Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Human Resource Management

Statistical Analysis

Assignment Overview

In this capstone project, you’ll demonstrate your ability to leverage your full range of statistical and analytical skills to solve a real-world problem, either in a business or healthcare context. This assessment will showcase your capability to frame statistical problems, conduct rigorous data analysis using Excel, and communicate your findings clearly and persuasively to guide decision-making.
 

Assignment Objectives

· Evaluate a real-world problem to determine its suitability for statistical analysis (CLO1).

· Design an appropriate hypothesis and testing plan (CLO4).

· Utilize Excel to collect, analyze, and present descriptive, inferential, or predictive statistical data (CLO3).

· Analyze results from statistical analyses comprehensively (CLO5).

· Recommend actionable and justified resolutions based on statistical findings (CLO2 & CLO6).

Task Description

Choose one of the following two scenarios based on your professional interests:

Scenario 1: Business Management Context Your company, a retail chain, is experiencing fluctuating customer satisfaction ratings across various regions. Upper management is concerned about inconsistent customer experience affecting long-term brand reputation and profitability. You are tasked with statistically analyzing customer satisfaction data, sales trends, and regional demographics to identify key problem areas and opportunities for strategic improvement.

Scenario 2: Healthcare Management Context Your healthcare facility is experiencing increasing patient wait times and inconsistent patient satisfaction scores across different departments. Senior management is concerned about the implications for patient care quality and overall operational efficiency. You are tasked with analyzing patient flow data, staffing patterns, and patient feedback surveys to identify underlying causes and recommend evidence-based operational improvements.

Steps for Completion

Step 1: Problem Framing (CLO1)

· Clearly describe and frame your chosen scenario as a statistical problem.

· Explain why the issue is suitable for statistical analysis, outlining the types of data required and potential outcomes.

Step 2: Hypothesis and Testing Plan (CLO4)

· Formulate specific, testable hypotheses related to your scenario.

· Identify appropriate statistical tests and methods suitable for evaluating these hypotheses.

· Clearly justify why these tests and methods are appropriate based on your data and objectives.

Step 3: Data Analysis and Visualization (CLO3 & CLO5)

· Utilize Excel to perform comprehensive data analysis (descriptive statistics, inferential tests, regression analyses, etc.).

· Prepare clear and accurate visuals (charts, graphs, dashboards) to effectively illustrate your analytical results.

· Provide insightful interpretations of your findings.

Step 4: Recommendations and Strategic Decisions (CLO2 & CLO6)

· Based on your analysis, formulate clear, practical, and actionable recommendations.

· Clearly align each recommendation with specific statistical evidence from your analysis.

· Discuss how your recommendations will practically address the identified problems and support strategic organizational decisions.

Submission Format (Choose One)

·
Formal Business-Style Report:

· 3–5 pages, professionally formatted with embedded visuals (charts, graphs, dashboards).

· Clearly organized into sections: Introduction, Methods, Results & Interpretation, Recommendations, and Conclusion.

OR

·
Recorded Presentation:

· 5–7 minutes with voice-over narration of visual slides.

· Organized clearly into slides covering: Introduction, Methods, Results & Interpretation, Recommendations, and Conclusion.

Criteria

Exemplary

Proficient

Developing

Needs Improvement

Not Submitted

Criterion Score

Problem Framing

50 points

Clearly identifies and explicitly describes 3 elements: (1) Scenario clearly framed as a statistical problem, (2) Clear explanation of suitability for statistical analysis, (3) Clearly identifies types of data required. (25 pts)

30 points

Explicitly describes 2 of 3 elements clearly. (20 pts)

15 points

Clearly describes 1 of 3 elements clearly. (15 pts)

10 points

Vague or unclear description without explicit identification of required elements. (10 pts)

5 points

No submission or off-topic response. (0 pts)

Score of Problem Framing,

/ 50

Hypothesis and Testing Plan

50 points

Explicitly and clearly defines 3 elements: (1) Clear, testable null and alternative hypotheses, (2) Appropriate statistical tests clearly identified, (3) Explicit justification clearly aligning tests to data and objectives. (30 pts)

