Please read the instructions attached below carefully. Also, a rubric is attached below.
Overview
Applying gathered feedback, you will use your outline from the previous step to write an analysis of
a medieval manuscript illustration and utilize the source text from the Bible to support it.
Instructions
Images are often created as a part of larger works. This is true of illustrated pages in medieval
manuscripts, which correspond to the text of the Bible. Like any visual narrative, these illustrations
are an interpretation of a story, but unlike Greek myths, these images are dependent on clearly
defined source material that must be interpreted by the artist and viewer. Due to the limitations of
the medium, the illustrator must make choices regarding how to tell the story, what parts of the
story to tell, and what parts of the story to omit. Those choices often serve the artist’s, patron’s, or
broader culture’s ideological motives and priorities.
In this assignment, you will use the outline you wrote in the previous step to write an essay that
analyzes the manuscript illustration utilizing both the relevant vocabulary and carefully selected
passages from the corresponding text. As with the Mythological Comparison, your paper must have
the following: an introduction paragraph with a thesis statement, a formal analysis that supports
that thesis, and a conclusion paragraph that reinforces that thesis and provides any additional
interpretation to the reader.
Step 1: Review Outline and Instructor Comments
Look at your outline from the previous step along with any instructor comments. Building on your
previously acquired skills and knowledge, make sure that your thesis is clear, and specific, and
argues something with stakes. Review any instructor comments for guidance on meeting those
qualifications. If you need to review the materials on thesis statements from the Mythological
Comparison, do so at this time. Feel free to make any changes you need to the thesis statement to
write the best paper you can. Once you have a strong thesis statement, review your supporting
analysis. Pay special attention to instructor comments on quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing,
and review the resources from the Purdue OwlLinks to an external site.. If you significantly edited or
rewrote your thesis, be sure that your supporting points still argue the thesis statement you
currently have. You may want to return to the image and text (Genesis, Chapters 7-9Links to an
external site.) to make sure you have all of the important points to support your argument.
Writing your paper
Using your reviewed and edited outline, write your paper. As you write your paper, make sure you
have a strong introduction that sets up your topic and thesis statement, providing any background
information about the myth or images necessary to understand your analysis. Your introduction
should be around 150 to 200 words long. For your supporting analysis, remember to utilize the
relevant vocabulary you have already learned and effectively transition from one point to another.
Effective transitions help you connect the individual points of your argument and the argument as a
whole. The Purdue Owl Links to an external site.provides some good background on transitions and
useful devices for writing strong transitions.
Your supporting analysis should be 1000-1500 words long. Your paper should end with a strong
conclusion that wraps up any of your points, reinforces the argument, and provides any additional
interpretation you would like to leave your reader. The conclusion should be 150 to 200 words long
and not have any new points or supporting information.
Citations
The Bible is a bit of a different animal when it comes to citations. In many ways, this is easier.
There is only one footnote format you need to know.
1Book Title Chapter: Verse Version.
For this particular assignment, a footnote might look something like this:
1Genesis 7:2 NRSV.
At the end of your paper, this should be in your Works Cited:
Exodus. In The Holy Bible: NRSV, New Revised Standard Version. New York: Harper Bibles, 2007.
