Week 3 Application Assignment: Integrated Health
Make sure to fully present each of the
two tools
you have chosen to include and use the
rubric to guide your writing (the rubric is used to determine your grade). Your assignments should be written in accordance with APA 7th edition guidelines and contain two professional sources (your text-book may count as one of your resources). Although there is no minimum page length requirement for this assignment, you will likely write a minimum of four pages to fully address all of the prompts.
Directions:
Select two tools from the
ps://soarworks.samhsa.gov/content/library-home
You may also use this site too:
(Note you may have to spend sometime searching/researching).
Provide an overview of the
two tools
and ways to implement those tools as a mental health specialist.
· This assignment is worth 100 points.
· All assignments should be written in APA format. Please include a title page, the body of your paper, and a reference page. All papers should include an introduction and conclusion.
· Submit the assignment to both Blackboard by 11:59 CST on Day 7 of the week.
Week Two Assignment Rubric
|
Criteria |
Exemplary |
Well Developed |
In Development |
Needs development |
|
35 points Select two tools from the websites listed above. Provide an overview of the tools and ways to implement those tools as a mental health specialist. Tool 1 |
30-35 points The first tool is accurately and thoroughly presented. The report provides clear and complete information about the tool itself and insightful ways it can be implemented by a mental health specialist. At least two sources are used, cited, and referenced correctly. |
22-29 points The first tool is accurately and presented. The report provides adequate information about the tool and some ways it can be implemented by a mental health specialist. At least two sources are used, cited, and referenced with possible minor errors. |
16-21 points The first tool is presented and provides some information about the tool and vague possibilities for implementation by a mental health specialist. One or two sources are used, cited, and referenced with some errors. |
0-15 points The first tool is included in the report but information is possibly inaccurate and incomplete. Ways to implement the tool by a mental health specialist are unclear or missing. Either one or no citations and references are provided and may contain errors. |
|
35 Points Select two tools from the websites listed above. Provide an overview of the tools and ways to implement those tools as a mental health specialist. Tool 2 |
30-35 points The second tool is accurately and thoroughly presented. The report provides clear and complete information about the tool itself and insightful ways it can be implemented by a mental health specialist. At least two sources are used, cited, and referenced correctly. |
22-29 points The second tool is accurately and presented. The report provides adequate information about the tool and some ways it can be implemented by a mental health specialist. At least two sources are used, cited, and referenced with possible minor errors. |
16-21 points The second tool is presented and provides some information about the tool and vague possibilities for implementation by a mental health specialist. One or two sources are used, cited, and referenced with some errors. |
0-15 points The second tool is included in the report but information is possibly inaccurate and incomplete. Ways to implement the tool by a mental health specialist are unclear or missing. Either one or no citations and references are provided and may contain errors. |
|
15 points
Structure: |
13-15 points The paper includes all five sections, well-written with clear communication of meaning. Both questions are adequately addressed. |
10-12 points The paper includes all five sections, is well-written, but lacks some clarity of meaning. Both sections are included in the paper and at least one is adequately addressed. |
7-9 points The paper includes at least four of the required sections. Writing is somewhat organized some lack of clarity of meaning is present. Both questions are included but are incompletely addressed |
0-6 points The paper includes three or less of the required sections. The writing is unclear in meaning and one question is incompletely addressed. |
|
10 points. Writing Mechanics and APA Grammar and Format: Papers are written using APA 6th edition formatting and writing skills. |
9-10 points No more than three grammatical, spelling, punctuation, and/or APA errors. Clarity of paper was not influenced by the errors. |
7-8 points More than three grammatical, spelling, punctuation, or APA errors. Clarity of paper was not strongly influenced by the errors. |
4-6 points More than three grammatical, spelling, punctuation, or APA errors that had a negative influence on the clarity of the paper. |
0-3 points More than three grammatical, spelling, punctuation, or APA errors that had a strong negative influence on the clarity of the paper. |
|
5 points Sources: Two additional professional sources are used to support points in |
5 points Two or more professional sources (e.g., journal article, textbook) used to thoroughly support ideas, correctly cited and documented in the references list and |
4 points Two professional sources were used to adequately support ideas and was documented in the reference list. Citations and references contain some errors. |
3 points One or two sources, not professional sources, were used to support the information and documented in the reference list. Errors in citation and/or referencing. |
0-2 points There were none or one source. Ideas were insufficiently supported. Citation and reference were incomplete or absent. |
|
Total: 100 points |