30 points

Explicitly describes 2 of 3 elements clearly. (24 pts)

18 points

Clearly describes 1 of 3 elements explicitly. (18 pts)

12 points

Unclear or vague identification of hypothesis or test; weak or no justification. (12 pts)

6 points

No submission or irrelevant response. (0 pts)

Score of Hypothesis and Testing Plan,

/ 50

Data Analysis & Visualization

40 points

Clearly presents and explicitly completes 4 elements: (1) Accurate descriptive/inferential statistical analyses, (2) Comprehensive Excel analysis shown, (3) Effective, clear, and accurate visuals (charts/graphs), (4) Insightful interpretation of findings clearly provided. (35 pts)

28 points

Clearly presents 3 of 4 elements explicitly. (28 pts)

21 points

Clearly presents 2 of 4 elements explicitly. (21 pts)

14 points

Vague, unclear, or limited data analysis/visualization with minimal interpretation. (14 pts)

7 points

No submission or irrelevant response. (0 pts)

Score of Data Analysis & Visualization,

/ 40

Recommendations & Strategic Decisions

30 points

Clearly and explicitly addresses 3 elements: (1) Provides clear, practical, and actionable recommendations explicitly based on analysis, (2) Clearly aligns recommendations explicitly with statistical evidence, (3) Clearly discusses practical impact on strategic organizational decisions. (30 pts)

24 points

Explicitly addresses 2 of 3 elements clearly. (24 pts)

18 points

Clearly addresses 1 of 3 elements explicitly. (18 pts)

12 points

Recommendations vague or minimally connected to data; minimal discussion of strategic impact. (12 pts)

6 points

No submission or irrelevant response. (0 pts)

Score of Recommendations & Strategic Decisions,

/ 30

Professional Communication & Format

15 points

Submission explicitly meets 3 elements: (1) Clear professional language and tone explicitly appropriate for audience, (2) Meets formatting requirements explicitly (3–5-page report or 5–7-minute narrated presentation), (3) Submission clearly organized into required sections explicitly: Introduction, Methods, Results & Interpretation, Recommendations, Conclusion. (15 pts)

12 points

Submission explicitly meets 2 of 3 elements clearly. (12 pts)

9 points

Submission clearly meets 1 of 3 elements explicitly. (9 pts)

6 points

Unclear or minimally professional submission; multiple format or organization issues. (6 pts)

3 points

No submission or irrelevant response. (0 pts)

Score of Professional Communication & Format,

/ 15

Skills

15 points

The student skillfully and consistently integrates relevant skills into the assignment. Application is accurate, contextually appropriate, and enhances the depth or originality of the assignment. Demonstrates mastery through insightful use of skills.

(15 pts)

12 points

The student applies relevant skills accurately and appropriately. The use of skills supports key ideas or analysis and demonstrates a strong understanding. Integration is effective but may lack the depth or originality of a mastery-level response.

(12 pts)

9 points

The student applies relevant skills inconsistently or with partial success. Connections to the assignment may be unclear, generalized, or only loosely aligned with the topic. Demonstrates a basic understanding but with limited integration.

(9 pts)

6 points

The student attempts to apply relevant skills but with evident inaccuracies, oversimplifications, or weak alignment with the assignment content. Demonstrates limited awareness or understanding.

(6 pts.)

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

case 4

Case 4 Module 4 – Case People/Predictive Analytics Assignment Overview Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Emphasized Level In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be assessed. The Quantitative Reasoning rubric will be useful for this purpose. In MGT511 quantitative reasoning skills were assessed at the “introduced” level. In HRM520 they

discussion 4

Discussion 4 What do you really think about HRM? Now that you are about finished with your MSHRM program, stop and pat yourself on the back! You started this educational journey to finish it! In this Module 4 discussion, please share what you think about HRM. For example, · Is

HR 2.7

Assessment for ENG 112 Signal Phrases, Direct Quotes, and Parenthetical Citations Read each item and follow the directions carefully, as each will require you to demonstrate different citation skills. Use the original source material and information given to complete each item. Type your answers in a new document. Item 1:

Negotiation

 Describe in specific details how you would approach the negotiation using these strategies. 

