Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Instructions – This will be two papers. Paper 1 instructions: This week you will research and read American Football League v. National Football League, 205 F. Supp. 60 (D. Md. 1962). You will need t

Instructions – This will be two papers.

Paper 1 instructions: 

This week you will research and read American Football League v. National Football League, 205 F. Supp. 60 (D. Md. 1962). You will need to find the case using Nexis Uni in our Library. You may also need to do additional research. Then, answer the following questions:

1. What was the case about? Summarize the background of the case. (20pts)

2. What law did the Court base their analysis on and why was it important? (20pts)

3. What was the outcome of the case? (10pts)

4. Did you agree or disagree with the outcome and why? (10pts)

5. Shepardize the case in Nexis Uni. Was there a later appeal, and if so what happened? (10pts)

Formatting (10pts)

Writing (10pts)

Citations (10pts)

Your paper should be single spaced, approximately 2-3 pages in length, 12 point Times New Roman font, with 1″ margins. You should put your name, date and student number at the top of the paper. A title page is not needed. Attach your paper here in Word format. Citations should be in APA. You must include a reference list at the end of your paper. Attach your paper in Word format below.

Paper # 2 — Instructions 

This week you will research and read Jason White, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association. You will need to find the case using Nexis Uni in our Library. You may also need to do additional research. Then, please answer the following questions:

1. What was the case about? Who did what to whom? Please include all facts the court considered significant. Summarize in your own words. DO NOT cut and paste from the opinion.2. What law did the Court base their analysis on and why was it important?3. What was the outcome of the case?o Did the court affirm the lower court’s decision, reverse it, and/or remand it for additional proceedings?o Why did the court decide the case the way it did?o What legal standard did they use or establish?o What prior cases did the Court rely upon and why?4. Did you agree or disagree with the outcome and why?5. Is there anything else that should be mentioned about this case? Is it a “landmark” case? Was the court “divided”? What were your personal thoughts on the case?

Your paper should be single spaced, approximately 2-3 pages in length, and 12-point Times New Roman font, with 1″ margins. You should put your name, date and student number at the top of the paper. A title page is not needed. It should be saved using your last name first in the file title (e.g. SmithCaseBrief.docx). Citations should be in APA tudies Department, you may use APA citations; however, you must include a reference list at the end of your paper. Please attach your paper in Word format below.

For more information on case brief format, please see the resources attached below. The brief should be in your own words, so please do NOT include long quotes from the opinion itself.

References

American Football League v. National Football League, 205 F. Supp. 60, 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4882, 1962 Trade Cas. (CCH) P70,334 (United States District Court for the District of Maryland May 21, 1962 ). 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

BMGT 305 6380 Knowledge Management (2252) Week 1 Brainstorming Discussions For the next eight weeks, we will be visiting with Jane Clive the current IT department head at the Chicago North America Bra

BMGT 305 6380 Knowledge Management (2252) Week 1 Brainstorming Discussions For the next eight weeks, we will be visiting with Jane Clive the current IT department head at the Chicago North America Branch of an airline freight delivery service. Global Delivery Direct (GDD) has grown rapidly but is currently suffering stagnant growth

Unit 8 Final Exam: Formal Plan Presentation Overview: Create a formal presentation of your plan for a board of examiners acting as your organization’s executive level management team. Instructions:

Unit 8 Final Exam: Formal Plan Presentation Overview:  Create a formal presentation of your plan for a board of examiners acting as your organization’s executive level management team.  Instructions:  You are required to submit a slide show of your presentation. Follow the below steps:  For the PowerPoint: Create a 15-20

As a human resources manager in a health care organization, you will be asked to develop varying types of strategies and management techniques that improve the performance of your workforce. It is imp

As a human resources manager in a health care organization, you will be asked to develop varying types of strategies and management techniques that improve the performance of your workforce. It is important for you to know how to keep abreast of such strategies through research, as well as analyze

Address the checklist items below in a minimum of nine PowerPoint slides with title and reference slides. Place any notes just below the slide. Assignment Checklist: State the scenario, including the

