Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

help



Week 4 Assignment: Critiquing Mixed-Methods or Action Research

Overview:

This week’s assignment asks the student to critique examples of published research. During a professional career, a person will often be presented with research on a specific topic. As a consumer of research, how will that person know if the research is legitimate and/or worthwhile? At other times, there will be a need to find research regarding problems, issues, or needs at an agency, campus or district. Additionally, if you found yourself needing to personally research a topic, this uniform method would assist with establishing a disciplined approach to conducting research that could be shared with others and added to the body of knowledge on the topic. The purpose of the Week 4 assignment is to critique a quantitative or qualitative research article.

Week 4 targets the following Course Learning Objectives

· CLO4: Review and analyze published, empirical studies using a variety of research methodologies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, and action research)

· CLO5: Develop a coherent research plan that support instructional planning through data-driven decision-making

Week 4 Learning Outcomes

Students will:

· Read a mixed-methods and action research article and formally critique one of them.

General Instructions

(1) Read the two research articles provided to you in the week 4 reading section. One article will be a mixed-methods research example and the other will be an action research example.

(2) Write a critique on one of the articles. Use the template below for your submission. Five sections have been identified. These include the introduction, review of the literature, methodology, findings, and conclusions.

(3) Review the grading rubric. Pay close attention to the Exceeds Criteria if you want all points.

(4) VERY IMPORTANT – Be sure to cover the required components. There is no need to submit a wordy document. Organize your thoughts and be concise and to the point.

Section I



Introduction – Review the Introduction section of the article. Briefly describe each of the following three parts of the Introduction and note the degree of clarity and completeness of each. Include any concerns found or suggestions for improvement (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) Setting of the study and problem being addressed

(2) Purpose and significance of the study

(3) Research questions

Section II



Literature Review – Read the Review of the Literature (or Background) section of the chosen article. Address the following four questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) How many different sources were cited?

(2) Were the majority of sources current? (Be sure to compare with the date of publication)

(3) Briefly describe the consensus (or main point) of this section

(4) Did this section adequately cover the body of knowledge related to the topic? Why or why not?

Section III

Methodology – Review the Methodology section of your chosen article. Address the following four questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)
Note: To answer questions 1 & 2, refer to the text – qualitative sampling, pages 167-169 and quantitative sampling, pages 191-199. To answer questions 3 & 4, refer to the text – qualitative data collection methods, pages 169-178 and quantitative data collection methods, pages 202-214.

(1) What type of sample was used?

(2) Did the sample adequately represent the population? Why or why not?

(3) What data were collected?

(4) How were the data collected?

Section IV

Findings – Review the Findings section of the chosen article. Address the following three questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) How were the data presented?

(2) Was the manner of presenting the data clear and understandable?

(3) Were the Findings directly related to the research question?

Section V

Conclusions – Review the Conclusions section of the chosen article. Address the following three questions. (This should be at least one paragraph, but no more than two paragraphs and written in a narrative paragraph format.)

(1) Were the conclusions solely based on the Findings of the study? Briefly describe.

(2) What populations can the conclusions be generalized to, and why?

(3) Why was the study design (quantitative or qualitative) the appropriate design?

Use the following Rubric to guide your work on the Week 4 Assignment.

PEDG 5307

Week 4

Tasks

Does Not Meet Minimum Criteria

Approaches Minimum Criteria

Meets Criteria

Exceeds Criteria

Part 1

Introduction Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes setting, problem, purpose, significance, and research questions

(20 points)

Part 2

Literature Review Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not and/or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not but omits (15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes number of citations and whether current or not, main point, and whether adequate coverage or not

(20 points)

Part 3

Methodology Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected and/or omits two or more prompt

(10 points)

Candidate describes the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes the type of sample and whether representative of population, what data was collected and how collected

(20 points)

Part 4

Findings Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not and/or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes how the data was collected, whether clear and understandable, and whether Findings relate to research questions or not

(20 points)

Part 5

Conclusions Section Critique

Candidate failed to describe whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate

(0 points)

Candidate vaguely describes whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate and/or omits two or more prompts

(10 points)

Candidate describes whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate but omits one prompt

(15 points)

Candidate fully and clearly describes whether conclusions were based on research questions, population that study can be generalized to, and why the design was appropriate

(20 points)

