Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

home work

Please follow instructions. No AI

You must post before seeing replies. Edit history will be available to instructors.

Due Sep 10 65 points

7 Replies (7)

View Split Screen

All

Search entries or author…

Newest First

 Back to Week at a Glance
(

MEASUREMENT OF CONCEPTUAL
VARIABLES

Last week, you learned about the importance of operationally defining variables to support the
construct validity and internal validity of a study. Operational definitions are also important as
you consider how to measure variables. For example, you will need to operationally define
conceptual variables of interest (e.g., self-esteem, satisfaction, anxiety) before you can measure
the concepts. When the measure accurately assesses the conceptual variable, it is said to have

(
LgRendition/GettyLicense_155136356.jpg)

3
3

face validity. Operationalizing variables is also important to the measurement concept of
reliability, which is the consistency or stability of a measure (e.g., test and retest to achieve similar
results).

In this Discussion, you will gain experience writing items to create a rating scale for a conceptual
variable of your choice, which you will administer to friends/family. Based on the responses you
obtain, you will consider the validity and reliability of your scale.

RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Review previous chapters if you need to (e.g., Chapter 4 on
variables and operational definitions)

Cozby, P. C., & Bates, S. C. (2024). Methods in behavioral
research (15th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Chapter 5, “Measurement Concepts”

Chapter 7, “Asking People About Themselves: Survey
Research”

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
(
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=pst&AN=9999-01038-000&site=eds-
live&scope=site&custid=s6527200) [Database record]. APA PsycTests.

ShortCutsTV (Producer). (2018). Reliability & validity
( [Video].
Alexander Street.

Walden University, LLC. (2024). Creating rating scales
(
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3003/cr/index.html)

Readings 

Media 

Optional Resources 

To prepare:

Read Chapter 5 and the indicated sections of Chapter 7 (focusing on the sections
Constructing Questions to Ask, Responses to Questions, and Rating Scales).
Recall what you learned in this week’s Learning Activity about creating rating scales with
numeric values, and review the example scale in the Learning Resources. Note that your
own rating scale may differ from the examples depending on the requirements for
measuring the conceptual variable you select.
Identify a conceptual variable that is of interest to you. A few examples are social
identity, risk-taking behavior, job satisfaction, employee engagement, environmental
awareness. Once you have decided on a conceptual variable, develop an operational
definition for the variable.
Create your own five- to 10-item rating scale with numerical values to assess the
conceptual variable you defined.

Before writing the items, consider the wording of statements and possible related
issues (e.g., double-barred statements, loaded statements, “yea-saying” and “nay-
saying,” etc.).
Be sure to fully develop your rating scale to include instructions for your
participants. Note: For the version of the scale you will provide in your post, include
coding instructions for the administrator (e.g., reverse-score certain items).

Administer the scale to at least three friends or family members. You may administer it in
person or via email.
Analyze the responses you obtained (i.e., what do responses reveal related to your
conceptual variable?).
Reflect on the possible strengths and limitations related to the measurement reliability
and validity of your scale.
Prepare to upload the scale you created as an attached document (in Word or RTF
format) to your Discussion post.

Post a response to the following.

[Interactive media]. Walden University Canvas.

American Psychological Association. (2023, June). Psychology
topics ( .

BY DAY 3

Include the conceptual variable in the first line of your post (e.g., “Job Satisfaction”).

Then:

Provide the operational definition you created for your conceptual variable.
Explain your experience writing the scale (noting at least one challenge) and
administering the scale.
Provide your analysis of the responses you obtained as it relates to your conceptual
variable. Do not include your participants’ actual responses.
Assess the strengths and limitations of your scale’s reliability and validity, describing what
you might do differently (if anything) in a revision.
Attach the five- to 10-item scale with numerical values to measure a conceptual variable
that you developed (either a Word or RTF file).

Note: Your initial response should be supported with scholarly evidence from your research
and/or the Learning Resources and properly cited in APA format. You may state your opinion
and/or provide personal examples; however, you must also back up your assertions with
evidence, including in-text citation(s) and reference(s) in APA style. It is recommended that
you review the Grading Rubric with the criteria that will be used to evaluate your Discussion
prior to your submission.

Respond to at least one colleague’s original post in one or more of the ways listed below.

Ask a probing question about their experience developing or administering the scale and
provide the foundation, or a rationale, for the question.
Offer an alternative way that the variables of interest in their proposed study could be
operationally defined.
Support or offer a different perspective to a colleague’s explanation of the strengths and
limitations concerning the reliability and/or validity of their scale.

Note: Your response to your colleague should be substantive and supported with scholarly
evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources and properly cited in APA
format. Personal anecdotes are acceptable within meaningful responses but cannot stand
alone as a response. Responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a
fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning for all students.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before
you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by
clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you
click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot

BY DAY 5

post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post
Reply!

