Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

need help

will explain when accepted.

Principle 1: Ruling out alternative explanations – Usually the results of any single study are consistent with several different explanations (or hypotheses) and additional research is often needed to decide which explanation/hypothesis is best supported. When looking at a pattern of results that has been reported from a study, it is important to ask “are there any alternative hypotheses that could explain this pattern of data?” That is, we should consider whether there are any other reasons why the researchers might have found the particular results that they found in their study. Maybe there was a confounding variable in an experiment that could offer a different explanation for the results, other than the one that the researchers have given. The alternative explanations that are most important to acknowledge are those that could explain the specific pattern of results that has been found in the study. It is useful to consider how we could attempt to rule out these alternative hypotheses.

Principle 2: Correlation vs. causation – A correlation between two things (a statistical association) does not necessarily mean there is a cause-and-effect relationship between them. If a pattern of results was produced simply by measuring two different things and comparing them, we cannot say anything for sure about whether one of these things caused the other; all we can say is that the two things go together. When a causal claim (e.g., A causes B) is made from a correlation, it’s always important to ask whether the causal connection could be reversed (i.e., B causes A) or whether a third variable could explain the relationship (i.e., A and B do not cause each other; instead C causes A and B to go together). If there is more than one possible pattern of cause-and-effect that could result in a correlation, we cannot use that correlation as evidence that any one specific pattern is necessarily true.

Principle 3: Falsifiability – Scientific claims must be
capable of being disproved. In other words, we should be able to think of a way to test whether or not a claim is true; there should be data we can collect that tell us if our hypothesis is likely to be true or false. If the claim is made in such a way that there’s no good way to test it, the claim is not really scientific. In science, we should always be open to the possibility that our ideas are wrong. If there are no data that could convince us that our ideas are wrong, then our ideas are not properly scientific. The idea behind this principle is that, for ideas to be scientific, there ought to be a way to test those ideas; there should be a way to show either that the idea might be correct, or that it might be false. So, to be considered scientific, a researcher has to allow his or her ideas to be tested and to be open to the possibility that studies might show his or her ideas were wrong.

Principle 4: Replicability – Scientific findings must be capable of being duplicated following the same methodology. In other words, in science, other people must be able to follow our methods and should get similar results. In addition, the most reliable claims are those that have converging evidence for them. We can only really be confident in a claim if it has been tested in multiple different ways and all of them point to the same effect. Before we can be confident in scientific claims, it is important that the studies they are based on can be, and are, replicated. In other words, a properly scientific claim is one built on data from studies that can be done many times, either in exactly the same way or in a slightly different way, and which when done, all show similar results. This is because there is nearly always the possibility that the results of a single study were flawed in some way, or maybe even just the result of chance.

Principle 5: Extraordinary claims – Science is, for the most part, a cumulative process, where new claims represent small advances over older ones. A claim that contradicts what we already know, or that seems to promise to completely explain or solve a complex problem in a new way, must have a lot of evidence to back it up. The bigger the claim, the more evidence must be provided.

Principle 6: Parsimony (a.k.a. Occam’s razor) – If two hypotheses explain a phenomenon equally well, in science we generally prefer the simpler explanation. The simpler explanation is not necessarily correct, but we should start by using that explanation and only make a more complicated one when the simple explanation cannot account for our results. In other words, we shouldn’t make our explanations more complicated than necessary.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Reflection and Application 2 QUIZ2 And answer sheet

Page 2 of 2 PSYC 437 – Reflection and Application 2: Answer Sheet Please use this Answer Sheet to write and submit your responses to Quiz 2. Do not rewrite the questions. Write answers in the Response column. Rows will expand to meet your needs. Your response lengths are not

Physiological Psychology

see attachment  Essay Instructions: Study the module presentation and additional electronic resources. You are also encouraged to seek further information on your own. Write an essay that includes the following: · Explain the differences between a man’s brain and a woman’s. · Discuss the importance of understanding these differences.  

