Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

leadership

Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

The Quadruple Aim provides broad categories of goals to pursue to maintain and improve healthcare. Within each goal are many issues that, if addressed successfully, may have a positive impact on outcomes. For example, healthcare leaders are being tasked to shift from an emphasis on disease management often provided in an acute care setting to health promotion and disease prevention delivered in primary care settings. Efforts in this area can have significant positive impacts by reducing the need for primary healthcare and by reducing the stress on the healthcare system.

Changes in the industry only serve to stress what has always been true; namely, that the healthcare field has always faced significant challenges, and that goals to improve healthcare will always involve multiple stakeholders. This should not seem surprising given the circumstances. Indeed, when a growing population needs care, there are factors involved such as the demands of providing that care and the rising costs associated with healthcare. Generally, it is not surprising that the field of healthcare is an industry facing multifaceted issues that evolve over time.

In this module’s Discussion, you reviewed some healthcare issues/stressors and selected one for further review. For this Assignment, you will consider in more detail the healthcare issue/stressor you selected. You will also review research that addresses the issue/stressor and write a white paper to your organization’s leadership that addresses the issue/stressor you selected.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 



WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for study.

· Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post for the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected.

· Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for this module) that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to address your selected national healthcare issue/stressor.

The Assignment (2-3 Pages):

Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Develop a 2 to 3 page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

· Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).

· Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

· Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

Looking Ahead

The paper you develop in Module 1 will be revisited and revised in Module 2. Review the Assignment instructions for Module 2 to prepare for your revised paper.

By Day 7 of Week 2

Submit your paper.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
WK2Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 2-3 page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing the selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following: · Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. · Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed evidence/data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …The response includes accurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …The response includes vague or inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization or is missing. …The response includes vague and inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected or is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Provide a summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources, on the national healthcare issue/stressor. · Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

Response includes a complete, detailed, and specific summary of two outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

Response includes an accurate summary of two outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

Response includes a vague or inaccurate or incomplete summary of outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response vaguely or inaccurately explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

Response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected or summary is missing. …The response vaguely and inaccurately explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations or explanation is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. · Explain how the strategies may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

Response includes a complete, detailed, and accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …Response accurately and thoroughly explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively, with specific and accurate examples for each.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

Response includes an accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …Response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively with at least one specific example for each.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

Response includes a vague or inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …Response vaguely or inaccurately explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively. …Response may include some vague or inaccurate examples.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

Response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor or summary is missing. …Response vaguely and inaccurately explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively or explanation is missing. …Response does not include any examples.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

week 5

See attached for instructions  Post an explanation of at least two strategies for including academic activities and accomplishments into your professional development goals. Then, explain how those goals may align with the University’s emphasis on social change. Be specific and provide examples. Plz provide 350 words Plz provide references

NUR 630

NUR 630 Weekly Discussion Submission Instructions: • Your initial post should be at least 500 words or more, 1. Introduction to Child Psychiatry After studying Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources, address the following in a well-written discussion post: • Should we be “diagnosing” children with psychological disorders?  Use current US scholarly

final project breast cancer survivors

Your final paper will encompass all assignments you have completed thus far. At this point, you will have submitted each section individually and a comprehensive rough draft. You have received extensive feedback. An attempt to incorporate all previous assignment feedback should be evident. 
 The paper should be between 20

Nursing HCAD ASSIGNMENT 2

 Grading will focus on content development, depth of analysis and professionalism of delivery. Your final deliverable will be a presentation of no more than 10 minutes in length, developed in an MS PowerPoint slide deck suitable for presentation to the Board of Directors or a C-Suite executive team. 

narrated power point

A narrated PowerPoint on Diverticulitis. PLEASE include narration on the PowerPoint. Name of Disease: Definition Diverticulitis Epidemiology risk factor clinical picture narration Characteristics of diverticulitis with pictures( ABCD ) REFERENCES :

DNP

Choose at least 3 of the golden rules of leadership discussed during this module, and explain the best way you can implement them in your workplace with samples. Remember to review the  academic expectations for your submission. Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be at least 450 words, formatted, and

DNP

D.N.P. Leadership Role in the Conflict Solution and Crisis Management Instructions: Think about a crisis or conflict in your work area, and develop an essay of a minimum of three pages explaining how, as a D.N.P. Leadership Role, you can use the strategies for conflict solution and crisis management to

Biostadistic

Using the reading covered in this module review the scenarios below. For each method, determine if a probability sampling or non probability sampling method is used. For each question, determine if this an effective way to determine patient satisfaction. Why or why not? 1. The CEO of a regional hospital

Biostadistic

Using the AGMU virtual library select one research paper on a topic of interest to you that reports quantitative research. Summarize the research by answering the following questions: 1. Identify where the steps in the scientific method lie within the paper. 2. Decide whether or not the paper follows the

Action Plan Review Presentation at the Clinical Site Peer Review

Action Plan Review Presentation at the Clinical Site Peer Review You will schedule a meeting with your Faculty Member, preceptor and stakeholders to review your action plan for your DNP Project during weeks 8, 9, or 10. You will also complete your practicum meeting with the preceptor at that time.

Nursing homework question 1017

3. Personal Statement or Philosophy of Practice  · 1–2 pages outlining your values, goals, and vision as an NP. 12. Reflection  · 1–2 page reflection on your NP journey and future goals

nursing

1) Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts. Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days by supporting or expanding on the ideas identified by your colleagues or sharing additional perspectives on the issue described by your colleagues. 2) Post substantive responses to at least two colleagues on two different days

ASSESSMENT 4_6026

What are some of your personal goals for personal, professional, and leadership development that you will achieve in the practicum experience? During my practicum, my personal goals include strengthening my self-awareness and emotional intelligence to better navigate professional challenges and interpersonal dynamics. I also aim to develop my adaptability and

Care Coordination Presentation to Colleagues

Your preceptor has been observing your effectiveness as a care coordinator and recognizes the importance of educating other staff nurses in care coordination. Consequently, she has asked you to develop a presentation for your colleagues on care coordination basics. By providing them with basic information about the care coordination process,

Final Care Coordination Strategy

You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Cultural Competence activity prior to completing this assessment. Completing course activities before submitting your first attempt has been shown to make the difference between basic and proficient assessment. In this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination infographic you developed in

Roch week 7 map

roch week 7 map Professional Development Plan Name Professional title Plan launch date Plan reflection date Professional goals to achieve What are your desired career advancements goals for the next 12 to 24 months? Structure as a S.M.A.R.T goals. See link below: Goal 1. S M A R T Goal

Nursing HOMEWORK

Prepare · · Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about psychiatric emergencies and the ethical and legal issues surrounding these events. Assignment : In 2–3 pages, address the following: · Explain your state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult psychiatric emergencies. Include

DNP

Where are you in your program of study? What are you hoping to learn from this particular class ? How will this apply to your future career?