Address the checklist items below in a minimum of nine PowerPoint slides with title and reference slides. Place any notes just below the slide.  Assignment Checklist: State the scenario, including the company name, business purpose, and issue presented. Identify three ways diversity relates to competitiveness for Vibe Trend, providing supporting details

Reflection: Topic: Controlling and Leading As you reflect on what you learned this week, in your own words, explain how you view controlling as an important part of the business management process. D

Reflection: Topic: Controlling and Leading As you reflect on what you learned this week, in your own words, explain how you view controlling as an important part of the business management process.  Describe how you can incorporate this concept into your current work situation and/or personal life. 400 words

Review Exhibit 15.9 from your textbook.Based on the information provided in this scenario, draft a persuasive essay that identifies what you believe will be the four most effective ways from Exhibit 1

Review Exhibit 15.9 from your textbook. Based on the information provided in this scenario, draft a persuasive essay that identifies what you believe will be the four most effective ways from Exhibit 15.9 one might manage resistance to change in implementing the new training program. Prepare an implementation plan using the four change management

1. In your journal entry: What government (local, state, tribal, territorial or federal), military, public, and private partnerships would be key to preparing your plan and why? • What challenges do

1. In your journal entry:   What government (local, state, tribal, territorial or federal), military, public, and private partnerships would be key to preparing your plan and why?  • What challenges do you see in developing these partnerships and how would you overcome them?  Requirements:  • 1-2 paragraphs in length. 2.

Planning Project Part II assignment. Please see my comments within the documents and make changes. Two documents attached. one is the document that has the comments from the professor and the other i

Planning Project Part II assignment. Please see my comments within the documents and make changes.  Two documents attached. one is the document that has the comments from the professor and the other is the Planning Project I submitted make the necessary correction. Pay attention to the checklist. 

Volkswagen and Its Project to Cheat Emissions Tests ”Volkswagen obfuscated, they denied, and they ultimately lied.” These were the words of U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, as she set out how the

Volkswagen and Its Project to Cheat Emissions Tests ”Volkswagen obfuscated, they denied, and they ultimately lied.” These were the words of U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, as she set out how the German carmaker would be punished for attempting to willfully mislead U.S. authorities over the emissions produced by its

Volkswagen and Its Project to Cheat Emissions Tests ”Volkswagen obfuscated, they denied, and they ultimately lied.” These were the words of U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, as she set out how the

Volkswagen and Its Project to Cheat Emissions Tests ”Volkswagen obfuscated, they denied, and they ultimately lied.” These were the words of U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, as she set out how the German carmaker would be punished for attempting to willfully mislead U.S. authorities over the emissions produced by its

Volkswagen and Its Project to Cheat Emissions Tests ”Volkswagen obfuscated, they denied, and they ultimately lied.” These were the words of U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, as she set out how the

Volkswagen and Its Project to Cheat Emissions Tests ”Volkswagen obfuscated, they denied, and they ultimately lied.” These were the words of U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, as she set out how the German carmaker would be punished for attempting to willfully mislead U.S. authorities over the emissions produced by its

Volkswagen and Its Project to Cheat Emissions Tests ”Volkswagen obfuscated, they denied, and they ultimately lied.” These were the words of U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, as she set out how the

Volkswagen and Its Project to Cheat Emissions Tests ”Volkswagen obfuscated, they denied, and they ultimately lied.” These were the words of U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, as she set out how the German carmaker would be punished for attempting to willfully mislead U.S. authorities over the emissions produced by its

Volkswagen and Its Project to Cheat Emissions Tests ”Volkswagen obfuscated, they denied, and they ultimately lied.” These were the words of U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, as she set out how the

Volkswagen and Its Project to Cheat Emissions Tests ”Volkswagen obfuscated, they denied, and they ultimately lied.” These were the words of U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, as she set out how the German carmaker would be punished for attempting to willfully mislead U.S. authorities over the emissions produced by its