discussion: Chapter 9 – Using Case #1 Sandy & Pam (chapter installments throughout the text) discuss the following: what stage of the addicted family do you think they are in? What are the different family roles, what feedback loops are present? What elements of this family may hinder

Final

Article Review on Behavioral/Non-Substance Addictions or Process Addictions–Final Article   All Students: Be sure to use a peer-reviewed article.   Look at the list under the “Assignments” tab for a list of some professional journals or ask one of the librarians to assist you in finding peer-reviewed sources.  Your article review should

Discussion Response

 I need a response to two discussion questions.   Discussion Post Guidelines: · Acknowledge your classmates’ posts. · Build upon these posts by providing additional details, statistics, ideas, perspectives, or links to interesting, relevant articles. Conclude with a question or new idea to further stimulate the discussion 1. The interaction of

Psychology Assignment

please follow up with the instruction . No AI Due Jul 20 by 10:59pm Points 90 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 1 Allowed Attempts 2 New Attempt Back to Week at a Glance ( To understand those around you and society as a whole, it

6530-7a1

  Submit your completed Intervention Plan in which you: Identify one issue you want to work on with your client. Write a goal statement in SMART goal format. Identify and describe an evidence-based intervention/treatment model or approach that you want to implement.

Human Sexuality

see attachment  Instructions Make a short learning reflection by answering the following questions with 3 to 5 sentences: 1. What is the most important thing you have learned from the information presented in modules 6 and 7? 2. What relevance do you see for your future career? 3. Briefly share

Article Review

How to write an article review on Professionalism, Ethics, and Value-Based Conflicts in Counseling?

Prof Double R

COMPLETE THE TEMPLATE THAT IS UPLOADED BELOW PSY 328 Module Two Journal Template First, you may want to revisit your submission for the Module One Journal assignment. Next, complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. Describe what a psychoanalyst like Freud or Jung would be