HIM 500 Guidelines and RubricOverview
You will submit your recommendations for technology for the institution and how it will be implemented.
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
- Technology System Recommendations: In this final section of your final project, you will review the provided technology options (File in attachment)and make informed recommendations to the organization regarding which technology it should choose.
- Determine the needs of the various roles of the organization in a new technology.
- Recommend a new health information technology system that meets the following criteria. Be sure to justify how your recommendations meet the criteria. The new health technology must:
- Abide by provided health regulations and laws
- Align with the needs of all staff members of the previously described organization
- Ensure the ethical management and use of health information
- Determine how the organization could more effectively invest its financial resources into the recommended technology system. Be sure to justify your response.
- Determine how the organization could monitor the use of the new health information system. Be sure to justify your response.
- Determine how the organization could effectively invest its time into the implementation of the new health information technology system. Be sure to justify your response.
What to Submit must be 2–3 pages in length (plus a cover page and references) and must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. All references cited in APA format.
Rubric. CriteriaMeets Expectations (100%)Partially Meets Expectations (75%)Does Not Meet Expectations (0%)ValueTechnology System Recommendations: NeedsDetermines the needs of the various roles of the organization in a new technologyDetermines the needs of the various roles of the organization in a new technology, but determination is cursoryDoes not determine the needs of the various roles of the organization in a new technology18Technology System Recommendations: Regulations and LawsRecommends a new health information technology that abides by the provided health regulations and laws, justifying responseRecommends new health information technology that abides by health regulations and laws, but recommendations are cursory or not justifiedDoes not recommend and justify new health information technology that abides by health regulations and laws that the institution is currently not in compliance with18Technology System Recommendations: StaffRecommends a new health information technology that aligns with the needs of all staff members of the organization, justifying responseRecommends a new health information technology that aligns with the needs of all staff members of the organization, but recommendations are cursory or not justifiedDoes not recommend and justify a new health information technology that aligns with the needs of all staff members of the organization18Technology System Recommendations: EthicalRecommends a new health information technology that ensures ethical management and use of health information, justifying responseRecommends a new health information technology that ensures ethical management and use of health information, but recommendations are cursory or not justifiedDoes not recommend and justify a new health information technology that ensures ethical management and use of health information18Technology System Recommendations: Financial ResourcesDetermines how the organization could more effectively invest financial resources into the recommended technology system, justifying responseDetermines how the organization could more effectively invest financial resources into the recommended technology system, but determination is cursory, illogical, or not justifiedDoes not determine how the organization could more effectively invest financial resources into the recommended technology system18Clear CommunicationConsistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audienceShows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understandingShows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication10Total:100%
