Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

NR224 RUA

Purpose

This assignment increases the students’ awareness of the National Patient Safety Goals developed by The Joint Commission. Specifically, this assignment will introduce the Speak Up Initiatives, an award-winning patient safety program designed to help patients promote their own safety by proactively taking charge of their healthcare.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

1. Apply the concepts of health promotion and illness prevention in the laboratory setting. (PO #2)

2. Explain the rationale for selected nursing interventions based upon current nursing literature. (PO #8)

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

Total points possible: 100 points

Preparing the Assignment

1. Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.

a. Select a Speak Up brochure from
The Joint Commission website.

b. Write a short paper reviewing the brochure. Use the Grading Criteria (below) to structure your critique.

c. Include current nursing or healthcare journal article to support your critique.

2. Include the following sections

a. Introduction of brochure (10 points/10%)

i. Includes brochure title

ii. Identifies date published

iii. Describes individuals or groups

iv. Brochure properly cited, included on reference list and submitted with assignment

b. Summary of brochure (20 points/20%) -brochure citation required

i. Review the main topics in the brochure.

ii. Includes information to promote communication between patients and healthcare providers.

iii. Reflects on why this topic is of interest to you?

c. Evaluation of brochure (30 points/30% total (4 points each) (Brochure & nursing article must be cited)

i. Was the information provided in the brochure beneficial? Could you incorporate it in your patient education?

ii. What was done well, and what could have been improved in the brochure?

iii. Was the information presented clearly?

iv. Did current nursing or healthcare related research support the information presented in the brochure?

v. What population or individuals does this brochure apply to (i.e., who will benefit the most from this brochure)?

vi. Who else can use this information?

vii. Will this information increase patient safety?

d. Clarity of Writing (20 points/20%)

i. Information presented in a logical progression.

ii. Section headers used:

iii. Summary of Brochure

iv. Patient Communication

v. Personal Reflection

vi. Evaluation of Brochure

vii. Evidence Review and Application

viii. Conclusion

e. Conclusion (10 points/10%)

i. Restates the purpose of the paper.

ii. Summarizes the main points of the paper.

iii. Summarizes the benefits of following the brochure’s advice to a person at risk.

f. APA style and structure (10 points/10%)

i. Uses appropriate APA format and is free of errors. 

ii. Paper is no longer than three (3) pages, excluding title page, reference page, and copy of brochure.

iii. Evidence from a recent (5 years) scholarly nursing journal article was integrated within the Evaluation of Brochure section to support your answers.

iv. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center.

Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module.

Fundamental Skills: RUA Safety Goals Guidelines


Fundamental Skills: RUA Safety Goals Guidelines

Fundamental Skills: RUA Safety Goals Guidelines_Sept23 © 2023 Chamberlain University. All rights reserved. 11

Fundamental Skills RUA Safety Goals Guidelines Sept 23 © 2023 Chamberlain University. All rights reserved. 1

Grading Rubric:

Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.


Assignment Section and

Required Criteria

(Points possible/% of total points available)

Highest Level of Performance

High Level of Performance

Satisfactory Level of Performance

Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

Section not present

Introduction of Brochure

(10 points/10%)

10 Points

9 points

8 points

3 points

0 points

Required Criteria

1. Includes brochure title.

2. Identifies date published.

3. Describes individuals or groups.

4. Brochure properly cited, included on reference list and submitted with assignment.

Includes no less than 4 requirements per section.

Includes no less than 3 requirements per section

Includes no less than 2 requirements per section.

Includes no less than 1 requirements per section.

Section not present or includes less than 2 criteria.

Summary of Brochure

(20 points/20%)

20 points

16 points

8 points

0 points

Required Criteria

1. Review the main topics in the brochure.

2. Includes information to promote communication between patients and healthcare providers.

3. Reflects on why this topic is of interest to you?

Includes no less than 3 requirement per section.

Includes no less than 2 requirements per section

Includes not less than 1 requirement per section

No requirements for section presented.

Evaluation of Brochure

(30 points/30%)

30 points

26 points

23 points

11 points

0 points

Required Criteria

1.
Was the information provided in the brochure beneficial? Could you incorporate it in your patient education?

2. What was done well, and what could have been improved in the brochure?

3. Was the information presented clearly?

4. Did current nursing or healthcare related research support the information presented in the brochure?

5. What population or individuals does this brochure apply to (i.e., who will benefit the most from this brochure)?

6. Who else can use this information?

7. Will this information increase patient safety?

Includes 7 requirements per section.

Includes 6 requirements per section.

Includes 5 requirements per section.

Includes 4 requirements per section

Includes less than 4 requirements per section.

Clarity of Writing

(20 points/20%)

20 points

17 points

15 points

8 points

0 points

Required Criteria

1. Information presented in a logical progression.

2. Section headers used:

a. Summary of Brochure

b. Patient Communication

c. Personal Reflection

d. Evaluation of Brochure

e. Evidence Review and Application

f. Conclusion

Includes no less than 7 requirements for section.

Includes no less than 6 requirements for section.

Includes no less than 5 requirements for section.

Includes 4 requirement for section.

Includes less than 4 requirements per section.

