Description
Solve a task in the strategy management course, which is a case study, following all written instructions carefully and without any similarity or plagiarism.
وزارة التعليم
الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education
Saudi Electronic University
College of Administrative and Financial Sciences
Assignment 2
Strategic Management (MGT 401)
Due Date: 22/03/2025 @ 23:59
Course Name: Strategic Management
Student’s Name:
Course Code: MGT 401
Student’s ID Number:
Semester: Second
CRN:
Academic Year:2024-25-2nd
For Instructor’s Use only
Instructor’s Name:
Students’ Grade:
/10
Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low
General Instructions – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Restricted – مقيد
The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via the
allocated folder.
Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.
Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced
for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.
Students must mention the question number clearly in their answers.
Late submissions will NOT be accepted.
Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other
resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.
All answers must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No
pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.
Learning Outcomes:
CLO1
CLO4
Recognize the basic concepts and terminology used in Strategic Management.
Describe the different issues related to environmental scanning, strategy formulation, and strategy
implementation in diversified organizations.
Explain the contribution of functional, business, and corporate strategies to the organization’s competitive
advantage.
Distinguish between different types and levels of strategy and strategy implementation.
CLO5
Demonstrate how executive leadership is an integral part of strategic management.
CLO6
Communicate issues, results, and recommendations coherently, and effectively regarding appropriate strategies
for different situations.
CLO2
CLO3
Case study: TomTom Company
Assignment Question(s):
Read carefully case study No. 21 from your textbook (entitled ‘TomTom: New Competition
Everywhere! By Alan N. Hoffman) and briefly answer the following questions: (1 mark for each question)
1. What competitive strategy does TomTom company use?
2. Apply the five forces of M. Porter’s framework to analyze the industry to which TomTom company
belongs.
Detail the different functional strategies employed by this company.
Explain TomTom company’s relationship with its primary stakeholders.
Outline TomTom’s market position.
Identify the core competencies of this company
Discuss at least TWO strategic alliances (such as acquisitions, outsourcing, joint ventures, etc.)
utilized by this company Were they successful? Justify your answer.
8. What main challenges has TomTom company faced?
9. Evaluate the competitive advantage of TomTom in its market.
10. Suggest recommendations for TomTom company to enhance its competitive advantage.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Notes.
▪
▪
▪
▪
Be brief while answering the questions.
Please do not copy/paste sentences from the case study text.
It is highly recommended to use the vocabulary/terminology used in your course of MGT401.
You do not need to use other references to answer the questions in this case; limit your answers to what is provided
in the studied case.
Good Luck
Restricted – مقيد
Student’s Answers
1.
2.
…
Restricted – مقيد
Case
31
TomTom
NEW COMPETITION EVERYWHERE!
Alan N. Hoffman
Bentley University
Tomtom was one of the largest producers of satellite navigation systemsin the
world. Its products were comprised of both stand-alone devices and applications.
TomTom led the navigation systems market in Europe and was second in the
United States. TomTom attributed its position as a market leader to the following
factors: the size of its customer and technology base, its distribution power, and
its prominent brand image and recognition.1
With the acquisition of Tele Atlas, TomTom became vertically integrated and
also controlled the map creation process. This helped TomTom establish itself as
an integrated content, service, and technology business. The company was Dutch by
origin and had its headquarters based in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. In terms of
geography, the company’s operations spanned from Europe to Asia Pacific, covering
North America, the Middle East, and Africa.2
TomTom was supported by a workforce of 3300 employees from 40 countries. The
company’s revenues had grown from €8 million in 2002 to €1.674 billion in 2008. (See
Exhibits 1 and 2.)
This case was prepared by Professor Alan N. Hoffman, Bentley University and Erasmus University. Copyright © 2015 by Alan N. Hoffman. The copyright holder is solely responsible for the case content. Reprint
permission is solely granted to the publisher, Prentice Hall, for Strategic Management and Business Policy,
14th Edition (and the international and electronic versions of this book) by the copyright holder, Alan N.
Hoffman. Any other publication of the case (translation, any form of electronics or other media) or sale (any
form of partnership) to another publisher will be in violation of copyright law, unless Alan N. Hoffman has
granted an additional written permission. The author would like to thank Will Hoffman, Mansi Asthana,
Aakashi Ganveer, Hing Lin, and Che Yii for their research. Please address all correspondence to: Professor
Alan N. Hoffman, Bentley University, 175 Forest Street, Waltham, MA 02452 or [email protected].
Printed by permission of Dr. Alan N. Hoffman.
RSM Case Development Centre prepared this case to provide material for class discussion rather than
to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Copyright © 2010, RSM Case
Development Centre, Erasmus University. No part of this publication may be copied, stored, transmitted,
reproduced, or distributed in any form or medium whatsoever without the permission of the copyright owner,
Alan N. Hoffman.
31-1
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 1
6/20/17 10:49 AM
31-2
C as e 3 1 TomTom
EXHIBIT 1
2,000,000
Sales Revenue and
Net Income (€):
TomTom (Amount in
millions of €)
Sales
Net income
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
Q3
Q4
–500,000
–1,000,000
–1,500,000
EXHIBIT 2
800
Quarterly Sales:
TomTom (Amount
in millions of €)
700
600
2009
2008
2007
500
400
300
200
100
0
Q1
Q2
However, because of the Tele Atlas acquisition and the current economic downturn,
the company has recently become a cause of concern for investors. On July 22, 2009,
TomTom reported a decline in its net income at the end of the second quarter of 2009.
TomTom was in the business of navigation-based information services and devices.
The company had been investing structurally and strategically in research and development to bring new and better products and services to its customers. The company’s
belief in radical innovation helped it remain at the cutting edge of innovation within
the navigation industry.
The vision of TomTom’s management was to improve people’s lives by transforming navigation from a “don’t-get-lost solution” into a true travel companion that gets
people from one place to another safer, faster, cheaper, and better informed. This vision
helped the company become a market leader in every marketplace in the satellite navigation information services market.3
The company’s goals focused around radical advances in three key areas:
■■
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 2
Better maps: This goal was achieved by maintaining TomTom’s high-quality map
database, which was continuously kept up to date by a large community of active
users who provided corrections, verifications, and updates to TomTom. This was
supplemented by inputs from TomTom’s extensive fleet of surveying vehicles.4
6/20/17 10:49 AM
Ca se 31 TomTom
31-3
Better routing: TomTom had the world’s largest historical speed profile database IQ
Routes, facilitated by TomTom HOME, the company’s user portal.5
■■ Better traffic information: TomTom possessed a unique, real-time traffic information service called TomTom HD traffic, which provided users with high-quality,
real-time traffic updates.6 These three goals formed the base of satellite navigation,
working in conjunction to help TomTom achieve its mission.
■■
TomTom’s Products
TomTom offered a wide variety of products ranging from portable navigation devices to
software navigation applications and digital maps. The unique features in each of these
products made them truly “the smart choice in personal navigation.”7 Some of these
products are described next.
TomTom Go and TomTom One
These devices came with an LCD screen that made it easy to use with fingertips while
driving. They provided Points of Interest (POI) that helped in locating petrol stations,
restaurants, and places of importance and traffic information.
TomTom Rider
These were portable models especially designed for bikers. The equipment consisted of
an integrated GPS receiver that could be mounted on any bike, and a wireless headset
inside the helmet. Similar to the car Portable Navigation Devices (PNDs), the TomTom
Rider models had a number of POI applications. The interfaces used in TomTom Rider
were user-friendly and came in a variety of languages.8
TomTom Navigator and TomTom Mobile
These applications provided navigation software along with digital maps. Both of
these applications were compatible with most mobiles and PDAs provided by companies like Sony, Nokia, Acer, Dell, and HP. These applications came with TomTom
HOME, which could be used to upgrade to the most recent digital maps and application versions.9
TomTom for iPhone
On August 17, 2009, TomTom released TomTom for the iPhone.
The TomTom app for iPhone 3G and 3GS users included a map of the United States
and Canada from Tele Atlas, and was available for US$99.99.
The TomTom app for iPhone included the exclusive IQ Routes technology. Instead
of using travel time assumptions, IQ Routes based its routes on the actual experience of
millions of TomTom drivers to calculate the fastest route and generate the most accurate arrival times in the industry. TomTom IQ Routes empowered drivers to reach their
destination faster up to 35% of the time.
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 3
6/20/17 10:49 AM
31-4
C as e 3 1 TomTom
Company History
TomTom was founded as “Palmtop” in 1991 by Peter-Frans Pauwels and Pieter Geelen,
two graduates from Amsterdam University, The Netherlands. Palmtop started out as a
software development company and was involved in producing software for handheld
computers, one of the most popular devices of the 1990s. In the following few years,
the company diversified into producing commercial applications including software for
personal finance, games, a dictionary, and maps. In the year 1996, Corinne Vigreux joined
Palmtop as the third partner. In the same year, the company announced the launch of
Enroute and RouteFinder, the first navigation software titles. As more and more people
using PCs adopted Microsoft’s operating system, the company developed applications
which were compatible with it. This helped the company increase its market share. In
2001, Harold Goddijn, the former Chief Executive of Psion, joined the company as the
fourth partner. This proved to be a turning point in the history of TomTom. Not only did
Palmtop get renamed to TomTom, but it also entered the satellite navigation market.
