Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Help Philosophy

ESSAY CRITERIA
PHIL-2306, Fall 2024

The essay is 100 points and is 25% of your final grade. This assignment is meant to test your ability to

explain ethics more in-depth and to show your own critical thinking on different approaches to ethics.

This must be a new essay written specifically for this class by you individually. You need approval from

your instructor before using part or all of an essay that was submitted for another class.

Topic: Pick any two out of the following ethical theories: Ethical egoism, utilitarianism, Kant’s

deontology, Aristotle’s virtue ethics, and Held’s care ethics. First, give you own cohesive summary of

each of the two theories you chose to focus on. Second, discuss what you see as the comparative

strengths and weaknesses of each theory and give your own argument for which is a better approach to

ethics and why (or why both are equally good or bad, etc.).

Summary: You must summarize each of the two theories you are discussing, in about a paragraph each

(or two each, if necessary). For this assignment, your summary should not give any judgment of each

theory, but simply present a neutral explanation of its main points (any evaluation should be in your

analysis). Your summary must be mostly in your own words; you can and should use key terms, and

limited use of direct quotes is helpful, but you cannot just copy the text, notes or other sources.

Analysis: You must discuss and explain what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of each theory and

give your own argument for which theory is better and why. This portion should not just repeat the

strengths and weaknesses given in the text and notes or outside sources; you must focus mainly on your

own clearly given analysis and your own rationally supported argument. You do not have to argue that

one theory is better than the other, as long as you have a clear conclusion that you argue for.

Example Topic: Compare utilitarianism and deontology. First, summarize the main points of each theory.

Then, give the strengths and weaknesses of each theory, and end with your own clear argument for which

is a better approach to morality and why.

Setup: Your essay will have two main parts: first, a relevant summary of course material. Secondly, your

own critical analysis or argument regarding the theories you are addressing. You must have both parts,

and they should be roughly equal in length. In addition to those two main parts, your paper should further

begin with a one-paragraph introduction (including a thesis statement) and end with a one-paragraph

conclusion. Again, this must be a new paper written specifically for this course by you individually; you

cannot reuse any work from other courses (including taking Ethics previously) without approval.

Due Date and Submission:

Your essay must be submitted on ecampus by 11:59 PM on Thursday, October 3. You will upload

the essay as a Word document (.doc or .docx) to ecampus; it must be a Word document specifically. Your

essay will be run through Turnitin, software to help identify potential cases of plagiarism and check for

potential cases of uncited AI use in your writing (see below concerning AI use in your essay).

(continued on next page)

PHIL 2306 – Essay Criteria (continued)

Length and Format: Your essay must be no less than 1000 words and should not be more than 1500

words. It should be 12” Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with 1” margins on all sides. Any essay

written below the minimum length will receive a lower grade (you may go beyond the upper word limit,

if necessary, but not too much). Headings, direct quotes, footnotes, your works cited list, etc. do not count

towards the 1000-1500 words.

Sources and Citation: All sources of information, including course materials, must be properly cited

according to either MLA, APA, or Chicago style citation, resources for which can be easily found online.

• You are required to cite the course materials relevant to the two theories you are writing on. You

may use the assigned reading, your notes from lecture, or the online course notes for this, or any

combination of the above.

• You may use outside sources if you want to, but it is not required; if you use any outside sources,

then you are required to properly cite them in your essay. Citing outside sources does not replace

the requirement to cite the relevant course material.

• Use of artificial intelligence or AI tools (for example, Chat GPT or similar) is strongly discouraged

on this assignment, as this assignment is meant to test your own writing, understanding, and critical

thinking. Very limited use of AI may be allowed but counts as an outside source and must be

properly cited; this includes a works cited entry, indicating all places in your writing where you

took information from AI, and using quotation marks when copying text directly.

Remember, anything that is not your own thinking or idea must be properly referenced! Proper citation

always includes two things: in-text citation (parenthetical references or footnotes) and full information for

each source at the end of the essay (a works cited list). Any use of a source that is not cited constitutes

plagiarism. Direct word-for-word copying from a source without use of both quotation marks and source

citation is also plagiarism. Plagiarism may result in a 0 on this assignment.

Grading: The essay as a whole is worth 100 points and is 25% of your final course grade. Your grade on

the assignment consists of the following criteria:

Summary (25 points): Give a clear and cohesive summary of two ethical theories, clearly covering the

most important aspects and overall main idea of each one.

Analysis (25 points): Compare what you see as the strengths and weakness of each ethical theory, and

give your own argument for which is better (or why both are equally good, etc.)

Critical Thinking (25 points): Be sure to show careful and consistent reasoning throughout your essay,

clearly explain your ideas, and give your own reasoning behind your judgments and conclusion.

