Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Help Philosophy

ESSAY CRITERIA
PHIL-2306, Fall 2024

The essay is 100 points and is 25% of your final grade. This assignment is meant to test your ability to

explain ethics more in-depth and to show your own critical thinking on different approaches to ethics.

This must be a new essay written specifically for this class by you individually. You need approval from

your instructor before using part or all of an essay that was submitted for another class.

Topic: Pick any two out of the following ethical theories: Ethical egoism, utilitarianism, Kant’s

deontology, Aristotle’s virtue ethics, and Held’s care ethics. First, give you own cohesive summary of

each of the two theories you chose to focus on. Second, discuss what you see as the comparative

strengths and weaknesses of each theory and give your own argument for which is a better approach to

ethics and why (or why both are equally good or bad, etc.).

Summary: You must summarize each of the two theories you are discussing, in about a paragraph each

(or two each, if necessary). For this assignment, your summary should not give any judgment of each

theory, but simply present a neutral explanation of its main points (any evaluation should be in your

analysis). Your summary must be mostly in your own words; you can and should use key terms, and

limited use of direct quotes is helpful, but you cannot just copy the text, notes or other sources.

Analysis: You must discuss and explain what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of each theory and

give your own argument for which theory is better and why. This portion should not just repeat the

strengths and weaknesses given in the text and notes or outside sources; you must focus mainly on your

own clearly given analysis and your own rationally supported argument. You do not have to argue that

one theory is better than the other, as long as you have a clear conclusion that you argue for.

Example Topic: Compare utilitarianism and deontology. First, summarize the main points of each theory.

Then, give the strengths and weaknesses of each theory, and end with your own clear argument for which

is a better approach to morality and why.

Setup: Your essay will have two main parts: first, a relevant summary of course material. Secondly, your

own critical analysis or argument regarding the theories you are addressing. You must have both parts,

and they should be roughly equal in length. In addition to those two main parts, your paper should further

begin with a one-paragraph introduction (including a thesis statement) and end with a one-paragraph

conclusion. Again, this must be a new paper written specifically for this course by you individually; you

cannot reuse any work from other courses (including taking Ethics previously) without approval.

Due Date and Submission:

Your essay must be submitted on ecampus by 11:59 PM on Thursday, October 3. You will upload

the essay as a Word document (.doc or .docx) to ecampus; it must be a Word document specifically. Your

essay will be run through Turnitin, software to help identify potential cases of plagiarism and check for

potential cases of uncited AI use in your writing (see below concerning AI use in your essay).

(continued on next page)

PHIL 2306 – Essay Criteria (continued)

Length and Format: Your essay must be no less than 1000 words and should not be more than 1500

words. It should be 12” Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with 1” margins on all sides. Any essay

written below the minimum length will receive a lower grade (you may go beyond the upper word limit,

if necessary, but not too much). Headings, direct quotes, footnotes, your works cited list, etc. do not count

towards the 1000-1500 words.

Sources and Citation: All sources of information, including course materials, must be properly cited

according to either MLA, APA, or Chicago style citation, resources for which can be easily found online.

• You are required to cite the course materials relevant to the two theories you are writing on. You

may use the assigned reading, your notes from lecture, or the online course notes for this, or any

combination of the above.

• You may use outside sources if you want to, but it is not required; if you use any outside sources,

then you are required to properly cite them in your essay. Citing outside sources does not replace

the requirement to cite the relevant course material.

• Use of artificial intelligence or AI tools (for example, Chat GPT or similar) is strongly discouraged

on this assignment, as this assignment is meant to test your own writing, understanding, and critical

thinking. Very limited use of AI may be allowed but counts as an outside source and must be

properly cited; this includes a works cited entry, indicating all places in your writing where you

took information from AI, and using quotation marks when copying text directly.

Remember, anything that is not your own thinking or idea must be properly referenced! Proper citation

always includes two things: in-text citation (parenthetical references or footnotes) and full information for

each source at the end of the essay (a works cited list). Any use of a source that is not cited constitutes

plagiarism. Direct word-for-word copying from a source without use of both quotation marks and source

citation is also plagiarism. Plagiarism may result in a 0 on this assignment.

Grading: The essay as a whole is worth 100 points and is 25% of your final course grade. Your grade on

the assignment consists of the following criteria:

Summary (25 points): Give a clear and cohesive summary of two ethical theories, clearly covering the

most important aspects and overall main idea of each one.

Analysis (25 points): Compare what you see as the strengths and weakness of each ethical theory, and

give your own argument for which is better (or why both are equally good, etc.)

Critical Thinking (25 points): Be sure to show careful and consistent reasoning throughout your essay,

clearly explain your ideas, and give your own reasoning behind your judgments and conclusion.