TomTom launched TomTom Navigator, the first mobile car satnav system.
In 2002, the company generated revenue of €8 million by selling the first GPS-linked
car navigator, the TomTom Navigator, for PDAs. The upgraded version, Navigator 2,
was released in early 2003. Meanwhile, the company made efforts to gain technical and
marketing personnel. TomTom took strategic steps to grow its sales. The former CTO
of Psion, Mark Gretton, led the hardware team, while Alexander Ribbink, a former top
marketing official, looked after sales of new products introduced by the company.
TomTom Go, an all-in-one car navigation system, was the company’s next major
launch. With its useful and easy-to-use features, TomTom Go was included in the list of
successful products of 2004. In the same year, the company launched TomTom Mobile,
a navigation system that sat on top of Smartphones.10
TomTom completed its IPO on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange in May 2005, raising €469 million (US$587 million). The net worth of the company was nearly €2 billion
after the IPO. A majority of the shares were held by the four partners.11 From the years
2006 to 2008, TomTom strengthened itself by making three key strategic acquisitions.
Datafactory AG was acquired to power TomTom WORK through WEBfleet technology,
while Applied Generics gave its technology for Mobility Solutions Services. However,
the most prominent of these three was the acquisition of Tele Atlas.12
In July of 2007, TomTom bid for Tele Atlas, a company specializing in digital maps.
The original bid price of €2 billion was countered by a €2.3 billion offer from Garmin, TomTom’s biggest rival. When TomTom raised its bid price to €2.9 billion, the two
companies initiated a bidding war for Tele Atlas. Although there was speculation that
Garmin would further increase its bid price, in the end management decided not to
pursue Tele Atlas any further. Rather, Garmin struck a content agreement with Navteq.
TomTom’s shareholders approved the takeover in December 2007.13
TomTom’s Customers
TomTom was a company that had a wide array of customers, each with their own individual needs and desires. TomTom had a variety of products to meet the requirements of
a large and varied customer base. As an example, its navigational products ranged from
US$100–$500 in the United States, spanning lower-end products with fewer capabilities
to high-end products with advanced features.
The first group was the individual consumers who bought stand-alone portable navigation devices and services. The second group was automobile manufacturers. TomTom
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 4
6/20/17 10:49 AM
Ca se 31 TomTom
31-5
teamed with companies like Renault to develop built-in navigational units to install
as an option in cars. A third group of customers was the aviation industry and pilots
with personal planes. TomTom produced navigational devices for air travel at affordable prices. A fourth group of customers was business enterprises. Business enterprises
referred to companies such as Wal-Mart, Target, or The Home Depot, huge companies
with large mobile workforces. To focus on these customers, TomTom formed a strategic
partnership with a technology company called Advanced Integrated Solutions to “optimize business fleet organization and itinerary planning on the TomTom pro series of
navigation devices.” This new advanced feature on PNDs offered ways for fleet managers and route dispatchers to organize, plan, and optimize routes and to provide detailed
mapping information about the final destination. TomTom’s fifth group of customers,
the Coast Guard, was able to use TomTom’s marine navigational devices for its everyday
responsibilities.
Mergers and Acquisitions
TomTom made various mergers and acquisitions as well as partnerships, which positioned the company well. In 2008, TomTom acquired a digital mapping company called
Tele Atlas. The acquisition significantly improved TomTom customers’ user experience
and created other benefits for the customers and partners of both companies, including
more accurate navigation information, improved coverage, and new enhanced features
such as map updates and IQ Routes.
In 2005, TomTom partnered with Avis, adding its user-friendly navigation system to
all Avis rental cars. This partnership began in Europe, and soon the devices had made
their way into Avis rental cars in North America as well as many other countries where
Avis operated.
TomTom acquired several patents for its many different technologies. By having
these patents for each of its ideas, the company protected itself against its competition
and other companies trying to enter into the market.
TomTom prided itself on being the industry innovator and always being a step
ahead of the competition in terms of its technology.
TomTom had a strong brand name/image. It positioned itself well throughout the
world as a leader in portable navigation devices. The company marketed its products
through its very user-friendly online website and also through large companies such
as Best Buy and Wal-Mart. TomTom also teamed up with Locutio Voice Technologies
and Twentieth Century Fox Licensing & Merchandising to bring the original voice of
Homer Simpson to all TomTom devices via download. “Let Homer Simpson be your
TomTom co-pilot” was one of the many interesting ways TomTom marketed its products
and name to consumers.14
TomTom’s Resources and Capabilities
The company believed that there were three fundamental requirements to a navigation
system—digital mapping, routing technology, and dynamic information. Based on these
requirements, three key resources could be identified that really distinguished TomTom
from its competition.
The first of these resources was the in-house routing algorithms. These algorithms
enabled TomTom to introduce technologies like IQ Routes that provided a “community
based information database.” IQ Routes calculated customer routes based on the real
average speeds measured on roads at that particular time.
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 5
6/20/17 10:49 AM
31-6
C as e 3 1 TomTom
The second unique resource was Tele Atlas and the digital mapping technology that the TomTom group specialized in. Having the technology and knowledge in
mapping that the company brought to TomTom allowed it to introduce many unique
features to its customers. First, TomTom came out with a map update feature. The company recognized that roads around the world were constantly changing and, because
of this, it used the technology to come out with four new maps each year, one per
business quarter. This allowed its customers to always have the latest routes to incorporate into their everyday travel. A second feature it introduced is its Map Share
program. The idea behind this is that customers of TomTom who notice mistakes in a
certain map are able to go in and request a change to be made. The change was then
verified and checked directly by TomTom and was shared with the rest of the global
user community.
The third unique resource was automotive partnerships with two companies in particular: Renault and Avis. At the end of 2008, TomTom reached a deal with Renault to
install its navigation devices in its cars as an option. The clincher was the new price of
the built-in navigation units. The cost of a navigation device installed in Renault’s cars
before TomTom was €1500. Now, with the TomTom system, it cost only €500. As mentioned earlier, TomTom also partnered with Avis in 2005 to offer its navigation devices,
specifically the model GO 700, in all Avis rental cars, first starting in Europe and then
expanding into other countries where Avis operated.
Traditional Competition
TomTom faced competition from two main companies. The first of these was Garmin,
which held 45% of the market share, by far the largest and double TomTom’s market
share (24%). Garmin was founded in 1989 by Gary Burrell and Min H. Kao. The company was known for its on-the-go directions since its introduction into GPS navigation
in 1989. At the end of 2008, Garmin reported annual sales of US$3.49 billion. Garmin
had competed head to head in 2009 with TomTom in trying to acquire Tele Atlas for its
mapmaking. Garmin withdrew its bid when it became evident that it was becoming too
expensive to own Tele Atlas. Garmin executives made a decision that it was cheaper
to work out a long-term deal with its current supplier, Navteq, than to try to buy out a
competitor.
The second direct competitor was Magellan, which held 15% of the market share.
Magellan was part of a privately held company under the name of MiTac Digital Corporation. Similar to Garmin, Magellan products used Navteq-based maps. Magellan was
the creator of Magellan NAV 100, the world’s first commercial handheld GPS receiver,
which was created in 1989. The company was also well-known for its award-winning
RoadMate and Maestro series portable car navigation systems.
Together these three dominant players accounted for about 85% of the total market. Other competitors in the personal navigation device market were Navigon, Nextar, and Nokia. Navigon and Nextar competed in the personal navigation devices with
TomTom, Magellan, and Garmin, who were the top three in the industry. But Navigon
competed in the high-end segment, which retailed for more than any of the competitors
but offered a few extra features in its PNDs. Nextar competed in the low-end market and
its strategy was low cost. Finally, Nokia was mentioned as a competitor in this industry
because the company acquired Navteq, a major supplier of map services in this industry.
Along with that, Nokia had a big market share in the cell phone industry and planned
on incorporating GPS technology in every phone, making it a potential key player to
look for in the GPS navigation industry.
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 6
6/20/17 10:49 AM
Ca se 31 TomTom
31-7
New Competition Everywhere!
Cell Phones
Cell phones were widely used by people all around the world. With the 2005 FCC mandate that required the location of any cell phone used to call 911 to be tracked, phone
manufacturers included a GPS receiver in almost every cell phone. Due to this mandate,
cell phone manufacturers and cellular services were able to offer GPS navigation services through the cell phone for a fee.
AT&T Navigator
GPS Navigation with AT&T Navigator and AT&T Navigator Global Edition feature realtime GPS-enabled turn-by-turn navigation onAT&T mobile Smartphones (iPhones and
BlackBerrys) or static navigation and Local Search on a non-GPS AT&T mobile Smartphone.
AT&T Navigator featured Global GPS turn-by-turn navigation—Mapping and
Point of AT&T Interest content for three continents, including North America (United
States, Canada, and Mexico), Western Europe, and China, where wireless coverage was
available from AT&T or its roaming providers. The AT&T Navigator was sold as a subscription service and cost US$9.99 per month.
