Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

need help

will explain when accepted.

Principle 1: Ruling out alternative explanations – Usually the results of any single study are consistent with several different explanations (or hypotheses) and additional research is often needed to decide which explanation/hypothesis is best supported. When looking at a pattern of results that has been reported from a study, it is important to ask “are there any alternative hypotheses that could explain this pattern of data?” That is, we should consider whether there are any other reasons why the researchers might have found the particular results that they found in their study. Maybe there was a confounding variable in an experiment that could offer a different explanation for the results, other than the one that the researchers have given. The alternative explanations that are most important to acknowledge are those that could explain the specific pattern of results that has been found in the study. It is useful to consider how we could attempt to rule out these alternative hypotheses.

Principle 2: Correlation vs. causation – A correlation between two things (a statistical association) does not necessarily mean there is a cause-and-effect relationship between them. If a pattern of results was produced simply by measuring two different things and comparing them, we cannot say anything for sure about whether one of these things caused the other; all we can say is that the two things go together. When a causal claim (e.g., A causes B) is made from a correlation, it’s always important to ask whether the causal connection could be reversed (i.e., B causes A) or whether a third variable could explain the relationship (i.e., A and B do not cause each other; instead C causes A and B to go together). If there is more than one possible pattern of cause-and-effect that could result in a correlation, we cannot use that correlation as evidence that any one specific pattern is necessarily true.

Principle 3: Falsifiability – Scientific claims must be
capable of being disproved. In other words, we should be able to think of a way to test whether or not a claim is true; there should be data we can collect that tell us if our hypothesis is likely to be true or false. If the claim is made in such a way that there’s no good way to test it, the claim is not really scientific. In science, we should always be open to the possibility that our ideas are wrong. If there are no data that could convince us that our ideas are wrong, then our ideas are not properly scientific. The idea behind this principle is that, for ideas to be scientific, there ought to be a way to test those ideas; there should be a way to show either that the idea might be correct, or that it might be false. So, to be considered scientific, a researcher has to allow his or her ideas to be tested and to be open to the possibility that studies might show his or her ideas were wrong.

Principle 4: Replicability – Scientific findings must be capable of being duplicated following the same methodology. In other words, in science, other people must be able to follow our methods and should get similar results. In addition, the most reliable claims are those that have converging evidence for them. We can only really be confident in a claim if it has been tested in multiple different ways and all of them point to the same effect. Before we can be confident in scientific claims, it is important that the studies they are based on can be, and are, replicated. In other words, a properly scientific claim is one built on data from studies that can be done many times, either in exactly the same way or in a slightly different way, and which when done, all show similar results. This is because there is nearly always the possibility that the results of a single study were flawed in some way, or maybe even just the result of chance.

Principle 5: Extraordinary claims – Science is, for the most part, a cumulative process, where new claims represent small advances over older ones. A claim that contradicts what we already know, or that seems to promise to completely explain or solve a complex problem in a new way, must have a lot of evidence to back it up. The bigger the claim, the more evidence must be provided.

Principle 6: Parsimony (a.k.a. Occam’s razor) – If two hypotheses explain a phenomenon equally well, in science we generally prefer the simpler explanation. The simpler explanation is not necessarily correct, but we should start by using that explanation and only make a more complicated one when the simple explanation cannot account for our results. In other words, we shouldn’t make our explanations more complicated than necessary.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Psychology Assignment week two

Need help with my assignment Assignment 2 Throughout this course, you will explore two critical components of your doctoral journey—the social problem and the research problem. The two are inevitably linked but also separate components of your research. You started to explore the differences between the social problem and the

Intro to psychology HW

Researchers often use a method called an experiment to study the causes of human and animal behavior. Design such an experiment based on a change in behavior you have observed in yourself or your roommates this past semester (e.g., eating or sleeping habits, exercise regime, game playing, etc.). Select a

How can I make a digital genogram without using complicated software?