Writing (25 points): Be sure to write clearly, properly cite all your sources, and make sure that your

essay is mostly free of spelling and grammar errors; submit essay in proper format.

Essays that are late and/or below the required word count will have points deducted

outside of this grading criteria.

Contact your instructor if you have any questions over the essay assignment!

  • Essay Criteria
    • PHIL-2306, Fall 2024
    • PHIL 2306 – Essay Criteria (continued)

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

NUR507W2

DISCUSSION: List strategies that might be used by a pediatric primary care provider to incorporate developmental anticipatory guidance into the following sick visits: 1. An 18-month-old with an acute upper respiratory infection 2. A 4-year-old with stool withholding and constipation 3. A 9-year-old with chronic headaches 4. A 15-year-old with

Week # 3

   Analyze the main global health institutions and their specific roles and the context within which they function. Use the rubric and template

RESPONSE- BLOG: PEER FEEDBACK: PRACTICE QUESTIONS AND SEARCH STRATEGIES

Respond to the 2 person in the attached Respond to at least two of your colleagues, on different days, by offering suggestions to improve the proposed practice question and/or search strategies they shared. Note: Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be

Agency Synopsis

 I need help identifying regulatory agencies that regulate health and the health care system within the US, and help creating a table listing your 5 regulatory agencies 

wearable technology

Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitor. Use the template  Week 3 Assignment Part 1: Examining Wearable Technologies Template Name: Date: Directions: Select one wearable technology used for health and wellness. Refer to the Week 3 lesson and the assignment guidelines for more information on wearable technologies. Use this template to complete

RH case study

RH case study Initial Psychiatric Interview/SOAP Note Template There are different ways in which to complete a Psychiatric SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) Note. This is a template that is meant to guide you as you continue to develop your style of SOAP in the psychiatric practice setting. Criteria

Lesson 6 – 3165

Instructions: Remember, there are Original research articles that are based on an experiment or study.  Often they follow the IMRAD format: introduction, methods, results, and discussion, and Review articles (literature reviews) are written to bring together and summarize the results/conclusions from multiple original research articles/studies. This analysis will be performed in

assign9

Mindmap This week’s mindmap is focused on psychological disorders. In this exercise, you will complete a Mind Map to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap assignment. · Generalized anxiety disorder · Depression · Bipolar disorders · Schizophrenia ·

MM 2 forms

MM 2 forms Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare Professionals Hierarchy of Evidence Guide Appendix D © 2022 Johns Hopkins Health System/Johns Hopkins School of Nursing P a g e | 1 Note: Refer to the appropriate Evidence Appraisal Tool (Research [Appendix E] or Nonresearch [Appendix F])

BMct

B mcti Joshua  Initial Psychiatric Interview/SOAP Note Template There are different ways in which to complete a Psychiatric SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) Note. This is a template that is meant to guide you as you continue to develop your style of SOAP in the psychiatric practice setting. Criteria

B Mct 6 soaps

B mct 6 soaps  Initial Psychiatric Interview/SOAP Note Template There are different ways in which to complete a Psychiatric SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) Note. This is a template that is meant to guide you as you continue to develop your style of SOAP in the psychiatric practice setting.

Mitz soap

Mitz soap create 6 different soap notes  Initial Psychiatric Interview/SOAP Note Template There are different ways in which to complete a Psychiatric SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) Note. This is a template that is meant to guide you as you continue to develop your style of SOAP in the

nursing outcome

Resignation Letter Writing Tips In the age of the popular rage-quitting separation from employment, we are going to take a step back and exercise some professionalism. When you leave a job, there is a polite and socially acceptable way to do so. This author explains it all and provides examples.

Nursing homework

work Resignation Letter Writing Tips In the age of the popular rage-quitting separation from employment, we are going to take a step back and exercise some professionalism. When you leave a job, there is a polite and socially acceptable way to do so. This author explains it all and provides

NUR507 Discussion #2

Module 2 Discussion   Management of Development   After studying Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following: · Garzon, D. L., Driessnack, M., Dirks, M., Duderstadt, K. G., & Gaylord, N. M. (2024). · Chapter 9: Developmental Management of Newborns and Neonates · Chapter 10: Developmental Management of Infants

Module 4 Journal Question:

 toxic leadership behavior   Module 4 Journal Question: Drawing upon your readings, research, and life experiences, identify toxic leadership behavior characteristics and describe strategies and processes that minimize stress and toxicity in healthcare organizations. How can you apply conflict management and resolution principles and processes to minimize or eliminate stress

Nursing Module 4 Assignment 4.3

 Toxic environments are characterized by negative motivations   Module 4 Assignment 4.3 Write a 1250 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to