Online Navigation Applications
Online navigation websites that were still popular among many users for driving directions and maps were MapQuest, Google Maps, and Yahoo Maps. Users were able to use
these free sites to get detailed directions on how to get to their next destination. In the
current economic downturn, many people were looking for cheap (or if possible, free)
solutions to solve their problems. These online websites offered the use of free mapping
and navigation information that would allow them to get what they needed at no additional cost. However, there were downsides to these programs: They were not portable
and could have poor visualization designs (such as vague images or text-based output).15
Built-in Car Navigation Devices
In-car navigation devices first came about in luxury, high-end vehicles. Currently, it
has become more mainstream and is now being offered in mid- to lower-tier vehicles.
These built-in car navigation devices offered similar features to the personal navigation
device but didn’t have the portability, so users wouldn’t have to carry multiple devices.
However, they came with a hefty price. Some examples of these are Kenwood, Pioneer,
and Eclipse units, which are all installed in cars. These units tended to be expensive and
overpriced because they were brand-name products and required physical installation.
For example, the top-of-the-line Pioneer unit was US$1,000 for the monitor and another
US$500 for the navigation device plus the physical labor. When buying such products,
a customer spent a huge amount of money on a product that was almost identical to a
product TomTom offered at a significantly lower price.
Physical Maps
Physical maps were the primary option for navigating for decades until technology
improved them. Physical maps provided detailed road information to help a person get
from point A to point B. Although more cumbersome to use than some of the modern
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 7
6/20/17 10:49 AM
31-8
C as e 3 1 TomTom
technology alternatives, it was an alternative for people who were not technically savvy
or for whom a navigation device was an unnecessary luxury.
Potential Adverse Legislation and Restrictions
In the legal and political realm, TomTom faced two issues that were not critical now, but
that might have significant ramifications to not only TomTom in the future, but also the
entire portable navigation device industry. The reaction of TomTom’s management to
each of these issues will determine whether or not there was an opportunity for gain or
a threat of a significant loss to the company.
The most important issue TomTom dealt with was the possible legislative banning of
all navigational devices from automobiles. In Australia, the government was considering
banning PNDs completely from automobiles. There was a similar sentiment in Ontario,
Canada, where a law that was currently under review would ban all PNDs that were not
mounted either to the dashboard or to the windshield itself.16
With the increase in legislation adding to the restrictions placed on PND devices,
the threat that the PND market in the future will be severely limited could not be
ignored. All of the companies within the PND industry, not just TomTom, must create a
coordinated and united effort to stem this wave of restrictions as well as provide reassurance to the public that they were also concerned with the safe use of their products.
This effort can be seen in the heavily regulated toy industry. Many companies within
the toy industry had combined to form the International Council of Toy Industries17 to
be proactive in regard to safety regulations, as well as lobby governments against laws
that may unfairly threaten the toy industry.18
The other issue within the legal and political spectrum that TomTom must focus
on was the growing use of GPS devices as tracking devices. Currently, law enforcement
agents were allowed to use their own GPS devices to track the movements and locations of individuals they deemed suspicious. However, if budget cuts reduced the access
to these GPS devices, then the simple solution will be to use the PND devices already
installed in many automobiles.
This issue also required the industry as a whole to proactively work with the consumers and the government to come to an amicable resolution. The threat of having
every consumer’s GPS information at the fingertips of either the government or surveillance company will most certainly stunt or even completely halt any growth within
the PND industry.
Another alarming trend was the rise in PND thefts around the country.19 With the
prices for PNDs at a relatively high level, thieves were targeting vehicles that had visible
docking stations for PNDs either on the dashboard or the windshield. The onus will be
on TomTom to create new designs that will not only hide PNDs from would-be thieves
but also deter them from trying to steal one. Consumers who were scared to purchase
PNDs because of this rise in crime will become an issue if this problem is not resolved.
There was also a current trend, labeled the GREEN movement,20 that aimed to
reduce any activities that would endanger the environment. This movement was a great
opportunity for TomTom to tout its technology as the smarter and more environmentally
safe tool if driving is an absolute necessity. Not only can individuals tout this improved
efficiency, but more importantly on a larger scale, businesses that require large amounts
of materials to be transported across long stretches can show activists that they too are
working toward becoming a green company.
It is ironic that the core technology used in TomTom’s navigation system, the GPS
system, has proliferated into other electronic devices at such a rapid pace that it has
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 8
6/20/17 10:49 AM
Ca se 31 TomTom
31-9
caused serious competition to the PND industry. GPS functionality was a basic requirement for all new Smartphones that entered the market and soon will become a basic
functionality in regular cellular phones. TomTom will be hard pressed to compete with
these multifunctional devices unless it can improve upon its designs and transform itself
into a single focused device.
Another concern for not only TomTom, but also every company that relies heavily
on GPS technology, was the aging satellites that supported the GPS system. Analysts
predicted that these satellites will be either replaced or fixed before there are any issues,
but this issue was unsettling due to the fact that TomTom had no control over it.21 TomTom will have to devise contingency plans in case of catastrophic failure of the GPS
system, much like what happened to Research in Motion when malfunctioning satellites
caused disruption in its service.
TomTom was one of the leading companies in the PND markets in both Europe and
the United States. Although they were the leader in Europe, that market was showing
signs of becoming saturated. Even though the U.S. market was currently growing, TomTom could not wait for the inevitable signs of that market’s slowdown as well.
The two main opportunities for TomTom to expand—creating digital maps for
developing countries and creating navigational services—can either be piggybacked or
can be taken in independent paths. The first-mover advantage for these opportunities
will erect a high barrier of entry for any companies that do not have large amounts of
resources to invest in the developing country. TomTom was already playing catch-up to
Garmin and its already established service in India.
Globalization of any company’s products did not come without a certain set of
issues. For TomTom, the main threat brought on by foreign countries was twofold.
The first threat, which may be an isolated instance, but could also be repeated in
many other countries, was the restriction of certain capabilities for all of TomTom’s
products. Due to security and terrorism concerns, GPS devices have not been allowed
in Egypt since 2003.22 In times of global terrorism, TomTom must be vigilant of the
growing trend for countries to become overly protective of foreign companies and
their technologies.
Internal Environment
Finance
TomTom’s financial goals were to diversify and become a broader revenue-based company. The company not only sought to increase the revenue base in terms of geographical expansion but also wanted to diversify its product and service portfolio. Additionally,
another important goal the company strived to achieve was reducing its operating
expenses.
Sales Revenue and Net Income
Exhibit 2 shows that from 2005 to 2007 there was a consistent growth in sales revenue, as
well as a corresponding increase in net income. However, year 2008 was an exception to
this trend. In this year, sales revenue decreased by 3.7% and the net income decreased
by 136%. In fact, in the first quarter the net income was actually negative, totaling −€37
million. The decrease in sales can be accounted for by the downturn in the economy.
According to its 2008 annual report, the sales are in line with market expectations.
However, the net income plummeted much more than the decrease in sales. This was
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 9
6/20/17 10:49 AM
31-10
C as e 3 1 TomTom
actually triggered by its acquisition of the digital mapping company—Tele Atlas—which
was funded by both cash assets and debt.
Quarterly sales. In the second quarter of 2009, TomTom received sales revenue of
€368 million, compared to €213 million in the first quarter and €453 million in the same
quarter in 2008 (Exhibit 3). By evaluating quarterly sales for a three-year period from
2007 until the present, it was apparent that the sales followed a seasonal trend in TomTom, with highest sales in the last quarter and lowest in the first quarter. However,
focusing on just the first and second quarter for three years, one can infer that the sales
revenue as a whole was also going down year after year. To investigate further on the
causes of this scenario, the company will have to delve deeper into its revenue base.
TomTom’s sources of revenue can be broadly grouped into two categories—market
segment and geographic location.
Revenue per Segment
TomTom’s per segment revenue stream can be divided into PNDs and others, where others consisted of services and content. Evaluating the first quarter of 2008 against that of
2009 and the last quarter of 2008, TomTom experienced steep declines of 40% and 68%
(see Exhibit 4). This could be a consequence of the compounded effect of the following: (1) The number of devices (PNDs) decreased by a similar amount during both time
periods. (2) The average selling price of PNDs had also been decreasing consistently. In
a technology company, a decrease in average selling price is a part of doing business in
a highly competitive and dynamic marketplace. Nevertheless, the revenue stream from
business units other than PNDs had seen a steady increase in both the scenarios.
Revenue per Region
TomTom’s per region revenue stream can be further divided into Europe, North America, and the rest of the world. Comparing the first quarter of 2009 against 2008, it can
be seen that revenue from both Europe and North America was on the decline, with a
decrease of 22% and 52%, respectively (see Exhibit 5). At the same time, revenue from
EXHIBIT 3
Revenue per
Segment: TomTom (Amount in
millions of €)
EXHIBIT 4
Revenue per
Region: TomTom (Amount in
millions of €)
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 10
Europe
North America
Rest of world
Total
Quarter 1 of 2009
Quarter 1 of 2009
Difference
178,114
84,641
1,087
263,842
146,549
55,558
10,976
213,083
–22%
–52%
90%
–24%
6/20/17 10:49 AM
Ca se 31 TomTom
31-11
EXHIBIT 5
Cash versus
Long-Term
Debt (Amount in
thousands of €)
Long Term Debt
Cash Assets
Borrowings
EXHIBIT 6
30%
Operating Margin:
TomTom
25%
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
301
178,377
0
338
437,801
0
377
463,339
0
4,749
321,039
1,241,900
4,811
422,530
1,195,715
Operating margin
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
2005
2006
2007
2008
the rest of the world had seen a huge increase of 90%. Both of these analyses supported
TomTom’s current goal to increase its revenue base and is aligned with its long-term
strategy of being a leader in the navigation industry.
