Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Identify 3 flaws in the research design that might impact the validity, reliability, and generalizability of the research outcomes.

Purpose of the Assignment:

  • The purpose of this assignment is to have you evaluate sociological research design. You will do this by identifying flaws and proposing solutions to those flaws in validity, reliability, and generalizability found in the research methodology of the provided research scenario. You will also demonstrate your sociological understanding of groups and leadership. 
  • Through this assignment, you will practice skills necessary to evaluate research you could possibly come across in real-world situations (in the news, social media, in current/future jobs, etc…). 

Research Scenario:

  • Here are the results of a rather poorly designed sociology study that investigated group leadership dynamics. The study suffered from significant methodological flaws, limiting the reliability and generalizability of the findings. The researcher chose a small convenience sample from personal friends. The sample had 8 women and 3 men. Participants were given a brief questionnaire with open-ended questions and no survey. None of the participants was a group leader themselves. Each participant defined “group” and “leadership” according to their own personal understanding of the terms. Despite these limitations, the study reported some preliminary observations, which should be interpreted with caution. 

Group Leadership Styles

  • The study explored different leadership styles observed within groups. Based on self-report questionnaires, participants reported a mix of authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire leadership styles in their groups. No definitions of these leadership styles were provided to participants.

Communication Patterns

  • Participants provided anecdotal evidence of various communication patterns within their groups. Some groups reported open and effective communication, fostering collaboration and decision-making. Conversely, others mentioned challenges with communication, such as dominance of certain members or lack of participation. (Anecdotal
    evidence is personal stories that are collected because they seem interesting and related to the topic.)

Group Cohesion

  • The study assessed group cohesion by asking participants to describe their
    perceived sense of unity and cooperation within their groups. The results indicated a range of
    experiences, with some groups reporting high levels of cohesion and others reporting low levels.

Impact of Leadership on Group Performance

  • Participants were asked about the perceived impact of leadership on group performance. While some participants believed that effective leadership positively influenced group outcomes, others reported no significant relationship
    between leadership and performance. There was no standardized measurement of performance.

Gender and Leadership

  • The study explored the potential influence of gender on leadership dynamics within the groups. participants provided subjective accounts of gender-related experiences in the workplace, including stereotypes and biases they think might impact leadership roles.

Results of this Study

  • The study only provides preliminary and insufficient insights into group leadership dynamics. Future research with improved research methods is necessary to deepen our understanding of group leadership and its impact on various outcomes.

  • Introduction (Paragraph 1): Identify 3 flaws in the research design that might impact the validity, reliability, and generalizability of the research outcomes. Explain why they are flaws. Define all terms and concepts (use your materials and in-text citations).
  • Flaw 1 (Paragraph 2): describe how the research design could be improved to address and eliminate flaw 1  (use your materials and in-text citations).  
  • Flaw 2 (Paragraph 3): describe how the research design could be improved to address and eliminate flaw 2  (use your materials and in-text citations).  
  • Flaw 3 (Paragraph 4): describe how the research design could be improved to address and eliminate flaw 3  (use your materials and in-text citations).  
  • Conclusion (Paragraph 5): Answer the following questions.
    • What do you think would be a good way to study group leadership dynamics?
    • What aspects of groups and leadership do you think are the most important to study?
    • What specific research methodologies would you choose?

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

discussion 5

Please see attached file. In this Discussion, you apply ethical decision making to a true-to-life scenario in social work practice. This activity takes place in the Discussion Board, but you do not need to respond to your peers. This Discussion works as follows: The goal of this activity is to

Reflection 3

Journal #3 Topic: Evaluating the way your agency manages their mission and vision: 1) what are examples of ways operations may be unintentionally racist/oppressive?; 2) what are ways they could improve their anti-racist and anti-oppressive practices?You may also include other reflections in your journal but please ensure to speak about the

theology

WRSP 101 Worship Study: Planning Template Step 1: Who – Determine your audience. For the purposes of this course, you do not need to actually present the devotionals. However, you should think through areas in your ministry where it is appropriate to share a devotional. For example, if you are

Assessment part

5 Client Overview Client Overview This paper describes the client who is receiving services at Center to Rise Wellness Spa Studio in Arlington, Texas, and his struggles with generalized anxiety disorder and alcohol dependency. They are treated with dual diagnosis within the Mental Health and Substance Misuse specialization, and the

Social Science – Sociology Assignment5

Please see attached file below.  When interacting with a supervisor, it may be difficult to know how to act, what to expect—and  how much to expect in terms of mentorship and guidance. You do not need to enter a supervisory relationship shrouded in mystery. In fact, like many other aspects of

250wds

Prompt 1: Explain Kant’s argument against the ontological proof, and assess it. Does he succeed? Research the positions and theories of the person you select: Peter Abelard

es

Concluding Essay Your writing assignment for this module is much more detailed and substantial than our previous assignments. Read the instructions very carefully and give yourself plenty of time to complete the assignment. Look at the rubric closely.   As we wrap up the course, we will start to bring together

6

Read chapter 6 and follow instructions below please create and submit two questions from your reading for this chapter.  The format of the questions must be true/false, multiple choice with 3+ answer choices, or matching.  Each question must be in a different format. For example, you cannot choose two true/false questions. You must also submit the quote and

Does the Feedback Fit the assessment?

   1. The author points out that the effectiveness of feedback depends on how students hear it. Have your teachers ever checked to see what you understand about their feedback? Did feedback empower you? If so, describe the event. If not, plan a way you would try this in your

theology

WRSP 101 Worship Study: Planning Assignment Instructions Overview The purpose of the Worship Study Assignment is to communicate important principles of worship. This communication could be effective for a number of ministry opportunities. You will complete a plan and then develop one devotional related to the core content in our

5

Required Reading – Justice, Chapter 5: Immanuel Kant about 60 minutes read “Chapter 5: Immanuel Kant” in our textbook: Michael Sandel’s  Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? A few things to keep in mind as you read this chapter: · What does Kant mean by “freedom”? (especially as compared

SOC Week 10

  Respond to two (2) of the following prompts: Explain what stigmatization of illness means. Choose a common illness and explain how it might be stigmatized for people of different cultures or social classes? (USLO 10.1)  Why do you think the United States has high obesity-related illnesses in comparison to

Discussion 6

Discussion Question Due 6/10/2025 Use references and in-text citations from easily accessible websites. The four leadership styles that match these readiness levels are as follows: S1: Requires Telling@ high task-low relationship S2: Requires Selling@ high task-high relationship S3: Requires Participating@ high relationship-low task S4: Requires Delegating@ low relationship-low task  

Reflection 1

Journal #1 Topic: How are Ethics and professionalism addressed in your agency? You may also include other reflections in your journal but please ensure to speak about the topic for the journal as well.  Be sure to utilize all headings, including paragraph headings, in your journal.  Paragraph Headings:  What, So

Social Science – Sociology ASSIGNMENT 1

Goals are more than a list, and setting goals is an intentional process. But how do you move from an abstract concept to something more concrete? Consider the concept of SMART goals. SMART is an acronym for specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. SMART goals guide you toward mastery of