Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Human Resource Management human, resource, assignment

I need your help

Name: Enter your name here.

Date: Enter the date here.

Critical Thinking Final Touchstone

In this assignment, you will make two contrasting normative arguments about what one
ought to do. Both arguments will be about the same topic, and so at least one of the arguments is likely to be something you don’t actually agree with. You will compose the arguments in standard form—that is, as a series of statements that end with your conclusion.
Reminder: Do not write as an essay!

Part I. Select your topic and arguments.

Page 1

Critical Thinking – Final Touchstone

a. Choose a topic from the following list:

· Should people eat meat?

· Should marijuana be legal?

· Should pet cats be kept indoors?

· Should zoos exist?

· Should customers leave a tip in a coffee shop?

· Should seat belt wearing be mandatory?

· Should children be required to take gym/PE classes?

· Should public roads be used for private car parking?

b. Write two logically contradictory normative conclusions for the topic. You do not need to agree with both (or either!) conclusions, but you should be able to logically support both of them.

The conclusions need
not be phrased exactly the same as they are phrased in the topic list, but they
do need to be logically contradictory to one another. For example, if you selected the topic “Should people eat meat?”, your conclusions might be:

· People should not eat meat.

· People should eat meat.

But it would also be acceptable to choose:

· People should reduce their meat consumption.

· People need not reduce their meat consumption.

c. These conclusions will be the final line of your argument. If you revise a conclusion after writing the argument, you should revise the conclusion here to match.

Conclusion #1:

Enter your first conclusion here.

Conclusion #2:

Enter your second conclusion here.

Part II. Write your arguments in standard form.

a. Standard form is a series of numbered statements. Each should be one sentence long. The final statement is the conclusion.
You do not need to label statements as premises or conclusions; it is understood by the form of the argument that all statements are premises except the final one, which is always the conclusion.

b. There should be at least one
normative statement (stating what people should do) and at least one descriptive statement (describing something to be true). Statements that predict outcomes or describe what people believe are not normative. A good way to determine if a statement is normative is looking for verb phrases like “should,” “ought,” or “have an obligation to.”

c. If any of your premises make factual statements that are not common knowledge and widely accepted, include a source supporting your reference. This can be an APA citation or just a link to a reputable website or publication.

Here is a helpful resource for APA references.

d. Place an asterisk (*) by the
normative premise(s) that support the conclusion.

e. Do not use your conclusion as a premise. This is the fallacy of “begging the question.”

f. There may be a
subargument within your argument, a conclusion reached by premises that then becomes a conclusion that supports your premise. If there is a subargument, underline the

subconclusion
.

g. The
conclusion should be the final statement in your argument (as given above) and begin with the word “therefore.” These should correspond to the conclusions from Part 1.

h. The complete argument (including conclusion) should be 5-7 statements.

Argument #1

Insert your first argument here.

Argument #2

Insert your second argument here.

Part III. Reflection

1. Are your arguments deductive or inductive? Explain what the difference is between the two and why you see your argument as inductive or deductive. (2 sentences)

Enter answer here.

2. Identify either a deductive rule of inference or an inductive practice that helps support your conclusion. Explain what the rule or practice means and how it was used to reach your conclusion. (2-3 sentences)

Enter answer here.

3. What moral framework do you use to justify your normative conclusions (utilitarian, deontological, or virtue ethics)? Explain the meaning of the moral framework and how adopting that perspective leads to your conclusion. The two arguments do not need to follow the same moral theory. (4-6 sentences)

Enter answer here.

4. What assumptions are you making that may compromise your arguments? Use language from the tutorials that identify cognitive and unconscious biases. This should be about your experience, not a general response about potential biases. (4-6 sentences)

Enter answer here.

5. What opinion did you have when you began this assignment, and what challenges to critical thinking did you encounter when arguing for a conclusion you didn’t agree with? How did logic and critical thinking help you to think about your topic from two different angles? This should be about your personal experience, not a general response about the challenges of considering other points of view. (4-6 sentences)

Enter answer here.

Refer to the checklist below throughout the Touchstone process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Argument Preparation

❒ Is each argument in standard form, not paragraph form?
❒ Do your two arguments have logically contradictory conclusions?
❒ Is each argument at least five declarative sentences, ending in a conclusion?
❒ Does each argument have a normative conclusion (saying what people ought to do)?
❒ Is there at least one normative premise that supports each conclusion?