Long-term debt. In 2005, TomTom was a cash-rich company. However, the recent
acquisition of Tele Atlas, which amounted to €2.9 billion, was funded by cash, the release
of new shares, and long-term debt (see Exhibit 6), in this case a €1.2 billion loan. These
combined to use up TomTom’s cash reserves. Currently, TomTom’s debt was €1,006
million.
Operating margin. TomTom saw a consistent increase in operating margin until 2006.
However, since 2007, operating margin has been decreasing for the firm. In fact, by the
end of 2008 it came down to 13%, compared to 26% in 2006.
Marketing
Traditionally, high quality and ease of use of solutions have been of utmost importance
to TomTom. In a 2006 interview, TomTom’s Marketing Head, Anne Louise Hanstad,
emphasized the importance of simplicity and ease of use with its devices. This underlined TomTom’s belief that people prefer fit-for-purpose devices that are developed
and designed to do one specific thing very well. At that time, both of these were core
to TomTom’s strategy as its targeted customers were early adopters. Now, however, as
the navigation industry moved from embryonic to a growth industry, TomTom’s current
customers were early majority. Hence, simplicity and ease alone could no longer provide
it with a competitive advantage.
Recently, to be in line with its immediate goal of diversifying into different market
segments, TomTom was more focused on strengthening its brand name. In December
2008, TomTom’s CEO stated “ . . . we are constantly striving to increase awareness of
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 11
6/20/17 10:50 AM
31-12
C as e 3 1 TomTom
our brand and strengthen our reputation for providing smart, easy-to-use, high-quality
portable navigation products and services.”23
Along with Tele Atlas, the TomTom group has gained depth and breadth of expertise over the last 30 years, which made it a trusted brand. Three out of four people were
aware of the TomTom brand across the markets. The TomTom group has always been
committed to the three fundamentals of navigation: mapping, routing algorithm, and
dynamic information. Tele Atlas’ core competency was the digital mapping database,
while TomTom’s was routing algorithms and guidance services using dynamic information. Together, the group created synergies that enabled it to introduce products almost
every year that advanced on one or a combination of these three elements. Acquiring
its long-time supplier of digital maps, Tele Atlas, in 2008 gave TomTom an edge with
in-house digital mapping technology.
TomTom provided a range of PND devices like TomTom One, TomTom XL, and
the TomTom Go Series. Periodically, it tried to enhance those devices with new features
and services that were built based on customer feedback. Examples of services were IQ
Routes and LIVE services. While IQ Routes provided drivers with the most efficient
route planning, accounting for situations as precise as speed bumps and traffic lights,
LIVE services formed a range of information services delivered directly to the LIVE
devices. The LIVE services bundle included Map Share and HD Traffic, bringing the
content collected from vast driving communities directly to the end-user.
These products and services accentuated effective designs and unique features, and
required TomTom to work with its customers to share precise updates and also get feedback for future improvements. Hence, effective customer interaction became essential to
its long-term goal of innovation. In 2008, J. D. Power and Associates recognized TomTom
for providing outstanding customer service experience.24 Although it awarded TomTom
for customer service satisfaction, J. D. Power and Associates ranked Garmin highest in
overall customer satisfaction. TomTom followed Garmin in the ranking, performing well
in the routing, speed of system, and voice direction factors.25
As mentioned previously, when the navigation industry was still in its embryonic
stages, features, ease of use, and the high quality of its solutions gave TomTom products
a competitive edge. Eventually, the competition increased in the navigation industry and
even substitutes posed a substantial threat to market share. TomTom offered PNDs in
different price ranges, broadly classified into high-range and mid-range PNDs, with an
average selling price of €99. There were entry-level options that allowed a savvy shopper to put navigation in his/her car for just over US$100. Higher-end models added
advanced features and services that were previously described.
TomTom sold its PNDs to consumers through retailers and distributors. After
acquiring Tele Atlas, it was strategically placed to gain the first mover advantage created by its rapid expansion of geographical coverage.26 This was of key importance when
it came to increasing its global market share.
TomTom directed its marketing expenditure toward B2B advertising that was
directed to retailers and distributors. TomTom also invested in an official blog website,
as well as search optimization, which placed it in premium results in online searches.
This enabled TomTom to do effective word-of-mouth promotion while keeping flexible
marketing spending, in accordance with changes in the macroeconomic environment or
seasonal trends.27 Although this approach gave TomTom spending flexibility, it lacked
a direct B2C approach. In 2009, only 21% of U.S. adults owned PNDs, whereas 65% of
U.S. adults neither owned nor used navigation.28 By not spending on B2C marketing,
TomTom discounted on the opportunity both to attract first-tier noncustomers and
glean an insight of needs of second-tier noncustomers.29
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 12
6/20/17 10:50 AM
Ca se 31 TomTom
31-13
Operations
The focus of operations had always been on innovation. More recently, TomTom’s operational objective had been to channel all its resources and core capabilities to create
economies of scale so as to be aligned with its long-term strategy. TomTom aimed to
focus and centralize R&D resources to create scale economies to continue to lead the
industry in terms of innovation.30
Implementation of this strategy was well underway and the changes were visible.
By the second quarter of 2009, mid-range PNDs were introduced with the capabilities
of high-range devices. In addition, 50% of PNDs were sold with IQ Routes technology.
The first in-dash product was also launched in alliance with Renault, and the TomTom
iPhone application was also announced.31
After acquiring Tele Atlas to better support the broader navigation solutions and
content and services, the group underwent restructuring. The new organizational structure consisted of four business units that had a clear focus on a specific customer group
and were supported by two shared development centers.
The four business units were CONSUMER (B2C), composed of retail sales of PND,
on-board, and mobile; AUTOMOTIVE (B2B), composed of auto industry sales of integrated solutions and content & services; LICENSING (B2B), composed of PND, automotive, mobile, Internet, and GIS content and services; and WORK (B2B), composed
of commercial fleet sales of Webfleet & Connected Solutions.
TomTom’s supply chain and distribution model was outsourced. This increased TomTom’s ability to scale up or down the supply chain, while limiting capital expenditure
risks. At the same time, however, it depended on a limited number of third parties—and
in certain instances sole suppliers—for component supply and manufacturing, which
increased its dependency on these suppliers.
TomTom’s dynamic content sharing model used high-quality digital maps along with
the connected services, like HD Traffic, Local Search with Google, and weather information. This provided customers with relevant real-time information at the moment they
needed it, which helped them deliver the benefits of innovative technology directly to
the end-user at affordable prices. Although the network externalities previously mentioned were among the advantages of TomTom’s LIVE, it had also increased TomTom’s
dependency on the network of the connected driving community. The bigger the network, the more effective the information gathered from the guidance services.
Furthermore, in order to reduce operating expenses and strengthen the balance sheet,
heavy emphasis had been placed on the cost-cutting program. In 2009, the cost reductions
were made up of reduction of staff, restructuring and integration of Tele Atlas, reduced
discretionary spending, and reduction in the number of contractors and marketing expenditures. However, if not executed wisely, it could hamper TomTom’s long-term objective
of being a market leader. For example, one of the core capabilities of any technology
company was its staff; reducing it could hinder future innovative projects. This may also
occur when reducing the marketing expenditures in a market that still held rich prospects
of high growth. Among U.S. adults, 65% did not own any kind of navigation system.32
Human Resources
Like in any other technology company, the success of individual employees was very
important to TomTom. Additionally, TomTom had a vision that company success should
also mean success for the individual employee. Therefore, at TomTom, employee
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 13
6/20/17 10:50 AM
31-14
C as e 3 1 TomTom
competency was taken very seriously and talent development programs were built
around it. There was a personal navigation plan that provided employees with a selection of courses based on competencies in their profile. In 2008, TomTom completed its
Young Talent Development Program, which was aimed at broadening the participants’
knowledge while improving their technical and personal skills.
TomTom’s motto was to do business efficiently and profitably, as well as responsibly.
This underlined its corporate social responsibility. TomTom’s headquarters was one of
the most energy-efficient buildings in Amsterdam. As previously mentioned, earlier
navigation was oriented toward making the drivers arrive at their destination without
getting lost. TomTom was the pioneer in introducing different technology that actually
helped drivers make their journeys safer and more economical. This showed TomTom’s
commitment to its customer base as well as to the community as a whole.
Issues of Concern for TomTom
First, TomTom was facing increasing competition from other platforms using GPS technology, such as cell phones and Smartphones. In the cell phone industry, Nokia was
leading the charge in combining cell phone technology with GPS technology. Around
the same time TomTom acquired Tele Atlas, Nokia purchased Navteq, a competitor to
Tele Atlas. With the acquisition of Navteq, Nokia hoped to shape the cell phone industry
by merging cell phone, Internet, and GPS technology.