Reply

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Psychology 3

Follow the attached instructions to complete this work. Page 1 PSY1010 – Touchstone 4 Type Your Name Here Smarter Decisions through Psychology Date here Using your problem solving and self and social awareness skill and the information you learned about brain plasticity, motivation, and mindset, answer the questions in this

FP Week 2 Assignment

Q1. Discuss (give an account on) postmortem lividity (Hypostasis)? Explain its characteristic features and the forensic significance? (5 points) Q2. What are the postmortem changes that may replace putrefaction? Explain the forensic significance of each one of these changes? (5 points) 

MSW 525 MODULE 6

READINGS CASE ANALYSIS ON JAMES Perry, B. D., & Szalavitz, M. (2017).  The boy who was raised as a dog: And other stories from a child psychiatrist’s notebook – what traumatized children can teach us about loss, love, and healing. Basic Books. Chapter 9: “Mom is Lying. Mom is Hurting

Discussion

Please follow the instructions. No AI     Co ege. ( 0 0). t oductio to psyc o og ca d so de s. Co ege o Southern Idaho. Chapter 1.1, “Defining Psychopathology” (chapter/definin gpsychopathology-2/) Time Estimate: 8 min Chapter 1.2, “Cultural Expectations” (chapter/cultura lexpectations-2/) Time Estimate: 5

ARTICLE CRITIQUE ASSIGN.

INSTRUCTIONS ATTACHED ; ARTICLE NAME “The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard” ARTICLE CRITIQUE INSTRUCTIONS 1 ARTICLE CRITIQUE INSTRUCTIONS 2 Article Critique Instructions First M. Lastname Florida International University Article Critique Paper Each student is required to write an article critique paper based on one of the research articles present

Psychology week 6 assignment

  Immersion Project—Dialogue (ungraded) In your course text, Cultural Diversity, you have explored many different written interviews that provide insight into the demographics, worldview, and treatment issues that face different cultures. For this ungraded Assignment, you will complete a virtual or face-to-face dialogue for your Immersion Project to learn more about

PE Week 7 Assignment 2

To prepare: Reflect on this week’s experiences with your team. Assignment Complete your journal entry for this week in your Personal Journal, reflecting on your experiences with the team process for this week. How is it going? What are you learning about yourself? What are you learning about the team

Psychology Help with homework

Week 6 assignment concept map The Concept map: Narrowing Down Your Topic In previous coursework, you used a mind mapping tool to start exploring a potential research topic. While the mind map is a useful strategy to start brainstorming a topic in an unstructured way, a concept map takes this

professor feedback

 Thoughtful synthesis, Barbara! As you move forward, think about the effect size you’d report for your area and set a practical benchmark to guide interpretation and sample-size planning–draw those thresholds from current studies and meta-analyses in your field. 

Psychology Critiques of Freud Assignment

Sigmund Freud’s structural model of the psyche—comprising the id, ego, and superego—remains one of the most influential yet controversial frameworks in psychology. His psychodynamic theory emphasizes unconscious drives, early childhood experiences, and internal conflict as primary forces shaping personality. The conceptual clarity and scientific validity of the id, ego, and

feedback to professor

 Thoughtful synthesis, Barbara! As you move forward, think about the effect size you’d report for your area and set a practical benchmark to guide interpretation and sample-size planning–draw those thresholds from current studies and meta-analyses in your field. 

Critique 8

Can someone help me complete this? Instructions Test Critique Papers: Write and post a paper 1-2 pages in length. You can choose one test that was studied that week and critique it. You need to discuss the description and purpose of the instrument, the population it was designed to assess,

psy

Cemeteries are full of history.  Have you ever taken a stroll through a cemetery?  If you have, you would see the headstones all tell a story.  They may or may not offer us a name, a birthdate, a death date, an inscription, something indicating their career, and even relationships.  For

Article

Article Assessment Report for Personality Assessment Date: To: From: Re: History and Description of Primary Complaint and Current Related Symptoms Who Referred For Etiology Symptom Duration Activity Scale Assessment Instruments (examples) Clinical Interview Minn. Multiphasic Pers. Inventory (MMPI-2) Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Zung Depression Inventory (ZDI) Brief Battery for Health

Psychology Can someone help me with my English compotition homework?

1 2 AYMARA VALDES WEEK 4 Research Topic and Rationale. The research topic I chose is the impact of climate change or extreme weather events on mental health. I decided to select this topic as climate change is becoming better known as not only an environmental and economic crisis but

journal equine

articles  1.⁠ ⁠Green, S. (2017). Equine assisted psychotherapy. In J. Carlson & S. Dermer (Eds.),  SAGE encyclopedia of marriage, family, and couples counseling. Thousand Oaks,  CA: SAGE. (pp. 552-554) 2.⁠ ⁠Risley-Cutiss, C. (2010). Social work practitioners and the human-companion  animal bond: A national study. Social Work. 55(1). 3.  Suthers-McCabe, H.

Psychology assignment 2 on psychology

Follow the attached instructions to complete this work. Page 2 PSY1010 – Touchstone 3.2 Type Your Name Here Smarter Decisions through Psychology Date here Using your problem solving and self and social awareness skills and what you have learned about personality traits and emotions, answer the questions in this case