Criterion 1
Design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
Distinguished
Designs evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks, providing support for why these are the most appropriate interventions.
Proficient
Designs evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
Basic
Designs interventions, though they may not be supported by evidence or the most effective for mitigating population health risks.
Non Performance
Does not design evidence-based interventions to mitigate population health risks.
Criterion 2
Demonstrate ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
Distinguished
Demonstrates ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations, and describes how inclusive needs, including potential biases, were identified and addressed in the process of developing a plan.
Proficient
Demonstrates ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
Basic
Demonstrates ethical decision making, though without addressing important opportunities for inclusion in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
Non Performance
Does not demonstrate ethical decision making that includes DEI in advanced preparedness to protect populations.
Criterion 3
Lead and collaborate with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
Distinguished
Leads and collaborates with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities, providing role-specific details to help make the plan actionable.
Proficient
Leads and collaborates with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
Basic
Develops a plan that takes into consideration some interprofessional roles and responsibilities, though leaving out other important roles and responsibilities.
Non Performance
Does not lead and collaborate with teams by developing a comprehensive plan that takes into consideration interprofessional roles and responsibilities.
Criterion 4
Evaluate emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
Distinguished
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level, providing examples of strengths and weaknesses.
Proficient
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
Basic
Evaluates emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters, though the evaluation may not look at the most important elements or not those on a systems level.
Non Performance
Does not evaluate emergency preparedness and readiness of partners to organize during natural and manmade disasters on a systems level.
Criterion 5
Evaluate and make recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
Distinguished
Evaluates and makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, providing examples to illustrate the pros and cons of the recommendations.
Proficient
Evaluates and makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
Basic
Makes recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information, but without evaluating important options.
Non Performance
Does not evaluate and make recommendations for improvements in interprofessional communication of individual information.
Criterion 6
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Distinguished
Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.
Proficient
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Basic
Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence and/or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.
Non Performance
Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and writing scholarly standards.