The Smartphone industry was emerging with the iPhone and the Palm Pre. There
was also a shift in how people were able to utilize these technologies as a navigation
tool. A big trend in Smartphones was applications. Because of the ease of developing
software on platforms for Smartphones, more and more competitors were coming to
the forefront and developing GPS navigation applications. On October 28, 2009, Google
announced the addition of Tom Tom and Garmin Ltd. as competitors. Google was adding driving directions to its Smartphones.
For TomTom, both of these sectors might signal that major change was on the horizon and that there was no longer a need for hardware for GPS navigation devices. The
world seemed to be heading toward a culture where consumers wanted an all-in-one
device such as a cell phone or Smartphone that would do everything needed, including
offering GPS navigation services. A recent study done by Charles Golvin for Forrester
suggested that by 2013 phone-based navigation will dominate the industry. The reason
was due to Gen Y and Gen X customers who were increasingly reliant on their mobile
phone and who would demand that social networking and other connected services be
integrated into their navigation experience.33
Secondly, TomTom faced a maturing U.S. and European personal navigation
device market. After three years of steady growth in the PND market, TomTom had
seen decreasing growth rates for PND sales. Initially entering the European market 12
months before entering the U.S. market, TomTom witnessed a 21% dip in sales for the
European market. Although TomTom experienced some growth in the U.S. market for
2008, the growth rate was not as good as in prior years.
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 14
6/20/17 10:50 AM
Ca se 31 TomTom
31-15
NOTES
1. TomTom AR-08, “TomTom Annual Report 2008,” TomTom
Annual Report 2008, December 2008.
2. Ibid.
3. TomTom, “TomTom, Portable GPS Car Navigation Systems,”
4. Ibid.
5. Ibid.
6. Ibid.
7. TomTom AR-08, “TomTom Annual Report 2008,” TomTom
Annual Report 2008, December 2008.
8. Ibid.
9. Ibid.
10. Ibid.
11. “TomTom NV,”
-n-v.
12. Ibid.
13. Thomson Reuters, “TomTom Launches 2.9 bln Euro Bid
for Tele Atlas,” (November 19,
2007).
14. Boston Business Article,
/ticker/2009/06/let_homer_simps.html.
15. Magellan website,
/About-Us.
16. Tanya Talaga and Rob Ferguson, TheStar.com, October 28,
2008,
(July 29, 2009).
17. ICTI, 2009, (July 29, 2009).
18. Ibid.
19. GPS Magazine, September 23, 2007,
.com/2007/09/gps_thefts_rise.php (July 29, 2009).
Z31_WHEE5488_15_GE_CA31.indd 15
20. “Webist Media,” Web Ecoist, August 17, 2008,
.com/2008/08/17/a-brief-history-of-the-modern-green
-movement/ (July 29, 2009).
21. Nick Jones, Garnter, January 5, 2009,
.com/id=1007612
22. US News, October 14, 2008,
dreviews.com/cars-trucks/daily-news/081014-GPS-Devices
-Banned-in-Egypt/ (July 29, 2009).
23. TomTom AR-08, “TomTom Annual Report 2008,” TomTom Annual Report 2008, December 2008.
24. Reuters, “TomTom Inc. Recognized for Call Center
Customer Satisfaction Excellence by J.D. Power,” January 7, 2008,
/idUS141391+07-Jan-2008+PRN20080107.
25. J. D. Power and Associates, “Garmin Ranks Highest in
Customer Satisfaction with Portable Navigation Devices,”
October 23, 2008,
/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2008221.
26. TomTom AR-08, “TomTom Annual Report 2008,” TomTom Annual Report 2008, December 2008.
27. Ibid.
28. Forrestor Research, “Phone-Based Navigation Will Dominate
by 2013,” March 27, 2009.
29. W. Chan Kim and Mauborgne, Blue Ocean Strategy (Boston:
Harvard Business School Press, 2005).
30. TomTom AR-08, “TomTom Annual Report 2008,” TomTom Annual Report 2008, December 2008.
31. Ibid.
32. Forrestor Research, “Phone-Based Navigation Will
Dominate by 2013,” March 27, 2009.
33. Ibid.
6/20/17 10:50 AM
Basic Concepts of
Strategic
Management
Chapter 1
Learning Objectives
Understand the benefits of strategic
management
Explain how globalization and environmental
sustainability influence strategic management
Understand the basic model of strategic
management and its components
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-2
Learning Objectives
Identify some common triggering events that
act as stimuli for strategic change
Understand strategic decision-making modes
Use the strategic audit as a method of
analyzing corporate functions and activities
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-3
The Study of Strategic Management
Strategic Management
a set of managerial decisions and actions that
determines the long-run performance of a
corporation
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-4
The Study of Strategic Management
Strategic Management includes:
Internal and external environment scanning
Strategy formulation
Strategy implementation
Evaluation and control
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-5
Phases of Strategic Management
Phase 1: Basic financial
planning
Phase 2: Forecast-based
planning
Phase 3: Externally oriented
strategic planning
Phase 4: Strategic
management
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-6
Benefits of Strategic Management
The attainment of an appropriate match, or “fit,”
between an organization’s environment and its
strategy, structure and processes has positive
effects on the organization’s performance.
Strategic planning becomes increasingly
important as the environment becomes more
unstable.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-7
Benefits of Strategic Management
Clearer sense of strategic vision for the firm
Sharper focus on what is strategically
important
Improved understanding of a rapidly changing
environment
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-8
Impact of Globalization
Globalization
the integrated internationalization of markets and
corporations
has changed the way modern corporations do
business
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-9
Impact of Innovation
Innovation
describes new products, services, methods and
organizational approaches that allow the business
to achieve extraordinary returns
Innovation is the implementation of potential
innovations that truly drives businesses to be
remarkable.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-10
Impact of Sustainability
Sustainability
refers to the use of business practices to manage
the triple bottom line
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-11
Impact of Sustainability
The triple bottom line involves:
1. the management of traditional profit/loss;
2. the management of the company’s social
responsibility; and
3. the management of its environmental
responsibility.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-12
Theories of Organizational Adaptation
Population ecology
once an organization
is successfully
established in a
particular
environmental niche,
it is unable to adapt
to changing
conditions
Institution theory
organizations can and
do adapt to changing
conditions by
imitating other
successful
organizations
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-13
Theories of Organizational Adaptation
Strategic choice perspective
not only do organizations adapt to a changing
environment, but they also have the opportunity
and power to reshape their environment
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-14
Theories of Organizational Adaptation
Organizational learning theory
an organization adjusts defensively to a changing
environment and uses knowledge offensively to
improve the fit between itself and its
environment
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-15
Creating a Learning Organization
Strategic flexibility
the ability to shift from one dominant strategy to
another and requires:
• Long-term commitment to the development
and nurturing of critical resources
• Learning organization
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-16
Creating a Learning Organization
Learning organization
an organization skilled at creating, acquiring and
transferring knowledge and at modifying its
behavior to reflect new knowledge and insights
Organizational learning is a critical component of
competitiveness in a dynamic environment.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-17
Creating a Learning Organization
Learning organizations are skilled at four main
activities:
Solving problems systematically
Experimenting with new approaches
Learning from their own experiences and past
history as well as from the experiences of others
Transferring knowledge quickly and efficiently
throughout the organization
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-18
Basic Model of Strategic Management
Strategic management consists of four basic
elements:
Environmental scanning
Strategy formulation
Strategy implementation
Evaluation and control
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-19
Basic Elements of the Strategic
Management Process
Figure 1-1
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-20
Strategic Management Model
Figure 1-2
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-21
Basic Model of Strategic Management
Environmental scanning
the monitoring, evaluating and disseminating of
information from the external and internal
environments to key people within the
organization
SWOT analysis
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-22
Environmental Variables
Figure 1-3
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-23
Basic Model of Strategic Management
Strategy formulation
process of investigation, analysis and decision
making that provides the company with the
criteria for attaining a competitive advantage
includes defining the competitive advantages of
the business (Strategy), crafting the corporate
mission, specifying achievable objectives and
setting policy guidelines.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-24
Basic Model of Strategic Management
Mission
the purpose or reason for the organization’s
existence
Vision
describes what the organization would like to
become
Objectives
the end results of planned activity
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-25
Basic Model of Strategic Management
Strategy
forms a comprehensive master approach that
states how the corporation will achieve its
mission and objectives
maximizes competitive advantage and minimizes
competitive disadvantage
corporate, business, functional
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-26
Hierarchy of Strategy
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-27
Basic Model of Strategic Management
Policy
a broad guideline for decision making that links
the formulation of a strategy with its
implementation
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-28
Basic Model of Strategic Management
Strategy implementation
a process by which strategies and policies are put
into action through the development of
programs, budgets and procedures
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-29
Basic Model of Strategic Management
Evaluation and control
a process in which corporate activities and
performance results are monitored so that
actual performance can be compared with
desired performance
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-30
Basic Model of Strategic Management
Performance
the end result of organizational activities
includes the actual outcomes of the strategic
management process
Feedback/Learning process
revise or correct decisions based on performance
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-31
Initiation of Strategy: Triggering Events
Triggering event
something that acts as a stimulus for a change in
strategy and can include:
• New CEO
• External intervention
• Threat of change of ownership
• Performance gap
• Strategic inflection point
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-32
Strategic Decision Making
Strategic decisions
deal with the long-term future of an entire
organization and have three characteristics:
• Rare
• Consequential
• Directive
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-33
Three Characteristics of
Strategic Decisions
Rare
Strategic decisions are unusual and typically have
no precedent to follow.