Writing (25 points): Be sure to write clearly, properly cite all your sources, and make sure that your

essay is mostly free of spelling and grammar errors; submit essay in proper format.

Essays that are late and/or below the required word count will have points deducted

outside of this grading criteria.

Contact your instructor if you have any questions over the essay assignment!

  • Essay Criteria
    • PHIL-2306, Fall 2024
    • PHIL 2306 – Essay Criteria (continued)

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Nursing week 6 assignment

Scholarly Writing For this assignment, you will write a paper on the pharmacological management of the disease. The paper should include a review of the: · Select a disease process that is of interest to you- Cystic fibrosis · Pathophysiology of the disease state. · Review of the pharmacological agents

Nursing homework

Topic-Rapid Response vs. code Blue: Knowing when to Act Part 1: STAFF EDUCATION PLAN Data must be supported by evidence-based literature with APA reference list included – (25 points) ***Use of Artificial Intelligence or prohibited outside resources to complete this project is strictly prohibited.*** I. PART 1: THE PLAN A. 

Policy Analysis

I need assistance in choosing a state health policy reform innovation

Nursing week 8_Assignment_DNP855

 Change theory –       What it is in YOUR project Nursing theory : Orem Self-Care Deficit Theory  = theoretical framework  Change theory PDSA cycle Intervention DSMP + SDSCA tool Outcome : Improved self-care behaviors

Treatments for Genitourinary Tract Disorders

please answer the following questions: Describe urinary tract infection, causes, symptoms and treatment Discuss treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia Describe overactive bladder, causes, symptoms and treatment  Treatment options and recommendations for different STIs (Chlamydia, Gonorrhea and Syphilis)

Personhood

Discuss the concept of personhood as used in the nursing as caring theory.

Nursing Homework

General Instructions   To implement evidence-based practice, advanced practice nurses must evaluate current research findings for application to practice. Create a PowerPoint Presentation and address the following requirements:   1. Download the  Week 7 Evidence-Based Practice Change template  Download Week 7 Evidence-Based Practice Change template Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader.

NUR 640

Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 3 Step 1: You will use the Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Template  Download Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Template to: 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychotherapy evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. 2. Upload your completed comprehensive psychotherapy evaluation as a Word doc. Scanned PDFs will

nurse

Now that you have completed the priority aspects of 1.0 and 2.0 of the Hoshin-Kanri Model for strategic planning, the time has come to complete aspect 3.0. · Reflect back on the goals identified in your Part 1 and Part 2 assignments. · Create a PowerPoint presentation that outlines at

PowerPoint on Dementia, Alzheimer’s

Write a comprehensive 10–15 minute PowerPoint presentation on dementia. The presentation should clearly define dementia and provide an in-depth discussion of its classifications, major types, underlying causes, risk factors (both modifiable and non-modifiable), diagnostic approach, and current treatment options, including both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management strategies.  Use this book if

EBP

Module 5:  Univariate and Multivariate Analysis Prepare an essay presenting the use of univariate and multivariate analysis in clinical studies.   Instructions As a DNP, you have been assigned to perform a database search of articles from peer-reviewed journals. To start the process, you need to explore what specific databases

EBP

Module 6:  Article Grading Table Instructions Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question. Clinical Question: In patients

Discussion 6

The Result & Discussion Section Please answer the questions below. 1. What must be included in the result and discussion section of the research paper? 2. Select a research result and state whether it includes the necessary elements. Why and why not? Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be

Lorem,lpsum

NR293 Pharmacology for Nursing Practice Medication Teaching Plan Guidelines © 2024 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved NR293_JUL24_RUA_Medication_Teaching_Plan_Guidelines_V6.docx 1 3 Purpose The purpose of this assignment is for the student to synthesize pharmacological knowledge (i.e., core drug knowledge, core patient variables, and nursing implications) of pharmacotherapeutic agents into a useful teaching

MINI SOAP NOTE

MUST BE OBGYN TOPIC/DIAGNOSIS  MINI SOAP NOTES DO NOT INCLUDE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS  PLEASE ONLY INCLUDE WHAT IS ASKED FOR ON THE ATTACHMENT 

Can you help by tomorrow?

PHIL 347 Critical Reasoning Week 6 Guided Learning Activity: Evaluating Expertise and Source Reliability Directions: Type the letter answer into Canvas. You may also include the whole line. The letter comes before the line or sentence Example: [A] Paris is the biggest city in France. [B] It is a major

Can you help by tomorrow?

Week 6 Assignment This checklist should be the final step as you prepare to write your argumentative essay. You should have completed your research and thought about what you will write and how you will present it. This checklist will help you to organize your points and make sure you