Description
422
No Plagiarism , No Matching will be acceptable .clear and presented using APA Style Reference .
All answers must be typed using Times New Roman ( Size12 , Double-space)font .
No pictures containing text will be acceptable and will be considered plagiarism.
proper examples and explanations for each questions.
– No short answer as it’s not acceptable for this assignment
the answer should be sufficient
Textbook
Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2016). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do It Right. John Wiley & Sons.
وزارة التعليم
الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education
Saudi Electronic University
College of Administrative and Financial Sciences
Assignment 1
Business Ethics and Organization Social Responsibility (MGT
422)
Due Date: 28/02/2026 @ 23:59
Course Name: Business ethics and
organization social responsibility
Course Code: MGT 422
Student’s Name:
Semester: Second
CRN:
Student’s ID Number:
Academic Year:2025-26-2nd
For Instructor’s Use only
Instructor’s Name:
Students’ Grade:
Marks Obtained/Out of 10
Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low
General Instructions – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY
• The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated
folder.
• Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.
• Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced
for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.
• Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.
• Late submission will NOT be accepted.
• Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other
resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.
• All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No
pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
• Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.
Learning Outcomes:
No
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)
CLO-6
Write coherent project about a case study or actual research about ethics
Assignment Overview:
This group assignment requires students to produce a structured and coherent written
report analyzing a business ethics case. The purpose of this assignment is to assess
students’ ability to organize ethical reasoning in a professional academic format and
apply ethical frameworks to a real ethical dilemma.
Students must analyze the case provided below and present a logically structured ethical
evaluation supported by course concepts.
Group Formation and submission guidelines:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Each group must consist of 5–6 students.
One submission per group is required.
All group members must contribute equally to the project.
APA referencing style required
Minimum of 3 academic references (textbook may be included)
Similarity index must not exceed 15%
Case Study
The Toxic Waste Collateral Dilemma
A long-time customer approaches you for financing for a new business venture. The
customer offers a piece of property as collateral for a planned housing development. An
appraiser discovers that the property contains toxic waste that is slowly migrating and
may contaminate nearby farmland and water sources in the future.
You inform your manager. Your manager instructs you to reject the property as collateral
but strictly forbids you from informing the customer about the toxic waste. He states:
“Let them find out about it themselves.”
You must decide whether to:
• Inform the customer about the toxic waste,
• Inform government regulators,
• Or follow your manager’s instructions.
Source: Treviño & Nelson, Managing Business Ethics, Chapter 4
MGT422_Wk06_TrevinoNelsonch04
Assignment Requirements:
Students must prepare a written report structured as follows:
1. Introduction (2 Marks)
• Brief description of the case
• Clear identification of the ethical dilemma
2. Ethical Analysis (4 Marks)
Students must:
• Identify the main stakeholders involved
• Apply one ethical framework from the course:
o Utilitarianism (Consequentialist approach), OR
o Deontological theory (Duties and principles), OR
o Virtue ethics
The analysis must clearly demonstrate how the selected framework evaluates the
dilemma and what action it supports.
3. Recommendation (2 Marks)
• Clearly state the recommended course of action
• Justify the recommendation using structured ethical reasoning
4. Writing Quality and Coherence (2 Marks)
Assessment will consider:
• Logical organization
• Clarity and flow of argument
• Academic tone
• Proper APA referencing
Purchase answer to see full
attachment