Consequential
Strategic decisions commit substantial resources
and demand a great deal of commitment from
people at all levels.
Directive
Strategic decisions set precedents for lesser
decisions and future actions throughout an
organization
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-34
Mintzberg’s Modes of Strategic
Decision Making
Entrepreneurial
Adaptive
Planning
Logical
incrementalism
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-35
Strategic Decision-Making Process
1. Evaluate current performance results
2. Review corporate governance
3. Scan and assess the external environment
4. Scan and assess the internal corporate
environment
5. Analyze strategic (SWOT) factors
6. Generate, evaluate and select the best
alternative strategy
7. Implement selected strategies
8. Evaluate implemented strategies
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-36
Strategic Decision-Making Process
Figure 1-5
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-37
Strategic Decision-Making Process
Figure 1-5
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-38
The Strategic Audit: Aid to Strategic
Decision Making
Strategic audit
provides a checklist of questions, by area or issue,
that enables a systematic analysis to be made of
various corporate functions and activities
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-39
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
1-40
Corporate
Governance
Chapter 2
Learning Objectives
Describe the role and responsibilities of the
board of directors in corporate governance
Understand how the composition of a board can
affect its operation
Describe the impact of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act
on corporate governance in the United States
Discuss trends in corporate governance
Explain how executive leadership is an important
part of strategic management
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-2
Role of the Board of Directors
Corporation
a mechanism established to allow different
parties to contribute capital, expertise and labor
for their mutual benefit
The corporation is governed by the board of
directors that oversees top management with
the concurrence of the shareholders.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-3
Role of the Board of Directors
Corporate governance
refers to the relationship among the board of
directors, top management and shareholders in
determining the direction and performance of the
corporation
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-4
Responsibilities of the Board
Effective Board Leadership
Strategy of the Organization
Risk vs. Initiative
Succession Planning
Sustainability
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-5
Responsibilities of the Board
Due care
the board is required to direct the affairs of the
corporation but not to manage them
If a director or the board as a whole fails to act with
due care and, as a result, the corporation is in some
way harmed, the careless director or directors can
be held personally liable for the harm done.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-6
Role of the Board in
Strategic Management
Monitor developments inside and outside
the corporation
Evaluate and Influence management
proposals, decisions and actions
Initiate and Determine the corporation’s
mission and strategies
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-7
Board of Directors’ Continuum
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-8
Members of a Board of Directors
Inside directors
typically officers or executives employed by the
corporation
Outside directors
may be executives of other firms but are not
employees of the board’s corporation
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-9
Members of a Board of Directors
Agency theory
states that problems arise in corporations
because the agents (top management) are not
willing to bear responsibility for their decisions
unless they own a substantial amount of stock in
the corporation
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-10
Members of a Board of Directors
Stewardship theory
proposes that, because of their long tenure with
the corporation, insiders (senior executives) tend
to identify with the corporation and its success
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-11
Members of a Board of Directors
Affiliated directors
not employed by the corporation, handle legal or
insurance work
Retired executive directors
used to work for the corporation, partly responsible
for past decisions affecting current strategy
Family directors
descendants of the founder and own significant
blocks of stock
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-12
Codetermination: Should Employees
Serve on Boards?
Codetermination
the inclusion of a corporation’s workers on its
board, began only recently in the United States
Although the movement to place employees on the
boards of directors of U.S. companies shows little
likelihood of increasing, the European experience
reveals an increasing acceptance of worker
participation on corporate boards.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-13
Interlocking Directorates
Direct interlocking directorate
when two firms share a director or when an
executive of one firm sits on the board of a
second
Indirect interlocking directorate
when two corporations have directors who serve
on the board of a third firm
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-14
Interlocking Directorates
Interlocking directorates
useful for gaining both inside information about
an uncertain environment and objective expertise
about potential strategies and tactics
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-15
Nomination and Election of
Board Members
97% of U.S. boards use nominating
committees to identify potential board
members
Staggered boards
only a portion of board members stand for reelection when directors serve more than one year
terms
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-16
Nomination and Election of
Board Members
Criteria for a good director include:
Willingness to challenge management when
necessary
Special expertise that is important to the
company
Available for outside meetings to advise
management
Expertise on global issues
Understands the firm’s key technologies and
processes
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-17
Organization of the Board
The size of a board in the United States is
determined by the corporation’s charter and
its by- laws, in compliance with state laws.
Although some states require a minimum
number of board members, most
corporations have quite a bit of discretion in
determining board size.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-18
Organization of the Board
The average large, publicly held U.S. firm has
10 directors on its board
The average small, privately-held company
has four to five members.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-19
Organization of the Board
Lead director
consulted by the Chair/CEO regarding board
affairs and coordinates the annual evaluation of
the CEO
96% of U.S. companies that combine the
Chairman and CEO positions had a lead
director.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-20
Organization of the Board
The most effective boards accomplish much
of their work through committees.
Although they do not usually have legal
duties, most committees are granted full
power to act with the authority of the board
between board meetings.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-21
Impact of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act on
U.S. Corporate Governance
Sarbanes–Oxley Act
designed to protect shareholders from excesses
and failed oversight of boards of directors
whistleblower procedures
improved corporate financial statements
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-22
Evaluating Governance
S&P Corporate Governance Scoring System
Ownership Structure and Influence
Financial Stakeholder Rights and Relations
Financial Transparency and Information
Disclosure
Board Structure and Processes
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-23
Avoiding Governance Improvements
Multiple classes of stock
Public to private ownership
Controlled companies
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-24
Trends in Corporate Governance
Boards shaping company strategy
Institutional investors active on boards
Shareholder demands that directors and top
management own significant stock
More involvement of non-affiliated outside
directors
Increased representation of women and
minorities
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-25
Trends in Corporate Governance
Boards evaluating individual directors
Smaller boards
Splitting the Chairman and CEO positions
Shareholders may begin to nominate board
members
Society expects boards to balance profitability
with social needs of society
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-26
The Role of Top Management
Top management responsibilities
involve getting things accomplished through and
with others in order to meet the corporate
objectives.
are multidimensional and are oriented toward the
welfare of the total organization
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-27
Executive Leadership and
Strategic Vision
Executive leadership
the directing of activities toward the
accomplishment of corporate objectives, sets the
tone for the entire corporation
Strategic vision
description of what the company is capable of
becoming
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-28
Executive Leadership and
Strategic Vision
Transformational leaders
provide change and movement in an organization
by providing a vision for that change
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-29
Executive Leadership and
Strategic Vision
Characteristics of effective CEOs include:
1. The CEO articulates a strategic vision for the
corporation.
2. The CEO presents a role for others to identify
with and to follow.
3. The CEO communicates high performance
standards and also show confidence in the
followers’ abilities to meet these standards.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-30
Managing the
Strategic Planning Process
Strategic planning staff
charged with supporting both top management
and the business units in the strategic planning
process
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-31
Managing the
Strategic Planning Process
Strategic planning staff responsibilities include:
1. Identify and analyze company-wide strategic
issues, and suggest corporate strategic
alternatives to top management
2. Work as facilitators with business units to
guide them through the strategic planning
process
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-32
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2-33
Social
Responsibility
and Ethics in
Strategic
Management
Chapter 3
Learning Objectives
Compare and contrast Friedman’s traditional
view with Carroll’s contemporary view of
social responsibility
Understand the relationship between social
responsibility and corporate performance
Explain the concept of sustainability
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-2
Learning Objectives
Conduct a stakeholder analysis
Explain why people may act unethically
Describe different views of ethics according
to the utilitarian, individual rights and justice
approaches
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-3
Social Responsibilities of Strategic
Decision Makers
Social Responsibility
proposes that a private corporation has
responsibilities to society that extend beyond
making a profit
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-4
Friedman’s Traditional View of
Business Responsibility
Argues against the concept of social
responsibility
Primary goal of business is profit
maximization not spending shareholder
money for the general social interest
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-5
Carroll’s Four Responsibilities
of Business
1. Economic responsibilities
produce goods and services of value to society so
that the firm may repay its creditors and increase
the wealth of its shareholders
2. Legal responsibilities
defined by governments in laws that management
is expected to obey
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-6
Carroll’s Four Responsibilities
of Business
3. Ethical responsibilities
follow the generally held beliefs about behavior in
a society
4. Discretionary responsibilities
purely voluntary obligations a corporation
assumes
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-7
Responsibilities of Business
Figure 3-1
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-8
Responsibilities of a Business Firm
Social capital
the goodwill of key stakeholders, that can be used
for competitive advantage
opens doors in local communities
enhances reputation with consumers
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-9
Benefits of Being
Socially Responsible
May enable firm to charge premium prices
and gain brand loyalty
May help generate enduring relationships
with suppliers and distributors
Can attract outstanding employees
Can utilize the goodwill of public officials for
support in difficult times
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-10
Characteristics of Sustainability
Environmental
Social
Economic
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-11
Corporate Stakeholders
Stakeholders
have an interest in the business and affect or are
affected by the achievement of the firm’s
objectives
Enterprise strategy
an overarching strategy that explicitly articulates
the firm’s ethical relationship with its
stakeholders
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-12
Stakeholder Analysis
Stakeholder analysis
the identification and evaluation of corporate
stakeholders
usually done in a three-step process
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-13
Stakeholder Analysis
The first step in stakeholder analysis is to
identify primary stakeholders.