Mini Case 2

Just looking for your analysis and insightful thinking. 1. Can any firm beat Amazon in the marketplace? If not, why not? If so, how can they best do so? 2. How formidable a competitor is Google for Amazon? Please explain. 3. What are Amazon’s major strengths? Does it have any

Human Resource Management

Purpose To evaluate your ability to design and integrate a comprehensive performance measurement system that synthesizes financial and non-financial metrics, applies course concepts across multiple units, and develops strategic recommendations for organizational performance improvement and accountability.   Associated Skills · Identify key financial ratios and metrics for operational assessment ·

HR Trending Brief – Power point presentation

Please refer to the attachment.   Topic –   Hybrid and Remote Work Models—managing distributed teams, virtual onboarding, and maintaining engagement. 2. Conduct Research Gather information on your chosen trend. You must use at least five scholarly or credible industry sources published within the last five years, in addition to the

Discussion 3

Discussion 3 Module’s First Post: Compare and contrast the ideas on HRM of the future that you have learned about with what you know of HRM today. For example, bring in Ulrich’s description and provide additional comments about Lawler’s vision that you have not contributed yet in previous discussions. You

case 3

Module 3 – Case Competencies in HR Case Assignment (Signature Assignment: Oral Communications, Emphasized Level) In this assignment, you are in the role of an HR consultant. There is a critical deliverable that your client’s CEO expects from you: This organization’s CEO would like you to convince his staff that

SLP3

Module 3 – SLP Competencies in HR Prepare a 3-page blog entry where you introduce new HR students to the topic of competencies in HRM. Utilize one or more tables showing facts about competencies in HR and discuss what the table information means. Refer to at least 2 valid sources

WK 5 Pro Interv

see attached Professional Interview Paper   Each student will be required to conduct one professional interview with a current or former professional working in their field of interest. The purpose behind the interview and paper is to practice the skills gained from the material covered within this course. Students will

Human Resource Management Assignment: Virtual Meetings: Communicating Your Plan

 Overview In today’s modern workplace, employees have a wide range of digital tools at their fingertips to meet virtually with colleagues and/or customers. This assignment allows you to practice your communication, digital proficiency, and productivity skills. Imagine that you are preparing for a Zoom meeting with a colleague to discuss

SLP2

SLP 2 Module 2 – SLP Competitive Strategy View the following video in which Professor Ulrich discusses HR Strategy, HR Business Partnering, HR & Technology, and the Future of HR: The HR Congress. (2017, October 25).  Ask Dave Ulrich: Interactive Q&A session with the father of modern HR  [Video file].

case2

Case 2 Module 2 – Case Competitive Strategy Case Assignment (Signature Assignment: Body of Knowledge, Emphasized Level) In this assignment, discuss what is meant by competitive advantage. Refer to examples of ways organizations create competitive advantage. Identify a specific real-life organization’s competitive advantage and determine what role HR plays in

Human Resource Management

Financial Decision Making  Purpose To evaluate your ability to conduct comprehensive capital investment analysis using discounted cash flow techniques, synthesize economic and financial factors, and develop strategic investment recommendations based on quantitative financial modeling and qualitative business considerations. Associated Skills · Discounted cash flow analysis and valuation techniques (NPV, IRR,

Human Resource Management

Statistical Analysis Instructions Select one of the two scenarios provided below: Healthcare Operations or Business Logistics. In this summative assignment, you will analyze time-series data in Excel, apply forecasting models, assess model accuracy, and make data-informed recommendations for operational planning. Your work should demonstrate your understanding of forecasting principles and

What Factors Influence the Strength of Outdoor Construction?

 The strength of outdoor construction depends on material quality, foundation preparation, and proper installation techniques. Experienced evaluate soil conditions, drainage, and load requirements before beginning any project. These factors prevent settling, cracking, and structural failure over time. Material selection also plays a critical role. Concrete mixes, stone density, and reinforcement