Description
– I want original text, no plagiarism.
– You can find the instructions in the file. Please read it carefully.
– APA Style
Thanks
–
Textbook:
Grant, R. M. (2019). Contemporary strategy analysis (11th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Print ISBN-13: 978-1119815235
Etext ISBN-10: 1119815231
وزارة التعليم
الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education
Saudi Electronic University
College of Administrative and Financial Sciences
Department of Business Administration
Assignment 1
Course Name: Strategy Planning
Student’s Name:
Course Code: MGT510
Student’s ID Number:
Term: 2nd
CRN:
Academic Year: 2024-25
For Instructor’s Use only
Instructor’s Name:
Students’ Grade: Out of / 15
Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low
Module 03: Critical thinking assignment (15 points)
Instructions
Industry Analysis (15 points)
Analyze the attractiveness and competitive dynamics of the electric vehicle (EV) industry
using industry analysis frameworks. Assess the profit potential and competitive
advantages of key players in the EV industry. Evaluate the strengths and limitations of
the industry analysis frameworks used in your analysis.
Instructions:
1. Research the electric vehicle industry, including major players, market
trends, growth projections, and competitive dynamics.
2. Apply Porter’s Five Forces, to assess the profit potential, competitive
advantages, and overall attractiveness of the EV industry.
Restricted – مقيد
3. Evaluate the strengths and limitations of the framework in providing
insights into the EV industry. Consider factors like:
•
Comprehensiveness of the framework in capturing key industry
dynamics
•
Ease of data collection and analysis
•
Actionability of insights for strategic decision making
4. Synthesize your findings into a paper that:
•
Provides an overview of the EV industry and key players
•
Analyzes the industry using the Porter’s Five Forces
•
Assesses the profit potential and competitive advantages of major EV
companies
•
Evaluates the strengths and limitations of Porter’s Five Forces
•
Draws conclusions about the overall attractiveness of the EV industry
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
Restricted – مقيد
•
Be 4 to 5 pages in length, which does not include the required title and reference
pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
•
Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style
guidelines.
•
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories
from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles
unless the assignment calls for more.
•
It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into the Turnitin
Originality Check before submitting it to your instructor for grading. If you are
unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality Check tool, review the
Turnitin Originality Check—Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.
•
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
Answer
Restricted – مقيد
Name
CT_Rubric_100
Description
100 Points
Rubric Detail
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Exceeds Expectation
Meets Expectation
Some Expectations
Unsatisfactory
Content
33 to 35 points
29 to 32 points
26 to 28 points
0 to 25 points
Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive knowledge of
the materials, with no
errors or major
omissions.
Demonstrates adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may include
some minor errors or
omissions.
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the materials
and/or includes some
major errors or omissions.
Fails to demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many major
errors or omissions.
33 to 35 points
29 to 32 points
26 to 28 points
0 to 25 points
Provides strong thought,
insight, and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides adequate
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts and
applications.
Provides poor though,
insight, and analysis of
concepts and applications.
Provides little or no
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts and
applications.
15 to 15 points
13 to 14 points
11 to 12 points
0 to 10 points
Sources go above and
beyond required criteria
and are well chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Sources meet required
criteria and are
adequately chosen to
provide substance and
perspectives on the issue
under examination.
Sources meet required
criteria but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and perspectives
on the issue under
examination.
Source selection and
integration of knowledge
from the course is clearly
deficient.
15 to 15 points
13 to 14 points
11 to 12 points
0 to 10 points
Project is clearly
organized, well written,
and in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and paragraph
structure, contains no
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style, or
APA citations and
references.
Project is fairly well
organized and written
and is in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Reasonably
good sentence and
paragraph structure, may
include a few minor
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style, or APA
citations and references.
Project is poorly organized
and written and may not
follow proper format as
outlined in the assignment.
Inconsistent to inadequate
sentence and paragraph
development, and/or
includes numerous or
major errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style or APA
citations and references.
Project is not organized
or well written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor quality
work; unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style, and
APA citations and
references.
Analysis
Sources
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
View Associated Items
Print
Close Window
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