Primary stakeholders
have a direct connection with the corporation and
who have sufficient bargaining power to directly
affect corporate activities
include customers, employees, suppliers,
shareholders and creditors
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-14
Stakeholder Analysis
The second step in stakeholder analysis is to
identify the secondary stakeholders.
Secondary stakeholders
have an indirect stake in the corporation but are
also affected by corporate activities
include NGOs, activists, local communities, trade
associations, competitors and governments
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-15
Stakeholder Analysis
The third step in stakeholder analysis is to
estimate the effect on each stakeholder
group from any particular strategic decision.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-16
Stakeholder Input
Once stakeholder impacts have been identified,
managers should decide whether stakeholder
input should be invited into the discussion of the
strategic alternatives.
A group is more likely to accept or even help
implement a decision if it has some input into
which alternative is chosen and how it is to be
implemented.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
17
Reasons for Unethical Behavior
Unaware that behavior is questionable
Lack of standards of conduct
Different cultural norms and values
Behavior-based or relationship-based
governance systems
Different values between business people
and stakeholders
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-18
Moral Relativism
Moral relativism
claims that morality is relative to some personal,
social or cultural standard and that there is no
method for deciding whether one decision is
better than another
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-19
Moral Relativism
Naïve relativism
based on the belief that all moral decisions are
deeply personal and that individuals have the
right to run their own lives
Role relativism
based on the belief that social roles carry with
them certain obligations to that role
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-20
Moral Relativism
Social group relativism
based on a belief that morality is simply a matter
of following the norms of an individual’s peer
group
Cultural relativism
based on the belief that morality is relative to a
particular culture, society or community
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-21
Kohlberg’s Levels of Moral
Development
Preconventional level
concern for one’s self
Conventional level
considerations for society’s laws and norms
Principled level
guided by an internal code of ethics
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-22
Encouraging Ethical Behavior
Code of Ethics
specifies how an organization expects its
employees to behave while on the job
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-23
Encouraging Ethical Behavior
A code of ethics:
1. clarifies company expectations of employee
conduct in various situations
2. makes clear that the company expects its
people to recognize the ethical dimensions in
decisions and action
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-24
Encouraging Ethical Behavior
Whistleblowers
employees who report illegal or unethical
behavior on the part of others
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-25
Guidelines for Ethical Behavior
Ethics
the consensually accepted standards of behavior for
an occupation, trade or profession
Morality
one’s rules of personal behavior based on religious or
philosophical grounds
Law
the formal codes that permit or forbid certain
behaviors and may or may not enforce ethics or
morality
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-26
Guidelines for Ethical Behavior
Utilitarian approach
proposes that actions and plans should be judged
by their consequences
Individual rights approach
proposes that human beings have certain
fundamental rights that should be respected in all
decisions
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-27
Guidelines for Ethical Behavior
Justice approach
decisions must be equitable, fair and impartial in
the distribution of costs and benefits to
individuals or groups
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-28
Guidelines for Ethical Behavior
Cavanagh’s questions to solve ethical problems:
1. Utility: Does it optimize the satisfactions of
the stakeholders?
2. Rights: Does it respect the rights of the
individuals involved
3. Justice: Is it consistent with the canons of
justice?
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-29
Guidelines for Ethical Behavior
Kant’s categorical imperatives
1. Actions are ethical only if the person is
willing for the same action to be taken by
everyone who is in a similar situation.
2. Never treat another person simply as a
means but always as an end.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-30
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
3-31
Environmental
Scanning and
Industry Analysis
Chapter 4
Learning Objectives
Recognize aspects of an organization’s environment
that can influence its long-term decisions
Identify the aspects of an organization’s environment
that are most strategically important
Conduct an industry analysis to understand the
competitive forces that influence the intensity of
rivalry within an industry
Understand how industry maturity affects industry
competitive forces
Categorize international industries based on their
pressures for coordination and local responsiveness
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-2
Learning Objectives
Construct strategic group maps to assess the
competitive positions of firms in an industry
Identify key success factors and develop an
industry matrix
Use publicly available information to conduct
competitive intelligence
Know how to develop an industry scenario
Be able to construct an EFAS Table that
summarizes external environmental factors
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-3
Environmental Scanning
Environmental scanning
the monitoring, evaluation, and dissemination of
information relevant to the organizational
development of strategy
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-4
Identifying External
Environmental Variables
Natural environment
includes physical resources, wildlife and climate
that are an inherent part of existence on Earth
form an ecological system of interrelated life
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-5
Identifying External
Environmental Variables
Societal environment
mankind’s social system that includes general
forces that do not directly touch on the short-run
activities of the organization, but that can
influence its long-term decisions
economic, technological, political-legal and
sociocultural
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-6
Identifying External
Environmental Variables
Task environment
those elements or groups that directly affect a
corporation and, in turn, are affected by it
government, local communities, suppliers,
competitors, customers, creditors, unions, special
interest groups/trade associations
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-7
Identifying External
Environmental Variables
Industry analysis
an in-depth examination of key factors within a
corporation’s task environment
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-8
Scanning the Societal Environment:
STEEP Analysis
STEEP Analysis
monitoring trends in the societal and natural
environments
sociocultural, technological, economic, ecological
and political-legal forces
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-9
Some Important Variables in the
Societal Environment
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-10
Current U.S. Generations
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-11
Current Sociocultural Trends
Increasing environmental awareness
Growing health consciousness
Expanding seniors market
Impact of Millennials
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-12
Current Sociocultural Trends
Declining mass market
Changing pace and location of life
Changing household composition
Increasing diversity of workforce and markets
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-13
Technological Breakthroughs
Portable information devices
Electronic networking
Alternative energy sources
Precision farming
Virtual personal assistants
Genetically altered organisms
Smart, mobile robots
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-14
Categories of Risk
Regulatory
risk
Supply chain
risk
Product and
technology
risk
Litigation risk
Reputational
risk
Physical risk
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-15
Some Important Variables in
International Societal Environments
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-16
Scanning External Environment
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-17
Forces Driving Industry Competition
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-18
Threat of New Entrants
Threat of new entrants
new entrants to an industry bring new capacity, a
desire to gain market share and substantial
resources
Entry barrier
an obstruction that makes it difficult for a
company to enter an industry
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-19
Barriers to Entry
Economies of scale
Product differentiation
Capital requirements
Switching costs
Access to distribution channels
Cost disadvantages due to size
Government policies
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-20
Rivalry among Existing Firms
In most industries, corporations are mutually
dependent.
A competitive move by one firm can be
expected to have a noticeable effect on its
competitors and thus may cause retaliation.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-21
Rivalry among Existing Firms
Number of
competitors
Amount of
fixed costs
Rate of
industry
growth
Product or
service
characteristics
Capacity
Height of exit
barriers
Diversity of
rivals
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-22
Threat of Substitute
Products or Services
Substitute product
a product that appears to be different but can
satisfy the same need as another product
The identification of possible substitute products
means searching for products that can perform
the same function, even though they have a
different appearance.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-23
The Bargaining Power of Buyers
Bargaining power of buyers
ability of buyers to force prices down, bargain for
higher quality and play competitors against each
other
Large purchases, backward integration,
alternative suppliers, low cost to change
suppliers, product represents a high percentage
of buyer’s cost, buyer earns low profits, product is
unimportant to buyer
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-24
The Bargaining Power of Suppliers
Buyers affect an industry through their ability
to force down prices, bargain for higher
quality or more services and play competitors
against each other.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-25
The Bargaining Power of Suppliers
A buyer or a group of buyers is powerful if some
of the following factors hold true:
Industry is dominated by a few companies
Unique product or service
Substitutes are not readily available
Ability to forward integrate
Unimportance of product or service to the
industry
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-26
Relative Power of Other Stakeholders
Government
Local communities
Creditors
Trade associations
Special interest groups
Unions
Shareholders
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-27
Industry Evolution
Fragmented industry
no firm has a large market share and each firm
only serves a small piece of the total market in
competition with other firms
Consolidated industry
domination by a few large firms, each struggles to
differentiate products from its competition
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-28
Categorizing International Industries
Multi-domestic industries
specific to each country or group of countries
Global industries
operate worldwide with multinational companies
making only small adjustments for countryspecific circumstances
Regional industries
multinational companies primarily coordinate
their activities within regions
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-29
Continuum of
International Industries
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-30
Strategic Groups
Strategic group
a set of business units or firms that pursue similar
strategies with similar resources
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-31
Mapping Strategic Groups in the
U.S. Restaurant Chain Industry
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-32
Strategic Types
Defenders
focus on improving efficiency
Prospectors
focus on product innovation and market
opportunities
Analyzers
focus on at least two different product market areas
Reactors
lack a consistent strategy-structure-culture
relationship
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-33
Hypercompetition
Market stability is threatened by short
product life cycles, short product design
cycles, new technologies, frequent entry by
unexpected outsiders, repositioning by
incumbents and tactical redefinitions of
market boundaries as diverse industries
merge.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-34
Using Key Success Factors to Create
an Industry Matrix
Key success factors
variables that can significantly affect the overall
competitive positions of companies within any
particular industry
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-35
Industry Matrix
Industry matrix
summarizes the key success factors within a
particular industry
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-36
Competitive Intelligence
Competitive intelligence
a formal program of gathering information on a
company’s competitors
also called business intelligence
Sources of competitive intelligence:
Information brokers
Internet
Industrial espionage
Investigatory services
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-37
Useful Forecasting Techniques
Extrapolation
Brainstorming
Expert
opinion
Delphi
technique
Statistical
modeling
Prediction
markets
Cross impact
analysis
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-38
Synthesis of External Factors—EFAS
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-39
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4-40
Internal
Scanning:
Organizational
Analysis
Chapter 5
Learning Objectives
Apply the resource-based view of the firm to
determine core and distinctive competencies
Use the VRIO framework and the value chain to
assess an organization’s competitive advantage
and how it can be sustained
Understand a company’s business model and
how it could be imitated
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-2
Learning Objectives
Assess a company’s corporate culture and how it
might affect a proposed strategy
Scan functional resources to determine their fit
with a firm’s strategy
Construct an IFAS Table that summarizes internal
factors
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-3
A Resource-Based Approach
to Organizational Analysis
Organizational analysis
concerned with identifying and developing an
organization’s resources and competencies
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-4
Core and Distinctive Competencies
Resources
an organization’s assets and are thus the basic
building blocks of the organization
tangible, intangible
Capabilities
refer to a corporation’s ability to exploit its
resources
consist of business processes and routines that
manage the interaction among resources to turn
inputs into outputs
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-5
Core and Distinctive Competencies
Core competency
a collection of competencies that cross divisional
boundaries, is wide-spread throughout the
corporation and is something the corporation
does exceedingly well
Distinctive competency
core competencies that are superior to those of
the competition
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-6
VRIO Framework of Analysis
1. Value: Does it provide customer value and
competitive advantage?