2. Annotating Your Argument

❒ Did you place an asterisk (*) on the normative premise(s) that support your conclusion?
❒ Did you underline any subconclusions in your argument?
❒ Are there sources for any assertions that are fact-based and not well known/accepted?<

3. Reflection Questions

❒ Did you answer all five of the reflection questions satisfactorily?
❒ Do your answers meet the length requirement and fully answer the question?

image1.png

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Research based on outline

This is based on the outline I posted recently. Can you please complete this based on the outline? Individual Research Paper: Final Assignment Instructions Overview: Complete an individual research paper over three separate assignments. Instructions: Using your research and outline, you will complete a 5-6 page research paper complying with the formatting

Human Resource Management Assignment 5

Please complete the following questions. Be sure to cite all your sources, even if you only use the textbook. Do individuals making staffing decisions have an ethical responsibility to know measurement issues? Why or why not? Describe the structured interview. What are the characteristics of structured interviews that improve on

SWOT business policy

Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 1 Points: 100 Overview: A SWOT Analysis is used to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats for a business. This analysis can be used to help in the creation of strategic plans for the future. You will perform a SWOT Analysis

Measurement

Do individuals making staffing decisions have an ethical responsibility to know measurement issues? Why or why not?

evaluation1

Name of person/ project that you are providing feedback for: _________ 1. Briefly describe the training and evaluation  2. Comment generally on what you like about your colleagues training module and if you think their evaluation can capture efficacy in the training. (If not, what could strengthen their evaluation/evaluation process)?

540 evaluation

Name of person/ project that you are providing feedback for: _________ 1. Briefly describe the training and evaluation  2. Comment generally on what you like about your colleagues training module and if you think their evaluation can capture efficacy in the training. (If not, what could strengthen their evaluation/evaluation process)?

Outline

I have instructions attached for an outline. HR Technology: Digital HR Tools – HR Information Systems INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH PAPER: OUTLINE AND REFERENCES ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS: You will complete a full-sentence outline for the second part of this paper. The outline must include: 1. Thesis Statement: Clearly state the main argument

Perusal mod 6

Perusal Assignment (I attached the textbook and this is coming from chapter 10 ( MIXED METHOD PROCEDURES) 1. Look in paragraph 1 under Mixed Methods Research in Perspective in the text, and explain the paragraph, that starts with “ mixed method research as a distinct methodology originating around the 1980’s

Ogl 554 final

2 Learning Design Check-in for EmpowerEd The Google Classroom training module will be delivered in person at a community center over four hours, with a catered lunch to encourage teamwork. This medium shows that 65% of teachers choose hands-on learning (EmpowerEd, 2025). Educators will receive a PDF handbook before the

Case 2

Module 2 – Case Employee Benefits Assignment Overview Please read the following for a review of employee benefits: Doyle, A. (2019).  Types of employee benefits and perks . Retrieved from  (Be sure to click on the links within this source to gain depth about specific benefits.) Glassdoor Team. (2018).  11

SLP 2

Module 2 – Case Employee Benefits Assignment Overview Please read the following for a review of employee benefits: Doyle, A. (2019).  Types of employee benefits and perks . Retrieved from  (Be sure to click on the links within this source to gain depth about specific benefits.) Glassdoor Team. (2018).  11

HR 10

Promote from Within or External Hire MDN Inc. is considering two employees for the job of senior manager. An internal candidate, Julie, has been with MDN for 12 years and received very good performance evaluations. The other candidate, Raoul, works for a competitor, and has valuable experience in the product

chapter 8 perusal

Chapter 8 1. Discuss the first paragraph in the introduction in 100 words. 2. Discuss the second paragraph which talks about putting quantitative research in context. It will start with the following: planning and writing. Write 100 words about this paragraph. 3. Talk about the topic on (a survey design)

Team-Building and Communications Proposal

You have just been hired as a consultant to the chief executive officer (CEO) of a health care organization. Your duty is to improve the management tools and practices needed to work in teams, build cross-functional teams, and facilitate collaborative decision-making. Instructions: You need to identify elements found in an

lifelong learning final

Submit Annotated Bibliography: Career Development and Lifelong Learning and Upload Space · Due Saturday by 11:59pm  Please complete your final section of your annotated bibliography with TWO peer reviewed articles related to your own career development and lifelong learning.  Make sure to follow the APA standards when doing your annotation Then share your

human resource

I need your help JWI 505: Business Communications and Executive Presence Week 10 Lecture Notes © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission

module 4 perusal

1. In the second paragraph of chapter 7 entitled “ Quantitative research questions and Hypotheses, talk about the first paragraph that starts with “ in quantitative studies” Write 100 words about this and explain what it means. 2. Go to page 7 of chapter 7, ( Mixed Methods Research Questions