1

PEDG 5307_Fall 2021 Page

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

PSYCHUNIT6

2 Please consider the following prompt and craft a response that sufficiently captures all aspects of it from your unique point of view and original research. Please cite and reference any source(s) you use to help write this response in APA format. Notice that in addition to your Main Entry

scientific method

see attachment  Discussion 1 Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, read the instructor guidance, the quantitative section of Chapter 7 and all of Chapter 8 in the Creswell and Creswell text, the chapter by Meltzoff and Cooper titled  Chapter 6: Research Designs and Threats to Internal ValidityLinks to

Behavioral disorders in childhood and adolescents

Assess Websites for Parents.  · Implementing Evidence-based Practices in Nonspecialty Mental Health Settings Wolk, C. B., Arnold, K. T., & Proctor, E. K. (2022). Implementing evidence-based practices in nonspecialty mental health settings.  Families, Systems, & Health, 40(2), 274–282. · Clinician’s commentary to accompany “Implementing evidence-based practices in non-specialty mental health

Psychology Homework help

Help with an assignment  ● ○ ○ ● ● ● ● ● ● ○ ● ● ● ● ● ● To prepare: Review the following articles from the Learning Resources: “Living happily despite having an illness: Perceptions of healthy aging among Korean American, Vietnamese American, and Latino older adults” by

case study 1

Page 2 PSY1010 – Touchstone 3.1 Type Your Name Here Smarter Decisions through Psychology SCENARIO: Monica is a single mom who has a 16-year-old son named Jordan. Monica and Jordan were close at one point. As of late, Monica has been noticing that Jordan spends a lot of time focusing on

Assessment

Follow rubric and all instructions carefully. Benchmark – Methods Revision and Ethical Considerations – Rubric Introduction Paragraph 10 points Criteria Description Describe the need for additional research and include the problem statement or hypothesis and the thesis statement. 5. Target 10 points Description of the need for additional research of

Week 8 Responses

Week 8 Discussion 1 Response. The Impact of Industrial Psychology in the Workplace INSTRUCTIONS: Respond to a colleague who selected at least one principle, model, or theory that you did not. Make an argument about the potential limitations of each principle, model, or theory in relation to the practice of industrial psychology.

6530-8a

 Using the template: Complete the agency and client information section. Provide a transcript of what happened during your field education experience, including a dialogue of interaction with a client. Identify your application of specific theories, practice models, techniques, and skills within the interaction. Analyze the interaction by interpreting the client’s

discussion

  To complete this assignment, you may use either SPSS or Excel. If using SPSS to complete this assignment, refer to the SPSS resources located in either Topic 2 resources, or Class Resources MindTap. View the video “Descriptive Statistics and Frequencies” in the MindTap course before starting this assignment. Go

Family and Marriage Therapy

 I need assistance with a reflection  · Weekly “Reflection” Papers – The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the material in the readings by sharing your interpretation of a primary topic. You may relate it to a case that you have either worked with or a family experience

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need assistance with a reflection · Weekly “Reflection” Papers – The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the material in the readings by sharing your interpretation of a primary topic. You may relate it to a case that you have either worked with or a family experience

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need help with a discussion question Discuss one of the patterns that develops in an addicted family that could be addressed in family therapy. *Each experience of grief is unique and complicated. Identify a loss that a family might experience and how family therapy could be helpful.

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need assistance with a discussion question There are many keys to effective therapy. One of the most basic is the need for an individual to use language. By encouraging individuals to route difficult or abstract challenges through the language center in various ways (individual dialogue, the empty chair, journaling,

Family and Marriage Therapy

  I need assistance with a reflection   · Weekly “Reflection” Papers – The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the material in the readings by sharing your interpretation of a primary topic. You may relate it to a case that you have either worked with or a family experience

DLRL Week 8 Assignment

To prepare: Review the theoretical frameworks resources. Assignment: 1- or 2-page paper, not including title page or references page(s) Create an Overview of Relevant Theories document that contains the following information: Identify the theoretical framework in each article in your annotated bibliography. If not noted there, return to the article

AQR&A Week 8 Workshop

If you are collecting phone or face-to-face interviews, the audio recorder is the most important tool for ensuring accuracy in capturing the interview. In addition, you may or may not want to take notes during the interview. If you are conducting e-mail interviews, format your document using the following guidelines:

AQR&A Week 8 Assignment

The Final Project is a stepwise process, and its goal is to leave you well-prepared by the end of this course to execute on your qualitative research study plan. In Week 8, you will complete Step III of the Final Project. For Step III of the Final Project, you will

Discussion Response

I need a response to two discussion questions.  1. I believe strategic therapists dig down to the root of the problem. In my words, these therapists get to the meat of the matter. I appreciate the fact that this particular therapist is in place to assist the individual/family in need