Conclusion

(10 points/10%)

10 points

8 points

4 points

0 points

Required Criteria

1.
Restates the purpose of the paper.

2. Summarizes the main points of the paper.

3. Summarizes the benefits of following the brochure’s advice to a person at risk.

Includes no less than 3 required criteria.

Includes no less than 2 requirements for section.

Present, yet includes no required criteria.

Section not present.

APA Style and Organization

(10 points/10%)

10 points

9 points

8 points

3 points

0 points

Required Criteria

1. Uses appropriate APA format and is free of errors. 

2. Paper is no longer than three (3) pages, excluding title page, reference page, and copy of brochure.

3. Evidence from a recent (5 years) scholarly nursing journal article was integrated within the Evaluation of Brochure section to support your answers.

4. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

Includes no less than 4 requirements for section.

Includes no less than 3 requirements per section.

Includes no less than 2 requirements per section.

Includes no less than 1 requirement per section.

Does not include all required criteria.

Total Points Possible = 100 points

image1.png

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

ASSESSXQ04

ASSESSMENT INSTRUTIONS Part 1: Infographic   Construct an Infographic on one quality improvement process or model. Select from one of the following quality improvement process or model: Six Sigma, FADE, PDSA.   Part 2: Fishbone Template  Complete the fishbone template to diagram how quality improvement tools might help you to

DQXQ04

APA STYLE, AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES 1.How do you determine the best improvement model for different scenarios?  2.What is the purpose of quality improvement models in healthcare organizations?  

DQXQ04

APA STYLE, AT LEAST THREE REFERENCES 1.How do you determine the best improvement model for different scenarios?  2.What is the purpose of quality improvement models in healthcare organizations?  

Evidence-Based Practice II

   Translation Action Plan Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix I Action Planning Tool © 2017 The Johns Hopkins Hospital/ Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing 1 1. Complete the following activities to ensure successful translation: ❑ Secure a project leader. ❑ Identify change champions. ❑ Consider whether translation activities

JOURNAL

JOURNAL ENTRY #1 On any given day, a nurse can play a pivotal role in someone’s life. Experienced nurses often share stories of previous experiences and draw upon these experiences when circumstances warrant. Hence, reflection can be a valuable tool. It serves as a tool for not only recalling experiences

case study

Case # (1, 2, 3 or 4) and Description of the Case Chosen: · Case 1 · Case 2 · Case 3 · Case 4 Outline Subjective data. Identify data provided in your chosen case and any additional data needed. Outline Objective findings. Identify findings provided in your chosen case

WK 5 DIS THEOR

 TRANSLATION FRAMEWORKS/MODELS Collaboration offers the advantage of incorporating other experiences and viewpoints to confirm or challenge your own. Discussions can do the same, and for some topics, getting early feedback is especially valuable. This Discussion is one such example. As you dig into the science of translation and select a framework

WK 5 RESP #1 Health

Policy What are legislators currently doing to address your selected advocacy priorities for a vulnerable population? Are there current policies in place? Are there current policies proposed at either the state or federal level? What are the most obvious strengths and weaknesses of these policies as they relate to your

Psychology D6

The Psychology of Teams Deliverable 6 – Role of Ethics on Teams Top of Form Bottom of Form Assessments Content 1. Top of Form Question <bdi></bdi> Competency Distinguish the role of ethics on team psychology. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is

Psychology D5

The Psychology of Teams Deliverable 5 – Conflict Resolution Infographic Top of Form Bottom of Form Assessments Content 1. Top of Form Question <bdi></bdi> Competency Analyze the role of team psychology in managing conflict. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded

Psychology D4

The Psychology of Teams Deliverable 4 – Leadership Style Presentation Top of Form Bottom of Form Assessments Content 1. Top of Form Question <bdi></bdi> Competency Evaluate the impact of leadership styles on team psychology.  Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded

CBT/response to discussion

see attached file Response to discussion Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Comparing Group, Family, and Individual Settings There are significant differences in the applications of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for families and individuals. The same is true for CBT in group settings and CBT in family settings. In your role, it is

Personal Legislative Agenda

Personal Legislative Agenda How can you move a policy forward? What strategies need to be implemented, evidence compiled, or resources utilized? What is the plan for the legislative process?  For this Assignment, you will create a Personal Legislative Agenda in which you will detail your strategy for moving your policy

Healthcare Policy and Analysis

   Muddiest Point and Peer Feedback Healthcare Policy and Analysis Muddiest Point and Peer Feedback Feedback and guidance are an integral part of any successful plan. Accessing the expertise, experience, and ideas of others allows us to fully examine topics and plans to ensure no stone is left unturned.  For

Healthcare Policy and Analysis

   Policy Healthcare Policy and Analysis Policy Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts and  respond to  at least two of your colleagues by supporting or expanding on the ideas identified by your colleague or sharing additional perspectives on the policy described by your colleague. PEER #1 RB Rabiatu Bangura Rabiatu Bangura Rabiatu

leadership discussion

Your Leadership Profile Do you believe you have the traits to be an effective leader? Perhaps you are already in a supervisory role, but as has been discussed previously, appointment does not guarantee leadership skills. How can you evaluate your own leadership skills and behaviors? You can start by analyzing