Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Nursing Assignment 1 MR

738.2.1 : Foundations of Inquiry

The learner differentiates between quality improvement processes, evidence-based practice, and research.

738.2.2 : 
Literature Review and Analysis

The learner demonstrates knowledge of the process and outcomes of conducting a literature review.

738.2.3 : 
Ethics and Research

The learner demonstrates an understanding of the ethics of nursing research particularly human subjects’ protections, informed consent, and alignment with patient and family values and preferences.

738.2.4 : 
Patient Outcomes

The learner discriminates between evidence-based standards of practice and conventional practices to improve patient outcomes.

738.2.5 : 
Data Collection, Analysis, and Documentation

The learner describes the process of data collection, analysis, and implementation of evidence that can improve clinical practice from an interprofessional perspective.

Introduction

Evidence-based literature comes from many sources. The discipline of nursing has an abundance of research data and resources to guide clinical decisions. Therefore, it is of pivotal importance to understand the basic tenets of critical appraisal of such evidence for its use in interprofessional healthcare practices.

In this task, you will identify a healthcare problem, develop an evidence-based practice (EBP) question, and review selected research-based and non-research-based evidence to find answers to that question.

Note that while you will be analyzing only one research-based and one non-research-based article in this task, an actual evidence-based practice change would require the support of many high-quality research studies.

Requirements

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The similarity report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Tasks may
 not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).

A.  Submit a copy of your Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) certification in either a .jpeg, .png, .bmp, .gif, or .pdf file.

B.  Discuss the impact of a clinical practice problem on the patient or patients and the organization it affects.

1.  Identify 
each of the following PICO components of the clinical practice problem:

•   
P: patient, population, or problem

•  
 I: intervention

•   
C: comparison

•   
O: outcome

2.  Develop an evidence-based practice (EBP) question based on the clinical practice problem discussed in part B and the PICO components identified in part B1.

Note: Refer to the “Appendix B: Question Development Tool” web link for information on the creation of an EBP question.

C.  Select a research-based article that answers your EBP question from part B2 to conduct an evidence appraisal.

Note: The article you select should not be more than five years old.

1.  Discuss the background or introduction (i.e., the purpose) of the research-based article.

2.  Describe the research methodology used in the research-based article.

3.  Identify the level of evidence for the research-based article using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) model.

Note: Refer to the “Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” web link for information on how to level a research-based article.

4.  Summarize how the researcher analyzed the data in the research-based article.

5.  Summarize the ethical considerations of the research-based article. If none are present, explain why.

6.  Identify the quality rating of the research-based article according to the JHNEBP model.

Note: Refer to the “Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” web link for information on how to establish the quality rating.

7.  Analyze the results or conclusions of the research-based article.

a.  Explain how the article helps answer your EBP question.

D.  Select a non-research-based article from a peer-reviewed journal that helps to answer your EBP question from part B2 to conduct an evidence appraisal.

Note: The article you select should not be more than five years old.

1.  Discuss the background or introduction (i.e., the purpose) of the non-research-based article.

2.  Describe the type of evidence (e.g., case study, quality improvement project, clinical practice guideline) used in the non-research-based article.

3.  Identify the level of evidence in the non-research-based article using the JHNEBP model.

Note: Refer to the “Appendix F: Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tool” web link for information on how to level the non-research-based article.

4.  Identify the quality rating of the non-research-based article according to the JHNEBP model.

5.  Discuss how the author’s recommendations in the non-research-based article help answer your EBP question.

E.  Recommend a practice change that addresses your EBP question using 
both the research-based and non-research-based articles you selected for part C and part D.

1.  Explain how you would involve 
three key stakeholders in supporting the practice change recommendation.

2.  Discuss 
one specific barrier you may encounter when implementing the practice change recommendation. 

3.  Identify 
one strategy that could be used to overcome the barrier discussed in part E2.

4.  Identify 
one outcome (the 
O component in PICO) from your EBP question that can be used to measure the recommended practice change.