2. Rareness: Do no other competitors possess
it?
3. Imitability: Is it costly for others to imitate?
4. Organization: Is the firm organized to exploit
the resource?
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-7
Using Resources to Gain Competitive
Advantage
1. Identify and classify resources in terms of strengths
and weaknesses
2. Combine the firm’s strengths into specific
capabilities and core competencies
3. Appraise profit potential—Are there any distinctive
competencies?
4. Select the strategy that best exploits the firm’s
capabilities and competencies relative to external
opportunities
5. Identify resource gaps and invest in upgrading
weaknesses
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-8
Access to a Distinctive Competency
Asset endowment
Acquired from someone else
Shared with another business
Built and accumulated within the company
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-9
Access to a Distinctive Competency
Clusters
geographic concentrations of interconnected
companies and industries
Access to:
Employees
Suppliers
Specialized information
Complementary products
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-10
Determining the Sustainability
of an Advantage
Durability
the rate at which a firm’s underlying resources,
capabilities or core competencies depreciate or
become obsolete
Imitability
the rate at which a firm’s underlying resources,
capabilities or core competencies can be
duplicated by others
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-11
Determining the Sustainability
of an Advantage
Transparency
the speed at which other firms under the relationship
of resources and capabilities support a successful
strategy
Transferability
the ability of competitors to gather the resources and
capabilities necessary to support a competitive
challenge
Replicability
the ability of competitors to use duplicated resources
and capabilities to imitate the other firm’s success
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-12
Determining the Sustainability
of an Advantage
Explicit knowledge
knowledge that can be easily articulated and
communicated
Tacit knowledge
knowledge that is not easily communicated
because it is deeply rooted in employee
experience or in the company’s culture
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-13
Business Models
Business model
a company’s method for making money in the
current business environment
includes the key structural and operational
characteristics of a firm—how it earns revenue
and makes a profit
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-14
Business Models
A business model is usually composed of five
elements:
Who it serves
What it provides
How it makes money
How it differentiates and sustains competitive
advantage
How it provides its product/service
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-15
Business Models
Some of the many possible business models are:
Customer solutions model
Profit pyramid model
Multi-component system/installed model
Advertising model
Switchboard model
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-16
Business Models
Some other possible business models are:
Efficiency model
Blockbuster model
Profit multiplier model
Entrepreneurial model
De Facto industry standard model
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-17
Value-Chain Analysis
Value chain
a linked set of value-creating activities that begin
with basic raw materials coming from suppliers,
moving on to a series of value-added activities
involved in producing and marketing a product or
service and ending with distributors getting the
final goods into the hands of the ultimate consumer
Figure 5-1
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-18
Industry Value Chain Analysis
Value chain segments include:
Upstream
Downstream
Center of gravity
the part of the chain that is most important to the
company and the point where its core
competencies lie
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-19
Corporate Value Chain Analysis
Primary activities
Inbound logistics
Operations
Outbound logistics
Support activities
Procurement
Technology
development
Human resource
management
Firm infrastructure
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-20
A Corporation’s Value Chain
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-21
Corporate Value Chain Analysis
1. Examine each product line’s value chain in terms
of the various activities involved in producing
the product or service
2. Examine the linkages within each product line’s
value chain
3. Examine the potential synergies among the
value chains of different product lines or
business units
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-22
Basic Organizational Structures
Simple
Functional
Strategic
Business
Units
Divisional
Conglomerate
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-23
Basic Organizational Structures
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-24
Corporate Culture:
The Company Way
Corporate culture
the collection of beliefs, expectations and values
learned and shared by a corporation’s members
and transmitted from one generation of
employees to another.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-25
Functions of Corporate Culture
1. Conveys a sense of identity for employees
2. Generates employee commitment
3. Adds to the stability of the organization as a
social system
4. Serves as a frame of reference for employees
to understand organizational activities and as
a guide for behavior
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-26
Corporate Culture:
The Company Way
Cultural intensity
the degree of which members of a unit accept the
norms, values and other cultural content associated
with the unit
shows the culture’s depth
Cultural integration
the extent of which units throughout the
organization share a common culture
culture’s breadth
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-27
Strategic Marketing Issues
Market position
refers to the selection of specific areas for
marketing concentration and can be expressed in
terms of market, product and geographic
locations
Marketing mix
the particular combination of key variables under
a corporation’s control that can be used to affect
demand and to gain competitive advantage
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-28
Marketing Mix Variables
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-29
Product Life Cycle
Product life cycle
a graph showing time
plotted against the
sales of a product as
it moves from
introduction through
growth and maturity
to decline
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-30
Brand and Corporate Reputation
Brand
a name given to a company’s product which
identifies that item in the mind of the consumer
Corporate brand
a type of brand in which the company’s name
serves as the brand
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-31
Brand and Corporate Reputation
Corporate reputation
a widely held perception of a company by the
general public
Consists of two attributes:
Stakeholders’ perceptions of quality
Corporation’s prominence in the minds of
stakeholders
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-32
Strategic Financial Issues
Financial leverage
ratio of total debt to total assets
describes how debt is used to increase earnings
available to common shareholders
Capital budgeting
the analyzing and ranking of possible investments
in fixed assets in terms of additional outlays and
receipts that will result from each investment
Hurdle point
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-33
Strategic Research and Development
Issues
R&D intensity
spending on R&D as a percentage of sales
revenue
principal means of gaining market share in global
competition
Technology transfer
the process of taking new technology from the
laboratory to the marketplace
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-34
R&D Mix
Basic R&D
focuses on theoretical problems
Product R&D
concentrates on marketing and is concerned with
product or product packaging improvements
Engineering R&D
concerned with engineering, concentrating on quality
control and the development of design specifications
and improved production equipment
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-35
Impact of Technological Discontinuity
on Strategy
Technology discontinuity
when a new technology cannot be used to
enhance current technology, but substitutes for
the technology to yield better performance
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-36
Strategic Operations Issues
Intermittent systems
item is normally processed sequentially, but the
work and sequence of the process vary
Continuous systems
work is laid out in lines on which products can be
continuously assembled or processed
Operating leverage
impact of a specific change in sales volume on net
operation income
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-37
Experience Curve
Experience curve
unit production costs decline by some fixed
percentage each time the total accumulated
volume of production units doubles
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-38
Increasing Use of Teams
Autonomous (self-managed)
a group of people work together without a supervisor
to plan, coordinate and evaluate their work
Cross-functional work teams
various disciplines are involved in a project from the
beginning
Concurrent engineering
specialists work side-by-side and compare notes
constantly to design cost-effective products with
features customers want
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-39
Increasing Use of Teams
Virtual teams
groups of geographically and/or organizationally
dispersed co-workers that are assembled using a
combination of telecommunications and
information technologies to accomplish an
organizational task
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-40
Trends Driving Virtual Teams
Flatter organizational structures
Turbulent environments
Increased employee autonomy
Higher knowledge requirements
Increased globalization
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
5-41
Quality of Work Life and
Human Diversity
Quality of work life includes improvements in:
ï…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment