Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

incentive plan

hw help

GrowCo Engineering Incentive Plan – C

Performance in the design engineering department of a major manufacturer had been less
than satisfactory in terms of adherence to schedule, drawing quality, and the number of
“mission-critical” complaints received from operations personnel. In an attempt to address
these problems, on December 1, 2022, GrowCo approved a 2023 short-term incentive
compensation plan for its engineers. The plan provides the potential for an annual bonus
based on individual performance. Engineers are to be evaluated annually on three major
factors. Individual factors include (1) adherence to schedule deadlines and (2) drawing
quality (opposite of error rate). They will also receive a “group rating” based on the number
of major complaints received by the department from operations personnel. 30% of the bonus
will be determined by performance to schedule; 50% will be determined by drawing quality;
and the remaining 20% will be determined by the number of mission-critical complaints
received by the department. The following table summarizes the criteria to be used in
determining the bonus amounts:

Performance
Criteria

Criterion
Weight

Threshold
Performance

Rating

Target
Performance

Rating

Maximum
Performance

Rating
Adherence to
Schedule 30% 70% 80% 100%

Drawing
Quality 50% 90% 95% 100%

Number of
Mission Critical
Complaints
Received by
Dept.

20% 5 2 0

Note: Threshold performance is the minimum level of performance qualifying for an incentive award; target
performance is the level of performance qualifying for the full incentive award; maximum performance rewards
performance above target with an additional incremental incentive payout.

For each criterion, at threshold performance, the individual payout is 50% of target bonus;
there is no payout for performance below threshold. At target performance, the individual
payout is 100% of target bonus. At maximum performance, the individual payout is 150% of
target bonus. Individual payout is adjusted proportionately for performance between these
values; that is, payout values are interpolated when they fall between set values. For 2023,
the individual bonus target was set at 20% of salary.

• What would an engineer’s incentive payout be for 2023 if the engineer’s salary is
$100,000 and he/she attains target performance for adherence to schedule, a drawing
quality rating of 97.5%, and the department receives a total of 3 mission-critical
complaints during 2023? Interpolate as necessary. Show all work!

• What is your evaluation of GrowCo’s incentive plan? That is, what do you like about
its design? What do you not like? What would you change if you could? Is it
consistent with the principles of individual incentive plans? Explain the reasoning
involved in your evaluation.

NOTE: Interpolation is the computation of points or values between points that are known based on
their relationship to other known points. For example, if performance is ¼ of the distance between the
performance threshold and the performance target, then one might estimate that an incentive payout
would be ¼ of the distance between the threshold payout value and the target payout value. See PPT
included in this week’s module for additional explanation.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Employee Development

Context Employee development programs can help organizations attract and retain top talent, increase employee engagement, and improve overall organizational performance. In this discussion thread, we will explore the importance of employee development from a human resource management perspective and some common types of employee development such as mentorship, coaching, and

wk 7 lawrec hra resp

see attached TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

Human Resource Management

Case Study Case Study Purpose: Flexibility, adaptability, and responsiveness to the external environment is essential if organizations are going to survive and thrive in a rapidly changing environment. Therefore, leaders and managers must know how to  implement change successfully in their organizations or departments in response to rapidly shifting conditions. The

J. Moore ESSY for Scholarship

No reference Needed!!!  No reference Needed!!! No reference Needed!!! A well-written essay with 350 to 500 words. Essay must be typed double-spaced using 12-pt Times New Roman or Arial font. Write a well-developed argument that addresses one of the following prompts: 1. Do movements like Black Lives Matter and #MeToo

Labor Relations week 3 discussion

 I am looking for original input, so please share your own experiences and then add support from our book our outside resources. Your thoughts and experiences are important to our discussions, so we can all learn from them. Please make sure that you back up the posts with factual information

Sanders HRM 4301 Unit 5 DB and reply

Please note that there are two posts needed to successfully complete the discussion board assignment. An initial post addressing the discussion board topic is due by end of day Saturday. A response post to at least one other student is due by end of day Tuesday.  The method of training

week 8

Explain how decision making and controlling are interlinked in e-commerce and for MNCs as global organizations. Justify your response.

Discussion 2

Discussion 2 Does labeling employees as human resources make them more of an investment in the future rather than a current cost? Are employees an asset or expense? How do you define the value of a company’s employees? What about the ethics of treating employees, who are, after all, responsible

Human Resource Management homework

research Student Research Project: Proxy Statement Analysis Topic: Kraft Heinz Your proxy analysis should be prepared as a formal student paper following APA guidelines (7th ed.). Respond to the questions posed above within an essay format; do not simply list and answer the questions. The analysis must have a title

wk 6 oil 510

Module 6: Parallel Narrative Reflection 2 (Discussion)  Overview Parallel Narrative Reflections Parallel refers to writing from both an academic/critical scholarly perspective and a personal narrative perspective. Thus, this reflection on the reading is assigned for narrative reflection on how the readings resonate with your own personal leadership experiences.  Here’s the

respond to discussion

2 SLP 1 Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Course Name and Number Instructor’s Name Due Date SLP 1 Elasticity of Demand Price elasticity of demand is one of the fundamental principles of economics, which measures the responsiveness of the quantity demanded for a good when its price changes. If the demand

Case Study

Copyright Post University 2022, All Rights Reserved Due Date: 11:59 pm EST, Sunday of Unit 7 Points: 100 Overview: To understand how to design a comprehensive compensation strategy, you will apply your learning to the selected case study. Instructions: Continue using the same company from Case Study 1 and 2

Human Resource Management TODAY HOMEWORK

SEE ATTACHED Internal staffing systems work in fundamentally different ways than do external staffing systems. Question 1 options: True False Question 2 (1 point)   Most jurisdictions allow for candidate or employee medical information to be shared with supervisors if HR deems it wise. Question 2 options: True False Question 3 (1

human resource

I need your help JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st Century Lecture Notes © Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer

WEEK 6

SEE ATTACHED TCOB Graduate Studies Discussion Rubric Criteria No Submission 0 points Novice (Criterion is missing or not in evidence) 1-13 points Basic (works towards meeting expectations; performance needs improvement) 14-16 points Proficient (meets expectations; performance is satisfactory) 17-18 points Exemplary (exceeds expectations; performance is outstanding) 19-20 points Support of

Human Resource Management Wk 7 assignment automation or no

Imagine being an HR manager at KLC company who has been tasked with creating a Talent and Value Proposition that focuses on creativity, annual budget savings, and possible labor reduction. Leadership has recently learned about a variety of automated solutions to assist with faster production, including artificial intelligence. This solution

Wk 7 discussion total rewards program and benefits

Benefits are another core element of a Total Rewards Program that no longer focuses primarily on insurance benefits. Benefits are designed to help protect and ensure financial security and includes retirement plans, health and welfare plans, and programs that provide pay for time not worked. Identify at least one nonmandatory