I need to create a digital genogram for a class project in psychology, but most of the software I’ve found so far seems too complicated or requires a paid subscription. Is there a simple and user-friendly way to make a genogram online without having to download bulky or expensive software?

Questions

See attachments Answer the questions below using the document attached: There is no specific page limit to the assignment, but the answers MUST be single-spaced WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. MUST be typed, with 1” margins throughout the document. 12-point, Times New Roman Font. Questions

Article

Article  Choose one of the assessments_ Need 12:00 PM Monday September 15th, 2025 Week 5: Chapter 12 and 13 – Rorschach Inkblot Method Test Critique Papers: These will be listed under Paper Assignments Tab 1-2 pages in length. You can choose one test that was studied that week and critique

Prof Double R

  Choose a specific health behavior that you would like to set as a goal for yourself or for someone else, and develop a strategy or program for change. First, briefly describe the specific health behavior you are addressing and why you are addressing this behavior (e.g., your own attitudes,

MSW 531 MODULE 2

  Chapter 2 of Ferraro and Wilmoth (2013)  What Is Aging? Biological Changes   Why Do We Age?  ******************************************  Geriatric Syndromes    Chapter 14 of Ferraro and Wilmoth (2013 

PSYCHOLOGY

  Upload your graph(s) illustrating relationships between personality  characteristics (extraversion or neuroticism) and the compulsive  internet use scale here. This assignment counts towards your Qualtrics  homework grade, which amounts to 24% of the final course grade. Follow along with this video to make a scatterplot: Then watch this video to

PSY Week 10

  Select ONE of the prompts below to respond to in this week’s discussion. Describe Erikson’s eighth stage, integrity vs. despair, in detail. What can nurses do if they have a patient who is experiencing despair during Erikson’s 8th stage of development? Also, include information on how generativity may be

home work

Please follow instructions. No AI You must post before seeing replies. Edit history will be available to instructors. Due Sep 10 65 points 7 Replies (7) View Split Screen All Search entries or author… Newest First  Back to Week at a Glance ( MEASUREMENT OF CONCEPTUAL VARIABLES Last week,

Assistance II

See attachments Answer the questions below using the document attached: There is no specific page limit to the assignment, but the answers MUST be single-spaced WITHIN each answer, with a double space BETWEEN each answer. MUST be typed, with 1” margins throughout the document. 12-point, Times New Roman Font. Questions

Discussion 1

Discussion 1: Weeks 1-3 Discussion 1 is based on content from Module 1 (Weeks 1-3) and contains 5 questions. Part A, B, and C are mandatory, and Part B requires citations (total of 1 citation).  You should also respond to two classmate’s posts. In order to ensure you receive the grade

PE Week 3 Discussion 2

To prepare: Review this week’s Learning Resources, especially the Wilder Research (2009) article, “Program Theory and Logic Models.” Consider the information contained in your team’s Request for Proposal. Post an explanation of how you would determine an appropriate program theory/conceptual framework to characterize a program. Explain what kind of information you

PE Week 3 Assignment 2

To prepare for this Assignment: Reflect on this week’s experiences with your team. Assignment Complete your journal entry for this week in your Personal Journal, reflecting on your experiences with the team process for this week. How is it going? What are you learning about yourself? What are you learning

Gloria tapes fall 2025

Gloria Tapes Critique Instructions Fall 2025 Review/Critique of the “Gloria Tapes” (100 points) The link is provided in the question. You will write a critical review of each therapeutic approach presented in this summary of therapy sessions. There are 3 therapists who treat Gloria. This will need to be 5-7

Research project topic and Hypothesis and The Stroop Effect Research

1 The Stroop Effect will be used for the  Research Report .   For the research report you will use the  data  set provided by me. Doing this online experiment allows you to experience the experiment so you are familiar with the procedures. You will need these details when you

Report Back activity

1 This week we will participate in a Report Back activity.  This activity allows you to gather information about concepts that we are discussing during the unit and test them out in the world!  As you report your results, please do not indicate full names. For this Report Back: 1. Respond with