F.   Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

G.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions

File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Change Implementation and Management Plan

  you are no doubt aware that success in the healthcare field requires the ability to adapt to change, as the pace of change in healthcare may be without rival. As a professional, you will be called upon to share expertise, inform, educate, and advocate. Your efforts in these areas

Patient Preferences and Decision Making

  What has your experience been with patient involvement in treatment or healthcare decisions? In this Discussion, you will share your experiences and consider the impact of patient involvement (or lack of involvement). You will also consider the use of a patient decision aid to inform best practices for patient

Literature Review

Review the resources Pay special attention to Chapters 19, 20, and 21 of the White et al. text; Chapters 4, 5, 6, and 11 of the Dang et al. text; and the articles addressing the PICOT format. Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). 

Discussion

Discussion 1 · Share your experiences identifying Level 1 evidence to address the practice question below. Be specific and provide concrete examples. · PICOT Question: In adults with mental health or substance use disorders in rural communities, how does telehealth intervention compared to in-person treatment affect access to care and

Applying Epidemiology to Program Design for Chronic Disease

Applying Epidemiology to Program Design for Chronic Disease Roughly 28.5 million Americans were still uninsured as of 2017, and 133 million Americans […] suffer from at least one chronic condition. —Nash et al. (2021, p. 5) As you know, promoting positive social change is a part of the Walden mission.

Putting It Together

 Putting It Together  How might the use of qualitative and quantitative methods serve to provide answers for researchers regarding the challenges associated with articles provided this week? What can qualitative data provide that quantitative data cannot, and vice versa? How might a mixed methods approach fill in the gaps to

part 4

Write a letter to an official in your state or local government. (Choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue. Expand All Introduction Note: Each assessment

WK 10 DIS DATA

 Putting It Together  How might the use of qualitative and quantitative methods serve to provide answers for researchers regarding the challenges associated with articles provided this week? What can qualitative data provide that quantitative data cannot, and vice versa? How might a mixed methods approach fill in the gaps to

Budget planning and operation

A hospital’s operating budget is estimated regularly, sometimes monthly, if an organization is experiencing fluctuations. Understand historical data on how a budget is formulated/developed.

Adv path wk9

In this exercise, you will complete a Mind Map to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap assignment. Generalized anxiety disorder Depression Bipolar disorders Schizophrenia Delirium and dementia Obsessive compulsive disease

growth chart

GROWTH CHART ANALYSIS As a pediatric nurse practitioner, it is essential that you analyze the growth chart and explain the findings to parents so that you can provide guidance in the form of a healthcare plan. RESOURCES Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.  Click the

Student Learning Outcome

1. Demonstrate competency in medication administration incorporating pharmacological principles. Answer the following questions directly on this document. Please make sure to open the Word document underneath number 1. Please patient 1. Please refer to the following document about safe medication administration: 2. Discuss how you used the nursing process during

smart goals eval

attached is the previous smart goals that was submitted, rubric, assignment details SMART Goals for PMHNP Clinical Rotation Jachai Littlejohn St. Thomas University NUR-640CL-AP3 Dr. Howard March 23, 2025 Introduction SMART goals guide professional skill development. Focus on psychiatric evaluations and communication. Enhance evidence-based psychotherapy techniques application. Improve documentation and

part 3

Writing Support page. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: · Competency 1: Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system

Task #3

You must demonstrate your passion and desire to become a dental hygienist. Explain why you are passionate about the dental field, and this career specifically, what would you like to do with your career as a Dental Hygienist, etc.

community health nursing

  make a PowerPoint presentation Instructions: Record your voice over your PowerPoint Presentation discussing your community assessment paper covering each point below and reply to a peer. DO NOT READ YOUR PAPER WORD FOR WORD. Content Introduction of your community 5 points Top two health problems 10 points Community Nursing