Discussion

Please follow instructions, No AI   variable, a moderator variable, or the third-variable problem. Post a response to the following. In the first line of your post, identify your headline or topic (and the type of additional variable (e.g., mediating variable, moderating variable, or third-variable problem). For instance, “Videos

MSW 525 Module 3

Week 3 Readings Perry, B. D., & Szalavitz, M. (2017).  The boy who was raised as a dog: And other stories from a child psychiatrist’s notebook – what traumatized children can teach us about loss, love, and healing. Basic Books. · Chapter 3: Stairway to Heaven   Write a Case Analysis

Psychology week assignment 3

please help with week 3 assignment. For your dissertation or capstone project, you will strictly use scientific, peer-reviewed literature to investigate your topic and inform your research. But how will you know if your source is legitimate or appropriate to inform your research? Claims makers can move from popular media,

Article

Article Choose one of the assessments_ Need 12:00 PM Monday September 22, 2025 Week 6: Chapter 14 – Thematic Apperception Test Test Critique Papers: These will be listed under Paper Assignments Tab 1-2 pages in length. You can choose one test that was studied that week and critique it. These

PSY Week 11

  Select TWO of the prompts below to respond to in this week’s discussion. 1. A father of three dies of a sudden heart attack. His wife must explain to their 3-, 7- and 14-year-old sons that their father has died. Using concepts and norms from the readings describe how

Psychology Assignment

Please follow instructions. No AI Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 60 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2 Start Assignment  Back to Week at a Glance ( EXTERNAL VALIDITY: REPLICATION AND GENERALIZATION In the Discussion for this week, you evaluated possible confounding

Psychology Can someone help me with my quitz ethics homework?

  Question 1 If psychologist’s ethical responsibilities conflict with law, regulations or other governing legal authority, psychologists clarify the nature of the conflict, make known their commitment to the Ethics code, and take reasonable steps to resolve the conflict consistent with the General Principles and Ethical Standards of the Ethics

Psychology Can someone help me with my quitz ethics homework?

  Question 1 If psychologist’s ethical responsibilities conflict with law, regulations or other governing legal authority, psychologists clarify the nature of the conflict, make known their commitment to the Ethics code, and take reasonable steps to resolve the conflict consistent with the General Principles and Ethical Standards of the Ethics

PE Week 4 Assignment 3

To prepare: Reflect on this week’s experiences with your team. What stage does it feel like to you for your team? Assignment Complete your journal entry for this week in your Personal Journal, reflecting on your experiences with the team process for this week. How is it going? What are

Critique 4

Can someone help me complete this? Instructions Test Critique Papers: Write and post a paper 1-2 pages in length. You can choose one test that was studied that week and critique it. You need to discuss the description and purpose of the instrument, the population it was designed to assess,

Critique 3

Could someone help me complete this? Instructions Test Critique Papers: Write and post a paper 1-2 pages in length. You can choose one test that was studied that week and critique it. You need to discuss the description and purpose of the instrument, the population it was designed to assess,

Diversity Research Article Critique

The lack of diversity in psychology research can cause many problems. Some can be seen in culturally biased aspects of the DSM-5 to research that should only be applied to small population subsets rather than general statements about all individuals. Since much of psychology research aims to make general statements

Dream Ass

Tips for remembering your dreams 1. What you think about and do in the time right before you go to sleep affects not only what you dream but also your ability to remember your dreams. Have you ever had an important appointment the next morning and so you fell asleep

Psychology Assignment week two

Need help with my assignment Assignment 2 Throughout this course, you will explore two critical components of your doctoral journey—the social problem and the research problem. The two are inevitably linked but also separate components of your research. You started to explore the differences between the social problem and the

Intro to psychology HW

Researchers often use a method called an experiment to study the causes of human and animal behavior. Design such an experiment based on a change in behavior you have observed in yourself or your roommates this past semester (e.g., eating or sleeping habits, exercise regime, game playing, etc.). Select a